SnapSummary logo SnapSummary Try it free →
FBI Agent Exposes Elvis's Graceland Scam
Matthew Cox | Inside True Crime · Watch on YouTube · Generated with SnapSummary · 2026-10-13

00:00 Is she threatened to sell Graceland to

00:02 the highest bidder if the Presley family

00:04 didn't pay $2.8 million in a settlement?

00:06 >> Hello, Matt Cox. Hello. [laughter] It's

00:08 so good to see you. Good. Hey, at first

00:11 right off the top, thank you so much for

00:12 having me on again. It's always It's

00:14 always fun to come see you. We love

00:16 having you. Our guests love you. Yeah,

00:18 well, good. Well, it's it's it's mutual.

00:19 I I read all the comments and I'm also

00:21 happy that they say nice things about us

00:22 and and and kind of an unusual day here

00:25 though for us. Kind of

00:27 different than our normal uh day because

00:30 the suits are here.

00:31 >> Mhm. You and I both do some work for a

00:33 company called Home Title Lock and we

00:34 invited them to sit in on the show today

00:36 and so they're they're observing us

00:38 right now. So, hopefully we can still

00:39 keep our chemistry together with our

00:40 corporate paymasters keeping an eye on

00:42 us.

00:43 >> [laughter]

00:43 >> Exactly. That's what I'm I'm going for.

00:45 I want I also want to mention something

00:46 real quick.

00:47 >> Yeah. How was

00:48 How was the Hard Rock last night? Uh

00:50 thank you for opening old wounds. I had

00:52 a very bad night at the poker table. I

00:54 had a lovely night going to dinner with

00:55 you and Colby and and our friends. And

00:58 so and that was great. And then I got

01:00 back to the hotel and I thought, you

01:01 know what, it's 10:00 p.m. I don't have

01:02 to be up. Our call time's not 09:00 a.m.

01:04 till for the [ __ ] show. Why don't I just

01:06 wander on down to the poker room? And

01:08 man, oh man, it would have been better

01:10 if I had been mugged in the lobby

01:12 walking to the poker room because it was

01:14 a bloodbath. But thank you for thank you

01:16 for asking.

01:16 >> You have no idea how much that upsets

01:18 me.

01:18 >> [laughter]

01:19 >> Right, cuz

01:21 not only are you not paying me,

01:23 >> [laughter]

01:23 >> but the Hard Rock is not paying me. I

01:25 reached out for the Hard Rock to see if

01:27 they wanted to sponsor me and pay for my

01:29 hotel room here in exchange for plugs on

01:31 the Matt Cox show. Radio silence. Radio

01:34 They're not interested. That's how I

01:35 feel about Ghost

01:37 Ghost energy drinks. Yeah, they're not

01:39 interested. Um so, I feel like I'm going

01:41 to take some mercy on you today. Okay.

01:43 Okay, cuz normally what we do and we're

01:45 going to still do it is I'm going to do

01:46 12 crime stories and your job is to

01:48 guess the sentence that was received by

01:50 the criminals after I tell the story.

01:52 Right. Like we normally do, right? And

01:54 with you and if you're within a 20%

01:56 variance, then you get a point. And your

01:58 goal is to get greater than 50% of the

02:02 you know of the answer answers right.

02:05 And you have a pretty bad track record.

02:06 I'm going to be honest with you about

02:08 this. So,

02:09 today I'm going to be throwing you some

02:10 softballs because all of the questions

02:13 today are going to involve mortgage

02:16 fraud and home theft and house theft and

02:19 things like that because you, Matt Cox,

02:22 whether you realize it or not, are the

02:24 most famous mortgage defrauder in the

02:26 entire US.

02:28 It's yeah, it's uh

02:30 It's not exactly what my mom was hoping

02:32 for, but yeah. Yeah, [laughter] good

02:34 good times.

02:35 >> Yeah, so these these are going to be

02:36 we're going to be telling stories about

02:38 your people. Nice.

02:40 >> Right. Okay. These are going to be

02:42 stories that are going to be so you'll

02:43 be able to finish my sentences as I

02:45 describe these crimes because much of

02:47 this stuff is what you did. And and we

02:49 all know that you spent some time in

02:50 prison and I'm sorry for that.

02:53 Yeah. I I feel horrible.

02:55 >> As a former FBI agent, I feel terrible

02:57 that that someone like you had [snorts]

02:58 to spend time in prison.

03:00 But

03:01 also, should we disclose that you're

03:02 playing you're playing hurt today?

03:05 Oh, that I'm I'm I am hurt today.

03:07 >> You're sick.

03:08 >> I'm sick. You're sick.

03:09 >> Which everybody's upset with me for

03:10 being here. Sick but

03:11 >> you're you're you're probably going to

03:12 put me in an early grave cuz I'm an

03:14 older fellow

03:15 with lots of lots of comorbi

03:17 comorbidities. Comorbidities. Aren't

03:19 Wait, I don't even know what that means.

03:20 We'll have to look that up. Aren't you

03:21 the same age as me roughly?

03:23 >> age as you. So,

03:24 >> I'm I'm 56. I'm 55. Oh, okay. We're off

03:27 by a few months.

03:28 >> Yeah, yeah, yeah. You're the canary in

03:29 the coal mine though. If you die from

03:30 this thing, I know that I'm doomed. I'm

03:32 good. I'm going to be fine. Okay. Want

03:34 to do our first story? Yes, let's let's

03:36 do it.

03:36 >> Okay, our first story takes place in

03:38 Washington, D.C.

03:40 The subject is a guy a 68-year-old guy.

03:43 His name's Jeffrey Young Bey.

03:46 Y O U N G {dash} B E Y and that B E Y

03:49 suffix at the end of his name, we're

03:51 going to talk about that after a few

03:52 stories because it is significant. Okay?

03:54 Jeffrey Young Bey. But we'll call him

03:56 Jeff. Okay?

03:58 What Jeff did is he identified a

04:00 property in Washington, D.C. Probably

04:03 not a good property, but it was owned

04:05 free and clear by an elderly homeowner.

04:08 Mhm. Okay. So, what he does is then he

04:10 prepares a fraudulent property deed.

04:13 Now, a deed is a mechanism to as you

04:15 know to transfer the ownership, the

04:17 title of the property from one person to

04:19 another. It's simply put.

04:21 And so he forges signatures of the true

04:23 owners of the home on it. He takes a

04:25 fake notary stamp and notarizes it.

04:27 Makes it look perfect. The deed looks

04:29 legitimate. Then he walks into the

04:31 Washington, D.C. Recorder of Deeds,

04:33 which is a government office in pretty

04:35 much every county and every city in the

04:36 US has that. That's how they keep track

04:38 of who owns what what plot of land.

04:41 And what he does is he transfers that

04:42 property from these true homeowners to a

04:45 fake corporation that he set up. So far,

04:48 so good?

04:48 >> Yeah. Okay. I know I know the scam well.

04:51 >> familiar with this.

04:52 >> [laughter]

04:52 >> Reality so far is he's on track.

04:55 >> Right. So, then he goes to a mortgage

04:56 broker

04:57 uh because what's he going to try and

04:58 do? He'll try and I refinance it or

05:01 borrow money against it?

05:02 >> Exactly. He he applies for a large loan

05:04 against the value of that home.

05:07 And he gets $360,000.

05:09 Nice. You know what he does with the

05:10 money?

05:11 Spends it on

05:12 hookers and blow. Buys himself a BMW.

05:16 So, okay. That was smart. Smart like

05:19 that's not going to lead directly to

05:20 him.

05:20 >> He's a Beamer guy.

05:21 >> Yeah. You ever owned a BMW?

05:23 >> I've owned a few BMWs.

05:24 >> Nice car. Yeah. Nice car. I've never had

05:26 a BMW. I'm kind of a more of a Lexus

05:28 guy. Thanks for asking.

05:30 >> [laughter]

05:31 >> Maybe they'll sponsor me.

05:33 Make up for that poker loss. Um so, then

05:35 he finds another property in D.C.

05:38 Dilapidated house.

05:40 Does it again. Forges the names of the

05:42 two owners using a fake notary stamp,

05:44 records the deed, etc. This time he goes

05:47 out and gets a construction loan on the

05:49 house with the idea that he's going to

05:51 fix it up.

05:52 Lender gives him $500,000

05:55 against the value of that house. You

05:57 know what he did with that money?

05:59 Um

06:00 another BMW?

06:02 >> BMW, Matt Cox. You know the type. I

06:04 mean, how much are these BMWs? I have no

06:06 idea. I mean, I'm sure he's spending on

06:07 other stuff, too.

06:08 >> Right. But then what he does is he flips

06:10 the house and sells the home

06:12 to a real estate investor, an unwitting

06:14 real estate investor for $42,000.

06:18 And that real estate investor must have

06:19 thought he got the greatest deal in the

06:21 world to get a property in Washington,

06:23 D.C. for $42,000.

06:25 Okay?

06:26 >> Um

06:27 So, the real estate investor does what

06:29 real estate investors do and he goes out

06:30 and starts renovating the home.

06:33 And then the homeowner is like, "Hi,

06:36 guys. What are you doing here?" They

06:37 come home. They go to the property. I

06:39 don't know exactly what if they were

06:40 living there or not. They see hard hat

06:42 guys swinging hammers. They're like,

06:43 "What are you doing?" They're like,

06:43 "We're renovating the home." They're

06:45 like, "Well, this is my house." They're

06:46 like, "Well, it's not your house. It's

06:47 our boss's house. He's the real estate

06:49 investor."

06:50 The whole thing unravels.

06:51 >> Right. Right. FBI gets in the mix.

06:55 Jeff gets arrested.

06:57 He um

06:58 one count of conspiracy to commit mail

07:00 fraud and bank fraud, two counts of bank

07:03 fraud, two counts of mail fraud, two

07:04 counts of money laundering, five counts

07:06 of aggravated identity theft. They just

07:08 throw the book at him.

07:10 Okay.

07:10 >> He He takes the case to trial. What an

07:12 idiot. Not good. Right?

07:16 Other thing I want you to know about him

07:18 is he has a history of legal problems.

07:21 Okay, so his criminal history category

07:22 is going to be through the roof. He's

07:24 got a

07:24 I looked at his rap sheet. It goes back

07:26 to the 1980s. Bad checks, theft,

07:29 attempted um

07:31 forcible sex stuff. I'm not going to use

07:33 the word cuz it's YouTube. False

07:35 imprisonment, assault and battery. Used

07:37 to dine and dash. One of these guys will

07:39 go to a restaurant, have a good meal,

07:40 maybe a filet mignon, maybe a a tower

07:43 filled with

07:44 with seafood. He'd eat and then the

07:47 waiter look waiter looks the other way,

07:48 this guy's off in the wind. Not an

07:50 honorable guy.

07:51 Uh forgery, perjury. Used to make

07:53 telephone threats.

07:55 He's got all these convictions, all

07:56 these arrests. He's not very good at

07:58 this.

07:58 >> No. Well, And he's taken the money and

08:01 he's purchasing something that's titled.

08:03 Like it's a direct like if he's wiring

08:05 the money from

08:06 the fraudulent funds that he got to buy

08:09 a BMW that's titled in his name. I mean,

08:11 Exactly. You know, it's just directly

08:13 leading back to him.

08:13 >> Right. And I've been on the

08:14 investigating agent side of this.

08:16 They're going to seize his BMW. But that

08:18 doesn't go toward minimizing the fraud

08:21 loss. That just goes toward minimizing

08:22 the restitution that's due at the end as

08:24 you know.

08:24 >> Yeah. So, given all those factors, Well,

08:27 so what's the total loss?

08:29 >> Okay, well, we could do the math here.

08:30 So, he gets the first $360,000 loan.

08:34 Uh then he gets a $500,000 loan. So,

08:36 let's call that $860,000. Then he sells

08:39 it for $42,000 to an unwitting real

08:41 estate investor. So, what are we up to

08:43 now? That looks like about 900,000.

08:47 Um call it 900,000. But again, criminal

08:50 history through the roof.

08:52 Um

08:54 and he went to trial and lost. I don't

08:56 even I don't even think the jury waited

08:58 around for the free lunch.

09:00 Um Matt Cox, how much time is this guy

09:02 going to do? I'm going to say 180

09:04 months. 180 months.

09:07 >> years.

09:08 >> That is 15 years. And I have to be

09:10 within 20%. You have to be in 20 You

09:12 have to be within 20% of the actual

09:14 sentence.

09:14 >> Yes. Right? And since you and I are

09:18 under the gun and math deficient, Colby

09:19 has a calculator standing at the ready

09:21 to compute this thing. Now, he does. Am

09:23 I right, sir?

09:24 I do now.

09:26 Here we go. All right. No, but I want to

09:27 ask you are you sure about that answer

09:29 because oftentimes you guess one thing

09:32 and then you waver and then you guess

09:34 yourself and then you don't believe in

09:36 yourself. And so I want to know how

09:39 confident you are in your

09:41 your guess.

09:42 >> Well, I don't want to go off of

09:45 my case. I'm going to go off of somebody

09:46 else's. I have a buddy named

09:48 Isaac Allen who for roughly $100,000,

09:51 his criminal history was off the chart

09:53 though. I mean, he was off the chart.

09:54 He's like criminal history was or seven

09:56 or something. I mean, it should have

09:57 been 12, you know.

09:58 >> Right.

09:59 It only goes all up so much.

10:00 >> Mhm.

10:01 For like $100,000, he got like 15 years.

10:04 Okay. So, I'm thinking

10:06 this guy deserves at least 15 years. His

10:08 is off the charts. Same thing with Oh,

10:10 aggravated identity theft adds 2 years

10:14 to it.

10:14 >> thing, isn't it?

10:15 >> 17 So, let's add 2 years to Let's say

10:17 instead of 15 years, 17 years.

10:20 >> I like that you're thinking this

10:21 through, man.

10:22 >> even think I didn't even think about

10:23 aggravated. So, aggravated identity

10:25 theft, for those that don't know, who

10:26 aren't fraudsters, they ta- if you

10:28 >> Or investigators. If you steal someone's

10:31 identity in the course of your crime,

10:34 they charge they can charge you with

10:35 aggravated identity theft and that adds

10:36 an additional 24 months to whatever your

10:39 normal sentence is. So, if your sentence

10:40 is 10 years, now it's 12. Right. Cuz I

10:42 got two extra years for

10:44 My sentence was 24 years

10:46 and 4 months, and I ended up getting 26

10:49 years and 4 months because of the extra

10:50 2 years.

10:50 >> Sure. Sure. Yeah. And so, given that

10:54 reality, 17. 17 years is your guess.

10:57 >> Yes. 17 years in prison, breaking rocks

10:59 in the hot sun for a non-violent crime.

11:01 >> history's off the charts. And he went to

11:03 trial. He's an idiot. Okay.

11:06 You're not swaying me.

11:07 >> I'm not trying to sway you. I just want

11:09 to understand what your answer is. Had I

11:10 not asked you, you would not have come

11:11 to this new conclusion. I'm giving doing

11:13 you favors. You're sick, buddy. I'm

11:14 trying to help you out here. 17. 17.

11:16 >> hospice nurse. Yeah. Yeah, you're you're

11:18 always looking out for me. Um the FBI's

11:21 FBI's always been so good to me. Um

11:23 [laughter] Uh

11:24 7- 7- 17 years. 17 years?

11:26 >> Final answer?

11:27 >> Yes. All right. The correct answer is

11:30 138 months, 11.5 years. [ __ ] [ __ ]

11:33 You you missed it by a country mile.

11:35 Really unfair. Okay. Either way, I I I

11:38 missed Okay, that's fine.

11:38 >> Yeah. Still, he he got a

11:41 Poor Zach. Zach's judge hated him.

11:44 Really did not like him.

11:47 Sorry. No problem. They Everybody says

11:48 that. All my agent The agents hated me

11:51 or the the US attorney hated My judge

11:53 didn't like me. Everyone always says

11:54 that.

11:56 It's always personal. It has nothing to

11:57 do with their own uh No. their own what

11:59 they did. That's that's your

12:00 competition. Whenever he gets out of

12:02 prison, that's going to be your

12:03 competition, Tom, for favorite guest.

12:04 >> Oh, yeah. Yeah, he's Zach. Everybody

12:06 loves Zach. Yeah, I see him in the I see

12:08 everyone's like, "Where's Zach? We love

12:10 We miss Zach." in the comments. And but

12:12 it's okay. There's There's room for us

12:13 all. Listen, talk about a career

12:15 criminal, too. Like, you can't He can't

12:17 He can't even say, "No, man, I'm trying

12:19 to change." Stop it. You

12:20 Since we got I got out of prison, we

12:21 both got out within a month or two, he's

12:23 been back to prison twice. Did you know

12:25 him in prison? Oh, yeah. That's all I

12:26 Oh, you know, you met him in prison.

12:27 Okay. It's funny. I remember one time we

12:29 were walking the track. We were at the

12:31 medium.

12:32 And he And I had that point I had 26

12:34 year sentence. He had 15.

12:36 And we're walking. He said, "You know,

12:37 it was so weird." He said,

12:40 "I had a dream the other night." He

12:41 said, "And you were trying to call me

12:43 from prison, and I kept hit trying to

12:45 hit the five to get the call to go

12:47 through." Mhm. He said it wouldn't go

12:48 through. He said it was just weird. And

12:50 I went, "I don't like the fact that

12:52 you're having a dream and I'm still in

12:53 prison." [laughter]

12:54 And he looked at me and he said, "Well,

12:55 let's face it, bro." He said, "You got

12:57 26 years." He goes,

12:59 "You're going to be in prison when I get

13:01 out."

13:01 >> And look who's I got a few months before

13:03 he did.

13:03 >> Look who's a famous YouTuber and look

13:05 who's still in his orange jumpsuit.

13:10 >> [snorts]

13:11 >> Get in. We're stealing homes.

13:15 We're not like those other home

13:16 criminals that steal your stuff. We

13:18 steal your hard-earned home equity.

13:22 We find your property online from the

13:23 public record. Got it. Create a deed

13:26 transfer that makes us the homeowners.

13:28 Got it. Then borrow tons of cash against

13:29 your equity, and you won't know till the

13:31 foreclosure notice hits months later.

13:33 You might already be a victim. Check

13:35 your title status now at

13:36 hometitlelock.com.

13:38 Ever been to Philadelphia? I don't feel

13:39 like I know I don't think so. Yeah. City

13:41 of Brotherly Love.

13:42 Philadelphia. Have I been to

13:43 Philadelphia? I don't think so. It's

13:45 where they filmed the Rocky movies.

13:47 In fact, there's a statue of Rocky

13:48 Balboa there.

13:50 Philadelphia. I feel like I should have

13:51 I I should know this. Anyway, maybe.

13:55 I'm not sure Listen, I was I was

13:56 educated in the South. I'm not really

13:57 even sure where Philadelphia is. But I I

13:59 probably Maybe.

14:01 >> of New York City, north of Baltimore.

14:03 >> Okay.

14:04 >> [laughter]

14:04 >> Basically.

14:05 Um

14:06 Okay, there's a fellow named in Philly

14:08 >> Wait, I have been because I had a

14:09 Philadelphia cheese I did go to

14:11 Philadelphia. I've been to And I

14:12 remember I met

14:13 >> it with the cheese whiz?

14:15 I don't know what the cheese whiz, but I

14:16 There was a You get cheese whiz on it.

14:17 There was a kid that that met me, he was

14:20 a fan, and brought me to some famous

14:22 cheesecake Yeah, probably Gino's or

14:24 Yeah, something. There's There's like

14:25 two of them across the street from each

14:26 other and Philly's a lovely city. A

14:29 horrible memory. Worst sports fans in

14:32 all of professional sports. So, like,

14:33 they're all the type who will like throw

14:34 a bottle at the back of your head if

14:35 you're cheering for the other team. But

14:38 It's not very nice. But outside the

14:40 stadiums, delightful people. City of

14:41 Brotherly Love.

14:43 You know

14:44 who's from Philadelphia? Mack Angelo

14:46 Tillman, age 52.

14:49 He He had a scam in the past. This is a

14:52 little bit of history on him. In 2007

14:54 and 2008, he ran a scam where he created

14:55 fake businesses

14:57 and then opened up American Express

14:59 merchant accounts

15:01 under names like Nelson's Concrete,

15:03 Joseph Tailoring, Jay's Hardwood Floor.

15:06 And then he started getting credit card

15:07 numbers online and just busting it out.

15:09 Got 72,000 bucks.

15:12 He got 8 months for that, which isn't

15:13 really the story, but I want you to know

15:15 kind of his background.

15:16 >> He's He's a career fraudster.

15:18 >> Got it.

15:19 You and I are kind of mortgage experts

15:22 because of our both being on opposite

15:26 sides of the law in the world of

15:27 mortgage fraud. But I'm going to assume

15:29 I want to ask your listeners to,

15:31 you know, I want to walk your listeners

15:32 through kind of how a foreclosure and

15:34 things like that work. When a homeowner

15:35 stops making mortgage payments

15:37 or stops paying property taxes, what

15:39 happens is the lender or the city that

15:42 they were paying property taxes actually

15:43 sues to foreclose on the property. It's

15:46 a court action.

15:47 And if the lender or the city who should

15:50 have been receiving the property taxes

15:51 wins that judgment in court, the court

15:54 orders the property to be sold at a

15:56 sheriff's sale to recover the un- the

15:59 unpaid balance. Yes. Right?

16:01 And so, what happens is the highest

16:03 bidder, which is often the bank itself,

16:05 will get the title to the property and

16:08 um

16:09 And so, any any balance exceeding the

16:11 amount due in either the mortgage or due

16:14 to the city of Philadelphia in the story

16:15 we're about to tell, um

16:18 it goes to the homeowner or their heirs.

16:20 Right.

16:20 >> Right. So, they're forcing the I Let's

16:22 say I owe 10,000 bucks in property

16:24 taxes. And I say, "I'm not paying my

16:25 property taxes anymore." My county's

16:27 going to come in, foreclose my property,

16:29 they're going to sell it, and then

16:30 they're going to get their 10 grand, but

16:32 the rest of the money from that sale is

16:34 going to go to me cuz I was the

16:35 homeowner. Make sense? Yeah, yeah. No, I

16:38 I get it. Same thing with the even if

16:39 it's not the taxes, if it's let's say a

16:41 first mortgage lien, Bank of America or

16:44 whatever. So, let's say the bank

16:46 forecloses. Yeah. You owe the bank

16:48 $100,000.

16:50 Let's say there ends up being kind of a

16:51 bidding war between the parties trying

16:52 to buy. They end up getting it to

16:53 $120,000. Well, then the Bank of America

16:56 gets their 100,000, and the extra 20,000

16:59 is supposed to go to

17:01 the

17:02 any outstanding liens that are still on

17:04 the property, but if there's anything

17:05 left over, it's supposed to go to the

17:07 heirs. Or the home Or the homeowner.

17:09 >> yeah. Yeah. Yeah, if he or her homeowner

17:11 or his heir. All right. So, let's get

17:12 back to Mack Angelo Tillman.

17:14 He identified properties in Philadelphia

17:17 that had substantial unpaid property tax

17:19 bills. Okay? And in some cases, they

17:22 were owned by people who were dead and

17:24 these things are in the pipeline for a

17:26 sheriff's sale.

17:28 And so, what he did is he got he he

17:30 obtained notary stamp. He created deeds

17:32 to transfer the ownership of these

17:33 properties

17:35 and fake notary stamps to transfer the

17:37 titles,

17:38 and sometimes he actually went to

17:40 notaries and like lied to them.

17:42 And so, he's transferring the title of

17:45 these

17:46 at-risk, I guess, properties to himself

17:49 and entities under his control.

17:51 Um he had some straw buyers, too, like

17:53 homeless people and things like that.

17:55 Despicable.

17:56 Don't get me started.

17:58 Um

17:59 He paid one notary $50 to illegitimately

18:02 notarize deeds.

18:04 Um

18:04 Anyway, he transfers 11 different

18:06 properties to himself and straw buyers.

18:09 Then he begins selling some of those

18:11 homes and um

18:13 And he had And he had property he owned

18:16 some of those homes before he could

18:17 actually sell them.

18:18 The numbers in this case don't make a

18:20 ton of sense to me. So, there's there's

18:21 11 properties in Philadelphia, but he

18:24 got caught in progress before he could

18:26 unload all the homes.

18:27 >> Okay.

18:28 I've been on the other side of this

18:29 thing investigating, and computing the

18:31 fraud loss on a mortgage fraud case is

18:34 difficult because you because the person

18:37 gets the defendant gets credit for the

18:41 value of the home that ends up getting

18:43 sold at a foreclosure and and uh

18:46 and all that. So, it's the net loss.

18:47 Right? In this case, what they decided

18:49 to do

18:51 was you know, they they bust Mack Angelo

18:53 Tillman. He goes to trial representing

18:55 himself. Always a good idea.

18:57 Right? Being your own lawyer, right? You

18:58 know, people who represent themselves.

18:59 >> Of course, I've I've I've seen it work

19:00 out many times. Yeah, yeah, yeah. It's

19:02 it's great. It's great. I I'm kidding.

19:04 Don't represent yourself. It's a bad

19:05 idea. Yeah.

19:06 Um so, but the the law And he gets found

19:09 guilty. So, what we have here is there's

19:10 two victims. The city of Philadelphia,

19:12 who were who were being kind of ripped

19:15 off from their property taxes that they

19:17 were supposed to be getting by this

19:18 thing.

19:18 >> Okay. Then we have 11 homeowners who

19:22 who, you know, either lost their homes

19:24 or were in danger of losing their homes.

19:26 The losses, though, are kind of low. So,

19:28 we have a $150,000 loss to the city of

19:31 Philadelphia cuz the government is using

19:34 the fraud loss of the unpaid property

19:36 taxes as that.

19:37 >> Right. After the dust settled and the

19:39 smoke cleared, um it with the values of

19:42 the homes eventually being restored to

19:44 the homeowners after a long legal fight

19:46 that they had to do on their own,

19:47 um $30,000 is their loss.

19:50 Okay.

19:51 >> Okay. So, the net the aggregate loss of

19:53 these two things is a hundred and eighty

19:54 thousand dollars. But then you have Mac

19:56 Angelo kind of orchestrating this giant

19:58 scheme, going to trial, losing, probably

20:01 irritating the hell out of the trial

20:03 judge representing himself. Cuz the

20:05 judges don't like that.

20:07 Right? So given all that, and there's a

20:10 lot of moving parts here,

20:12 how much time you going to give Mac

20:13 Angelo Tillman, Matt Cox?

20:15 Um

20:17 But he has a a

20:19 prior criminal history. I'm going to

20:20 assume Yes, right. Remember cuz back in

20:22 2000 2000 2007 2008 he ran this bust out

20:26 scheme with the credit cards. Right. So

20:27 that's another factor. You know, it's

20:29 funny at the I wouldn't the homeowners

20:33 I kind of felt because these homes were

20:35 behind on their taxes, that's why he

20:38 targeted them thinking to himself

20:40 nobody's taking care of these

20:41 properties. Nobody

20:43 Cuz if

20:44 if the homeowner was interested in the

20:47 property, they would have just gone

20:48 ahead and sold it themselves. So he

20:49 probably thought

20:51 these things are three years behind on

20:52 their taxes. Nobody's doing anything.

20:54 Nobody's paying the taxes and nobody

20:55 sold them.

20:56 >> He's rationalizing this as a victimless

20:57 crime? W- Well, or that you don't have

20:59 to worry about the homeowner cuz if they

21:01 were involved in this whole thing, they

21:03 would have sold it. Like they probably

21:05 just thought ah that that the probably

21:07 not even worth it. Like I'm not going to

21:08 go through try and sell this thing

21:11 and pay off the taxes cuz I'm barely

21:12 going to get any money if it if any

21:13 money at all. So so the but the fact

21:16 that they then showed up later

21:18 to fight it out in court It wouldn't

21:20 surprise me that the first time they

21:22 heard about this is when the FBI was

21:23 knocking on their door.

21:25 These probably these people probably

21:26 have a mailbox filled with foreclosure

21:29 notices from the city who are taking

21:31 action cuz the back property taxes. And

21:33 so

21:34 um I mean I've notified plenty of

21:36 [snorts] people that they were victims

21:37 of fraud that they had no idea they were

21:38 victims of. Okay. So

21:41 maybe they had no idea that

21:42 >> Maybe not the most sympathetic victims

21:44 or or victims who Yeah or yeah or they

21:46 had an asset that they really didn't

21:48 give a damn about.

21:49 >> Right. So

21:54 one

21:55 The dollar amount of the loss for

21:56 sentencing guidelines purposes is a

21:58 hundred and eighty thousand dollars.

21:59 >> Yeah.

22:00 Criminal history category Brazilian cuz

22:03 he's got this fraud conviction federal

22:04 fraud conviction. He goes to trial,

22:06 loses, represents himself. Put that in

22:08 the Matt Cox calculator.

22:10 S-

22:12 72 months?

22:14 72 months?

22:16 W- Tell me how you came up with that

22:17 number. This [snorts] is

22:19 um

22:21 Cuz I don't I don't think he's

22:23 you know, it sounds to me like he's

22:25 committed fraud but he's not off the

22:26 chart. He's probably somewhere in the

22:27 middle. He did

22:28 >> Yeah.

22:29 I mean he he probably would have only

22:31 been a few years.

22:32 Right. If he taken a plea, it probably

22:33 would have been like two years or

22:34 something like that. But he didn't. He

22:35 went. He represented himself. It only

22:38 irritates the judge when you do that. I

22:40 I would say

22:41 six to seven years. Okay. So 72 months?

22:44 Let's go with 72 months.

22:45 >> You going to stand firm on that one?

22:46 God, this really bothers me. Um I am

22:49 going to stand firm on that cuz he went

22:50 to trial and I think that the judge will

22:51 make him he will have to

22:53 pay a

22:54 penalty for that. Matt Cox, you know

22:56 what the correct answer is?

22:57 >> The correct answer is 72 months. No. Are

23:00 you serious?

23:00 >> Yeah, is Colby holding up a No, [snorts]

23:02 I did not I did not [laughter] see this.

23:04 I did not I feel like I should get

23:05 double points for that.

23:06 >> For getting it right? That's head on

23:08 that's that's I hit that.

23:10 >> 72 months? I'm proud of you.

23:11 >> nail on the head.

23:12 >> Mhm. So you were a pretty prolific con

23:14 artist in your day.

23:15 >> That's what the US attorney said. Yeah.

23:17 Do you um

23:18 Do you get along with other con artists?

23:19 Do you when you were in prison and you

23:20 met a a person who was a another

23:22 prolific con artist kind of going for

23:24 the gold medal

23:26 held by Matt Cox? Did you look at that

23:28 person as a a twerp [snorts] and and

23:31 someone that you didn't like? Or did you

23:32 have a kindred spirit with them? Did you

23:34 bond with them? It depended. This is

23:37 what's funny.

23:38 It all depended on

23:40 you know, cuz the government will call

23:41 everybody like a con man or a fraudster

23:43 con man. Like everybody is like that.

23:44 And it depended on the sophistication of

23:48 the the scam. Okay.

23:50 I've met some guys that just talking

23:52 with them, I realized what they did, how

23:55 it worked. I was kind of impressed. I

23:57 was like, "Wow, that's super cool." And

23:59 then I was like, "Wow, I'm impressed by

24:00 this person." There are other people

24:02 that were just

24:03 blatant liars. Yeah. Like yeah, did you

24:05 steal they they got three or four

24:07 million dollars but they were just such

24:09 scoundrels and just complete blatant

24:11 liars. It was like, "Okay, but you're

24:14 just a liar." Like you there's no

24:15 there's no skill between lying to

24:17 people. You're just lying to people to

24:19 get them to give you money and then

24:20 telling them that you've invested the

24:22 money and but it's all just blatant lies

24:24 as opposed to

24:25 there are other guys that I would

24:27 >> Yeah, exactly. Like you see some

24:28 finesse. Some thought into it.

24:29 >> Right. Some backstopping of their

24:31 stories.

24:32 >> Yeah, of course they set up this, you

24:34 know, websites. They set up they they

24:35 had they had storefronts. They had they

24:38 had a whole thing set up. You would it

24:40 would

24:41 it would withstand scrutiny. And I was

24:43 always shocked by that. I was always

24:45 like, you know, there was some

24:45 psychology behind it as opposed to

24:47 somebody who's just lying. You give me a

24:48 hundred thousand dollars and I'll get

24:50 you back a hundred fifty within a year.

24:51 You know, it's like, "Okay, well you're

24:52 just a blatant liar." Like that. Anybody

24:54 could do that. See you like you want to

24:55 see like

24:56 Paul Newman Robert Redford in The Sting.

24:59 Not some guy who kicks a lady down the

25:00 stairs for her welfare check so he could

25:02 forge

25:03 Exactly.

25:03 >> Both the fraudsters but two different

25:05 ends of the spectrum.

25:07 I want to tell you about a guy and I'm

25:08 pretty curious to know I think you're

25:09 going to find him

25:11 to be your [snorts] your kind of guy.

25:13 Unbelievable. His name's James Henley.

25:16 35-year-old guy from Greenwood, Indiana.

25:20 Prolific con artist, I think

25:21 objectively.

25:23 His prior felony convictions, which keep

25:25 in the back of your head when you're

25:25 guessing a sentence for financial crimes

25:27 including theft, forgery, and fraud. So

25:29 this ain't his first rodeo.

25:32 He implemented four schemes in this case

25:35 that I'm going to tell you about as

25:37 quickly as I can.

25:38 During COVID, he filed 120 unemployment

25:42 insurance applications in 10 different

25:45 states.

25:46 Uh once the applications were approved,

25:48 he used 65 unemployment insurance debit

25:51 cards to make purchases at retailers and

25:54 withdraw cash at the ATM.

25:56 The states paid him a total of 1.1

25:59 million dollars in this COVID

26:01 unemployment insurance thing.

26:03 And

26:04 he the money that he was taking out in

26:05 the ATM used it to buy a Chevy Camaro.

26:10 See? I knew you'd like this guy.

26:12 Scheme two.

26:13 Same guy.

26:15 His buddy buys a home in Indianapolis

26:18 using a mortgage loan from a bank. And

26:20 Henley files a fraudulent document with

26:23 the county.

26:24 Um a satisfaction of mortgage document.

26:27 Okay, you know what that is. It's it's a

26:28 document that you're filing with the

26:29 county to say remove the lien from Bank

26:33 of America whoever the bank is I've

26:35 heard of it. because it's been paid off.

26:36 Yeah.

26:37 This sounds familiar, huh?

26:39 Um

26:40 Brilliant, by the way. I like where his

26:41 head's at. Yeah, yeah, yeah. This the

26:43 apple doesn't fall far from the tree

26:44 here. This guy this kid could be your

26:46 your son. Um

26:49 So the satisfaction of mortgage takes

26:51 the mortgage off the books creating the

26:52 illusion that the mortgage the loan on

26:54 this property has been paid off when it

26:55 had not been paid off.

26:58 Uh your boy James then files a deed

27:00 naming himself a joint owner of the

27:03 home.

27:04 And then they sell the property for

27:05 255,000 dollars pocketing all the

27:07 proceeds.

27:08 Okay.

27:09 >> Nice. Yeah. This is a It's scheme number

27:11 two.

27:11 >> This is Yeah, I was going to say this is

27:13 a this is my scheme. Got it.

27:16 Then James hits Indianapolis.

27:18 He steals five homes in Indianapolis by

27:20 filing fraudulent deeds with the county

27:22 recorder's office. Um

27:24 Through the filings, he claims that the

27:26 homeowners had sold their homes to his

27:28 fake businesses. But in reality, he had

27:30 never even spoken to these homeowners.

27:33 Uh unbeknownst to the victims, he files

27:35 these fraudulent liens then sells the

27:37 homes for significantly less than their

27:38 market value. Cuz I think that's the

27:40 trick. If you're going to sell a house

27:41 that you steal, you do it at like a fire

27:43 sale price and just try to fire it

27:45 through the title companies and

27:46 whatever. So if you're running your

27:48 calculator, he gets 260,000 dollars in

27:51 profits from scheme number three.

27:54 Uh one property one homeowner it was he

27:56 stole their their childhood home. Like

27:58 it was like a sad story that came out of

27:59 the sentencing.

28:00 Uh scheme four, he purchases a couple

28:04 vehicles, a Dodge Durango for 71,000, a

28:08 Chevy Silverado for 54,000 using auto

28:11 loans from a credit union. Here's the

28:14 thing, Matt Cox. He had an attorney that

28:16 he did not like evidently. He looked at

28:18 one of the attorney's checks that

28:19 somehow he had and he looks at the

28:21 routing number and the account number at

28:23 the bottom. He provided that routing

28:25 number and that account number to the

28:27 credit unions who gave him the loans for

28:29 these cars and they began doing auto

28:32 debits of the attorney's account to pay

28:35 his monthly car payments. The attorney

28:37 had his did not have his eye on the ball

28:39 and ends up paying 98,000 dollars toward

28:42 the purchase of these two vehicles.

28:44 Whoa. Okay.

28:45 >> Yeah. So those are the four schemes this

28:48 guy did. I want to first know

28:51 from you. You respect this guy as a con

28:53 man? Like

28:54 you kind of as a kindred spirit Kind of

28:56 it's it's you know what it reminds me

28:57 of? It

28:59 once again

29:01 Isaac Allen Zach.

29:03 Uh [snorts] it's like some parts of the

29:05 scheme are brilliant and then there's

29:06 other parts of the scheme that he's

29:08 doing that are just

29:10 just stupid. Like

29:13 My buddy Zach ran a whole credit card

29:15 scam. He was making tons of money and

29:17 then he would go check into a hotel and

29:19 use one of the stolen credit cards

29:21 to get a hotel room where he was going

29:23 to stay for the next five days. Like,

29:24 "What are you doing? You're making a

29:25 hundred thousand dollars a month. Pay

29:27 for your hotel room. Like don't don't

29:28 have

29:29 don't have this scam lead directly to

29:32 where you are." And this you're buying

29:33 vehicles and

29:35 having the payments debited from an

29:37 account that you have to assume at some

29:39 point

29:40 the person's going to realize, "Hey,

29:42 there's all these payments going

29:43 through." The authorities have to can

29:45 look into it very easily and say, "Hey,

29:46 these vehicles are all titled in this

29:48 guy's name. Do you know who that is? You

29:49 ever seen this picture before?" Oh,

29:51 yeah, that's Jimmy.

29:52 >> You'd be amazed how many people get

29:53 caught for crimes because of the dumb

29:55 mistakes they do on little things. I

29:56 mean, I always say you know, I the when

29:58 I was an FBI agent I used to talk about

29:59 people who get arrested for jaywalking

30:01 on their way out of the bank robbery.

30:03 You know, it's

30:04 you don't you pay attention to the

30:06 little things that are going to trip you

30:07 up. The stuff in in then you may get

30:09 away with the big stuff. I talked to a

30:12 law enforcement guy the other day

30:14 and he said uh

30:16 that they used to say

30:18 focus on the misdemeanors, the felonies

30:20 will take care of themselves.

30:22 It's like you know, you can Yeah. you

30:23 arrest some guy for you pull over the

30:25 vehicle that has a broken tail light or

30:28 does something minor and then you search

30:29 the vehicle and there's a body in the

30:31 trunk. You know what I'm saying? It's

30:31 like normal people fix their tail

30:33 lights. Normal people don't have their

30:34 titles or their tags expire. Like these

30:37 are these are legal things that lead to

30:38 big things.

30:38 >> Yeah, it's an interesting perspective.

30:39 It's kind of like that broken windows

30:40 theory of law enforcement, right? You

30:42 deal with the broken windows and the

30:44 people who are hopping the subway trains

30:46 yeah, like for free and and that's going

30:48 to help kind of rise the tide and make

30:50 the city a place where law is enforced

30:53 and the city's going to get cleaned up

30:54 that way.

30:55 Uh the other thing that just struck me

30:57 about James Henley's crime is how easy

30:59 it was for him to steal these houses and

31:02 you know and I know this but your

31:03 viewers may not that no one is watching

31:06 the store at the county clerk's offices.

31:08 >> Right. They uh

31:09 uh they're just their their job is not

31:12 to investigate the validity of these

31:14 deeds transferring property ownership

31:16 from one person to another. Their job is

31:18 just to record those deeds in the public

31:19 record and that's the weak link in the

31:21 chain that allows home theft to occur.

31:23 What what what's so funny is that that's

31:25 the thing that most people feel the most

31:27 secure about and that's really just a

31:29 couple pieces of paper and a fake notary

31:31 stamp. Like anybody can do it. Like it's

31:32 a joke.

31:33 >> exactly. You can go to your office

31:34 supply store, get a notary stamp, order

31:35 it online and but people are like, "Oh

31:37 my god, it's been notarized. It's got to

31:38 be good."

31:39 >> Oh, yeah. Right. So, anyway, so we got

31:41 James Henley. Because the it's getting a

31:43 notary stamp is it's a lock and

31:45 key. It's exactly.

31:47 It's not like you can go to a site and

31:48 pay $12 with your debit card.

31:51 Exactly. At the end of the day, it's a

31:52 rubber stamp.

31:54 So, we got James Henley.

31:55 Prolific con artist, long criminal

31:57 history.

31:59 $1.1 million stolen in his COVID

32:01 unemployment scam.

32:03 Uh 225,000 in a a home title theft scam

32:08 basically or a satisfaction of mortgage

32:10 scam really. Then he steals five homes.

32:13 That's another 260,000 bucks.

32:15 And then we got two cars totaling about

32:18 $120,000 in value that he was able to

32:21 steal by uh

32:23 tricking an attorney into paying for

32:24 them.

32:25 How much time you going to give this

32:26 guy?

32:27 I think he played guilty.

32:29 I mean, I didn't hear

32:31 aggravated identity theft. Doesn't sound

32:33 to me like he went to trial. He played

32:34 guilty. Mhm.

32:37 Assuming he played guilty in a timely

32:39 manner. I think it was straight up

32:40 fraud. I don't think he I don't think he

32:41 stole anyone's identity. Okay. So,

32:46 5 years?

32:47 5 years? 60 months? This guy's a menace.

32:50 I just described four really

32:52 >> Yes, but I think that that's a crime

32:53 spree.

32:55 So, I don't see that as being I mean,

32:56 those may be enhancements on the

32:58 overall.

32:59 I don't see that

33:00 I I mean, I I think 5 years. I think 60

33:02 months.

33:04 60 months?

33:06 See, you know

33:07 >> No, I'm just asking. This guy you you

33:08 still don't seem [clears throat]

33:09 bothered at all [snorts] by this fellow

33:10 and uh I mean, he's a scumbag.

33:12 >> he ran four different I would argue

33:15 fairly complex schemes.

33:18 I mean, I I hear you but

33:20 >> got a criminal history. He convictions

33:22 for financial crimes including theft,

33:24 forgery, and fraud.

33:25 >> What is it? A few million? It was a few

33:26 million dollars though, right? I mean,

33:28 we could add it up again but yeah, 1

33:29 million plus 225,000 plus 260,000 plus

33:34 >> It's a couple million. All right. So, 5

33:36 years? I can't stand I'm trying to help

33:39 you, man. You're sick today. I'm I'm

33:41 >> I can't stand I don't I don't I can't

33:42 stand

33:43 it.

33:43 >> trust you anymore. You don't I I the

33:46 Supreme Court said that FBI agents are

33:48 allowed to lie to their subjects in

33:50 order to gain

33:52 uh um a confession. And thank heavens we

33:54 can cuz we don't want an even playing

33:56 [snorts] field between criminals and FBI

33:58 agents. Yeah, I want We want the

33:59 government to have an advantage so we

34:00 can put criminals in prison.

34:02 I'm going to say 84 months but I'm going

34:05 to be very upset if you've moved me off

34:07 of 60. 84 months, how many years is

34:09 that?

34:10 Uh it's 7 years. 7 years. So, you're up

34:12 to 7 years now. We're we are five now,

34:14 you said seven.

34:16 Yes. Because I bullied you into it?

34:18 >> Yes.

34:18 >> So, if the answer's 5 years, you're

34:20 going to be super upset if

34:20 >> Yes.

34:22 The answer, however,

34:24 is 10 years. Okay. Well, I made it,

34:26 right?

34:26 >> No, you did not.

34:27 >> Why? Because 20% of 10 years

34:30 >> Oh, did I say seven? Oh, man. Wait a

34:34 minute. Come on. Do some math. No. 20%

34:37 of 10 is eight. Right? You can do the

34:39 math.

34:40 >> The system is outdated and archaic and

34:42 vulnerable to title fraud. A growing

34:45 scam the FBI now calls house stealing.

34:49 Scammers could now easily download

34:51 [music] and forge one document, apply

34:53 one fake notary stamp, and then file it

34:56 with the recorder. Just like that, the

34:58 property has been taken out of your

35:00 [music] name. Then they borrow against

35:02 your home using your equity. Find out if

35:05 you're already a victim. Go to

35:07 hometitlelock.com

35:09 now. I was talking earlier about the

35:12 idea that the person at the county

35:13 clerk's office is not really paying that

35:17 close of attention to what is being

35:18 filed. Again, their job is to record the

35:21 deeds, not to not to look at the

35:24 validity of the deeds transferring

35:25 property and that's what allows these

35:27 home title thefts to occur. Yeah, I

35:29 mean, I think they're they're they're

35:30 paying attention. They're just that it's

35:32 actually against I think I believe it's

35:34 against the law for them to look in as

35:36 long as all of the boxes are checked,

35:38 they're not really allowed to look into

35:39 it. Now, Texas just passed some

35:41 legislation kind of holding them

35:43 accountable and so and I I actually did

35:45 some consulting with the Texas state

35:46 legislature on the the the the law and

35:49 it's a good law and

35:51 Texas is going to be stepping up and

35:52 forcing their recorders of deeds to get

35:55 some fraud anti-fraud training and do

35:57 some mandated reporting if they suspect

35:59 something's wrong. Kind of like the

36:00 banks do suspicious activity reports but

36:02 Nobody ever asked me to to to chime in

36:05 on laws.

36:06 >> I wasn't paid for it. I was just Oh,

36:07 yeah. Forget that.

36:09 >> [laughter]

36:10 >> Exactly. So, I want to tell a story

36:12 about someone who worked for the

36:13 recorder of deeds in Cook County, which

36:15 is where in Illinois which where I'm

36:17 from from Chicago. Okay. Okay. Um

36:20 I don't have a ton of details about how

36:22 this came to be but a bad guy got caught

36:25 doing something bad by the FBI and and

36:28 they're always given a chance to

36:30 cooperate. Is there anything you want to

36:32 tell me about somebody else?

36:34 Do I?

36:35 >> [laughter]

36:36 >> Do I? I have a story to tell you about

36:39 59-year-old Regina Taylor, the

36:41 cooperating witness said.

36:43 She takes bribes and she works at the

36:45 Cook County Recorder of Deeds. And if

36:47 you need to get something filed or

36:48 backdated or anything, she will ram that

36:52 right through for you in exchange for a

36:53 bribe.

36:55 They said, "All right, that sounds good.

36:56 Can you introduce somebody to her?" And

36:58 they go, "Yeah." So, they sent an

36:59 undercover FBI agent from Chicago,

37:01 former colleague of mine.

37:03 And

37:04 and what he did is he said, "Listen, I

37:05 got a problem here.

37:07 I have this quick claim deed. My mom

37:10 died and I want to transfer her property

37:13 to my name. And using this quick claim

37:16 deed, which would do exactly that, can

37:18 you do that and predate it?

37:21 So, it makes it look like this was filed

37:24 18 months ago back when mom was alive."

37:27 Right. You know what Regina said?

37:29 No problem. She said, "I am shocked you

37:31 would ask me. I am a government

37:32 employee. I took an oath of office." No,

37:34 she didn't say that at all. She said,

37:36 "I'll be happy to do that." For how much

37:38 bribe? Let's start with I'm how much

37:40 money do you think she would charge in a

37:41 bribe for that?

37:43 I don't think these people are all that

37:44 bright. Probably a couple hundred bucks.

37:46 Yeah. $200? Nice. Nice. You got that

37:48 right.

37:49 And so

37:50 then they she helps him to prepare a

37:52 fraudulent quick claim deed, backdated

37:55 it by 18 months transferring ownership

37:57 from this guy's dead mother the

37:58 undercover's dead mother to

38:01 to the undercover agent. I'm assuming

38:04 that the story he told was that he was

38:05 trying to keep the property out of the

38:07 hands of siblings or other heirs. That's

38:09 the only reason why you would do this

38:11 cuz otherwise it would just already wash

38:12 out in probate if this person was the

38:13 legitimate heir.

38:15 Um and so she gets arrested.

38:20 And then she pleads guilty.

38:22 And [snorts] she has no criminal history

38:24 for taking a $200 bribe. And she loses

38:26 her job at the Cook County Recorder of

38:28 Deeds.

38:29 How much time you going to give Regina

38:31 Taylor?

38:36 I don't know. 36 months

38:38 uh

38:39 uh

38:40 paper probation. Okay. 37 Yeah. No no

38:43 time in prison at all but No, she has no

38:45 criminal history. She is in a position

38:47 of trust.

38:49 Uh but there's no real dollar amount

38:52 connected to it unless the FBI tried to

38:54 say, "Oh, the property's worth half a

38:56 million so she's out half a million

38:57 dollars." Actually, but she doesn't know

38:58 any of that. So, I don't know. Something

39:00 small but

39:01 Slap on the wrist.

39:02 >> Yeah, 36 months. Don't do it again,

39:04 Regina. Yeah. Don't take bribes in your

39:06 official government position, Regina.

39:07 We're just going to let you walk.

39:09 I mean, that the first time I got in

39:11 trouble, I got 30 actually got a little

39:13 bit more than 36 months. But yeah, but

39:15 basically 3 years. No dollar loss and it

39:17 was wire fraud. Okay.

39:20 You were really upset the last episode

39:21 we did when people [snorts]

39:23 working for the government were like

39:24 spying

39:25 for the Russians and the Chinese and

39:27 stuff like that. But this doesn't seem

39:29 to bother you at all. The county worker

39:30 would be happy to take a bribe take a

39:32 bribe. I mean, it's not espionage. I

39:33 mean, it's it's it I mean, I said she a

39:35 position of trust which I'm assuming

39:37 takes her from

39:38 from 24 months paper to 30 earth

39:42 to 36. Let's say 36. Okay. So you're

39:44 saying you think she should go to jail?

39:46 I don't think anything. I'm just here to

39:48 facilitate the conversation.

39:50 36 36 months probation.

39:54 Matt Cox, I think my paper may be

39:56 see-through. She got one day in prison

39:59 and 3 years supervised release. You hit

40:01 it on the head.

40:02 >> Okay, thank you. Thank you. Thank you. I

40:05 can't see.

40:06 >> [laughter]

40:06 >> I'm telling you.

40:09 But [snorts] keep in mind that's that's

40:10 almost the exact same thing that I got.

40:13 Yeah. In all the newspapers it says it

40:15 says that I got

40:17 I got 3 years probation the first time I

40:19 got in trouble. It was actually 42

40:21 months.

40:21 >> Right. Uh so it was 3 and 1/2 years. And

40:24 it was the same thing. There was no and

40:26 I got an enhancement for a position of

40:27 trust

40:29 which was I was a licensed mortgage

40:30 broker. Yeah. And it doesn't really

40:32 matter whether it's a bank fraud charge

40:33 or it's a wire fraud or it's a mail

40:35 fraud. They're all basically kind of the

40:37 same. So I I assume she's going to get

40:38 roughly what I got.

40:39 >> Yeah. We're good. You got it right. And

40:40 it's a great job. It's a great job. See,

40:41 that's why I'm throwing you these

40:42 softballs today. Uh so to get build up

40:45 your self-esteem.

40:46 Right? What's the score?

40:48 >> You're always looking out for me. Two

40:49 out of four? Two out of four. Well, I

40:50 mean, you know,

40:52 what is 20% of 1 day? Yeah. I I wasn't

40:55 going to I wasn't going to litigate

40:57 that. If he if he was in the ballpark,

40:59 I'll we'll we'll give him that one.

41:01 >> out of four. So we're talking about home

41:02 title theft a lot today. And there are

41:05 people out there who are geniuses like

41:07 yourself who successfully did home title

41:09 theft.

41:10 And then there's other there's a

41:11 subculture though who's really really

41:14 into filing deeds and liens and things

41:16 like that. They're called sovereign

41:19 citizens. I love these guys. These guys

41:21 are the best.

41:22 >> you tell me a little bit about what you

41:23 know about sovereign citizens? I'll

41:25 share what I know and I want to give a

41:26 little background that's going to kind

41:27 of lead into the next couple stories.

41:29 The quick version of my understanding of

41:32 sovereign citizens is that they believe

41:34 that they are

41:35 sovereign from they they can they can

41:38 register themselves as being sovereign

41:41 from the United States. So they're their

41:43 own country.

41:44 >> Yes. And their own corporation. Mhm. And

41:47 they can kind of like incorporate

41:49 themselves and therefore the laws of

41:52 whatever country they're in do not apply

41:55 to them. So they don't need a driver's

41:57 license and they don't have to abide by

41:59 all the laws and they'll get pulled over

42:02 for driving a vehicle and the cop will

42:04 say, "Can I have your driver's license?"

42:05 Well, "I'm not driving. I'm traveling."

42:07 >> Right.

42:07 >> And they have all these They're also

42:08 very hung up on maritime law. Yeah. Yes.

42:10 Yeah. Like that seems to be a thing.

42:12 >> Yeah. And And so they'll get in front of

42:13 the judge and they'll they'll argue that

42:15 the judge has you know, the some federal

42:17 judge or state judge, "You have no

42:18 jurisdiction over me. I'm a sovereign

42:20 citizen and none of this applies to me."

42:22 And it's like, "Come on. Stop." And I

42:24 used to joke the whole time I would talk

42:25 to these guys. Like they wouldn't pay

42:27 for their taxes. They wouldn't do all

42:28 these things.

42:29 And I would sit there and say, you know,

42:31 they they always went back to some like

42:34 the federal income tax was never

42:36 ratified by the Constitution in in 1903.

42:40 They never ratified it and therefore

42:41 they don't can't force me to and they

42:43 they found a loophole. Some loophole.

42:45 And I used to always say, "You know what

42:46 the funny thing about that is,

42:48 you guys may be absolutely right, but

42:51 the country you live within has

42:54 all the prisons, all the fences, all the

42:56 guns, all the guards. And you're you can

42:59 complain the whole time you're here, but

43:00 you're going to do your 3 years for not

43:02 paying your taxes." Right. They're

43:03 Common law would say this.

43:05 >> Yeah.

43:06 So silly. So silly.

43:07 >> Have you ever heard of the Moorish M M O

43:10 O R Moors, the Moorish sovereign citizen

43:12 movement?

43:13 >> No. Okay. Because because this is

43:14 America, black people have to have their

43:16 own sovereign citizen movement.

43:18 >> Of course. It's a given. It's a given.

43:19 It's called the They call themselves the

43:20 Moors. Oh. Okay. And so little bit

43:22 little history lesson, kind of fun.

43:24 Um

43:25 in 1913

43:27 in Newark, New Jersey, the Moorish

43:30 Science Temple of America was

43:32 established by a guy named Noble Drew

43:34 Ali.

43:35 And what he recommended is that people

43:37 who who and it's basically it's

43:39 basically a sovereign citizens movement

43:40 saying that that they are the

43:42 descendants of the ancient Moors, the

43:45 Moor tribe. And and therefore they had a

43:48 distinct nationality that was separate

43:50 and apart from being an American or

43:53 being a black person. They are Moors.

43:56 Okay. And what they recommended is that

43:59 if you were adopting this philosophy

44:01 that you need to add the suffix Bay, B E

44:04 Y, to your like slave name. Okay.

44:08 >> And and that will be your

44:09 your or sometimes L, E L, to your your

44:14 legal name. And so when we did our very

44:16 first story this episode, the bad guy

44:18 was named Jeffrey M. Young-Bey because

44:22 he was a Moorish sovereign citizen.

44:24 Okay.

44:26 Um what happened over time the Moorish

44:28 Science teachings

44:30 uh I hate to call it a cult cuz it's not

44:32 really a a faith, but kind of a

44:34 white-collar cult where people, you

44:35 know, it's a a set of very mistaken

44:37 beliefs.

44:38 Um merges with the sovereign citizen

44:41 common law movement and with all these

44:43 crazy pseudo-legal ideas. And so they

44:46 claim that they're not subject to laws

44:48 or taxation. They they correct their

44:50 names with the Bay or the L. And um they

44:54 reject their slave names. They assert

44:57 divine or ancient national status over

45:00 regarding

45:01 citing Moorish law.

45:03 And they believe that they um that they

45:05 have entirely separate standing here

45:08 independent of the US government.

45:10 I have investigated a lot of Moorish

45:13 sovereign citizens which is how I became

45:15 good friends by partnering up with the

45:17 woman who arrested you.

45:19 Um Special Agent Peacock. Really? Mhm.

45:23 Yeah. I like Special Agent Peacock. She

45:26 She was always very nice. She was very

45:27 professional.

45:28 >> She's a great agent. I enjoyed working

45:30 with her. We put some I didn't enjoy

45:32 working with her, but

45:33 We put some of these folks in prison

45:34 together.

45:35 We had we had a different experience.

45:37 Yeah, I know. I know it, but it's just

45:39 in the the Venn diagrams of our lives,

45:41 she's where we overlap. Nice. I didn't

45:43 know that.

45:44 >> Good person. Good agent.

45:45 >> Have you mentioned that me before?

45:46 >> Several times. You always act surprised.

45:48 >> [laughter]

45:49 >> Well, I'm old. I forget things. All

45:50 right.

45:52 Richard Lewis Mifflin, age 45 of

45:56 Richmond, Virginia, legally changed his

45:59 name to Ali Mif-Bay, B E Y, right?

46:04 Uh when he adopted the Moorish sovereign

46:06 citizen worldview.

46:08 As an aside, it was always interesting

46:10 to me when cases were being pitched to

46:11 me in the suspicious activity reports

46:13 coming from banks, all I really needed

46:15 to do was it once I saw the B E Y, I was

46:18 like, "Oh, it's a Moorish sovereign

46:19 citizen case. There's something

46:20 interesting here."

46:22 Anyway, he engaged in a scheme to

46:23 fraudulently transfer title and

46:25 ownership of seven different real estate

46:27 properties from the legitimate owners to

46:29 himself.

46:30 He formed some DBAs to do this.

46:32 Bay and Bay Associates.

46:35 Morocco at Virginia Trust.

46:38 Morocco Empire Land of the Moors Trust.

46:42 And the Virginia Republic.

46:44 Right?

46:45 >> So So he's just preparing deeds and

46:48 transferring the deed to his own name or

46:50 to one of these corporations.

46:52 >> Right. Right. Which which which are all

46:53 like just steaming with Moorish ideology

46:56 in the names, right?

46:57 >> is just these are just homeowners or

46:59 some guy living in his house and minding

47:00 his own business. They just

47:01 >> Okay. We'll get there. Pluck some in

47:02 We'll get there, yeah. Uh the properties

47:04 were generally in foreclosure or

47:06 pre-foreclosure. Um I think you I think

47:08 they often choose to stressed properties

47:11 to commit this do this to because based

47:13 on your theory that we talked about

47:14 earlier that the homeowners may just

47:16 have their eye off the ball.

47:17 >> Yeah, kind of cuz they've kind of thrown

47:18 their hands up They're almost walking

47:20 away from the property. Yeah, but

47:22 um

47:23 and so yeah, so he he was forging

47:25 signatures of legitimate owners onto the

47:27 property and to on these fraudulent

47:30 deeds which transfer ownership of the

47:31 property into these DBAs that he

47:34 created. Um then he what he did, he

47:37 started renting out the houses. He

47:39 became a landlord with these houses.

47:41 He's a yeah. Even though money has no

47:43 value. He changes he changed the locks.

47:45 And he And you know what he does? He

47:47 plants a flag in the front of each of

47:48 these properties, the Moorish flag

47:50 letting the government know that

47:52 this is an independent republic.

47:53 >> This is sovereign territory right here.

47:56 Don't step over. Exactly. Don't you step

47:59 on my land, state of Virginia. You're

48:01 off you're in my nation now. Okay,

48:03 you're in my Moorish nation. Um I'm sure

48:06 that went over well. Yeah. Yeah. So So

48:08 he did that a bunch.

48:09 >> I always wonder how these guys like, you

48:11 know, they're always talking about how

48:13 like money has no value. It's like,

48:15 "Well, how are you paying your rent?

48:16 Well, what were you collecting from your

48:17 tenants?" Right. Well, they were paying

48:19 me in US dollars. Well, well, has no no

48:22 value though. Why were you even

48:23 accepting it?

48:25 He ran a second scheme also. Um

48:28 he attempted to purchase foreclosed

48:29 properties at auction using fraudulent

48:32 money orders

48:33 uh backed by and redeemed by the US

48:36 Treasury. And that's what Peacock and I

48:38 were doing, Agent Peacock, is that we

48:40 were we were catching They were creating

48:41 fake IRS checks and trying to pay for

48:43 stuff with that.

48:44 >> That sounds like

48:46 Chris uh Marrero. I was a which is a

48:48 sovereign citizen I met in

48:49 >> Okay. Yeah. Super entertaining guy. They

48:51 love to try to cuz they believe that

48:53 there is a secret government account

48:55 that the government establishes for you

48:57 when you're born that if you write the

48:59 special things on this check, you can

49:01 write checks from the US Treasury to

49:03 draw upon your secret account in the

49:05 money. It's this bizarre subculture that

49:09 and they believe it. They will argue

49:10 this till they're blue in the face. They

49:11 love arguing about this stuff.

49:13 Definitely. Definitely. Or the black

49:15 card. They

49:17 they Chris had took it a step further

49:19 that you could actually get a black card

49:21 issued to your your What is the name of

49:25 there's a name of your

49:27 CUSIP number.

49:28 >> Yeah. Yeah. CUSIP. C U S I P. They've

49:30 got a It's a CUSIP number that's

49:33 assigned to you. And if you you get the

49:34 black card, you get the CUSIP number and

49:36 you can you just could use the card, use

49:38 it, and use it, and you can buy whatever

49:39 you want. I'm like, and everybody

49:41 can do this? Absolutely.

49:42 >> A CUSIP number is a real thing, but it's

49:44 it's it's the way that the securities

49:45 [snorts]

49:46 um it's the way they keep track of

49:47 stuff. Like a a a

49:49 the common stock for Microsoft has a

49:52 CUSIP number. The common stock for AT&T

49:54 has a CUSIP number. It's basically a

49:55 serial number for a stock that's

49:57 publicly traded. But they believe that

49:58 humans have a CUSIP number that they can

50:01 draw upon their secret accounts. Yeah,

50:02 he would argue and argue and argue. Go

50:05 ahead. Richard Lewis Mifflin our again

50:08 our friend Ali Bey

50:09 uh

50:10 he would go to these foreclosure

50:11 auctions and try to buy properties using

50:13 these these fake money orders, these

50:15 fake drawing on the Treasury. And

50:17 finally, the law firm that was handling

50:19 the foreclosure sale sends him a letter

50:21 prohibiting him like basically you can't

50:23 come back here to our auctions. You keep

50:25 doing this, winning these auctions, and

50:26 then paying for the property with a a

50:29 counterfeit check basically.

50:31 And um in the response, he mails a

50:34 letter to the law firm demanding that

50:35 the firm stop having auctions and that

50:39 that and then he begins filing liens on

50:41 the property of the law firm.

50:44 Also to retaliatory liens. We'll talk

50:46 about that in a little bit.

50:47 So, real pest, real nuisance, charged

50:51 with all sorts of fraud stuff. He

50:53 created $250,000 worth of fake money

50:56 orders drawing on the US Treasury to buy

50:57 these properties at the auction. I think

50:59 that was really the heart of the

51:00 government's case against him. And I

51:02 think he actually pled guilty, which is

51:03 unusual cuz most of the Moorish

51:05 sovereign citizens are thrilled to go to

51:06 trial and represent themselves. Yeah,

51:08 what it is.

51:10 Um

51:11 >> How much time you going to give this

51:12 guy, Mr. Bey? 3 years. 3 years, 36

51:14 months?

51:15 >> months. Yeah, because I don't think that

51:17 the uh judge would is going to find this

51:19 funny at all. I don't think the

51:20 government's going to find it funny.

51:21 I don't think anybody's going to have

51:22 any sympathy. I don't think they're

51:24 giving him the low end of the

51:25 guidelines.

51:26 I don't think uh or that even if they

51:28 did, they're going to jack it up so

51:29 high. I think it's 3 years. 3 years.

51:30 Okay. The um

51:33 I won't belabor this cuz we're

51:35 The correct answer is 48 months.

51:38 Come on, how close am I? Come on.

51:39 >> 48 * 0.8

51:42 Oh, that's not I can't That's I'm going

51:44 to

51:44 >> 48 * 0.8 is 38 months. Oh, you missed it

51:48 by 2 months, buddy.

51:51 You missed it by 2 months. I know this

51:53 really upsetting you. That's I'm not

51:56 playing against that high. I should have

51:57 gone higher. I'm not playing against

51:59 you.

51:59 >> Yeah, see I suggested I told I told

52:01 Thomas like, you know, maybe we should

52:02 do the scoring system like points, like

52:04 point for Matt, point for Tom. And he's

52:05 like, no. He's like, I'm just here to

52:07 facilitate this. That's all I'm doing is

52:09 I'm here to facilitate the conversation.

52:11 I I'm you know, when you go on Jeopardy,

52:13 you are not playing against the host.

52:15 He's not trying to talk you out of your

52:16 answers.

52:18 What am I at? Uh 205. All right, come

52:21 on.

52:21 >> No, no, no, you were on the cusp. You're

52:22 on the cusp of winning this thing. I

52:24 believe in you. We're talking a little

52:25 bit about home title theft and the

52:27 Moorish sovereign citizens. But another

52:29 thing that they do because one thing

52:31 they're good at is understanding kind of

52:33 the files and records systems of county

52:35 clerks and real estate is if there's

52:38 someone they don't like, a judge, cop,

52:40 FBI agent, they'll file a lien against

52:43 their house. Right. Basically tying your

52:45 house up so you can't sell it. Basically

52:46 saying, you owe me 600 gazillion

52:48 dollars. Here's a lien on your property.

52:51 And man oh man, it's a headache to get

52:52 those liens off your property. Varies

52:54 from county to county, but it's still

52:55 it's no fun.

52:57 So, let's talk about Timothy Germaine

52:58 Pate. He also went by the name Akhenaten

53:01 Ali,

53:02 age 43 of Augusta, Georgia, Moorish

53:05 sovereign citizen, not subject to US

53:07 law.

53:09 Okay.

53:10 What Tim does is Tim files tax returns

53:11 from 2016 to 2018 falsely claiming that

53:15 he was owed more than $7 million in tax

53:18 refunds. Right. Do you know what the IRS

53:20 did? They They

53:23 They

53:24 didn't pay it. They did not pay it

53:26 because it's nonsense. And you can't

53:28 just file a tax return in crayon and the

53:30 government and hope that the

53:31 government's going to give you it.

53:33 This drove him so This made him so

53:35 angry. This [snorts] made him so angry.

53:37 So, he goes he files a federal civil

53:39 case against the IRS commissioner

53:41 saying, "Give me my money."

53:43 And uh he attempted to have the court He

53:46 said he he asked the judge to have the

53:48 US Marshals arrest the IRS commissioner.

53:52 I'm sure he did.

53:53 >> rejected it and said, "Absolutely."

53:55 Right.

53:56 And so then then he's standing in court,

53:58 he threatens out loud to file liens

54:02 against the property of the federal

54:03 judge assigned to his case, other

54:06 officials at the US Treasury Department,

54:08 and the IRS unless he was paid these

54:10 millions of dollars from the IRS that he

54:12 wanted.

54:14 The uh the judge was unbowed by his

54:16 threats and and everyone else just kind

54:19 of went to go carry on their duties. And

54:21 you know what Pate did then?

54:23 He filed the liens.

54:24 >> the liens. He filed the liens. He filed

54:26 liens ranging from $15 million to $33

54:30 million

54:31 against the US magistrate judge in

54:33 Augusta,

54:34 the former US Treasury Secretary, the

54:37 IRS commissioner, the Treasury Inspector

54:39 General, among others. He's out there

54:42 filing these liens, gumming up their

54:43 property.

54:45 He also targets additional federal

54:46 officials with bogus liens.

54:48 Uh he went after a federal bankruptcy

54:50 judge in Augusta. He went after the US

54:52 bankruptcy clerk of courts,

54:55 the US magistrate judge, liens ranging

54:57 from 15 million to 100 million. He then

54:59 filed involuntary bankruptcy petitions

55:02 against five federal officials

55:04 uh to put these other people into

55:06 bankruptcy without their now knowledge.

55:08 Just an absolute nightmare. Nightmare.

55:11 Okay.

55:12 Now, there is a federal law against

55:14 filing retaliatory liens against

55:17 government officials.

55:17 >> I I know a guy in federal prison that

55:19 got charged with that while in federal

55:21 prison for filing a lien against the his

55:24 judge in his case. Well, did he get

55:25 extra time for that? Yeah, he got like 3

55:27 years. Yeah, okay. Well, given that

55:29 >> they were bringing him back to release

55:31 him.

55:32 >> [laughter]

55:32 >> Like one day he's on the pack out, he

55:33 has to get on a bus, and he's thinking,

55:34 "I'm going home." No, you've been

55:36 re-indicted. Right. Well, my former fed

55:38 colleagues went out and arrested Timothy

55:40 Germaine Pate charging him with 15

55:43 counts of filing retaliatory liens

55:45 against federal officials and five

55:47 counts of making false bankruptcy

55:49 declarations.

55:51 This guy's a menace. Yeah.

55:53 Uh

55:54 no [snorts] economic loss though other

55:56 than the red tape and the and the

55:57 nightmare that he causes these federal

55:59 officials to try to get these liens

56:00 released from their properties.

56:02 How much time you going to give Tim

56:04 Pate?

56:05 Did he plead guilty? Um

56:07 >> know.

56:10 >> [snorts]

56:11 >> No, he went to trial, represented

56:13 himself,

56:14 and lost.

56:16 I'm going to go with like 8 years. No,

56:18 let's go 7 years.

56:20 What is that? 84 months? 84 months.

56:22 Okay.

56:24 84 months is your guess? There's no

56:25 dollar loss. And I but I see him racking

56:28 up the enhance enhancement after

56:30 enhancement for all the just the

56:31 insanity that he's in the problems he's

56:33 causing. Yeah, he caused a lot of

56:35 problems to a lot of people in positions

56:37 of power and and they didn't take nicely

56:40 to it.

56:41 And so you said 8 years?

56:42 >> Yeah. No, I said 84 months. That's 70

56:45 That's 7 years, right?

56:46 >> 7 years, okay. Yeah, in that

56:47 neighborhood. He actually received the

56:50 longest federal sentence ever handed out

56:54 for a retaliatory lien

56:56 case, 25 years. Oh my god. Can you

57:00 imagine? I can't I I I mean

57:04 He made a nuisance of himself and the

57:06 courts I think wanted to send a

57:07 statement.

57:08 Yeah, he's [snorts] he's probably still

57:10 causing them problems inside.

57:11 >> Oh, I'm sure. These guys love to file

57:13 and stuff. So, you and I both do

57:16 business with HomeTitleLock, and they

57:18 have a service that they provide which

57:20 will monitor your home title. They'll

57:23 notify you if something changes on your

57:26 home title, if a lien gets filed, or

57:28 someone files a deed to transfer

57:29 ownership, and then they'll cover all

57:32 the costs and expenses associated with

57:34 restoring your home back into your good

57:36 name.

57:37 >> Right. I think there's an opportunity

57:38 for them to not only sell this to people

57:41 who are trying to protect their home

57:42 title, which for most people and the

57:43 equity in their homes, which for most

57:44 people is the largest asset they own,

57:46 but to sell this service, HomeTitleLock

57:48 service, this monitoring service to law

57:50 enforcement officers, government

57:52 officials, IRS agents, judges,

57:54 prosecutors, lawyers, because when these

57:56 liens get filed, it is a nightmare. It

57:59 varies from county to county, but it's

58:00 really tough to get it released from

58:02 you. So, I think it's an untapped market

58:04 for HomeTitleLock. And uh

58:06 and I'd love to encourage them to kind

58:07 of try to sell to those people as well

58:09 because that's who I that

58:11 you know. Have you ever had anything

58:12 filed against you?

58:13 >> I have not, and it's been nothing short

58:14 of a miracle cuz I've investigated so

58:16 many sovereign citizens. But I know

58:17 people who have, and it's it's a it's a

58:19 pain in the neck, and it's scary, you

58:20 know? It's like this is the house that

58:22 you and your family live in, and now

58:24 it's got a lien on it, and so you can't

58:25 go out and get yourself a home equity

58:27 line of credit. If you transfer And

58:29 sometimes you won't even know there's a

58:30 lien on it.

58:30 >> Yeah, or you go to sell sell the house,

58:32 and suddenly it shows up. You didn't

58:33 even know it was there. Right, you go to

58:34 the title company, and it's all gummed

58:35 up. And so

58:37 yeah, people I need to monitor the

58:39 titles in their homes for against liens

58:41 as well as title transfers. That's I

58:42 guess that's my point. Either do it

58:44 yourself or hire a company like

58:45 HomeTitleLock to do it because it's I've

58:47 talked to people who've had this done to

58:49 them, and it's a nightmare. Personal

58:50 question for you, Matt Cox. Yes, sir.

58:52 When you went through your legal

58:53 troubles,

58:54 did your family kind of stand by you and

58:56 go to court with you? And did you have

58:57 like family in the courtroom you know,

58:59 as you were kind of going through the

59:00 court process to kind of I don't know,

59:03 be supportive or send a message to the

59:04 courts that you

59:06 aren't alone? Uh yeah, my my my yes.

59:09 Yes. Guys are yes. Good. Yeah, cuz I see

59:11 that a lot. And sometimes I see people

59:12 who don't have family there in the

59:13 courtroom, and it just feels sad to me.

59:15 Like a

59:16 white-collar crime case that I'll

59:17 investigate, and you know, someone

59:19 embezzles, you know, half million bucks

59:21 or whatever. That was a very typical

59:22 case for me. And just kind of going

59:23 through that whole court process knowing

59:26 that they have a husband, a father, a

59:27 mother, and there's just no one there

59:28 for them in court. It always sort of

59:30 bummed me out. And like, you know,

59:32 did they ask their families not to come?

59:33 Are they embarrassed? Is the Have the

59:35 families forsaken them? It's It was just

59:37 interesting to me cuz I never really get

59:38 to find out once they have an attorney.

59:40 It's not like I can call them up or

59:41 anything like that, but I just thought

59:43 it was sad.

59:44 So, there was a guy in Chicago

59:47 um named Davon Phillips. He was

59:49 investigated and prosecuted in Chicago

59:52 with trafficking um we'll we'll say

59:54 narcotics. Okay.

59:55 >> Um the one that begins with C, which we

59:57 probably can't say on YouTube. Um

1:00:00 Wow. They blow up. powder Yeah,

1:00:03 what powder? Yeah.

1:00:05 But the story is really about his

1:00:06 sister, Sharon Phillips. And uh

1:00:09 she was kind of infected with this

1:00:11 sovereign citizen mind virus um and so

1:00:14 she also adopted the name River Tally

1:00:17 Bay, B E Y.

1:00:19 But she's in this case sitting through

1:00:22 her brother's trial. Right? Kind of

1:00:24 being there for him on his drug case.

1:00:27 Kind of being that that that comfortable

1:00:29 face in the audience for him.

1:00:31 Um but she was seething with anger the

1:00:34 whole time because she doesn't believe

1:00:36 the courts have any jurisdiction over

1:00:37 her brother. Right?

1:00:40 I If she's a Moorish sovereign citizen,

1:00:42 by extension, he's also a Moor, right?

1:00:45 And so she begins filing crazy [snorts]

1:00:48 legal briefs with the US District Court

1:00:50 in Chicago where I used to live

1:00:52 explaining to the courts again, she's

1:00:54 not even the defendant. She's just some

1:00:56 the defendant's sister explaining to the

1:00:57 courts how the US government has no

1:00:59 jurisdiction over her little brother

1:01:01 because he's a sovereign citizen.

1:01:03 Okay. Right? And um

1:01:06 there's no indication that her brother,

1:01:07 Davon, was a fan of any of this hogwash.

1:01:10 Right? He's not like He's not co-signing

1:01:12 any of this stuff.

1:01:14 And so eventually, she became such a

1:01:16 nuisance, she gets banned from the

1:01:18 courthouse.

1:01:19 You know, court's open to the public,

1:01:21 but not to you right

1:01:23 um Sharon.

1:01:24 You still have to be well-behaved.

1:01:26 >> Right. Do you think that made Sharon

1:01:26 happy or sad? I don't think that

1:01:28 Sharon's putting up with any of this.

1:01:30 Sharon was furious, Matt Cox. Um her

1:01:34 brother was found guilty and sentenced

1:01:35 to 6 years in prison.

1:01:37 And Sharon snapped.

1:01:39 And then she began filing liens against

1:01:42 the homes of the US attorney, friend of

1:01:44 mine, the federal case agent, someone I

1:01:47 probably know,

1:01:48 uh the federal court clerk, four federal

1:01:51 judges in Chicago who were directly or

1:01:53 peripherally involved in her brother's

1:01:55 case.

1:01:56 When you file a lien, you need to put a

1:01:58 value of that lien down when you're you

1:02:00 know, tying up someone's house with this

1:02:01 nonsense. And the value of the liens was

1:02:04 collectively $100 billion.

1:02:07 Makes sense.

1:02:08 >> Yeah. So, the FBI opens a case on

1:02:10 Sharon, uh does a search warrant of her

1:02:13 home, and finds copies of the lien

1:02:14 paperwork that she played that she

1:02:16 filed.

1:02:17 And then she writes apology letters to

1:02:19 all the people she filed liens on saying

1:02:21 that she was sorry and she made a

1:02:23 serious mistake.

1:02:24 >> [laughter]

1:02:26 >> I'm so sorry, US attorney.

1:02:27 >> My bad.

1:02:29 But all of these these public officials

1:02:31 need to go through the expense and red

1:02:33 tape of getting these liens removed by

1:02:35 the county. And um

1:02:37 and of course Sharon gets charged with

1:02:39 filing retaliatory liens.

1:02:41 Uh she goes to trial. Uh to her credit,

1:02:43 she had two attorneys.

1:02:45 And they had to move the venue of the

1:02:47 case to southern Illinois because she

1:02:50 had

1:02:50 >> filed so many liens and stuff.

1:02:52 >> no, there wasn't a judge left or you

1:02:54 know, the the the clerk works for the

1:02:55 courts. Ev- everybody involved in the

1:02:57 case in Chicago in the court system

1:03:00 either it was a victim or was one degree

1:03:03 of separation away from the victim.

1:03:05 So, she goes down uh she goes to She

1:03:09 actually has an attorney to her credit.

1:03:11 Um

1:03:12 jury finds her guilty of filing

1:03:14 retaliatory liens. I know you will find

1:03:15 that But she didn't plead guilty. She

1:03:17 actually went to trial.

1:03:18 >> to trial. She wrote the letters. She

1:03:20 already admitted it.

1:03:23 >> That's what we call a confession in my

1:03:24 business.

1:03:26 Um at the sentencing, her lawyer is

1:03:28 saying, "Just give her probation."

1:03:31 They is saying He's saying, "The case

1:03:32 against my client is absurd. It's akin

1:03:35 to someone trying to pass Monopoly money

1:03:38 and then being charged with

1:03:39 counterfeiting." That was the defense's

1:03:41 argument. That That's That's poor

1:03:43 argument because you know, these people

1:03:45 are their their titles are still screwed

1:03:46 up.

1:03:47 >> what the government said. The government

1:03:48 got in there and said, "This isn't This

1:03:49 isn't nothing. This is paper terrorism."

1:03:52 Those are the words they used.

1:03:53 >> Yeah.

1:03:54 I don't know which way the judge or I do

1:03:55 know which way the judge saw it. You

1:03:57 don't know which way the judge saw it.

1:03:59 How much is the judge going to sentence

1:04:01 this lady to for filing a hundred

1:04:04 billion dollars in liens

1:04:07 >> [laughter]

1:04:08 >> against against these these hard-working

1:04:11 public servants? Yeah, I don't think the

1:04:13 I don't think the hundred billion

1:04:14 changes anything. You don't look at the

1:04:15 federal guidelines to get the hundred

1:04:17 billion dollars.

1:04:19 Um [snorts] but but I would say

1:04:25 she went to trial. Mhm.

1:04:27 I I I'd say uh 60

1:04:29 >> they call it.

1:04:30 60 months. 60 months? That's 5 years,

1:04:33 Matt Cox. 60 months.

1:04:34 >> the last guy got 25 years.

1:04:36 >> but but that that doesn't throw you off

1:04:39 the scent.

1:04:39 >> No, I think she's just she was

1:04:42 She did go to trial. What an idiot. Uh

1:04:46 60 months. 60 months? That's 5 years.

1:04:49 >> 72 months. I'm going 72 months.

1:04:52 72 months.

1:04:54 >> 72 months is 6 years.

1:04:55 >> Yeah.

1:04:56 Okay.

1:04:57 Are we sticking with that? Yes. Well,

1:04:59 again, I mean, I'm just asking cuz you

1:05:01 were at 5 months and it took nothing to

1:05:03 get you off into 6 months.

1:05:05 And so I If we sit around, maybe you'll

1:05:07 get it up to 25 years.

1:05:09 >> I was at 5 years again.

1:05:10 6 Yeah, I think 6 years. 6 years? You

1:05:12 want to hold steady with that? Yes. All

1:05:14 right. The correct answer, her sentence

1:05:17 in US District Court was 7 years. Oh!

1:05:21 Is that within 20%?

1:05:22 >> It's got to be. 7 * .8 is 5.6. You got

1:05:28 it. You're good. You're good.

1:05:30 >> [sighs]

1:05:30 >> Aren't you glad I nudged you up? You

1:05:32 didn't. You were trying to get me to go

1:05:33 to like 20 years or something. You're

1:05:35 not helping me.

1:05:35 >> at five You were at five. I knew that

1:05:37 was going to be a disaster and was going

1:05:38 to hurt your self-esteem.

1:05:40 It was uh [snorts] I asked you if you

1:05:42 were sure and you went up to six and

1:05:43 then you won it. I'm on team Matt Cox.

1:05:46 >> Not true.

1:05:49 I'm here for you.

1:05:49 >> trust the government.

1:05:50 >> I'm here. I'm not the government.

1:05:52 >> So, did Chris Morero

1:05:54 did he go to trial? Sorry. Did Chris

1:05:56 Morero go to trial, the sovereign

1:05:58 citizen? Chris Morero went to trial.

1:06:01 Chris Morero

1:06:03 worked for a guy that they were filing

1:06:06 some kind of tax

1:06:08 Like they were saying like if you have a

1:06:09 mortgage, it creates some kind of a

1:06:11 document, which I'm sure you've heard

1:06:13 this this ridiculousness.

1:06:14 That that

1:06:15 creates something that you can now file

1:06:18 on your taxes and get a a refund.

1:06:21 So, these guys are going

1:06:23 they're calling people and saying,

1:06:25 "Look, I can file an not an extension,

1:06:28 but I can I I can file this uh

1:06:32 I forget what they called it, but

1:06:34 they could file something and they could

1:06:35 get you a refund from the government and

1:06:37 and so they were people were saying,

1:06:39 "Okay." And they'd get them these

1:06:40 refunds because

1:06:42 typically the IRS just cuts a check.

1:06:44 They don't really do much. Like if you

1:06:45 if you file taxes and most of it checks

1:06:48 out and you say, "Hey, you owe me

1:06:49 $12,000."

1:06:50 >> of people make a lot of money filing

1:06:51 false tax returns. Correct. So, they're

1:06:54 getting these $40,000 tax returns,

1:06:56 $80,000, $100,000, $10,000. And they're

1:07:00 supposed to get like 20% of it or

1:07:01 something.

1:07:03 And some of these people are cutting

1:07:04 them checks. Well, one of these guys And

1:07:06 this is it's basically a phone room.

1:07:07 They're just calling people and getting

1:07:09 them to do this. And Morero was supposed

1:07:11 to be getting checks.

1:07:13 Uh or supposed to be getting uh a

1:07:15 portion of the refunds and they got some

1:07:17 refunds.

1:07:18 One of the guys got like $200,000

1:07:21 knowing like he he talked to these guys

1:07:23 and he gets a check from the IRS saying,

1:07:25 "Here's your $250,000 refund."

1:07:27 And he immediately says something's got

1:07:28 to be wrong with this. Like, "Well, what

1:07:30 did you sign all the paperwork for?"

1:07:32 But he got the 250 and then I think he

1:07:35 contacted the IRS said, "This is what

1:07:37 these guys have done." That started an

1:07:39 investigation. Morero was furious cuz he

1:07:42 never made any money. But the guys that

1:07:43 were running the operation

1:07:45 all got indicted including Morero.

1:07:48 They went to trial.

1:07:49 We're talking about like a 6-week trial.

1:07:51 It was ridiculous. They're all standing

1:07:52 up talking about the flag the fringe on

1:07:54 the flag and maritime [snorts] law and

1:07:57 sovereign citizenship.

1:08:00 Morero's name is mentioned like three

1:08:02 times the entire time.

1:08:04 Cuz he simply just one of the guys that

1:08:06 called made the just got the the initial

1:08:07 call.

1:08:09 He got 17 years. Yeah. I mean, the

1:08:10 courts do not mess around with these

1:08:12 people. They they do not they

1:08:14 you know. What How does he feel now? Now

1:08:17 that he's out, does has he changed his

1:08:19 worldview or is he just

1:08:21 No, no. He he

1:08:23 absolutely

1:08:25 uh believes in the sovereign citizen

1:08:27 sovereign citizenship.

1:08:30 But that the uh

1:08:31 he's just trying to get his black card.

1:08:33 And he's filing paperwork. He's still

1:08:36 all in. And uh he's one of these guys

1:08:39 that I'm like and he's telling me how

1:08:40 money doesn't mean anything. It's a

1:08:42 cult. And then I I'll say, "Well, what

1:08:43 are you paying your

1:08:45 what are you paying your rent in?" Mhm.

1:08:47 Well, I mean, I obviously I use I use

1:08:48 money. Okay. Um you know, but you know,

1:08:50 you you they can't do this. Well, you

1:08:51 just did like 12 years. Mhm.

1:08:54 >> You did 12 years

1:08:56 for something you're telling me that

1:08:57 they can't do. Like this this is You

1:08:59 know, it don't I mean, don't tell

1:09:00 themselves to the grave that the

1:09:01 government got it wrong when they locked

1:09:02 him up. And what's really funny about

1:09:04 that whole thing is that if

1:09:07 I mean, if you really listen to what

1:09:08 they're saying,

1:09:10 you never have to pay in taxes. There's

1:09:13 an inexhaustible money machine out there

1:09:16 that everybody should be able to buy

1:09:17 whatever they want. Like well, who would

1:09:19 work? Like that the whole system would

1:09:20 collapse if you're correct.

1:09:21 >> Yeah. They're even partially correct.

1:09:24 The entire system would would collapse.

1:09:26 Mhm. And in their minds, they're like,

1:09:27 "No, no, you don't understand.

1:09:29 They could just keep giving you money."

1:09:31 And you're like, "What do you You

1:09:33 obviously don't know how the

1:09:34 economy works. Like, it doesn't make

1:09:36 sense." But common law. Yeah, it's it's

1:09:39 >> Yeah. They they desperately want to It's

1:09:41 a leaderless cult. It's a you know, it's

1:09:44 like an urban legend that they buy into

1:09:46 and and it really is like a mind virus.

1:09:48 Again, I've talked to so many of these

1:09:49 people and it's not even worth trying to

1:09:51 deprogram them.

1:09:53 >> No, they're they're They'll run circles

1:09:54 around you with like quoting different

1:09:56 like weird, you know, Yeah. Well, you

1:09:57 have to understand that the Vatican has

1:09:59 to be involved. So, you get into that,

1:10:00 too.

1:10:01 >> It's insane. And what's so funny with

1:10:02 Chris is he is tied in it's almost every

1:10:05 conspiracy out there he's tied into

1:10:07 this. If you're all from from aliens

1:10:10 running the entire world to Jesus

1:10:12 uh uh you know, being the savior to it's

1:10:15 like, "Okay, how do you believe you

1:10:17 believe

1:10:18 Christianity and you believe in the

1:10:20 Anunnaki and you believe and like it's

1:10:22 it's just it's it's It's an all you can

1:10:24 eat buffet. for a good podcast.

1:10:27 >> It does. He's he's very entertaining.

1:10:28 The funniest thing about him

1:10:31 is unlike other sovereign citizens will

1:10:33 get upset and frustrated with you cuz

1:10:35 you don't you're not believing him.

1:10:38 He's jovial. He laughs about it. He

1:10:41 knows you think he's crazy. He knows so

1:10:43 he's funny about the whole thing.

1:10:44 >> Well, I think at some point they have to

1:10:45 make peace with that themselves.

1:10:47 So,

1:10:47 >> [laughter]

1:10:48 >> he's so much fun to talk to. Good.

1:10:50 Let's talk about another guy

1:10:52 uh a guy he's not actually not a

1:10:54 sovereign citizen.

1:10:55 Uh his name is David Goldsmith.

1:10:58 Uh in lives in a lived in Alaska.

1:11:01 But in 2003, he decided to adopt the

1:11:04 mountain man lifestyle.

1:11:07 Cool.

1:11:07 >> Goldsmith changed his name legally

1:11:10 to Trapper Kills Many.

1:11:15 First name Trapper, last name Kills

1:11:17 Many.

1:11:19 What's the TV show with the guy with the

1:11:21 beard and he's got like Grizzly Adams?

1:11:23 Grizzly Adams, yeah. He's a modern-day

1:11:24 Grizzly Adams.

1:11:26 Anyway, Trapper Kills Many had many

1:11:29 grievances with the government mostly

1:11:30 relating to social security that he felt

1:11:33 he was entitled to even though he was in

1:11:35 his 50s. Like, maybe he had a disability

1:11:36 or something like that. But he believed

1:11:37 that

1:11:38 and that um that they owed him a lot of

1:11:41 money in social security. And so he

1:11:42 begins and he's just frustrated because

1:11:44 the government doesn't see it that way.

1:11:46 They're not willing to give him uh

1:11:49 you know, 50 you know, all the money

1:11:50 that he wants when he's in his 50s.

1:11:52 So, he ends up filing liens claiming

1:11:55 against seven federal employees and um

1:11:58 and people with state state agencies and

1:12:01 people with the Social Security

1:12:02 Administration. I guess it was seven

1:12:03 employees in uh state, local, and uh

1:12:06 Social Security.

1:12:07 Uh for $950 million total. Um saying

1:12:11 that he was entitled to their assets

1:12:12 including their homes. You know, gummed

1:12:14 up their title on [snorts] their homes.

1:12:16 Um now again, as we discussed, the state

1:12:19 uh in this case Alaska is not in the

1:12:21 business of interpreting the legality of

1:12:23 these liens. Right. So, you can place

1:12:25 these liens on the property and there's

1:12:27 no one in the county clerk's office

1:12:29 who's going to stop you. Anyone can file

1:12:31 the public documents for $20. And now

1:12:34 later the debtor

1:12:36 can dispute the claim in a separate

1:12:37 filing, but they're bearing the legal

1:12:39 expenses of that unless you have like a

1:12:40 home title lock or something like that

1:12:41 to do it for you. So, the liens go on

1:12:43 the books

1:12:45 and for these public officials they have

1:12:47 to undo.

1:12:48 Now,

1:12:49 the US Department of Justice I think

1:12:51 showed some great restraint here, but

1:12:53 they got they were tired of his [ __ ]

1:12:55 And they sue him civilly, not

1:12:58 criminally, for filing false and

1:13:00 fraudulent financing documents designed

1:13:02 to harass, intimidate, annoy, punish,

1:13:04 and retaliate.

1:13:06 The courts rule against him against

1:13:08 Trapper Kills Many and basically getting

1:13:12 laying a restraining order on him

1:13:14 banning him from the courthouse. That

1:13:15 that's how they're going to do it. You

1:13:17 can't set foot inside the courthouse to

1:13:19 file these liens anymore. He violates

1:13:22 that restraining order. He goes into the

1:13:23 courthouse and they and so they get a

1:13:24 warrant for him for um

1:13:27 a state warrant for violating the

1:13:30 restraining order. Make sense? Right.

1:13:32 Okay. Do you have living with the bears

1:13:34 they can't find him or something?

1:13:35 >> to his cabin or house or whatever he's

1:13:37 living and he confronts the troopers and

1:13:39 he has a shotgun at his door.

1:13:42 He's eventually subdued and

1:13:45 and they they arrest him and he says,

1:13:48 "Listen, I never brandished the shotgun.

1:13:49 It was just there. I'm Trapper Kills

1:13:51 Many. I got shotguns everywhere. That's

1:13:52 that's my jam."

1:13:53 And but ultimately they he pleads guilty

1:13:56 to third-degree assault

1:13:59 and they had more serious charges like

1:14:01 attempted murder that they dropped. They

1:14:03 were probably a little trumped up on

1:14:04 >> Yeah.

1:14:05 After that conviction, he's like, "Maybe

1:14:08 Alaska is not for me."

1:14:09 So, he moves to New Mexico.

1:14:11 But then he starts it up again. He files

1:14:13 a $20 million lien in New Mexico naming

1:14:16 several individuals including Social

1:14:18 Security employees alleging that they

1:14:21 owed him money. Okay? Just again,

1:14:23 retaliatory lien after retaliatory lien

1:14:25 against these

1:14:26 low-level clerks at the Social Security

1:14:29 Administration who are rejecting his

1:14:30 claim that he is owed all this money.

1:14:33 And finally, the FBI steps in and

1:14:36 charges him federally with uh with

1:14:39 retaliat with false claims and

1:14:40 retaliatory liens.

1:14:42 And Trapper Kills Many pleads guilty.

1:14:46 So, he has all these incidents of this

1:14:49 and he continues to you know, harass

1:14:51 everybody and he had this weird kind of

1:14:54 confrontation with the Alaska State

1:14:56 Troopers that was an outgrowth of this.

1:14:59 But it all culminates in a sentencing

1:15:01 hearing. How much time do you give

1:15:03 Trapper Kills Many?

1:15:05 Do we know if he has a We know he's got

1:15:07 a history of this, but do we know if he

1:15:08 has a criminal record? I don't think he

1:15:10 has much of a criminal record other than

1:15:12 that that weird fight dispute that ended

1:15:16 up being a third-degree assault against

1:15:17 the Alaskan State Troopers who came to

1:15:19 his house to arrest him.

1:15:21 >> [snorts]

1:15:21 >> That's my impression at least. Um

1:15:27 There's no dollar loss. Well, there

1:15:28 might be. Well, I mean again, there's a

1:15:29 $950 million worth of liens, but that

1:15:32 doesn't really

1:15:33 >> really

1:15:34 That's hypothetical numbers. Just where

1:15:35 does he Where's he going to put his

1:15:36 decimal place?

1:15:37 Um

1:15:39 Let's see.

1:15:41 He pleads guilty. He probably played

1:15:42 guilty to 5 years. I'd say he's

1:15:45 60 months. 60 months for filing all

1:15:48 these false liens, being told to knock

1:15:49 it off, moving to another state, doing

1:15:51 it again,

1:15:53 retaliating against government

1:15:54 employees. Do you think that 5 years

1:15:55 that sounds right to you?

1:15:59 I mean, he's a mountain man, so they

1:16:00 kind of live by their own rules.

1:16:03 96 months.

1:16:05 That's what I'm going with. 96 months.

1:16:07 96 months?

1:16:09 That's an astronomical amount of time,

1:16:11 man. Oh, um will you stop?

1:16:13 >> [laughter]

1:16:15 >> I've already decided I'm losing this

1:16:16 whole thing, so Oh, really? That's the

1:16:18 spirit.

1:16:19 >> [laughter]

1:16:19 >> I don't know. There's no dollar amount.

1:16:22 There's no

1:16:22 >> Yeah.

1:16:25 This is purely a paper caper.

1:16:29 72 months. We're at 72 now. We're at 72.

1:16:32 How many years is 72 months? It's it's 6

1:16:34 years. 6 years? Yeah, I guess it is,

1:16:36 isn't it?

1:16:38 We're sticking with that? Yes. All

1:16:40 right. Well, I don't want to belabor

1:16:41 this.

1:16:42 The uh the federal sentence that Trapper

1:16:45 Kills Many had to do was 27 months.

1:16:49 >> [sighs and gasps]

1:16:51 >> I was off anyway. That's okay. So,

1:16:53 tw-

1:16:55 That's the thing is because there's it

1:16:57 doesn't fit neatly [snorts] into a

1:16:58 sentencing guidelines, it's really how

1:16:59 irritated is the judge.

1:17:01 And if I'm skeptical, I would say that

1:17:04 um

1:17:05 that when you file liens against judges

1:17:09 that that they take it up maybe a little

1:17:10 more seriously than filing liens against

1:17:12 the clerk at the Social Security

1:17:13 Administration. I

1:17:14 I'm just saying that a judge can have

1:17:16 implicit bias like that and evidently

1:17:18 they did.

1:17:20 What do you mean they didn't at all?

1:17:21 That barely he barely got any time at

1:17:23 all. I'm saying the judge gave him a

1:17:24 break for not messing [clears throat]

1:17:25 with the judges. Yeah. Yeah.

1:17:28 Okay.

1:17:29 >> [snorts]

1:17:29 >> You good for the next one? Yeah. All

1:17:31 right. Um

1:17:33 For the sake of your audience, What's a

1:17:34 HELOC?

1:17:35 >> what? I don't even really know to be

1:17:36 honest. I don't really even know

1:17:39 what these are. I I haven't seen

1:17:42 what I I'm not sure I haven't seen what

1:17:45 the sentences are. You keep the paper

1:17:47 folded over. We don't know if I'm really

1:17:49 close or not. 27 months. Okay, fine.

1:17:53 I have no interest in you not doing

1:17:56 well. I want your show to do well. I

1:17:57 want you to do well personally. I want

1:17:58 your self-esteem to go up. I'm I'm here

1:18:00 for you in this thing.

1:18:02 Not playing against you.

1:18:05 Explain to your audience what a HELOC

1:18:07 is. A home equity line of credit is like

1:18:09 a large credit card that is attached to

1:18:11 the equity in your house. Yeah. Yeah.

1:18:14 Perfect. You said it better than I ever

1:18:15 could.

1:18:16 You ever heard of something called a

1:18:17 shotgunning scheme? I I know it well. I

1:18:21 am feel like I'm one of the uh

1:18:24 founders of the shotgunning. Okay, good.

1:18:26 Well, this is a story about a

1:18:27 shotgunning scheme. Okay? A crime you

1:18:29 know a thing or two about, but we'll get

1:18:30 your audience up to speed.

1:18:32 Um

1:18:34 We have three jokers in this story, but

1:18:36 only two of which have [snorts] been

1:18:37 sentenced at this point. So, um

1:18:40 The Yorse Yotagri

1:18:43 I did a I did a Chad GPT search. I think

1:18:46 these people are of Colombian history.

1:18:49 Um

1:18:50 uh Colombian ancestry. I don't know

1:18:52 [snorts]

1:18:52 if they're US citizens or what. He lived

1:18:55 in a property in Freeport, New York.

1:18:57 And he was recruited into a scheme a

1:19:00 shotgunning scheme by a real estate

1:19:03 broker named Simon in the Bronx. Okay?

1:19:06 And so Yorse was convinced to use a

1:19:08 quick claim deed to make his buddy Jose,

1:19:11 these are our three characters, a

1:19:12 co-owner of his property.

1:19:15 Okay. Okay. So, Simon's the brains

1:19:17 behind the operation.

1:19:19 Um Yorse owns a property and he recruits

1:19:22 Jose into um to basically a quick claim

1:19:25 deed over Yohannes' own property

1:19:28 to Jose.

1:19:29 They go out and get a home $290,000 home

1:19:32 [snorts] equity line of credit on the

1:19:34 property in Jose's name cuz he's now the

1:19:36 owner of the property from the first

1:19:38 bank and they just split that money.

1:19:41 They don't make any payments on the

1:19:41 loan. Okay. Okay.

1:19:43 4 months later they create fake

1:19:45 documents

1:19:47 uh saying notifying the clerk of courts

1:19:50 that the HELOC is paid off like a

1:19:52 satisfaction [snorts] of mortgage for a

1:19:53 HELOC. Okay.

1:19:54 >> Okay. And then they go out and get a

1:19:56 second $250,000 HELOC on that property

1:19:59 from a new bank splitting the money

1:20:01 again.

1:20:02 And then the you we said that HELOCs

1:20:05 work like a credit card. It certainly

1:20:07 works as a line of credit but often what

1:20:08 you're doing is you're writing checks

1:20:10 against against it. Somehow and I don't

1:20:12 understand how this happened the bank

1:20:14 allows them to go overdrawn on their

1:20:16 HELOC $290,000.

1:20:19 >> Wow, okay. Right? So they get again just

1:20:23 to get do the math here. It's where 290

1:20:25 appear they get $290,000 HELOC then they

1:20:28 get a $250,000 HELOC and then they draw

1:20:30 an additional 290 on that second HELOC.

1:20:33 Okay. So the numbers are adding up. The

1:20:36 real estate itself does not have

1:20:38 sufficient equity to cover these loans,

1:20:40 right? So foreclosing it's but the banks

1:20:42 foreclose on the properties anyway.

1:20:45 So the banks then sell the property on a

1:20:47 foreclosure sale and all that. The

1:20:51 net loss to the bank including accrued

1:20:54 interest is $580,000.

1:20:57 Okay.

1:20:58 >> Okay. So that which is the FBI

1:21:00 investigates this thing along with the

1:21:02 US Federal Housing Finance Agency Office

1:21:05 of the Inspector General.

1:21:06 Um it's also important to know if I for

1:21:09 context that these three guys were much

1:21:12 part of a much larger shotgunning scheme

1:21:15 with $3.5 million

1:21:17 in fraudulent HELOCs in New Jersey and

1:21:19 New York all orchestrated by the Simon

1:21:21 character

1:21:22 but they but the two transactions that I

1:21:25 just told you about were the only ones

1:21:27 that they ended up pleading guilty to.

1:21:30 Okay. What happened with the other ones?

1:21:32 I think the evidence just it wasn't

1:21:33 there for the evidence just wasn't as

1:21:35 clear

1:21:37 for whatever reason.

1:21:38 >> This was the strongest case they brought

1:21:39 forth. And and and my guess is that it

1:21:42 probably had to do with the plea

1:21:42 negotiations cuz

1:21:44 uh all three of these guys pled guilty.

1:21:46 Okay.

1:21:47 >> Okay. And so you know sometimes during

1:21:49 the plea negotiations you say all right

1:21:51 we're going to focus on these

1:21:52 transactions the ones that the evidence

1:21:54 the best

1:21:54 that has the best evidence. We're going

1:21:56 to walk away from the other ones. You

1:21:58 want to [snorts] go to you want to take

1:21:59 it to trial we're going to supersede the

1:22:00 indictment and charge you with the whole

1:22:01 nine yards.

1:22:03 Um

1:22:04 so

1:22:05 we have Simon who pled guilty to

1:22:07 orchestrating and sharing the proceeds

1:22:10 and then we have Yohannes who was kind

1:22:11 of one of the stooges involved with kind

1:22:13 of making all this happen and Jose who

1:22:15 has not been sentenced yet so we're

1:22:16 going to leave Jose aside.

1:22:18 Uh I want to know from you how much time

1:22:20 is Simon the ringleader getting for the

1:22:22 shotgun planning or and then how much

1:22:24 time is Yohannes getting for um for his

1:22:27 part in this game?

1:22:31 I would say Simon's probably getting

1:22:35 4 years. Yohannes is probably getting 36

1:22:38 months. So 36 months and 4 years and 3

1:22:40 years respectively? Yeah. 4 years to the

1:22:42 ringleader Yes. 3 years to the um the

1:22:45 stooge. Again I want to

1:22:47 underscore with you that the economic

1:22:49 loss in this case is only the $580,000

1:22:53 the net loss after they received the

1:22:55 proceeds from the foreclosure sale.

1:22:57 Right but I think there's sophisticated

1:22:58 means. I think there's there's some

1:23:00 enhancements there.

1:23:02 Uh there's he's in charge of

1:23:04 he's the ringleader there's he's in

1:23:05 charge of multiple people. I I think

1:23:07 that's All right now I just want to make

1:23:08 sure you were going into your guess with

1:23:09 your eyes wide open.

1:23:11 >> [snorts]

1:23:13 >> Yes I am. And do you want to stay with

1:23:15 those?

1:23:15 >> Yes. Be what you said [snorts] 4 years

1:23:17 and 3 years respectively? Okay.

1:23:20 >> Well I did my best. The correct answers

1:23:22 are 2 years and 1 year. Oh come on. I

1:23:25 tried Half a million dollars I'd I'll do

1:23:27 a year for half a million most people

1:23:29 will

1:23:30 >> [snorts]

1:23:30 >> You may you may get your chance.

1:23:34 Most of the cases we talk about on your

1:23:36 show are handled federally but this

1:23:37 one's a local prosecution. But I think

1:23:40 it it's right where it needs to be as

1:23:41 far as understanding kind of the home

1:23:43 title theft um

1:23:45 crime. But you have to like put your put

1:23:47 yourself in the eyes of a local

1:23:49 prosecutor a local judge on this one,

1:23:51 okay?

1:23:52 Uh Rosalind Johnson of Huber Heights,

1:23:55 Ohio

1:23:57 she formed a business a DBA called Love

1:24:01 Has Homes. Nice.

1:24:03 >> Isn't that nice?

1:24:03 >> It's very yeah. Isn't that nice?

1:24:06 So Roz as we'll call her she used quick

1:24:08 claim deeds to transfer ownership of

1:24:10 three properties one in Dayton, one in

1:24:13 Centerville, one in Huber Heights all

1:24:15 into her DBA Love Has Homes. These the

1:24:18 three homeowners had no idea this

1:24:20 occurred. There's just somebody some

1:24:22 regular person just

1:24:24 she just took the house and just

1:24:25 transferred the transferred the title.

1:24:27 >> She forged their signatures of the

1:24:29 homeowners and in the county clerks

1:24:32 recorded their deeds like good little

1:24:33 sheep.

1:24:34 Right? And now now [snorts] her company

1:24:37 her DBA Love Has Homes again

1:24:41 again we talked about this with Home

1:24:42 Title Lock. The homeowners have no idea

1:24:44 this even occurs until months later when

1:24:46 the foreclosure notices start arriving

1:24:47 in their mail, right?

1:24:49 >> shows up to their house and tries to

1:24:50 move in.

1:24:50 >> Right exactly. So that's why good

1:24:52 viewers you need to keep track of your

1:24:54 own home title online or hire a company

1:24:57 like Home Title Lock to do it for you at

1:24:59 pennies pennies a day because this is so

1:25:01 much money that these people have tied

1:25:03 up in their homes. Let me walk you

1:25:05 through what she does that once she has

1:25:06 the property of these homes she sells

1:25:09 them but at fire sale prices, right?

1:25:11 Because she wants to just get these

1:25:12 things off the books as fast as possible

1:25:15 and and probably not get gummed up in

1:25:17 title companies and stuff like that. So

1:25:19 the Dayton property had a market value

1:25:22 of $134,000.

1:25:24 She sells it for 35,000 bucks. Okay.

1:25:27 Right? The Centerville property uh

1:25:30 estimated value $312,000.

1:25:33 She sells it for $200,000.

1:25:36 The Huber Heights property the third in

1:25:37 the trio estimated value was 135,000.

1:25:41 She sells it for 85,000, right? These

1:25:44 three homeowners are dealing with the

1:25:46 situation where literally someone is

1:25:48 getting ready to move in their houses

1:25:50 with a moving truck believing that they

1:25:52 bought the house fair and square

1:25:54 and uh and so these poor homeowners

1:25:57 going to have to spend a fortune to try

1:25:58 to get this thing remedied uh again

1:26:01 unless they have a Home Title Lock or

1:26:02 some company that's going to do it for

1:26:03 them. The but we're really focusing on

1:26:05 Rosalind, right? So Rosalind

1:26:08 I don't know how you're going to compute

1:26:09 the sentence on this. The it's either

1:26:11 the market value that she stole of the

1:26:14 houses 133 300 plus 300 for 12 plus 135

1:26:18 or the amount of money she actually got

1:26:20 which is probably a little more like

1:26:22 Over 400 400. A little over 300. Uh

1:26:25 285 plus 35

1:26:28 315 320. Okay. Right? Um locally

1:26:31 investigated though, right? FBI didn't

1:26:33 get involved with this one. The local

1:26:35 police handled it locally prosecuted.

1:26:38 Um

1:26:38 she pled guilty actually to charges of

1:26:40 forgery, grand theft, and

1:26:42 telecommunications fraud

1:26:44 in Montgomery County, Ohio.

1:26:47 The

1:26:50 How much time do you think the local

1:26:52 judge gave her?

1:26:55 Within 20%.

1:26:56 2 years.

1:26:59 What do you think? 2 years? I think 2

1:27:00 years. You think? I think I think

1:27:02 >> I know. You I don't have to guess. I

1:27:03 think 2 years. You think 2 years? Yeah.

1:27:06 Okay. I think the local that local uh

1:27:10 judges state judges are

1:27:12 used to seeing violent crimes more so

1:27:14 than something like this and to them

1:27:17 this probably isn't that serious.

1:27:19 >> It's possible that the judges own their

1:27:20 own home and kind of realize the horror

1:27:22 that the home owners are having to face

1:27:25 by having someone buy their house

1:27:27 without their knowledge and without

1:27:29 receiving any money.

1:27:31 Do you still think it's just 2 years?

1:27:32 >> 2 years. No big deal, huh? This crime

1:27:34 just a walk in the park.

1:27:36 2 years. 2 years that's your answer?

1:27:39 >> [snorts]

1:27:40 >> All right. Well I here's I'll tell you.

1:27:42 Um and Colby can figure out how he wants

1:27:44 to compute this because local sentences

1:27:47 are weird. She was sentenced to 3 to 4

1:27:51 and 1/2 years. They have a range but

1:27:53 we'll say 3 years because it's going to

1:27:55 get you closer but I'm not so sure it

1:27:56 doesn't necessarily get you there.

1:27:57 >> make it but I mean to the the low

1:28:01 sentences the percentage the low

1:28:03 sentencing the percentages get real

1:28:06 tight. You know what I mean? You're 1

1:28:07 year off but you're not 20%.

1:28:08 >> tyranny of small numbers, yeah.

1:28:10 >> Yeah. Yeah. I give it to you. Wait what

1:28:12 do you mean you're going to give it to

1:28:12 him? He's a third off. 4 4 out of 11.

1:28:16 The answer the low end of the sentence

1:28:18 was 36 months. He guessed 24 months,

1:28:22 right? All right wasn't that your guess?

1:28:24 2 years?

1:28:24 >> Yeah 2 years 24 months, yeah.

1:28:26 The sentence was the sentence was 3 to

1:28:28 4. So he he it's a range. So his his

1:28:32 guess should be a range 2 to 3.

1:28:35 Uh I I know who I know who signs Colby's

1:28:37 paychecks. Oh.

1:28:39 You ever been to Graceland?

1:28:43 No I don't think so. Memphis, Tennessee

1:28:44 Elvis' home.

1:28:46 I have to tell you Been to Memphis. It's

1:28:48 a great tour. The Graceland tour is

1:28:50 fantastic.

1:28:51 Um we're going to tell a story about

1:28:53 Graceland.

1:28:54 We interviewed a guy who bought Elvis'

1:28:56 plane and turned it into like an RV or

1:28:58 something with the right right?

1:28:59 >> Yeah.

1:28:59 >> Yeah. Yeah I mean anything to do with

1:29:01 Elvis is ratings gold so expect this

1:29:03 you're going to be going through the

1:29:04 roof here. This woman named Lisa Janine

1:29:07 Findlay

1:29:09 and she falsely claimed that Elvis

1:29:11 Presley's daughter Lisa Marie Presley

1:29:14 who's deceased now. She was married to

1:29:15 Michael Jackson for a while. Remember

1:29:16 that?

1:29:17 >> Yeah. Weird, huh? Uh strange bedfellows.

1:29:20 Um anyway,

1:29:21 Lisa Finley is kind of confusing cuz

1:29:23 there's two Lisas. Lisa Finley claimed

1:29:25 that Lisa Presley borrowed $3.8 million.

1:29:29 Um

1:29:30 from a private lender and pledged

1:29:32 Graceland as collateral for the loan

1:29:35 before Lisa Marie Presley died in 2023,

1:29:38 right? So, none of this is true, but

1:29:40 this is what she's claiming.

1:29:42 And so,

1:29:44 um what Lisa Finley did is she

1:29:46 threatened to sell Graceland to the

1:29:48 highest bidder.

1:29:50 She's foreclosing upon Graceland

1:29:52 functionally if the Presley family

1:29:53 didn't pay $2.8 million in a settlement.

1:29:57 And so, Lisa poses as three different

1:30:00 people allegedly involved with this fake

1:30:02 lender that uh that doesn't that not

1:30:05 doesn't exist. She fabricates loan

1:30:07 documents and publishes a fraudulent

1:30:10 foreclosure notice in a Memphis

1:30:12 newspaper announcing the auction of

1:30:15 Graceland in May 2024.

1:30:19 Ballsy. Imagine the gall, right? Uh

1:30:22 um Elvis's granddaughter actually owns

1:30:24 the property right now. Her name is

1:30:25 Riley Keough. She's an actress, I guess.

1:30:28 Uh she catches wind of this and sues. A

1:30:31 judge halts the proposed auction, right?

1:30:33 That we're not going to auction off

1:30:34 Graceland, the judge says.

1:30:36 Um with an injunction. We're going to

1:30:38 pause this until we find out what's

1:30:39 going on here.

1:30:41 Lisa has a criminal history

1:30:43 uh attempting to pass bad checks.

1:30:46 And so, she begins doctoring creating

1:30:48 documents to make it look like this

1:30:51 entire scheme to steal Graceland was a

1:30:53 Nigerian identity theft scam. Like, I

1:30:55 had nothing to do with this. It was

1:30:56 Nigerians who were doing it.

1:30:58 >> Right. Like like blame the black man.

1:31:01 It's so sad.

1:31:02 >> I know.

1:31:03 The government sees right through that.

1:31:06 Lisa gets prosecuted federally for fraud

1:31:10 and identity theft relating to her

1:31:12 attempts to steal Graceland.

1:31:16 She uh pleads guilty to the fraud and

1:31:18 they drop the identity theft charge.

1:31:21 Got that? Uh-huh. Mhm. Okay. Now, the

1:31:23 defense defense argues that the

1:31:26 Presley estate did not suffer any loss

1:31:29 of money as a result of this attempt to

1:31:31 steal Graceland. Okay.

1:31:33 And uh the prosecutor's like, you still

1:31:36 can't steal Graceland.

1:31:37 >> Yeah.

1:31:38 And what I'm wondering is, what does the

1:31:39 judge say?

1:31:41 And I'm going to tell you.

1:31:42 Big hint.

1:31:43 Memphis judge. Right.

1:31:45 >> [laughter]

1:31:46 >> Memphis [clears throat] judge.

1:31:50 Um

1:31:50 >> She's trying to steal Graceland.

1:31:53 >> Yeah.

1:31:54 >> [snorts]

1:31:55 >> Um By foreclosing upon it

1:31:58 with a fake loan. And she's got a

1:32:00 criminal history. She does.

1:32:03 Passing bad checks. Uh it's not John

1:32:05 Dillinger. No, but still fraud.

1:32:07 >> a cover-up involved, right? Where

1:32:09 brazenness of it. There was a cover-up

1:32:11 where she's blaming Nigerians.

1:32:14 Who are good and honorable people.

1:32:16 Most of them.

1:32:18 Um I'm going to go with 6 years, 72

1:32:21 months.

1:32:21 >> 6 years, 72 months is your guess.

1:32:25 Wha- give me

1:32:26 I know you don't want to belabor this.

1:32:28 Give me one or two sentences about why

1:32:29 you come to that conclusion.

1:32:31 I I I I For a no loss fraud.

1:32:35 I I don't know. I was thinking I felt

1:32:36 like the fraud is the

1:32:38 two and a half million or three million

1:32:40 that she put on it. Like I feel like

1:32:42 that's where if I was doing the

1:32:43 sentencing guidelines, I'd say that's

1:32:45 what the potential loss was. Okay. Of

1:32:48 two two and a half million or whatever

1:32:49 it was, a couple million dollars, plus

1:32:52 >> [snorts]

1:32:52 >> she's cover she's not taking

1:32:54 responsibility.

1:32:55 She even though she pleads guilty,

1:32:57 she's trying to say it was somebody

1:32:58 else. She you know, there's all kinds of

1:33:00 little things that are she's filing the

1:33:02 paperwork. She's

1:33:04 got a criminal history. It's

1:33:05 sophisticated. It's it's Tell me where

1:33:08 you landed. Um

1:33:10 I what did I say? 6 years? Yeah, 6

1:33:12 years. 6 years. The correct answer

1:33:15 57 months. Come on, that's really close,

1:33:17 right? That's got to be close.

1:33:18 >> 57 * 1.

1:33:20 That's got to be 57 * 1.2.

1:33:22 68.

1:33:24 Uh which is Oh, I'm shy.

1:33:26 >> missed it. Just missed it.

1:33:27 >> Which is 5.7 5.7 years.

1:33:30 >> Yeah. Since Colby's giving it away, you

1:33:31 can give you that one, too. Stop.

1:33:35 I'm going to tell you

1:33:35 [cough and clears throat] the story of

1:33:36 Mazen El-Zoubi, Southern California boy,

1:33:39 >> [snorts]

1:33:39 >> real estate investor.

1:33:42 He fraudulently sold or attempted to

1:33:44 sell homes that did not belong to him.

1:33:47 Which is sort of the theme of our

1:33:48 episode.

1:33:48 >> Yeah, right?

1:33:49 And so, what here's what how he did it.

1:33:51 He forged deeds. Again, that's the

1:33:52 document that transfers ownership of a

1:33:54 property from one person to another.

1:33:56 That would make it appear as if the true

1:33:58 owners of a property had sold the home

1:34:00 to a sham investment company that he

1:34:03 controlled.

1:34:04 Reality, the true owners were entirely

1:34:06 unaware that he had done this.

1:34:08 >> Okay. Okay.

1:34:09 He then began to record the forged deeds

1:34:12 at the county recorder's office, make it

1:34:13 official. And what we we've talked about

1:34:15 this again and again and again, the

1:34:17 counties are not paying attention to the

1:34:19 validity of these things. They're not

1:34:20 allowed to pay attention. Their job is

1:34:21 to record the deed in the public record.

1:34:24 Um once the fraudulent documents were

1:34:26 recorded in the chain of title,

1:34:29 he would pose as the new owner.

1:34:31 Um and he had business his businesses

1:34:34 were like land investment 01 and stuff

1:34:36 like that, you know. And so,

1:34:39 he then immediately tries to sell the

1:34:40 properties

1:34:41 and working with co-conspirators

1:34:43 sometimes to set up bank accounts for

1:34:44 sham companies and whatnot. They assume

1:34:46 the identities of others in order to

1:34:48 keep the scheme going. So, there's some

1:34:49 identity theft happening here. Uh

1:34:51 setting up dummy email accounts,

1:34:53 obtaining fake driver's licenses. They

1:34:56 also forged the signatures and notary

1:34:58 stamps of real notaries to make them

1:35:00 look um make the fake documents look

1:35:02 legitimate when they filed these things.

1:35:04 And they forged the signatures of real

1:35:06 lawyers to prepare and file the

1:35:08 fraudulent court documents.

1:35:10 Um

1:35:11 and then their their goal then is to

1:35:12 sell these properties out from under

1:35:14 people. Stealing people's homes and

1:35:16 trying to sell them without the actual

1:35:18 homeowners knowing. FBI catches wind of

1:35:20 this. They send in an undercover agent

1:35:23 to pose as a prospective buyer

1:35:26 of one of these properties.

1:35:27 >> Okay. And um and El-Zoubi is pretending

1:35:30 during the conversation with the

1:35:32 undercover FBI agent to be an attorney

1:35:35 for the true owners or the sellers is

1:35:37 what he said. But it's El-Zoubi there.

1:35:39 And so,

1:35:41 the reason the FBI does undercover

1:35:42 assignments like that is to kind of just

1:35:44 lock in who the bad guys are.

1:35:46 >> Right.

1:35:46 >> I would often go undercover as a

1:35:48 prospective investor um in Ponzi

1:35:51 schemes, you know, and because I want to

1:35:53 record the sales pitch. And so, having

1:35:55 El-Zoubi there kind of trying to sell

1:35:57 someone a home that he did not

1:35:59 rightfully own, that he only owns on

1:36:01 paper due to his home title theft, was

1:36:03 fantastic evidence for the FBI. It's

1:36:06 fantastic.

1:36:07 Anyway, so he attempted to sell 15 homes

1:36:10 with more than $3.6 million collective

1:36:12 value

1:36:13 uh that never belonged to him. On 10

1:36:16 occasions, he was successful. So, he

1:36:17 successfully earned illicit proceeds of

1:36:21 $2.2

1:36:22 million in his home title theft scheme.

1:36:26 Wow. Okay. Meanwhile, the real

1:36:28 homeowners are left high and dry cuz the

1:36:30 government does not restore the home

1:36:31 back into their name. They got to they

1:36:33 got to bear the expense of lawyers and

1:36:34 stuff like that unless they have home

1:36:36 title lock or some company that's going

1:36:37 to bail them out.

1:36:38 >> Right. That's their problem.

1:36:39 >> Right. So, uh he's charged with fraud,

1:36:42 money laundering, and identity theft. He

1:36:44 pleads guilty.

1:36:47 Again, the attempted loss $3.6 million,

1:36:50 15 homes.

1:36:51 The actual loss $2.2 million.

1:36:55 How much time is the judge going to

1:36:57 sentence Mazen El-Zoubi to?

1:37:00 What do we know if he has a criminal

1:37:02 history? You know, I don't know, but I'm

1:37:04 going to assume that he has some

1:37:06 historic legal problems.

1:37:08 >> is this is extremely complicated. What

1:37:09 what he did was not that's not some guy

1:37:12 who's working at Walmart just decides to

1:37:14 come up with this Exactly. And the the

1:37:16 undercover um the judge got to view in

1:37:19 open court the undercover recording

1:37:21 where

1:37:22 >> a human action. Yeah. Yeah, yeah. Which

1:37:24 which always has an impact on the judge

1:37:25 to actually see it. So, it's not just a

1:37:27 paper caper to the judge.

1:37:29 I don't know. I still like maybe 5

1:37:31 years, 6 years.

1:37:33 5 6 years. Um

1:37:37 S-

1:37:38 Mhm.

1:37:41 72 months.

1:37:42 72 months is your guess? Yeah.

1:37:45 I have to tell you, Matt Cox.

1:37:48 Jesus. What?

1:37:50 The correct answer

1:37:51 >> Yeah. is 75 months.

1:37:53 You ended on a high note.

1:37:55 >> Yes. Well, I mean, yeah, kind of. Yeah.

1:37:57 Yeah. I lost the game, but that's fine.

1:37:59 Mhm. Well, you're feverous. You're

1:38:01 stuffed up. You're having a tough time

1:38:03 kind of making it through this episode.

1:38:04 [snorts]

1:38:05 I'm happy to carry you along for this

1:38:07 process. And uh

1:38:09 it's a good guess. Yeah. So, um

1:38:12 should we talk about Home Title Lock on

1:38:13 this episode? I mean, I mentioned them a

1:38:15 few times because they are the solution

1:38:16 to this problem, but should we kind of

1:38:18 do a

1:38:18 >> god you were here. Should we should we

1:38:20 do a conversation about what they do?

1:38:21 Does that make sense? Uh Sure. I mean,

1:38:23 they're sponsoring this episode, so we

1:38:24 should probably disclose that to your

1:38:26 your viewers.

1:38:27 Um but they're addressing a real crime

1:38:29 problem. I mean, again, I told 12

1:38:30 stories of people who are just running

1:38:32 roughshod over the transfer of homes and

1:38:36 liens on homes from one person to

1:38:37 another. And so, this isn't some

1:38:39 hypothetical crime that doesn't happen.

1:38:41 And you of all people know that because

1:38:42 you served a substantial portion of your

1:38:44 life doing this. Jesus.

1:38:47 You put it like that.

1:38:48 >> It's it's But my my point though is that

1:38:50 that that Home Title Lock is protecting

1:38:53 people from a real crime problem here,

1:38:55 right? And so, what they do is they have

1:38:57 million-dollar triple lock protection.

1:38:59 So, if you subscribe to Home Title Lock,

1:39:01 and I'm a subscriber, I own my house.

1:39:02 I'd be terrified if someone tried any of

1:39:03 this nonsense with me. They're going to

1:39:05 monitor your home 24/7. They're going to

1:39:07 notify you if anything should happen.

1:39:09 And if something should happen, they're

1:39:11 going to spend like a million dollars

1:39:13 with their US based restoration team to

1:39:16 get that home back into your name and

1:39:18 undo everything the bad guys do.

1:39:20 And it's going to make you sleep better

1:39:21 at night. Even if you never need it, you

1:39:23 like you hope you never need this,

1:39:24 right? But having it there is going to

1:39:26 make you sleep better at night the same

1:39:27 way that I sleep better at night knowing

1:39:28 that I got a smoke detector in my house

1:39:30 even though my house is unlikely to

1:39:32 spontaneously burst into flames. So,

1:39:34 that's what Home Title Lock does. I know

1:39:35 you work with them, I work with them and

1:39:36 all, they're good people and and I know

1:39:39 your viewers probably would want to at

1:39:41 least know what the product is since you

1:39:42 and I both endorse it.

1:39:44 Yeah, I think that the

1:39:47 I I'd say at least what

1:39:49 seven or eight out of these

1:39:52 crime stories that you've shown are just

1:39:54 the you know, you don't really talk

1:39:55 about the victims but these are just

1:39:56 people that are just sitting at their

1:39:58 sitting there in their Barca loungers

1:40:01 watching Netflix

1:40:03 who someone stole their house and they

1:40:04 don't even figure it out until

1:40:06 until

1:40:07 they're notified by the FBI or

1:40:08 somebody's foreclosing or they find So,

1:40:10 it's And again, I've seen this in

1:40:11 action. I mean, I've told the story here

1:40:13 in the past about the Demetrians, the

1:40:15 the fugitive couple that I failed to

1:40:16 catch who were stealing

1:40:17 who were stealing the equity from

1:40:18 people's homes that in

1:40:20 you know, and and good people lost their

1:40:22 homes as a result of this. And the

1:40:24 government are is very good at putting

1:40:26 people in orange jumpsuits in prisons.

1:40:28 They're not really good they're not

1:40:29 their job is not to restore your home

1:40:31 back into your your name if you are

1:40:35 victimized by this. That's on you and

1:40:37 lawyers aren't cheap. Yeah, it's like a

1:40:39 burglar a burglary, you know, they catch

1:40:40 the burglar and then they turn around

1:40:42 and go to

1:40:43 turn to the

1:40:44 law enforcement say, "Okay, well, what

1:40:45 about my broken door? What about all the

1:40:47 stuff that was broken in my house? And

1:40:48 what about all the stuff that was

1:40:49 stolen?"

1:40:50 >> the cop says, "I ain't a carpenter."

1:40:51 Yeah. [laughter]

1:40:53 Good luck with that.

1:40:53 >> Exactly. Exactly. So, yeah, it's the

1:40:55 same it's the same thing. Yeah. So,

1:40:57 I want to thank Home Title Lock for

1:40:59 sponsoring this episode. Something a

1:41:00 little special and different for us.

1:41:02 Usually, we kind of give a a potpourri

1:41:04 of different types of cases, but I just

1:41:05 thought this was an important enough

1:41:07 issue that I wanted to bring this to

1:41:08 your listeners. Because you and I have

1:41:09 this business relationship with Home

1:41:11 Title Lock, I thought it'd be kind of

1:41:12 cool if we could see if we can get your

1:41:14 viewers to get a deal. And so, I talked

1:41:16 to Home Title Lock and they said that

1:41:18 they'd be willing to

1:41:19 any Matt Cox viewer who wants to try out

1:41:22 Home Title Lock for 30 days, they'll

1:41:24 just pay $1 for it. I have it on my home

1:41:27 because again, I'm terrified given my

1:41:29 history of kind of going after a lot of

1:41:30 people who do this type of stuff for a

1:41:31 living. And the customer service is

1:41:33 great. It's a fantastic product. I would

1:41:35 not be associated with them if I didn't

1:41:37 think it was a good product. So, they

1:41:38 could go to the description down below.

1:41:40 Colby's going to put it in there how

1:41:41 they can get that deal. Hey you guys, I

1:41:42 appreciate you watching. Do me a favor,

1:41:44 hit the subscribe button, hit the bell

1:41:45 so you get notified of videos just like

1:41:46 this. Also, all of those links for Home

1:41:48 Title Lock are going to be in the

1:41:49 description box so you go straight to

1:41:50 the description box, click on the link,

1:41:51 it'll shoot you right to

1:41:53 their website.

1:41:55 Form's really easy. You get 30 days for

1:41:57 $1. Definitely worth it. It's definitely

1:41:59 a deal.

1:42:01 Thank you very much.

1:42:02 See you. Be cool.

📬 Never miss a Matthew Cox | Inside True Crime video — every new upload summarized in your inbox. Follow free

Summarize any YouTube video instantly

Get AI-powered summaries, timestamps, and Q&A for free.

Generate your own summary →
More summaries →