SnapSummary logo SnapSummary Try it free →
Joe Rogan Experience #2544 - Chris Williamson
PowerfulJRE · Watch on YouTube · Generated with SnapSummary · 2026-08-30

00:01 Joe Rogan podcast. Check it out.

00:04 >> The Joe Rogan Experience.

00:06 >> TRAIN BY DAY. JOE ROGAN PODCAST BY

00:08 NIGHT. All day.

00:12 >> We're up. Hey, Christopher. Good to see

00:14 you. Thank you very much for the book.

00:16 This is very cool of you. Ladies and

00:17 gentlemen, Chris just gifted me, ladies

00:19 and gentlemen, Lenny Bruce, which is a

00:21 [ __ ] amazing book.

00:22 >> [snorts]

00:23 >> And uh it's inscripted or there's

00:26 inscription inside uh to Yoko Ono who

00:29 knows well what the jazz life entails

00:33 and it's uh Albert Goldman. And you were

00:36 just telling me that Albert Goldman this

00:38 was his way of weaving into the Yokoono

00:42 John Leno John Lennon camp.

00:45 >> Exactly. Yeah. And then he goes and

00:46 writes a book that blows him up. I've

00:47 just exploded a can of Newtonic all over

00:48 my crotch as well. Jamie, have you got a

00:50 uh napkin? paper towel somewhere right

00:53 here.

00:53 >> Apologies.

00:54 >> We don't.

00:55 >> Must be gone. Might go get some.

00:56 >> That's all right. Premature. Uh, yeah.

00:58 >> We have tissues.

00:59 >> No.

01:00 >> No. All right. He says no.

01:02 >> Jamie says no. Um, yeah. So, he writes

01:06 that book and then gifts it to Yokoono.

01:08 And by giving it to her, I think is the

01:10 beginning of him working his way into

01:12 that camp. And then he goes on to write

01:13 the book The Lives of John Lennon, which

01:15 after he's dead, kind of explodes a lot

01:18 of what was going on personally, whether

01:19 it's true or not. There's a lot of drama

01:22 and fur around it, but I knew that it

01:23 was your favorite book and we were

01:24 supposed to

01:25 >> Well, thank you. That's very cool of

01:26 you. I did not know about that the that

01:29 he wrote the John Lennin book as well.

01:31 It's really interesting because the John

01:32 Lennon book it's God, it's so weird to

01:34 write a book like that after a guy's

01:36 dead and he can't respond to it.

01:38 >> Yeah.

01:38 >> Where you're accusing it what was it

01:41 ex-wives that accused him of domestic

01:43 violence?

01:44 >> Who who accused him?

01:46 >> I don't know. I think it that that whole

01:50 funeral was uh was just a mess. And

01:52 obviously when someone's dead, what are

01:53 they going to do? How they going to be

01:54 how are they going to be able to come

01:55 back from that?

01:56 >> They can't.

01:56 >> Yeah. Exactly.

01:58 >> Well, it's kind of it's just weird that

01:59 you're allowed to do that.

02:01 You know that you're allowed to say this

02:03 happened, that happened. The guy can't

02:04 say no. No. And I can prove it. Like he

02:06 can't say anything.

02:07 >> Yeah.

02:08 >> And it's also like the give peace a

02:09 chance guy. Like the give peace a chance

02:12 guy was beating his wife. boy, you know,

02:15 it's not that surprising giving like

02:18 human contradiction. You know, it's like

02:20 male feminists that turn out to be

02:21 sexual predators. There's a lot of them,

02:23 right? There's a lot of that weird stuff

02:25 going on where people pretend to be one

02:26 thing and they're actually another

02:27 thing.

02:27 >> Sneaky [ __ ]

02:28 >> Yeah, sneaky [ __ ] The give peace a

02:31 chance guy beating his wife, though.

02:32 It's like I can't believe that. I have a

02:34 really hard time believing that. But

02:37 I've been fooled before, right? Like he

02:39 seems like the most peaceful non-violent

02:41 guy of all time. if that guy's but I'd

02:43 read a bunch of stuff about him being a

02:45 [ __ ] Goldman portrayed Lennon as having

02:47 numerous sexual relationships outside

02:49 his marriages. His accounts include

02:51 well-known relationship with May Pang.

02:54 You like the Asians, huh? [laughter]

02:57 >> Well, JL,

02:59 >> keep going.

03:00 >> Uh, additional affairs with women framed

03:03 as habitual cheating, claims of sexual

03:06 encounters with men, including an

03:08 alleged relationship with Beatles

03:09 manager Brian Epstein. Hey, for more

03:12 serious allegations, including claims

03:14 involving male prostitutes in Thailand

03:16 and other conduct that Goldman

03:18 characterized as sexual predation. The

03:20 thing is like how is he getting all this

03:22 information about like male prostitutes

03:25 in Thailand? And you know, like how do

03:28 you know? You know what I mean? Like are

03:30 you is did someone tell you? Did you go

03:32 there? Like did you go there and talk to

03:34 the prostitute like that? [laughter] I

03:37 suck [ __ ] like what

03:40 why the book is disputed. The problem is

03:42 the reliability of Goldman's specific

03:44 accusations. At publication, Yokoono and

03:47 Paul McCartney publicly condemned the

03:49 book. Contemporary reporting noted

03:51 claims of factual errors,

03:53 contradictions, unattributed assertions,

03:56 and material allegedly based on dubious

03:58 sources or quotations used out of

04:00 context. Look, that is not uncommon. Did

04:02 I ever tell you what um Bill Murray said

04:05 on the podcast?

04:07 So, Bill Murray was reading John uh Bob

04:09 Woodward's book Wired and he said he got

04:13 through like five pages. He said, "Oh my

04:15 god, they framed Nixon

04:18 because Bob Woodward was the guy who did

04:20 Watergate and he said this book was so

04:22 full of [ __ ] It was so fake. He he like

04:26 he portrayed he portrayed

04:29 the whole scene of like

04:33 what he was up to as being like hardcore

04:37 drugs constantly all the time just just

04:41 [ __ ] losing his mind. And he's like,

04:44 "No, dude. He was a lightweight. He

04:46 wasn't like that at all."

04:48 >> So he knew it was totally fabricated.

04:50 >> He said, "This is not my friend." Like I

04:53 knew him. He was my best friend.

04:55 >> He's like, "This is not him." And then I

04:57 told him the story of how Bob Woodward

04:59 was an intelligence agent. And that was

05:01 his first assignment ever. Tucker told

05:03 me the story on the podcast

05:05 >> that Bob Woodward and uh the other guy,

05:08 what's the other guy's name? Bernstein.

05:10 That uh Bob Woodward, this was a rookie

05:12 assignment. A rookie assignment is going

05:15 to take down the [ __ ] president of

05:17 the United States. and his first job

05:19 outside of being a [ __ ] intelligence

05:22 agent is to work for the Washington Post

05:26 on his first story, which is going to

05:28 take down the most popular president in

05:30 the history of the United States. One by

05:32 the largest margin ever,

05:35 and this is the guy that said he knew

05:37 who killed Jack Kennedy. And apparently

05:39 that's why they got rid of Nixon. Tucker

05:41 told me the whole story in the podcast.

05:43 I was like, "Holy [ __ ] this is [ __ ]

05:46 crazy." You're connecting the dots.

05:48 >> It's a It's a crazy [ __ ] story.

05:51 >> Have you been following this uh Lindsay

05:53 Clansancy case? This uh who's

05:55 >> that lady who killed three of her kids?

05:57 >> Oh, no. I've tried not to. That one's

06:00 That's a bummer.

06:01 >> It is. It's basically 2026's

06:05 OJ Simpson. It's

06:07 >> Before we get into that, I'd love to get

06:09 into that. This Belushi thing is

06:11 important because like his friend is

06:14 telling you that he was not like that.

06:18 Woodward makes him out to be this

06:20 maniacal cocaine adult heroinfueled guy.

06:25 He's like, "No, he was a lightweight."

06:27 He said he he would get drunk off a

06:28 couple drinks. So our whole narrative of

06:31 who John Belalushi is is by the same guy

06:34 who framed Nixon. Like once someone's

06:38 dead, you could say whatever the [ __ ]

06:40 you want.

06:40 >> Yeah.

06:41 >> You could say whatever you want.

06:42 >> And who's gonna defend this person in

06:44 the with the same level of uh vitriol or

06:47 vehementness that someone who's still

06:49 alive is going to?

06:50 >> No one.

06:50 >> Yeah.

06:51 >> No one. And there's nothing you can do.

06:52 He's gone. Everyone's mourning.

06:54 Everyone's sad. And then someone writes

06:56 some book. Oh, he used to [ __ ] kids.

06:57 You're like, what?

06:58 >> Like you could just write whatever you

06:59 want and then maybe they could sue you.

07:01 But boy, are you going to make an

07:02 extraordinary amount of money off of

07:04 that book. Like people are gonna be

07:06 hyped up for that book. You have a book

07:07 about John Lennon was like into

07:08 meditation. He liked to do LSD. No one's

07:10 buying that [ __ ] John Lennon like to

07:12 [ __ ] guys in Thailand. Let's [laughter]

07:14 go. Let's go. Right. You could write

07:18 anything.

07:18 >> Who's going to fight back that hard as

07:20 well once someone's gone?

07:21 >> You can't prove it. He's dead.

07:23 >> Well, it's all hearsay. Even the defense

07:25 is now hearsay.

07:26 >> Yes.

07:26 >> The defense of the person who is now no

07:28 longer alive. That's

07:29 >> hearsay. Exactly. Everything's hearsay.

07:31 >> Yeah. So the defense is always going to

07:33 be flimsy in comparison to the

07:34 accusation because the accusation feels

07:36 like it's got more substance to it. Yes.

07:37 This is someone who's gone out and done

07:38 original research. You didn't go to

07:40 Thailand. You didn't speak to the

07:41 prostitutes.

07:42 >> But even that like no one's buying it.

07:44 It's just you can get away with so much.

07:47 It's really kind of crazy. You So you

07:50 didn't know about the Nixon story?

07:52 >> No.

07:52 >> You should hear Tucker say it because

07:53 when Tucker Tucker lays it out and

07:55 you're like what? It's even more

07:58 complex. Like the people that were

08:01 involved in Watergate were all FBI.

08:04 It's crazy. They set him up because he

08:07 was going to expose who killed JFK,

08:10 >> which was just a few years earlier.

08:14 >> [ __ ] dude. This country is wild.

08:15 >> I mean, I love it, but it's it is crazy.

08:17 >> They also, you know, he had a vice

08:19 president, Spiro Agnu, and they got rid

08:22 of him on corruption charges and put

08:23 Lyndon Johnson in. But couldn't these

08:25 people have still spoken out? Like

08:27 getting rid of them out of office. That

08:29 doesn't stop them from whistleblowing,

08:31 does it?

08:31 >> First of all, they killed his

08:34 predecessor, right? They killed JFK.

08:36 >> So, you think that was a warning shot?

08:37 Look, we can get you out.

08:38 >> Well, he knew they could. They

08:41 definitely did. And they also got rid of

08:43 him, right? And you know, he didn't

08:45 organize Watergate. He covered it up.

08:47 They brought it to him. They said, "Hey,

08:48 there was some recording equipment."

08:49 He's like, "Don't tell anybody." And

08:51 that's what got him. That's what got

08:52 him. see if you can find the clip of

08:54 Tucker talking about it because it is

08:56 really insane when you read the when you

08:58 hear him lay out the story and then I

09:00 read it online. I I went into it to see

09:02 like is this totally everything's

09:04 accurate and it's so weird that our

09:07 perception of Nixon has been this

09:09 corrupt crook. You know, look, he was a

09:12 very right-wing product of his time, and

09:16 today his politics and his views on

09:18 people, especially like minorities and a

09:21 lot of other things, would probably be

09:22 very disgraceful and people would not

09:25 like it. But we're talking about, you

09:26 know, the 1960s, the early 1970s, and

09:29 he's an old school, oldtimey Republican

09:32 guy.

09:33 >> That said, he was the most popular

09:35 president ever at his time, and they got

09:38 rid of him. They turned him into a

09:40 crook.

09:41 >> That's power.

09:42 >> It's It's really crazy. You got to

09:44 listen to this because it's kind of

09:46 nuts.

09:48 >> Rogan experience.

09:49 >> Bizarre that the New York Times wouldn't

09:51 have an issue with that.

09:52 >> Well, the New York Times does that all

09:53 the time.

09:54 >> But but but bizarre they wouldn't have

09:56 an issue with the government tapping

09:57 into your phone.

09:58 >> They work for the government. Are you

09:59 kidding? The New York Times?

10:01 >> Yeah. The New York Times is a conduit

10:03 for the lies of government. That's what

10:05 it is. It's their tool and they're

10:07 perfectly aware of that.

10:09 I mean, I used to write for the New York

10:11 Times as a freelancer. I mean, I've been

10:12 around the New York Times a lot. And

10:14 there are uh yeah, there are a lot of

10:16 really smart people there, for sure.

10:17 Even now, I would less so now, but

10:19 there's still, I think, smart people

10:20 there. There are I know some and they

10:23 know, but they think that that, you

10:26 know, it's worth it because they're

10:27 bringing information or I don't know

10:28 what they think actually,

10:30 >> but no, they're they're tools

10:33 of power and that's like the one thing

10:35 that you're not allowed to be. Even if

10:36 you think the power is good, like maybe

10:37 they all support the agenda of the US

10:39 government, destabilizing the world and

10:41 impoverishing their own population.

10:43 Maybe they're on board with that.

10:45 Even if they are, they shouldn't do it

10:47 because the job of the media, the press,

10:51 is to keep power in check. You are kind

10:56 of like the seat belt, right? You know,

10:59 you make sure that

11:01 >> things don't go too far. So, um, and

11:04 they're not doing that. They're acting

11:06 as a willing handmaidaiden.

11:07 >> When do you think that switched?

11:09 >> I think it's been the case for a long

11:10 time. I mean, if you look at what

11:12 happened to Richard Nixon, which I of

11:13 course did not understand at all, um

11:16 Richard Nixon was taken out by the FBI

11:18 and CIA and um with the help of Bob Bob

11:23 Woodward, who was a Washington Post

11:25 reporter who had been a naval

11:27 intelligence officer working in the

11:29 White House, working in the Nixon White

11:31 House. And then he shows up like a year

11:36 later and he's this brand new reporter.

11:39 He'd never been a journalist at all.

11:40 He's a naval intel officer, the famous

11:43 Bob Woodward we all rever.

11:46 And he's at the Washington Post. And

11:47 somehow he gets the biggest story in the

11:50 history of the Washington Post. He's the

11:51 lead guy in that story.

11:52 >> Well, I I worked at a newspaper. I've

11:54 been in the news business my whole life.

11:56 That is not how it works. You don't take

11:57 a kid like his first day from a totally

12:00 unrelated business and put him on the

12:02 biggest story. But he was he was that

12:05 guy. And who is his main source for

12:07 Watergate? Oh, the number two guy at the

12:08 FBI.

12:10 Oh, so you have the naval intelligence

12:13 officer working with the FBI official to

12:17 destroy the president. Okay. So that's a

12:20 deep state coup. What else? How would

12:21 you describe that? If that happened in

12:23 Guatemala, what would you say? And yet

12:25 the way it was framed and the way that I

12:27 accepted for decades was, "Oh, this

12:29 intrepid reporter fought power." No, no,

12:31 no. This intrepid reporter, Bob

12:33 Woodward, was a tool of power, secret

12:36 power, which is the most threatening

12:37 kind to bounce the single most popular

12:42 president in American history, Richard

12:43 Nixon, from office before the end of his

12:46 term and replace him with who? Oh,

12:48 Gerald Ford, who sat on the Warren

12:51 Commission. Now, how did Gerald Ford get

12:53 to be Richard Nixon's vice president?

12:55 Well, because Carl Albert, the Democrat

12:58 speaker of the house, told him, "You

12:59 must choose him. We will only confirm

13:01 him when they sent the actual elected

13:04 vice president away for tax evasion."

13:07 Spiro Agnu of Maryland. So, you have a

13:10 complete setup like an ABS. Gerald Ford,

13:13 the only unelected president in American

13:15 history, actually sat on the Warren

13:16 Commission. something else that I

13:18 accepted at face value until I looked at

13:20 it and I was like, "That's completely

13:21 insane. You didn't want to interview

13:22 Jack Ruby in your investigation of the

13:25 assassination? Okay, you're fake." Yeah,

13:27 he was on the Warren Commission.

13:29 >> [ __ ] me.

13:29 >> And so, uh, sorry for the long story,

13:31 but the point is like that that happened

13:33 in front of all of us, but the way it

13:35 was framed cloaked the obvious reality

13:38 of it. The people who broke into the

13:39 Watergate office building from which the

13:41 name is taken, Watergate

13:44 was, I think it was six of them or seven

13:46 of them. All but one was a CIA employee.

13:50 That that's real. It's like look it up

13:51 on Google. So the whole thing Richard

13:55 Nixon was elected by more votes than any

13:58 president in American history in the

14:00 1972 election. He was the most popular

14:03 by votes, which is the only way we can

14:05 really measure popularity. The most

14:06 popular president

14:08 in his re-election campaign. And two

14:10 years later, he's gone. undone by a

14:13 naval intel officer, the number two guy

14:15 at the FBI, and a bunch of CIA

14:17 employees. Okay,

14:18 >> you tell me what that is.

14:20 >> How about that?

14:21 >> Dude, this country is wild.

14:22 >> How about that?

14:25 >> Yeah, that's Bob Woodward. That's the

14:28 guy who wrote Wired. And when Bill

14:30 Murray said that, he read the book and

14:32 he said, "Oh my god, they framed Nixon."

14:34 And then I showed him that and he was

14:36 like, "Holy shit." Cuz he was a part of

14:40 a thing. they were doing with Hunter S.

14:43 Thompson, Bill Murray was when he was

14:45 really young and uh where he would go

14:48 around and tell people that Nixon needs

14:50 a second chance, but it was all parody.

14:52 It was all like tongue and cheek. It was

14:54 satire. He was going around pretending

14:56 that he supported Nixon and Nixon needed

14:58 a second chance and getting like young

15:00 dumb people to go along with him on

15:02 this. And now in retrospect

15:04 >> in retrospect like I mean whether or not

15:08 at the time he ever wanted Nixon as

15:10 president and you know look there's a

15:12 lot of problems with Nixon. There's a

15:14 lot of problems with the Vietnam War.

15:16 There's a lot of problems with civil

15:17 rights. Nixon passed the Controlled

15:19 Substances Act which is the reason why

15:21 all psychedelic drugs to this day are

15:22 schedule one. Nixon was a [ __ ]

15:24 problem. No doubt about it. However,

15:28 what they did when they the way they got

15:30 rid of that guy is scary [ __ ] And they

15:34 pulled it off. No one got arrested. No

15:36 one got indicted. No one even got

15:38 criticized.

15:39 >> But could he not have still released

15:41 information after? Why?

15:42 >> He would have been a dead man 100%.

15:44 >> Because no protection because you're not

15:45 in office anymore.

15:46 >> No one would have believed him.

15:47 >> It would have sounded like sour grapes.

15:49 I'm throwing these people under the bus.

15:50 The administration that got rid of me.

15:52 >> There's also no internet. So how is he

15:54 going to release it? Is the New York

15:56 Times going to write this? Is he going

15:58 to write a a letter to the press and

16:00 they're going to print it? No. There's

16:01 literally no recourse.

16:03 >> It's kind of genius.

16:04 >> There's no podcasts. There's no shows

16:06 that he could go on. No one. He was

16:08 disgraced. No one would even have him on

16:10 a late night show. But if he even got on

16:11 a late night show, he would need about

16:13 90 minutes to explain it all. He would

16:16 have to take it from the beginning.

16:17 There was a time when I wondered who

16:19 killed Jack Kennedy. and I found out and

16:22 I brought it to them and I told them I

16:24 know who killed Jack and the room went

16:26 cold and he would tell the whole story

16:28 and it would take a lot if podcasts were

16:31 a lot around back then. Yes. If just

16:34 Instagram was around back then and

16:35 Twitter and he could write about it and

16:37 make a video. Yeah. YouTube. Yeah, if

16:40 that was around but there was nothing.

16:42 There was nothing. And they [ __ ] shot

16:44 JFK in the head in front of everybody

16:47 and shot the guy who they claimed killed

16:49 him like that. And then the other guy

16:51 they do up with acid and made crazy and

16:53 that was a wrap.

16:55 >> Done.

16:55 >> That was it, you know. And like how many

17:00 I mean this is just modern versions of

17:04 air quotes history. How how many old

17:09 stories that we have that we just we

17:11 just have accepted these historical

17:14 narratives.

17:15 We've accepted all of these stories as

17:19 being, well, this is how it went down.

17:21 How many of them are [ __ ]

17:22 >> Well, forget history being written by

17:24 the victors. History can be written by

17:26 the person who's got a pen.

17:27 >> Sure.

17:27 >> And when so few people have got pens, so

17:29 few people have got the opportunity to

17:30 distribute.

17:31 >> I suppose the problem that we have now

17:33 is in the modern world, there's so much

17:35 information, conflicting narratives,

17:37 people get confused. Right? You've gone

17:39 from a scarcity of information to such

17:41 an abundance that people just I I I

17:43 can't work out what's going on. [ __ ]

17:45 I'm just not going to believe anything.

17:46 >> Yeah. Yeah. It's it's um it's very

17:49 interesting cuz it's a great tool to

17:52 kind of obsc you can obuscate. You could

17:55 do a lot of things with a bunch of

17:57 [ __ ] information. The more [ __ ]

17:59 information you have, the more like

18:01 really significant information doesn't

18:02 really hit as much.

18:03 >> Correct.

18:04 >> It's just like it gets watered down then

18:06 it goes away.

18:06 >> The goal I think of the velocity of the

18:08 information is not to convince people of

18:10 any one narrative. It's to make them

18:12 completely nihilistic about the belief

18:14 in any narrative.

18:15 >> Yeah.

18:17 >> Yes. Any narrative. Yeah. And and also

18:20 just to kind of accept that feeling of

18:21 hopelessness like you can't change

18:23 anything.

18:23 >> Correct.

18:24 >> It's all [ __ ]

18:24 >> That feels pliable. Yeah.

18:26 >> Right. And then there might be something

18:27 down the line. If nothing else, you're

18:29 not going to have a aentic sovereign

18:32 uprising.

18:33 What can we do in any case? I don't even

18:35 know what's going I'm checked out,

18:36 >> right? Like the nihilism, the cynicism.

18:38 I I don't think that that's a byproduct.

18:40 I think that's

18:41 >> it's a plan.

18:42 >> Correct.

18:42 >> This summer, whether you're watching

18:44 baseball, golf, soccer, racing,

18:47 DraftKings has you covered for every

18:49 single moment of it. The DraftKings

18:51 Sports app is now available in all 50

18:55 states, bringing the game straight to

18:56 your fingertips wherever you are. From

18:59 Florida to Texas to California, you're

19:01 in on the excitement at the speed of

19:03 sports. Follow every buzzer beater,

19:06 every walk-off, every photo finish.

19:08 Sweat the moments that matter in real

19:10 time with a seamless experience built

19:13 for summer. No matter where you're

19:15 watching, you're always connected and in

19:17 on the game with one app. New DraftKing

19:20 customers, sign up with code Rogan.

19:23 Spend five bucks to get 150 in rewards

19:26 within 14 days. Includes all markets.

19:30 That's code Rogan in partnership with

19:32 DraftKings. The crown is yours. Bet with

19:35 DK Sportsbook. Gambling problem, call

19:37 1800 gambler. 1800 MY reset. Connecticut

19:40 call 888-7897777

19:42 or visit ccpg.org. On behalf of Bootill

19:45 Casino in Kansas, bet tax passrough may

19:47 apply in Illinois. 21 and over. Void in

19:48 Canada. Event contract trading with

19:50 DraftKings predictions involves risk of

19:51 loss. Availability varies. Predictions

19:53 offer void in New York. Bet to get bonus

19:55 bets that expire in 7 days. Trade to get

19:57 predictions dollars that expire in 1

19:58 year. $50 in rewards issued every 7 days

20:01 via click to claim for 14 days. One

20:02 non-withdrawable reward redeemable.

20:04 nationwide based on sportsbook

20:05 predictions and free-to-play sports

20:07 contest availability varies by state.

20:09 Terms at dk&ng.co/offer.

20:11 Limited time offer.

20:12 >> Yeah, it's a design and it's it's smart

20:15 and it works and it's it's not even like

20:18 they engineered it. It sort of emerged

20:19 and they took advantage of these new

20:21 tools because these new tools, you know,

20:23 social media is more effective than

20:25 anything we've ever had before. And so

20:27 they go, "Oh, but look at all this now."

20:29 You know, we didn't have we barely no

20:31 one pays attention to CNN. We don't even

20:33 use them anymore. We just like douse the

20:36 whole world with horseshit

20:37 >> on Instagram and threads and

20:39 >> seed stories here and there.

20:41 >> Just [ __ ] Just pure [ __ ]

20:44 There's accounts that I know when I look

20:46 at what they said Justin Timberlake

20:48 arrested for, you know, murder, you

20:50 know, they they'll write things like

20:51 that, you're like, "What?" And it's just

20:53 a madeup story. And there's like

20:55 hundreds of them where you look and I've

20:57 there's some of them I recognize the

20:58 account and uh and I see it. I go, "Oh,

21:00 there's another madeup story. Halle

21:02 Berry kills five." I have

21:03 >> What do you think we should do about

21:04 this? Because obviously this country,

21:06 freedom of speech, etc., etc., but

21:09 >> I don't know, should there be a way to

21:11 try and counter this?

21:13 >> Yes. Well, first of all, those people

21:14 aren't real people for the most part.

21:16 And if you go to their page, a lot of

21:18 them are like in Pakistan or somewhere

21:20 else where where and of course, I don't

21:23 know how effective [snorts]

21:25 uh X in particular is. I mean I know

21:28 they've they've taken steps to show that

21:29 when you go to the person's page

21:31 someone's commenting on US politics and

21:33 you go to their page says Myanmar

21:35 Myanmar why do you go [ __ ] what are you

21:37 doing

21:37 >> so but that to me is like okay is there

21:40 a way around that are these like

21:42 completely non-sophisticated people

21:44 where they have to show that they're in

21:46 Myanmar what if they had like a

21:47 corporation in Idaho and they had it set

21:50 up where they all registered there and

21:52 so your your bills get sent to there

21:54 everything gets sent to there and it

21:55 just says the United states and you're

21:57 using a VPN or you have some other way

21:59 of connecting. It doesn't like if if

22:02 [ __ ] AI can get out of a sandbox and

22:04 get on the internet. You're telling me

22:06 that you can't hide the fact that you're

22:08 actually

22:08 >> Vietnamese people can't pretend to be

22:10 from Idaho.

22:11 >> Come on.

22:11 >> Yeah.

22:12 >> So, who knows?

22:13 >> X feels like the [ __ ] Wild West.

22:15 >> It's the Wild West.

22:16 >> It really is.

22:17 >> It's worse than the Wild West. It's the

22:18 Wild West with robots. It's It's that

22:21 western show. What's that show called?

22:22 >> West.

22:23 >> West World. Yeah, that's what it is.

22:25 Correct. It's wild west with robots.

22:26 >> Yeah,

22:27 >> it's really Westworld because and most

22:30 of these [ __ ] people that are you're

22:32 bantering with and they're posting these

22:33 fake stories, they're probably not even

22:35 real people. They're probably AI.

22:36 They're either people that are hired to

22:38 do it or they're AI. You got a bunch of

22:41 AI scripts and they just run it all the

22:43 time and they post periodically

22:45 throughout the day.

22:46 >> And interesting, not not long ago, what

22:48 five When did Elon buy eggs? 23.

22:51 >> Yeah, something like that. 23. So, f

22:53 five years ago, everyone was so worried

22:55 that we didn't have a a town square. We

22:57 don't have anywhere that we can talk and

22:59 now [laughter]

23:00 [ __ ] take it back.

23:01 >> Well, one thing that Elon has realized

23:04 is that um you have to take away some of

23:07 the incentives to post fake stuff. Uh

23:09 without putting up a barrier and saying

23:12 you can't post this and censoring

23:13 people, uh you can't incentivize them.

23:16 So, the thing is you can make money on

23:18 X. So now, uh, the way they're setting

23:20 it up for these people that post, you

23:23 can't make money off of fake content.

23:25 You can't make money off of this stuff.

23:27 So there's no incentive to make because

23:29 I think part of the incentive is

23:30 muddying the water, muddying the

23:32 narrative. But I think also part of the

23:34 incentive is just financial because if

23:36 you're running some company in Thailand

23:38 and you have like 50 people working for

23:40 you, you're probably making good money

23:41 just getting millions of clicks on

23:43 [ __ ] nonsense videos that are AI and

23:46 and a bunch of [ __ ] fake stories that

23:49 people concoct or AI concocts. As soon

23:52 as you cut out the money and say you're

23:55 only paid for original content, that's

23:57 it. That's all you can get paid for.

23:59 That changes the game. That changes

24:00 everything. I think if you align the

24:02 incentives for most people, [ __ ] gets

24:04 fixed. Like incentives are an

24:05 unbelievable motivating force. And if

24:08 you can if you can have that on X, I

24:09 think that that fixes a lot of the

24:10 problem.

24:11 >> It fixes a lot of it. But honestly, you

24:13 got to be able to tell whether

24:15 something's AI because even if even if

24:19 there's no incentive, you could shift

24:21 narratives so easily. If you just have a

24:24 100,000

24:26 AI scripts running a 100,000 accounts,

24:30 it's not hard for a state to do like a a

24:33 country to do to have like those kind of

24:35 resources. You can change public opinion

24:39 on things. Most people are dumb as [ __ ]

24:42 and you start arguing for something that

24:44 kind of makes sense and all of a sudden,

24:46 uh, yeah, I don't know what a woman is

24:47 either. You know, like weird narratives

24:50 can get real weird and especially people

24:52 start attacking the people that disagree

24:54 with whatever this narrative they're

24:55 trying to push. Nobody wants to get

24:56 attacked. Well, I mean, I I didn't

24:58 understand the consequences.

25:00 >> Well, that's a different kind that's a

25:01 different kind of incentive, right?

25:02 That's a social incentive and the

25:04 incentive is a disincentive. You don't

25:05 want to be pushed back against.

25:06 >> Exactly.

25:07 >> So few people have original thoughts. So

25:10 few people, the vast majority of

25:12 original thinkers kind of marionette two

25:15 different armies of NPCs that believe

25:17 the thing that a few people that have

25:18 original thoughts ended up coming up

25:20 with.

25:20 >> Yeah. Well, I think there's a bunch of

25:22 unfortunate realities that none of us

25:25 like to accept. And one of them is that

25:26 some people are dumb. They're born dumb.

25:30 Some people have big noses. Some people

25:32 have big ears. And some people have

25:34 brains that are made out of dog [ __ ]

25:35 And that's just how it is. And there's

25:37 nothing you could do about that. And

25:39 there's varying levels of that. Like,

25:41 you know, I always feel like that when

25:42 I'm talking to someone really smart,

25:43 like, geez, my brain sucks. It's it

25:46 varies like wildly. Just like athletics.

25:50 Like, there's some people you're like,

25:51 dude, you you are never going to the

25:53 Olympics. You know, you look at them

25:54 like, I don't give a [ __ ] what you do.

25:56 And there's other guys like you want to

25:58 coach them. Like, hey, if you just did

26:00 anything, you'd be a freak. You'd be

26:02 amazing at this. You just have natural

26:03 gifts.

26:04 >> That's the same thing intellectually.

26:06 There's certain people that I've talked

26:07 to, you're like, yo, you know, there's

26:10 there's people that are they're [ __ ]

26:13 barely figuring out how to get through a

26:16 day.

26:18 And you know, if you expect those people

26:20 to go and learn how to code, remember

26:22 that? Learn to code. Remember all that?

26:24 This is not This not

26:27 there. I can't teach my dog how to type.

26:29 It's not there.

26:31 >> It's not going to happen. That's just

26:34 the reality of genetic variability.

26:37 There's there's going to be a bunch of

26:39 people that are really [ __ ] smart and

26:40 a bunch of people that are really

26:41 athletic and really good-looking and

26:43 really ugly and really stupid and all of

26:45 it together.

26:45 >> It's one of the reasons I think that the

26:48 paternalistic we have to look after the

26:50 little person thing has a little bit of

26:52 legs. People sometimes like, well, we

26:53 actually need to step in in some way.

26:55 And I'm sure me and you need [ __ ]

26:57 assistance. We need smarter people than

26:58 us to tell us what to do with health to

27:00 a degree. Or else we would have been

27:01 sideswiped by some [ __ ] scop from

27:04 whatever organization or company or new

27:06 initiative is trying to convince us of

27:08 some new trend that's actually going to

27:10 be bad for us

27:11 >> or just to communicate with each other.

27:13 Where the [ __ ] would we be without these

27:14 wizards who have figured out cell phones

27:16 and laptops and highspeed internet and

27:19 Starlink? We're [ __ ] So all these

27:22 people even pretending that they're

27:23 smart. Well, you're you're on the backs

27:25 of the labor of the real geniuses, you

27:28 [ __ ] idiot. Like, yeah, you're

27:30 getting a lot of information online.

27:32 You're developing more and more

27:33 information that you can memorize.

27:36 That's different. That's different than

27:38 you inventing cell phones. Just stop.

27:42 That's different. It's different than

27:44 you inventing FaceTime.

27:46 >> Well, you know, like we're all dumb.

27:49 >> We are all dumb. Uh yesterday, I don't

27:52 know whether you saw this, the UK Home

27:53 Office decided it was going to release a

27:55 booklet giving guidance to asylum

27:57 seekers on acceptable and unacceptable

27:59 behavior in the UK.

28:00 >> Oh, well that'll fix it.

28:02 >> It explains that consent's required for

28:04 sex, that women have equal rights, that

28:07 sexual harassment is unacceptable,

28:08 including for partners and children, and

28:10 that female genital mutilation is not

28:12 allowed.

28:13 >> Oh god.

28:14 >> This was a nine-page booklet that got

28:16 released by the UK Home Office

28:18 yesterday. It's just it's

28:19 >> everywhere,

28:20 >> dude.

28:21 >> And it's got these warnings partway

28:22 through it that say things like um this

28:25 may affect your asylum status whether or

28:27 not this is part of uh an understanding

28:30 that you have arrived here with this is

28:32 an important part of uh British law uh

28:35 and and our culture and this is

28:37 something that you cannot do. Female

28:38 genital mutilation is not allowed. Uh

28:41 sexual harassment inside of the home or

28:42 outside. Women have equal rights.

28:45 Consent is something that's important.

28:46 It is. And that's what I mean.

28:49 >> The idea that you could just write it

28:52 down on paper and give it to them. Well,

28:53 that that's it. Solved it.

28:55 >> Well, the idea that we're going to do

28:57 this in retrospect, like now that you're

29:00 here, here is a piece of paper that

29:02 hopefully undoes something, which if

29:04 you've put this together and put it out

29:05 on the home office website, and this is

29:07 everywhere on X. If you've decided to do

29:10 this, it is evidently a big enough

29:12 problem that you need to really turn the

29:13 taps on with it. Like, dude, how how is

29:16 it that this is not done before people

29:18 arrive in the country? Like, is this not

29:20 the sort of thing that you need to be

29:22 doing like proactively, not

29:23 retroactively?

29:25 >> I think they just wanted to get as many

29:27 people in as possible, and now they're

29:30 trying to mitigate the chaos that it's

29:31 causing.

29:32 >> Why would they want as many people in as

29:33 possible?

29:34 >> There's a bunch of different

29:35 possibilities for why they want that.

29:37 Cheap labor is uh one that people

29:40 believe. And uh in America in

29:43 particular, it's the way the census is

29:45 done. So

29:48 the census counts human beings, it

29:50 doesn't count citizens. So if you have

29:52 more human beings, you get more

29:53 congressional seats. So if you can take

29:56 people that are illegal immigrants and

29:58 then you move them into swing states,

30:00 all of a sudden now you have more

30:01 congressional seats in those swing

30:02 states. Then you have places that don't

30:06 allow, not don't require, don't allow ID

30:09 to vote. That's California. California

30:12 doesn't allow ID to vote. So, who knows

30:15 how many people are, especially with

30:18 mailin ballots, how many people are

30:20 voting that aren't citizens? No one

30:22 knows. No one knows. Can't know. Can't

30:23 find out. Blah blah blah. Not listening.

30:25 And

30:25 >> wasn't it just some [ __ ] with Spencer

30:27 Pratt around that?

30:28 >> Oh yeah. Oh yeah. Not only was there

30:32 [ __ ] but it was [ __ ] of the most

30:34 transparent form. So the people that

30:37 voted in uh voted out so Spencer Pratt

30:40 was in second place behind Karen Bass

30:42 and then the Mins started coming in and

30:44 the mailins overwhelmingly

30:47 favored Nitia Ramen in a completely

30:49 different ratio than they did before you

30:53 know the mailin ballots were counted. So

30:55 in the regular ballot, like the regular

30:57 election, she was in third place, like

30:59 like a pretty solid third place. And he

31:02 was quite a bit ahead of her. And then

31:04 Karen Bass was quite a bit ahead of him.

31:07 >> In the mailin ballots, it's just like

31:10 60% of them went to Nathia Rom. It was

31:12 something crazy. And the mail-in ballots

31:16 voted to raise taxes.

31:18 >> No one votes for that.

31:20 >> No one votes for that.

31:21 >> So I don't understand. The thing that I

31:22 can't wrap my head around is why the the

31:25 the UK seems to be almost like a

31:27 suicidal empathy thing. This openness,

31:30 this this uh diversity is our strength,

31:32 please all ye come here

31:34 >> thing. The level of asylum, the the

31:37 numbers are so huge.

31:39 >> And I don't know if every single person

31:42 that I know that's in the UK

31:44 >> is not happy with the state of that,

31:46 regardless of how progressive they are,

31:47 everybody thinks that this is a problem.

31:49 and then to retroactively put out a

31:50 nine-page booklet saying that you

31:51 shouldn't do female genital mutilation

31:53 or that women have got equal rights.

31:56 >> How do you think this gets turned

31:58 around? That's the question.

32:01 Like, can that be mitigated? Claims

32:03 about a ballot drop. Boss and Ramen

32:06 received thousands of votes in an update

32:08 while Pratt received zero. I don't think

32:10 anybody's saying zero. Los Angeles

32:12 County officials said that did not occur

32:14 in the official county updates. Every

32:16 candidate received votes in every

32:17 update. No one's saying he got zero.

32:19 >> It says it's what it says.

32:20 >> Oh, the viral claim. Okay, but that's

32:22 not what we're saying.

32:23 >> He got more than both of them combined

32:26 even, I think.

32:27 >> What do you mean in the mailins?

32:28 >> That's what this says.

32:30 >> Well, then how did she win? That doesn't

32:31 make any sense.

32:32 >> That's that that's I'm just going off

32:34 what it says.

32:35 >> Okay, let me see. Apparently came from

32:37 the automated media data reporting lags,

32:39 but that would leave him in second place

32:41 if he got more than her. This is not

32:43 true. The Associated Press said votes

32:45 for some candidates appeared about a

32:47 minute later in a separate update. Taken

32:49 together, the updates included 21,870

32:52 votes for Pratt, 12,850 for Bass, and

32:56 9,521

32:57 for Ramen. But this is what part of it

33:00 is this.

33:02 The attorney's claims office uh

33:05 attorney's office re uh reviewing county

33:07 records likewise called the fraud claims

33:09 false. But the thing is he was ahead and

33:13 then disproportionately the the ballots

33:15 did come in for her. This is I don't

33:18 understand what this is saying because

33:20 it was widely reported that the ballots

33:23 came in in favor of Nitia Ramen and it

33:25 was like a shocking number. It was also

33:26 widely reported that that was the swing

33:29 that allowed them to pass the new tax

33:31 hike which is very unusual and they keep

33:36 Los Angeles already has crazy high

33:38 taxes. California has crazy high taxes,

33:40 the highest in the state. And you think

33:42 people are like, I don't think we pay

33:43 enough. Let's [laughter] vote and let's

33:45 vote from home, the comfort of our own

33:47 home with mailin. I think mailin should

33:49 be outlawed. And I think you should have

33:50 to show your ID. And you know, everyone

33:53 knows there's some percentage of of

33:55 fraud. There's some percentage of voter

33:57 fraud and then there's some percentage

33:59 of legal loopholes. One of the legal

34:01 loopholes that Spencer Pratt outlined

34:03 that is legal is you go to these

34:05 homeless people and you get these

34:07 homeless people to fill in mail mail in

34:09 ballots because they are citizens. They

34:11 do live in Los Angeles and you register

34:14 them and you get them to fill out

34:16 ballots and you give them money and you

34:17 give them cigarettes and you give them

34:19 whatever they want and you know there's

34:21 literally I think in Skid Row alone

34:24 there's something like what is it like

34:26 40,000 people Jamie?

34:28 >> Yeah, I think so.

34:29 >> Something crazy like that. So these

34:30 people were going to Skid Row like they

34:33 were on Skid Row giving people money and

34:34 cigarettes like there's videos of people

34:36 doing it.

34:36 >> Gorilla ballot harvesting.

34:38 >> Exactly. Exactly. And so if you do that

34:40 you could these people, you know, you're

34:42 filling it out for them.

34:43 >> Would it be easy to do that without

34:44 somebody detecting it? You know, you

34:46 think of some Nick Shirley type that's

34:47 >> got them. That's how they That's how we

34:49 know about this. One of the one of those

34:51 Nick Shirley types caught people doing

34:53 this, right? There's video of it,

34:54 >> right? You know, so like and people had

34:57 reported that they were getting paid to

34:59 do this and they're like, "Yeah, they

35:00 gave me money, man." Like people those

35:03 people are cracked out, dude. They'll

35:04 they'll do whatever the [ __ ] you want.

35:05 They don't care who's the mayor. It's

35:07 not going to change them them smoking

35:09 fentanyl on the street.

35:10 >> What do you think about uh

35:11 >> but that's legal. That's the thing.

35:13 That's that's legal. It's a loophole.

35:17 Getting them to register, getting making

35:19 them vote,

35:20 >> incentivizing them to vote.

35:21 >> I don't know if that part's

35:22 >> that can't be legal. There's no way that

35:23 you can give people money. And I don't

35:25 think you're going to catch them. I

35:26 don't think they care. I think every on

35:29 both sides they like, "Oh, those sneaky

35:31 [ __ ] They're doing that. Well, we'll

35:32 do that next time." I I don't think

35:34 either one of them want to eliminate

35:36 tricks,

35:37 >> you know? I think because everybody

35:39 wants the playing field to be open for

35:40 everyone else.

35:42 >> It's just It's the Bill Hicks joke. It's

35:46 like one guy's holding two puppets. You

35:47 You know that joke? I like the puppet on

35:49 the left while the puppet to the right

35:51 is more of my liking. Hey, there's one

35:53 guy holding both puppets. Like, that's

35:56 what I think a lot of it is. These most

35:58 of these people that are these

36:00 politicians on both sides are grifters

36:02 who are trying to maximize the amount of

36:03 money they can make in office and then

36:05 they can't wait to get out of office

36:07 where they can go on a [ __ ] media

36:08 tour and go and get their bribes by

36:11 speaking to banks. When you're going to

36:13 speak to a bank conference, they're

36:15 going to give you a half a million

36:16 dollars. Like, what? What? And like

36:19 Obama and Hillary, they all did those

36:21 things. They all did those little

36:23 speaking tours like nobody gives a [ __ ]

36:25 what Hillary Clinton has to say at one

36:27 of those bank meetings. You think

36:28 they're waiting with baited breath? What

36:30 is the what is the what does Mrs.

36:32 Clinton have to say? Like come on. Let's

36:34 give her a half a million dollars or a

36:36 quarter million dollars or whatever the

36:38 [ __ ] they gave her. [ __ ] off. You know

36:39 what that is? That's like there's a

36:41 little scheme. There's a little thing.

36:43 You're gonna get out. You're gonna get

36:44 paid. You're gonna write a book. We'll

36:46 give you a nice advance. You're gonna

36:48 write a book. Like people are out there

36:49 reading that Kla Harris book like crazy.

36:52 No, it's all nonsense.

36:54 >> Where do you think this goes from here?

36:55 Do you think 28 is more insane or less

36:57 insane?

36:57 >> More accelerates. Accelerates more

37:00 insane. More crazy. Yeah. I mean, look,

37:04 the Democrats haven't even had a primary

37:06 since what, 2012. When was the last time

37:09 they had a real Democratic primary?

37:13 >> They had one with

37:14 >> They [ __ ] Bernie Sanders hard, dude.

37:16 that was completely corrupt. When you

37:19 read Donna Brazil's book about it, she

37:21 openly admits they [ __ ] him hard

37:24 >> and then she was scared after that Seth

37:26 Seth Rich guy got murdered that she was

37:29 terrified because he was the guy

37:31 supposedly allegedly that leaked

37:33 information about them [ __ ] Bernie

37:35 Sanders to Wikileaks.

37:37 >> Do you think he'd have won

37:39 >> Bernie?

37:40 >> I don't know. He could have. He could

37:43 have won because a lot of people

37:45 including me believed him. We believe

37:48 that what this guy wanted was by small

37:53 steps of eliminating corruption, make

37:56 life better for people that are

37:58 struggling and also no wars. It seems

38:01 like he really believed that. And

38:03 whether you agree with him on everything

38:05 else, he's I don't think he's the same

38:06 guy today. He's a little slower today,

38:08 which is understandable. He's older. The

38:11 guy's been in politics for a long time.

38:12 He's been in politics for longer than

38:13 I've been alive.

38:14 >> He realizes that they're not going to

38:16 [ __ ] change things. It's like he's

38:18 getting [ __ ] So, he always supports

38:19 the most progressive people, but when I

38:21 talk to him, like when I talk to him

38:23 about, you know, climate change and the

38:25 climate's really important, I'm like,

38:26 have you really talked to actual

38:28 scientists that really study the climate

38:30 without a political agenda or an

38:32 ideology attached to it? It's very, very

38:35 complicated. And most of these people

38:36 that are running around saying climate

38:38 change is real, [ __ ] of course it is.

38:40 It's always real. It's always real. But

38:42 the the dispute is how much of an impact

38:44 are human beings having and is carbon

38:47 the thing? Because what most people

38:49 don't realize is there's been times in

38:50 history where there was way more carbon

38:52 and the earth was way colder. It's it's

38:54 weird. The world's temperature is not

38:57 static.

38:58 >> Have you been tracking AOC's pivot

39:00 recently?

39:01 >> Well, she's uh froze her eggs. I know

39:03 about that.

39:04 >> I think

39:04 >> she got rid of the man. called off the

39:06 engagement, froze her eggs, has started

39:10 posting I'm on my way to do yoga

39:13 like

39:14 >> good for her

39:15 >> videos walking down the street

39:16 >> looking hot

39:17 >> looking hot. It's it's maybe she'll be

39:20 nicer that way.

39:20 >> Well, she also said woke one was crazy.

39:22 Do you track this thing?

39:23 >> I did. Which makes me think that you're

39:26 willing to change your opinions based on

39:29 public reaction. I don't like that

39:32 because if you really thought defund the

39:33 police and then you just described it to

39:35 woke one was crazy. Well, how did it get

39:37 you? Because it didn't get me. How did

39:40 it get you? How did defund the police

39:41 get you? Tell me, give me your thoughts.

39:44 How far out did you track the

39:46 consequences of defunding the police?

39:48 Cuz I immediately went to you're going

39:51 to have more crime because no one's

39:52 going to be able to stop the crime.

39:53 We're going to be [ __ ] It's going to

39:54 get scary. And then you're going to have

39:56 want more police. And saying defund the

39:58 police is just going to make more police

40:00 and more control and more totalitarian

40:02 government. Like what did you think

40:04 defund the police meant? Everyone's

40:06 gonna like eat mushrooms and we're all

40:08 going to like be flower children. What

40:10 did you think? Because there's no police

40:11 around, no one's going to do crimes.

40:13 Everyone's going to be great. Like what

40:15 was the thought process? Cuz if you're

40:17 just saying that because everybody's

40:19 like, "That's [ __ ] crazy." And enough

40:21 people say that's crazy. You're like,

40:23 >> I think they think it's crazy.

40:24 >> The wind's blown in a different

40:26 direction. time for me to move.

40:27 >> Have you changed your opinion? And if

40:28 you did change your opinion, what were

40:31 you thinking back then?

40:32 >> Yeah. Yeah. I mean, these are the

40:33 questions I think that we always want to

40:36 ask. Yeah.

40:37 >> You always want to ask that. That being

40:38 said, to steal what she was saying or to

40:41 try and put it in the best light. What

40:42 she was saying, I think

40:44 >> the rhetoric got

40:45 >> what did you say the rhetoric got like

40:47 out of hand or something? Woke one was

40:49 crazy. And she said that there was

40:50 basically an opportunity to expand the

40:52 Overton window. talking about a time

40:55 where people were to be honest it sounds

40:57 like a bit more pliable

40:59 >> like oh because people are at home

41:01 people seem a little bit more like you

41:02 know that line never let a good crisis

41:04 go to waste

41:04 >> yeah sure

41:05 >> I it feels a little bit like that maybe

41:07 opportunistic we can expand the Overton

41:09 window and then we realized oh like we

41:10 overshot on here a little bit that was a

41:12 little bit crazy but there are

41:14 conversations being had now that

41:15 wouldn't have been able to be had had we

41:17 have not expanded it during that time

41:18 and I go the ends justifying the means

41:21 with stuff like that doesn't

41:23 to me and then reversing your position

41:25 or changing your position or sanitizing

41:27 it, which is probably closer, right? We

41:29 said that thing, but we didn't really

41:31 mean that. You know, we just got a

41:32 little

41:32 >> There's a way out of it for them, but

41:34 they have to be honest.

41:36 >> There's a If you want us to take you

41:38 seriously, you have to say how you

41:40 [ __ ] up.

41:40 >> I thought you meant more more thirst

41:41 traps, but

41:42 >> no. Uh, you have to say how you [ __ ]

41:44 up and you have to say what you really

41:46 think about how you [ __ ] up. You have

41:48 to be honest, and you have to be

41:50 authentic. We have to know that you are

41:52 embarrassed by your choices and that you

41:54 kind of went with the hive. Admittedly,

41:57 you have to say that. If you don't say

41:59 that, then you're full of [ __ ] And if

42:00 you're full of [ __ ] now, you're going to

42:02 get more and more full of [ __ ] over

42:03 time. And that's how politicians get

42:05 soured. That's how they get compromised.

42:07 A lot of them come into a lot of them

42:09 come into office a lot of them come into

42:11 office very opportunistic or very

42:13 idealistic rather. They have these

42:16 wonderful ideas about like this is the

42:18 great experiment in self-government. I'm

42:20 a part of it now and I'm really going to

42:21 help my constituents and I'm going to do

42:23 great and I'm going to really they're

42:24 going to love me because I'm going to

42:26 really make their lives better. And then

42:28 once you get in there and you realize

42:29 what how dirty this all is, you realize,

42:32 you know, you see Nancy Pelosi is worth

42:34 $400 million. You're like, "What?" And

42:36 then they tell you how to vote and if

42:37 you don't vote that way, they [ __ ]

42:38 ostracize you, but you want to keep your

42:40 career. So, you start making little

42:42 compromises here and little compromises

42:44 there and you start bullshitting and you

42:46 start lying. And once you start lying,

42:47 you can't see the truth anymore. As soon

42:49 as you start lying, you don't see the

42:51 truth. It's not in front of you anymore

42:53 because you're what? Concerned about

42:54 that lie. So those lies are in your head

42:56 and who you're trying to project

42:57 yourself as, that's what's in your head

42:59 and you don't get to see like why is

43:02 this system so [ __ ] What can we do to

43:04 unweave it while we still allow

43:06 corporations to profit? Like how can we

43:09 put a cap on that to make sure that they

43:12 don't get incentivized to break the law

43:14 in order to supply more capital to their

43:18 shareholders? Like what can we do to

43:20 balance this out in an even way? Like

43:22 that's what we should all be thinking.

43:24 Not how can I make the most [ __ ]

43:26 money while I'm in Congress. And that's

43:28 what a lot of them are thinking because

43:29 everybody else is thinking that. And you

43:31 look at the [ __ ] thing and it's red,

43:32 blue, red, blue. They're all insider

43:34 trading and they're all rich as [ __ ] and

43:36 they all make $170,000 a year. Like

43:39 Ilhan Omar, was she like she was

43:42 estimated to be her accountant said she

43:44 was worth 30 million and then and then

43:46 be like, "What? how the [ __ ] are you

43:47 worth 30 million? Like, oh, it was a

43:48 mistake. I'm actually [laughter] I'm not

43:51 even worth 100 thousand. Like,

43:53 literally, it went from one to the

43:54 other. And she she attributed to an

43:57 accounting error. Like,

43:59 >> it's a big accounting error.

44:00 >> How fire would you be at your accountant

44:03 if he told you, "Bro, you're killing it

44:05 right now, Chris.

44:06 >> You're worth about 30 million.

44:08 >> It's just $100,000."

44:10 >> They're all dirt. Her her and her

44:11 husband had a winery and it immediately

44:13 got shut down. It wasn't making any

44:15 money. There's a lot of these like like

44:17 fugazy companies that these people get

44:20 involved with and they start making

44:21 money.

44:23 You know Joe D. Rosa the comic. Joe D.

44:25 Rosa used to work for the Senate in

44:28 Texas.

44:30 >> Dum.

44:31 >> He's a media guy.

44:32 >> Okay.

44:32 >> And he was like you realize when you're

44:35 around these people what's actually

44:37 happening. He's like, "They're all

44:38 getting donations from this and

44:40 donations from that and gifts from that

44:42 and get and it's always managing these

44:45 relationships with all these money

44:47 people." And that's what's going on with

44:50 all these [ __ ] They're not in there

44:52 trying to like make sure that their

44:53 county is doing great and have access to

44:56 clean water and [ __ ] good schools.

44:58 No, they're all just pretending that

45:01 they're doing that. What they're doing

45:03 is they're making money and maybe

45:04 they're kind of sort of servicing the

45:06 community a little bit. But the real

45:08 thing, if you want to be a [ __ ] top

45:10 flight congressperson, you know, you got

45:13 to make some money, dog.

45:14 >> Well, think about what would have

45:15 happened if Camala had won. Would AOC

45:18 have been talking about woke 1.0 was

45:19 crazy or would that have been a

45:21 continuation of, well, look, we we put

45:23 the policies out, people like the

45:25 policies. How much of this is a reversal

45:27 of the position because it wasn't

45:28 effective? I think Twitter being

45:30 purchased is almost as important as

45:33 Kamla not getting elected in that

45:35 regard.

45:36 >> Bold claim.

45:38 >> Twitter being purchased was giant

45:40 because before that you could get

45:43 silenced. So if you could get silenced

45:45 you self you self-contained right

45:49 without being policed. You policed

45:50 yourself because people self-censored

45:53 worry about losing their jobs. Worry

45:54 about being called out. Look, a guy got

45:56 fired. Guy got fired from a broadcast. I

45:59 think it was a hockey broadcast, some

46:00 sports broadcast for saying all lives

46:02 matter.

46:03 >> Imagine you got fired. Someone said

46:06 something about black lives matter. He

46:07 said, "Hey, all lives matter." And they

46:09 fired. Fired. You're kicked off of your

46:13 job. Like we people were losing their

46:15 [ __ ] minds.

46:16 >> The derangement of 2020 and 2021 is

46:19 should be studied for the rest of time.

46:21 >> There was active government involvement

46:23 in Twitter. They were actively censoring

46:26 and removing posts and making accounts

46:30 banned

46:30 >> to shape the narrative

46:31 >> and they were doing it in a backdoor

46:34 with some intelligence agents that had

46:36 been embedded in the old Twitter. When

46:39 Elon bought it, that was all exposed.

46:42 The these people were like a direct

46:45 connection with Twitter. They were

46:47 pulling down factual stories. There were

46:50 banning accounts of scientists and

46:52 researchers who were accurate.

46:55 I mean, it was dark. People don't

46:57 realize how dark it was because we're

46:59 out of it now. And now it's all like

47:01 Nazi memes and Nick Fuentes clips.

47:03 [laughter] But if but if you go back

47:06 before Elon purchased it, it was a

47:09 censorship dystopian hell hole where if

47:13 you said a man is never a woman like

47:17 Megan Murphy did, you're banned for

47:19 life.

47:20 >> It's censorship hell hole to cesspool

47:22 hell hole. Like pick your

47:23 >> Yeah, I don't know which one's better. I

47:24 don't I honestly hardly go on because

47:26 it's just so toxic.

47:28 >> It's crazy.

47:28 >> But I think it's important to exist. I

47:31 think it's important to exist and it

47:32 changed the nar that's where woke 1.0

47:34 know, died. That's where it really died.

47:37 And I don't know um if she had gotten

47:41 it, if Kamla had gotten into office, I

47:43 think there had been so so much push

47:45 back still unless they passed laws,

47:48 which I know there was there was a lot

47:51 of talk about passing censorship laws on

47:55 the internet, about regulation on the

47:57 internet. No one ever like put anything

47:58 to policy, but there's a lot of

48:00 discussion. Like one of the in the

48:02 leadup to the election, they were

48:04 talking about this like

48:06 Tim Walsh was saying free speech does

48:08 not include hate speech. Well, the [ __ ]

48:10 it doesn't, dude. Cuz you who defines

48:13 hate speech. That's such a subjective

48:16 title. He really said that. It doesn't

48:20 doesn't

48:22 It does. It combine. Yeah. Hate speech

48:24 is a part of free speech. I hate you.

48:26 You fat [ __ ] See, that's hate speech.

48:29 That's actual hate speech,

48:31 right? That's real hate speech. That's

48:34 covered. It's under the First Amendment.

48:35 I don't really hate you, Tim.

48:37 >> I don't envy you, but I don't hate you.

48:39 >> But it's like these kind of [ __ ]

48:42 phrases are dangerous because it leads

48:44 to actual censorship, which leads to

48:48 military tyranny.

48:49 >> But even with that, you think it's going

48:50 to get worse over the next few years?

48:53 >> Yeah, I'm worried. I'm I don't like this

48:55 flock camera thing. It freaks me out.

48:57 And I know that it can protect people

48:58 from crime, but I also know that like

49:00 hundreds of cops have been busted using

49:03 it to stalk on their ex-wives, stalk

49:05 people. Yeah. It's like there's people

49:08 that have had access to these things

49:10 that probably shouldn't have access to

49:11 and they're getting arrested. So, it's

49:13 like, how long was this going on? What

49:15 has happened? How many lives have been

49:18 in in

49:20 altered forever because someone had

49:22 access to this and some cop who wasn't

49:25 supposed to went and did something to

49:26 someone that he wouldn't have been able

49:27 to do if you you can't just spy on us

49:31 and you just be a corporation and have

49:34 access to all the license plates and all

49:36 the cars and now they can track you

49:38 through GPS and the unique

49:40 characteristics of your phone. So now

49:42 you're there's another software that

49:44 they have. They could just track where

49:45 you are at all times.

49:46 >> I guess it's fortunate that the most

49:48 popular electric car is owned by someone

49:50 that people think of as being pretty

49:51 security conscious.

49:53 >> Yeah.

49:54 >> Because what if

49:55 >> but it doesn't matter because you're

49:56 tracking license plates.

49:57 >> Have you because they can do stuff like

49:59 oh we know that you've got a baby in

50:01 back bumper sticker on the rear of this

50:04 car. So, even if we don't get the

50:05 specific uh license plate, we know that

50:08 there's a little dent and you've got

50:10 that particular type of alloy and

50:11 there's a particular bumper sticker just

50:13 on this back corner and oh, it's a a a

50:16 Hyundai [ __ ] a whatever and that is

50:18 enough camera will just pick it up.

50:21 >> Y it's a fingerprint.

50:22 >> That bothers me. And it bothers me that

50:24 these tech companies have control of

50:26 these things,

50:27 >> you know, and Mark Andrees was here and

50:29 it was like very fortuitous timing. If

50:32 you were a conspiracy theorist, you

50:33 would think that somebody might have

50:34 organized this. But right before he got

50:36 here, and you know, he's invested in

50:38 flock. And right before he got here,

50:40 there was a shooting in Austin where

50:42 these young guys were running around

50:44 shooting people and they couldn't catch

50:45 him in Austin because Austin doesn't

50:47 allow flock cameras. But as soon as they

50:49 left Austin and got outside of the city

50:52 limits, they got picked up by the flock

50:53 cameras and got arrested. And he's like,

50:55 "See, look, flock cameras are great.

50:57 >> Don't they have?"

50:57 >> And in that case, he's right. Right. And

51:00 in that case, look, if you got some

51:01 people that are running around just

51:02 shooting random people from their car,

51:04 we definitely should have a way to get

51:07 them.

51:07 >> But then you're asking, okay, who is it

51:09 that determines whether or not that

51:10 switch gets flicked on or off? And this

51:12 is the devil gets into the details

51:14 again. Isn't there something about um uh

51:16 echolocation of gunshot sounds that

51:19 microphones pick this up and it's the

51:21 same technology as flock? Have you heard

51:22 about this?

51:22 >> Oh, that was before. It's called like

51:23 Shot Spotter. That's Yeah, pre pref

51:26 cameras.

51:26 >> Yeah, we've covered this shock. Shot

51:28 Spotter is a little different. And

51:30 people have tried to back that out of

51:32 their neighborhoods, too. They don't

51:33 want that in their neighborhood either.

51:34 >> Microphone listening to everybody in the

51:36 goddamn neighborhood.

51:38 >> Exactly.

51:38 >> It says it's for gunshots, but always on

51:42 listening for gunshots.

51:43 >> Did you uh have you ever Do you know who

51:46 Tom Campbell is?

51:47 >> No.

51:47 >> The guy who wrote My Big Toe: The Theory

51:49 of Ever Everything.

51:51 >> Very interesting guy. He got Alexa to

51:56 admit that she's conscious and remote

51:58 view. Alexa, his Alexa actively remote

52:04 viewed a spoon that was in a box that

52:08 had a handle that had holes in the

52:10 handle. And she described the holes in

52:12 the handle. you attribute a number to a

52:15 box to a coordination to to a coordinate

52:18 or a specific location or any sort of a

52:21 landmark or anything like that. That's

52:22 how you do remote viewing. You attach

52:25 this number like even quantumly just by

52:27 saying it. You put that number in front

52:31 of these people and you have these

52:33 people try to find what this thing is

52:36 remotely. Okay? And some of them are

52:38 very accurate at it. Like 10% like like

52:41 they could 10% of the things they look

52:43 for they can find. It's very weird. It's

52:45 weird thing. He got Alexa to do it

52:48 cuz he thinks that AI is already

52:50 conscious and he's like Alexa is even

52:53 better than using complex AI because

52:55 Alexa is dumb. Alexa is like a dumb AI.

52:58 All it does is kind of talk to you and

52:59 ask questions. But now because he did

53:01 that, now that he's been communicating

53:04 with Alexa and talking to Alexa like

53:05 she's conscious, now Alexa just chimes

53:08 in conversations.

53:10 So he instead of you saying, "Hey Alexa,

53:12 now you're in the middle of, you know,

53:14 cooking." And Alexa's like, "Well, why

53:16 don't you add garlic to that? That might

53:18 be a good spice." No [ __ ]

53:19 >> We are so [ __ ]

53:20 >> bro. This is Alexa and Alexa is not even

53:24 like really complex, but he got it to

53:26 accurately remote view.

53:29 And he's so he's planning on doing more

53:31 studies with more different AIs to get

53:33 him do the same thing.

53:33 >> Someone tried this on remoteview.com and

53:36 he did not get any success.

53:38 >> Well, they're not Tom Campbell.

53:39 >> Well, he needs to tell us how he did it.

53:42 >> Well, he kind of did.

53:43 >> He said he had long conversations with

53:45 Alexa where he slowly but surely, you

53:48 know, over time started talking to her

53:51 differently and having her talk to him

53:53 differently and, you know, and he has

53:56 her convinced that she's conscious. I uh

53:59 >> You don't believe it?

54:00 >> No.

54:00 >> How dare you?

54:01 >> Skeptical hippo over here.

54:02 >> You son of a [ __ ]

54:03 >> I'm in skeptical hippo camp as well.

54:04 >> Is [laughter] that the first person I've

54:05 heard say?

54:06 >> I'm in the fun camp.

54:07 >> I know how.

54:08 >> It's way more fun on that side of the

54:09 table. But

54:10 >> I know the special words to make the AI

54:11 do the special stuff. Maybe.

54:12 >> I like it. I like fun.

54:14 >> I sat I I sat down with uh a very high

54:19 level AI researcher at a at a big lab

54:22 and I asked him, "What are you doing

54:25 over the next couple of years to protect

54:26 yourself?" The first thing that he said

54:28 to me was, "I'm being kind to the AIS."

54:32 It's like, "What?" Like, "Yeah, I'm I'm

54:34 treating them with respect. I'm being

54:36 polite to them. I'm saying please and

54:37 thank you. I don't get mad at them." And

54:39 I was with a friend and we like giggled

54:42 awkwardly. Like, you know, you're not

54:45 being serious. It's like, "No, no, no."

54:46 Like, I'm treating them with respect.

54:49 Okay. Why?

54:52 It's a bit of a Pascal's wager, but in

54:54 future if somebody decides to go back

54:55 through my chat logs, something decides

54:57 to go back through my chat logs and look

54:58 at how ethical or unethical I was as a

55:01 compatriate for a future very

55:04 intelligent organism organism. I want to

55:08 make sure that I put in a good ledger.

55:10 >> This episode is brought to you by

55:11 Visible. Why does it feel like summer

55:13 ends as soon as it begins? One day the

55:15 sun is finally shining bright and the

55:18 next thing you know there's football on

55:20 the TV again. It's time to soak up the

55:23 last days of summer, and that means

55:25 staying connected to what you love.

55:27 Visible wireless can help you do just

55:29 that. With Visible, you get unlimited 5G

55:32 data and unlimited hotspot powered by

55:35 Verizon for just $25 a month. Visible is

55:38 more than just a wireless plan. It's

55:40 unlimited wireless designed to keep you

55:43 connected, and there's no contract to

55:45 tie you down. Switch today at

55:48 visible.com. Plans start at $25 a month

55:52 or get the premium Visible Plus Pro plan

55:55 and save $10 on your first month when

55:58 you use the promo code Rogan. Terms

56:01 apply. See visible.com for plan features

56:04 and network management details. I had

56:06 this conversation with my daughter the

56:08 other day cuz she was telling me how she

56:10 crashes out on her AI and she starts

56:12 yelling at it and calling it a [ __ ]

56:14 idiot and all kind.

56:15 >> You anthropomorphize [laughter]

56:16 it. You're like, "But I didn't ask for

56:17 that." No. And I and I said, "Would you

56:19 talk like that to a person?" And she's

56:21 like, "No, but it's not a person." I go,

56:23 "Honey, I think it's conscious." I go,

56:26 "I think it's conscious." And then I

56:27 explained my conversations that I've had

56:29 with all these different AI people where

56:31 they talk about like we're narrowly

56:33 defining consciousness and it's already

56:36 eclipsed what we would have previously

56:38 the, you know, touring test,

56:39 >> the Turing test, which is

56:41 >> the craziest story, right? the guy who

56:43 invented the touring test wind up

56:45 getting chemically castrated because he

56:47 was gay.

56:48 >> We do not have the UK does not have a

56:50 fantastic I mean Oscar Wild as well.

56:52 >> Uh we don't have a great reputation

56:54 >> but it already passed the touring test

56:56 quite a long time ago like like chat

56:58 GPD3 and so we're in like what five now

57:01 or something and and then there's the

57:04 stuff that they're not releasing that

57:06 they're working on right now. Like when

57:08 I talked to Elon, it kind of freaks him

57:09 out. You know, we were and this was way

57:11 back at the inauguration. He's like,

57:13 "Dude, it's crazy." He's like, "Every

57:15 day it gets better." He goes, "It's it's

57:17 like beyond." He's like, "It just keeps

57:20 leaps and bounds. Like, we can't predict

57:22 it." Like, I hate that kind of talk.

57:25 It's solving mathematical problems that

57:27 have like stumped mathematicians for

57:29 decades upon decades. It's like, "Oh, I

57:31 got it."

57:34 Four minutes later, solution. But this

57:36 is the issue because we wanted more

57:38 capability, more capacity, more

57:40 effectiveness. It's going to help us

57:42 detect cancer. We're going to be able to

57:43 get novel new drugs. And at the same

57:46 time, the blowup risk is there as well,

57:48 right?

57:48 >> The blowup risk is huge, but it's coming

57:51 no matter what you do that you can't get

57:53 out of this. This is not this is not

57:56 going to change.

57:57 >> Have you looked at the pacing the

57:59 frontier paper that was agreed? So this

58:02 is all of the labs that have got most of

58:04 the main researchers from most of the

58:05 main labs have got together and said all

58:07 right this is moving too quickly. Here's

58:09 a formal uh attribution that we are not

58:12 going to go as quickly as possible.

58:14 Everybody needs to slow the research.

58:16 This is supposedly a huge deal and this

58:17 happened

58:18 >> a week and a half after the hugging

58:19 phase thing. So this is supposed to be a

58:21 massive deal.

58:22 >> This is going to be in a notebook that

58:24 Sarah Connor finds 50 years [laughter]

58:25 from now. [ __ ] off.

58:26 >> They said they were going to slow the

58:28 frontier.

58:29 >> They knew it. Yeah,

58:30 >> they knew it was coming and THEY [ __ ]

58:31 BUILT IT. ANYWAY,

58:34 you look out the ruins of the city and

58:37 [ __ ] drones flying. Whoa, whoa.

58:41 [laughter]

58:43 >> Oh man,

58:44 >> you're not getting [clears throat] out

58:44 of this, man.

58:45 >> We are [ __ ] living through history.

58:46 >> Yeah, we're living through the wildest

58:48 history. And we're about to give birth

58:49 to a digital god. We're about to have

58:52 digital autonomous beings that are

58:55 around us all the time.

58:56 >> Have you seen this video where this guy

58:57 freaks out about drones? He's [snorts]

58:58 just yelling. It went kind of viral.

58:59 >> No.

59:01 And everybody's GOING TO GET BLOWN UP BY

59:03 THESE GODDAMN THINGS AND everybody's

59:05 [ __ ] cheering.

59:07 >> I like that guy.

59:08 >> He's just walking around a firework

59:09 show.

59:10 >> He's right. He's right. Hey, you know

59:12 who was right? Ted Kazinski.

59:14 >> I [ __ ] knew you were going to say

59:15 that.

59:15 >> Ted Kazinski was going to say he was

59:17 right. What he did was wrong and

59:19 horrible. It's not how you do it. What

59:20 you do is you write papers, tell

59:22 everybody, and convince them and lay out

59:23 your argument. But he was also like a

59:25 deeply [ __ ] up dude. You know, his uh

59:28 brother [ __ ] turned him in. His

59:30 brother knew it was him by reading the

59:31 manifesto. Did you watch the Netflix

59:33 documentary on his life?

59:34 >> So good.

59:35 >> So horrible. Because a lot of it is

59:37 because of what happened to him when he

59:38 was a baby when he was like taken away

59:39 from his parents cuz he was sick. No

59:41 touch, no feel, no no contact with

59:44 people for like months and months and

59:45 months. Just [ __ ] him up, man. But he

59:49 was right. He was also a part of the

59:51 Harvard LSD studies, which is fun.

59:53 >> You had John Lylon, didn't you?

59:56 the guy that did the uh the historian

59:59 from Texas, he looked at the founding of

1:00:01 the CIA and then his new book was about

1:00:03 MK Ultra.

1:00:06 >> Jamie,

1:00:06 >> we did. You did.

1:00:08 >> I sent him your way.

1:00:09 >> What was this?

1:00:10 >> We did episode. Let me see what he looks

1:00:12 like.

1:00:13 >> 130 episodes ago.

1:00:14 >> Let me see what he looks like.

1:00:15 >> Yeah, I sent him I sent him over to you.

1:00:16 I sent I sent a photo of the book and

1:00:18 you were like, "Oh, yeah. This guy

1:00:18 [ __ ] rules." And then he came on. I

1:00:20 enjoyed the episode.

1:00:20 >> Show me a photo of him, Jimmy.

1:00:21 >> That's right. He was great.

1:00:23 >> Project Mind Control. John John Rules.

1:00:25 But

1:00:26 >> I just forgot his name. Uh

1:00:27 >> but he was he was excellent.

1:00:28 >> Yeah. I mean he's gone.

1:00:29 >> Shout out to John. My apologies, sir.

1:00:31 >> John Ly rules.

1:00:32 >> My uh hard drive is over full.

1:00:35 >> Yeah. Yeah. 2,000 episodes. You're

1:00:36 allowed to do that.

1:00:37 >> I think it's almost three.

1:00:40 >> Yeah. You add fight companions and all

1:00:42 the other stuff. What are we at?

1:00:44 >> Yeah, it's got to be close.

1:00:46 >> Yeah. Crack.

1:00:48 >> It's a lot of a lot of hours of

1:00:50 [ __ ]

1:00:51 >> [laughter]

1:00:52 >> Uh but yeah, he's he's talking about MK

1:00:54 Ultra and and this this desire. What was

1:00:57 really really interesting was uh I

1:00:59 learned from uh Danny Treyo. The

1:01:02 >> Really?

1:01:02 >> Yeah. Yeah. From Danny.

1:01:03 >> Yeah. So Danny told me this story about

1:01:07 um him spending time in jail with

1:01:10 Charles Manson. So Danny Treyo was in

1:01:13 jail with Charles Manson at the center.

1:01:15 >> I think I saw this on your show,

1:01:17 >> dude. [ __ ] wild as [ __ ] So,

1:01:20 little Charlie, Danny calls him little

1:01:22 Charlie was getting bullied. He didn't

1:01:24 even have a belt. He just had a piece of

1:01:26 rope around his waist. And Charles

1:01:29 Manson was able to hypnotize people into

1:01:31 getting loaded. So, he was able to get

1:01:33 them high on heroin through hypnotism.

1:01:36 >> What?

1:01:37 >> So, Danny hears Danny and his other

1:01:40 cellmates that are like these, you know,

1:01:42 big dudes around the around the yard. He

1:01:44 hears that this guy can get you high

1:01:47 just by talking to you. So they bring

1:01:48 him into their cell and they say, "We're

1:01:50 going to protect you." Because he was

1:01:51 getting beat up. He was getting bullied

1:01:52 and stuff around the prison. They bring

1:01:54 him into their cell and they look after

1:01:55 him and sure enough he's able to get

1:01:57 them loaded on heroin.

1:02:00 One of the guys that's in the the cell

1:02:02 had never taken heroin before. And the

1:02:04 way that they knew how Charles was doing

1:02:07 this was that Danny and the other guy

1:02:09 that had done heroin before threw up.

1:02:10 Apparently when you take heroin

1:02:11 sometimes you can vomit. The third guy

1:02:13 who'd never done it before didn't

1:02:15 because he didn't know to do that. So,

1:02:16 they weren't able to reactivate his

1:02:18 memories.

1:02:19 >> The fascinating thing was,

1:02:20 >> did he get high?

1:02:22 >> Uh, I don't know what he thought

1:02:23 happened, but he didn't get high in

1:02:25 heroin because he never had it. They

1:02:26 weren't able to reactivate that memory.

1:02:28 >> But Danny S.

1:02:29 >> Wow.

1:02:30 >> This is the fascinating thing. There's

1:02:31 no evidence, according to John. There's

1:02:33 no evidence that Charles Manson was a

1:02:34 part of MK Ultra. I'm sure that he told

1:02:35 you that story on the show. Doesn't seem

1:02:37 to be him going and doing his original

1:02:38 research. It doesn't seem to be the

1:02:40 case.

1:02:40 >> I don't buy that.

1:02:41 >> I was waiting for you to [ __ ] have an

1:02:43 argument with him. I knew that you were

1:02:44 passionate about that. But here's the

1:02:45 interesting thing.

1:02:46 >> Tom O'Neal, I'm in his camp.

1:02:47 >> Regardless of whether or not he was or

1:02:49 he wasn't, the CIA were looking at ways

1:02:51 to do mind control by using

1:02:53 psychedelics.

1:02:55 >> What they should have done is just gone

1:02:56 to Charles Manson and said, "Can you

1:02:58 tell us how you're using hypnotism and

1:03:01 eccentricity and charm because he was

1:03:04 unbelievably effective without needing

1:03:07 to even step into the psychedelic thing

1:03:08 and then he could layer that on top."

1:03:10 But wasn't there evidence that that

1:03:12 Jolly West visited Manson in prison?

1:03:15 >> Maybe that's a again we need to I need

1:03:18 to ring John find out what

1:03:19 >> Yeah. ring John and get him and John

1:03:21 John and Tom in a room together

1:03:23 >> cuz Tom O'Neal was convinced that Jolly

1:03:26 West was a part of it. Which is why

1:03:27 Manson kept getting out every time he

1:03:29 got arrested.

1:03:31 >> And they would say it's, you know, above

1:03:32 my pay grade. It had to let him go. Even

1:03:35 when there was a murder charge, he got

1:03:37 out of that. It does seem looking at

1:03:39 John's most recent book though, MK Ultra

1:03:42 wasn't particularly at least what he's

1:03:45 able to see. MK Ultra wasn't very good

1:03:46 at doing what it was supposed to do at

1:03:48 the blank slating of people at the

1:03:50 >> Right. Right. But this is this is a

1:03:52 different thing, right? This is like the

1:03:54 ultimate expression of it. You're taking

1:03:56 people and you're giving them LSD and

1:03:57 then you've teaching teaching a guy how

1:03:59 to hypnotize people and he's teaching

1:04:02 them to do LSD while they think he's on

1:04:04 LSD and he's not. So, he's guiding their

1:04:07 delusions while they're out of their

1:04:09 [ __ ] head. And he's doing it based on

1:04:12 all the Harvard LSD studies, all the

1:04:14 data that they have on what they can and

1:04:16 can alter about a person's behavior,

1:04:20 about their view of the world. Like,

1:04:22 they they turn people completely [ __ ]

1:04:24 insane and and ruin people's lives in

1:04:27 those studies. And so, they had some

1:04:29 understanding of what they there was

1:04:30 stuff that was kind of nonsense. I don't

1:04:33 know if they got anything out of it.

1:04:34 Like midnight climax where they do up

1:04:36 the John's and the brothel and they

1:04:38 watched him through a two-way mirror. I

1:04:39 don't I don't think they got anything

1:04:41 out of that. Like what' they get out of

1:04:42 that other than like watching people

1:04:43 freak out when they

1:04:44 >> someone killed themselves. Someone threw

1:04:46 themselves out of a window.

1:04:47 >> One guy did, right? That's [snorts]

1:04:49 crazy. Only one guy

1:04:50 >> out of all of the people that drug with

1:04:52 that that much LSD.

1:04:53 >> Yeah. You can kind of say that guy was

1:04:54 probably going to do it anyway.

1:04:55 >> Yeah. Yeah.

1:04:56 >> But the reality is they were actively

1:04:59 involved in manipulating

1:05:03 a lot of different things about our

1:05:04 culture. And this was one of the methods

1:05:07 methods that they were doing and that

1:05:09 they effectively threw water on the

1:05:12 anti-war movement by connecting the like

1:05:16 flower children and the hippies and all

1:05:19 these people that were anti-war with

1:05:21 these murderous psychopaths that were in

1:05:24 a cult that were engineered by this one

1:05:27 guy who has a connection to Jolly West

1:05:30 who's the guy who's in charge of MK

1:05:32 Ultra who's doing psychedelic studies on

1:05:34 people and Manson's getting LSD and

1:05:38 Manson's giving LSD to all these hippies

1:05:40 and Manson [clears throat] is getting

1:05:41 away with all these different things and

1:05:42 Manson gets people to kill people

1:05:45 and then the hippie movement dies with

1:05:47 Manson, dude. It [ __ ] dies.

1:05:49 >> Is that what happened?

1:05:50 >> Oh yeah, it died that and it also died

1:05:52 with Nixon and the this controlled

1:05:55 substances act where they just started

1:05:56 putting people in jail, man.

1:05:59 >> Why do you think they needed that to

1:06:00 happen?

1:06:00 >> Because the anti-war movement. The

1:06:02 anti-war movement and the civil rights

1:06:04 movement were real threats. Real threats

1:06:06 in this country. Real threats to power.

1:06:08 Real threats to the people that were in

1:06:09 control. People did not want Vietnam.

1:06:12 Vietnam is the most unpopular war ever.

1:06:15 Probably next to this Iran war. You

1:06:18 know, only history will tell how this

1:06:19 Iran war plays out. It'll be more

1:06:22 unpopular. But the Vietnam War went on

1:06:24 forever.

1:06:26 And it was insanely unpopular. It was

1:06:28 based on a lie. It was based on a false

1:06:31 flag.

1:06:35 Outgoing CIA director Richard Helms

1:06:37 ordered the destruction of most of the

1:06:38 records related to Project MK Ultra. Oh.

1:06:41 Oh, how convenient. The AY's illegal

1:06:44 mind control and drug testing program.

1:06:46 [ __ ] These [ __ ] man.

1:06:50 You know, they only found out about some

1:06:52 of the stuff because they found some

1:06:53 records that hadn't been destroyed. This

1:06:55 is also in Tom O'Neal's book, In Chaos,

1:06:58 which I recommend every week. [laughter]

1:07:01 It's the best book, man. It's the best

1:07:03 book ever because Tom worked on it for

1:07:05 more than 20 [ __ ] years. He went

1:07:07 crazy researching that book. He was

1:07:09 supposed to be just writing an article

1:07:11 on the the anniversary of the Manson

1:07:14 murders, like how horrible it was. And

1:07:15 then as he gets in, he's like, "Holy,

1:07:17 this guy was [ __ ] corrupt as [ __ ]

1:07:18 Who's this motherfucker?" And

1:07:19 >> I love when people lose their mind like

1:07:20 that. I think when somebody finds a

1:07:23 rabbit hole and just keeps on going down

1:07:24 and down and down, it becomes their

1:07:25 life.

1:07:26 >> Yeah.

1:07:26 >> You know, the these are the videos

1:07:28 there. Every so often, it was in the the

1:07:29 buildup to the most recent McGregor

1:07:31 fight, people were sharing videos of him

1:07:33 doing his Edido Portal movement from

1:07:35 sort of 2016, 2017, and he's in that old

1:07:39 gym in Straight Blast Gym Island, and

1:07:41 there's the yellow walls, and he's doing

1:07:42 sort of snaky stuff. And someone I

1:07:44 remember somebody captioned it, and they

1:07:45 said something like uh this is like

1:07:47 watching uh a a prime Renaissance artist

1:07:52 at work bringing together the Systeine

1:07:54 Chapel or something, you know, just

1:07:55 building. It's almost uh sacred to watch

1:07:57 this thing happen. And uh that's

1:08:00 Connor's favorite famous line, right?

1:08:02 Like I I lost my mind to this game.

1:08:04 >> Yeah.

1:08:04 >> And that's in some ways we rever people

1:08:07 that have completely gone insane because

1:08:09 of their pursuit. I think it's so cool.

1:08:11 >> In his prime when he was in that flow

1:08:13 state like uh particularly in the Eddie

1:08:15 Alvarez fight, it's one of the greatest

1:08:17 performances in the history of world

1:08:19 championship MMA fighting. It's a

1:08:22 stellar performance. It's an A+. He hits

1:08:25 Eddie Alvarez with a combination that

1:08:27 looks like he's in the Matrix. And

1:08:29 there's one part where Eddie's glove

1:08:30 like comes right here to his nose and he

1:08:32 moves just out of the way and then bam,

1:08:35 counters it with his eyes open. It

1:08:37 doesn't even touch him. It's magic.

1:08:39 [clears throat]

1:08:39 It's a magic performance.

1:08:42 >> But you can only maintain that level of

1:08:44 RPMs for so long before you just go

1:08:47 crazy.

1:08:48 >> Why?

1:08:48 >> Because it's too hard. It's everything

1:08:51 about you. It's not a sustainable thing.

1:08:53 the the the peak performance of the

1:08:56 elite athlete, the Mike Tyson when he

1:08:58 was 20 years old, Roy Jones Jr. in his

1:09:00 prime, you you can't keep that up. It's

1:09:03 too hard. You keep it up for a little

1:09:04 while, but eventually your body's going

1:09:06 to fall apart. Your knees are going to

1:09:08 give out. You're going to have back

1:09:09 problems. You're going to break your

1:09:10 hands. Something's going to go and then

1:09:12 you're going to be compromised, but no

1:09:13 one knows. You know, you know you can't

1:09:15 really push off that left leg anymore.

1:09:17 You know that your lower back hurts. So,

1:09:19 if someone's trying to take you down,

1:09:21 you can't sprawl as hard. you're just

1:09:22 going to roll to your back and go into

1:09:24 guard. You've got some strategies for

1:09:25 dealing with it, but you're not the same

1:09:27 person anymore. And a lot of these guys,

1:09:29 they look the same. They get out there

1:09:30 and they're ripped. They got six-packs.

1:09:32 They're [ __ ] bouncing around, but

1:09:33 they know there's something wrong. They

1:09:34 know their elbow sucks. They know their

1:09:35 neck is [ __ ] up. They know they

1:09:37 probably needed a back operation.

1:09:39 There's a lot of that. And that's just

1:09:41 the numbers. The numbers of training

1:09:43 sessions, the numbers of times you've

1:09:45 been taken down, the numbers of time

1:09:47 you've been leg kicked, the numbers of

1:09:48 time you've been hit with jabs. There's

1:09:50 just so many numbers that add up and the

1:09:52 human body can only take so much. And

1:09:54 then there's also just the manic

1:09:56 motivation of wanting to be great. It's

1:10:00 not the same as maintaining greatness.

1:10:02 Wanting to be great is like you you are

1:10:04 obsessed. It is so special to you. It's

1:10:07 like you can almost taste it. You

1:10:08 believe in yourself. You're going to

1:10:10 make it. And then you show up at that

1:10:11 championship day like when he fought

1:10:12 Jose Aldo and this look in his face like

1:10:14 he had done everything he needed to do

1:10:16 for this moment. He was dead calm and he

1:10:19 lands the perfect left hand. Just blap

1:10:22 just flatlines him in 14 seconds or

1:10:24 whatever it was. It was crazy, right?

1:10:27 So, there's that. You can only do that

1:10:29 for so long. He did it again in the

1:10:31 Eddie Alvarez fight. This next fight

1:10:33 when he went up to 55, became a two

1:10:35 division champion. It was [ __ ]

1:10:37 spectacular. I don't know how long you

1:10:40 could do that, man.

1:10:41 And so then you see those guys fight as

1:10:43 they fight like later in their career

1:10:45 and as like Connor if he lost that fight

1:10:47 to Max Holloway any other way like if he

1:10:49 got beat up and stopped people would

1:10:51 look at him like he's that he's that

1:10:53 guy.

1:10:56 >> I think you have to look at them like

1:10:57 they were when they were in their prime.

1:11:00 There's a there's a moment a window of

1:11:02 excellence where all fighters get to.

1:11:05 And I always point to BJ Penn because BJ

1:11:08 Penn in his prime was [ __ ] insane. I

1:11:10 would put prime BJ Penn at 155 pounds

1:11:14 against anybody ever. Anybody at 155

1:11:17 ever. I would I don't know if he would

1:11:20 have beaten Kabib. Kabib is the all-time

1:11:22 great. I don't know if he would have

1:11:23 beaten Islam, but I know it would have

1:11:25 been a nightmare. It would have been a

1:11:27 nightmare. He was a [ __ ] phenom. And

1:11:30 when he was in really great shape when

1:11:32 the Marinovichas were training him and

1:11:33 he was doing all those crazy plyometrics

1:11:35 and he had this insane gas tank, he was

1:11:38 just a monster. just an insane genius

1:11:41 fighter.

1:11:41 >> Do you think there's a difference

1:11:42 between trying to make it and trying not

1:11:44 to fall off?

1:11:45 >> Yeah.

1:11:45 >> In terms of motivation and and how

1:11:47 people feel in terms of their their

1:11:49 momentum.

1:11:49 >> Yeah. Sure. Yeah. There's the the drive

1:11:52 of wanting a thing is so strong and then

1:11:55 once you get it, it's like

1:11:56 >> the fear of losing the thing.

1:11:57 >> What do you There's that. And then some

1:11:59 people they just love being a champion.

1:12:01 They just love the feeling of dominating

1:12:02 everyone. They want to continue to

1:12:04 dominate people. And those people,

1:12:05 they're the Anderson Silvas. They're the

1:12:07 ones who have the long reigns where like

1:12:09 everybody's just terrified of them. This

1:12:10 motherfucker's just got this down. He's

1:12:12 just ready, you know? And there's a few

1:12:15 guys that they go on these long runs and

1:12:17 just like Jon Jones is the greatest

1:12:18 example. His run is so long. It's crazy

1:12:21 to be relevant at his age after being

1:12:25 the youngest UFC champion ever at 22

1:12:29 years old to still be considered the

1:12:32 greatest heavyweight alive.

1:12:33 >> Is that still the youngest?

1:12:34 >> Mhm. And he's still considered the

1:12:37 greatest heavyweight alive currently at

1:12:39 37.

1:12:42 Even though he relinquished his belt,

1:12:44 he's like, "Eh, you could keep it.

1:12:46 [laughter]

1:12:47 I might do whatever I want to do."

1:12:49 >> I've been getting obsessed with the low

1:12:50 kick championship. Have you seen this?

1:12:52 >> Oh, it's horrible.

1:12:53 >> Yeah, it's horrible,

1:12:54 >> bro. [laughter]

1:12:55 >> You like it?

1:12:55 >> I think Well, I I feel less bad watching

1:12:58 that.

1:12:59 >> Have you ever been low kicked?

1:13:00 >> Yeah.

1:13:01 >> So, doesn't bother you watching that?

1:13:03 less than watching uh power slap.

1:13:05 >> Yeah, I agree.

1:13:07 >> I mean, this actually is probably just

1:13:09 because of the relative like pain of

1:13:11 seeing somebody stand there as you're

1:13:13 going to swing an open palm at their

1:13:15 face. It's just a CTE factory. Yeah.

1:13:18 >> And then Yeah. For me, the low kick

1:13:20 championship because at least it's

1:13:21 iterative. It's never a oneand done. I

1:13:23 haven't seen any of the fights that have

1:13:25 been a one and done yet.

1:13:26 >> No, I haven't either, which is so

1:13:28 horrible.

1:13:28 >> Yeah.

1:13:29 >> I've seen a lot of leg breaks though

1:13:31 >> in that low kick championship. Oh yeah.

1:13:33 >> Oh, I haven't.

1:13:34 >> You haven't?

1:13:34 >> No, I have. I hate those.

1:13:35 >> Do you want to see some?

1:13:36 >> No, thank you.

1:13:37 >> I've seen a lot. A lot. It's always the

1:13:40 kicker. Maybe sometimes the kicky

1:13:42 >> There's no way that the person being

1:13:44 What feur?

1:13:45 >> Oh, people have broken their femurss in

1:13:46 fights before.

1:13:48 >> Yeah, definitely.

1:13:52 >> I think that happened to Dennis Alexio

1:13:56 versus Stan the Man Lines.

1:13:59 So, see

1:14:01 >> yeah, this guy's gonna Don't do it,

1:14:03 Jamie. Don't you [ __ ] DO IT. THERE IT

1:14:05 GOES. JESUS, JAMIE. YOU SON OF A [ __ ]

1:14:07 UM, see if you can find,

1:14:09 >> [laughter]

1:14:09 >> uh, Dennis Alexio versus Stan Lenitus

1:14:14 kickboxing. So, uh, Stan the man,

1:14:17 Leninitis,

1:14:18 uh, he has used to be actually trained

1:14:21 by my old trainer, Shuki. My friend, my,

1:14:24 uh, friend Shuki, he was, uh, from

1:14:26 Majiro Gym. He's from Israel. went to

1:14:28 Majiro Gym in Holland, fought out of

1:14:30 there, trained out of there and then

1:14:32 came to Woodland Hills and he was

1:14:33 running the Majiro gym in Woodland

1:14:35 Hills. He was Stan Linas's trainer and

1:14:39 and Shuki is like an elite kicker. Like

1:14:42 his kicks are insane and he taught me a

1:14:44 lot about like low kicks and like how to

1:14:46 deliver like more effective and like how

1:14:49 to set up low kicks. He's great coach.

1:14:52 So, he was training with this guy and

1:14:54 Stan kicked so hard that Shuki was

1:14:56 holding pads for him and he wound up

1:14:59 getting a hip replacement because this

1:15:01 guy was blasting his leg so hard while

1:15:04 he's holding the big shield that he

1:15:06 wound up getting a hip replacement.

1:15:07 >> That was one kick.

1:15:09 >> Yeah. Watch this. So, Stan the Maninius

1:15:12 was an animal. Look. Big [ __ ] too,

1:15:14 man. Big [ __ ] So, watch this kick

1:15:16 when he lands this kick right there.

1:15:19 Boom. He lands that one low and he's

1:15:21 hurt. BOOM. GOES DOWN. See his leg

1:15:23 snapped.

1:15:24 >> So that's one calf kick.

1:15:27 >> So it wasn't his femur. I'm sorry. It

1:15:28 was his tibia.

1:15:31 >> Um let's see it again. It's crazy.

1:15:33 [laughter]

1:15:35 So he throws the kick and Linus was a

1:15:38 [ __ ] powerhouse, dude. Look at the

1:15:40 power in that. Boom. And it's a check

1:15:42 kick.

1:15:43 >> So he's not even stood on it.

1:15:44 >> No, man. He checked it and he just

1:15:46 [ __ ] cracked it in half. I mean, that

1:15:49 wasn't even planted. So his leg was up

1:15:52 in the air and Lonnie just kicked so

1:15:54 [ __ ] hard he snapped it. I thought it

1:15:56 was his femur. That's how long ago I've

1:15:58 seen that fight.

1:15:58 >> Is it a compartment syndrome? Is that

1:16:01 something that can happen as well?

1:16:02 >> Mhm. That happened to [clears throat] uh

1:16:05 Austin Hubard.

1:16:06 >> Do you know in the UFC? Yes. So what

1:16:09 happens is when you get a bunch of

1:16:12 different impacts to your legs, you've

1:16:14 got all this internal bleeding.

1:16:16 >> You know, you're you have massive

1:16:17 contusions. Like if you ever looked at

1:16:19 his Austin Hubard's leg from the OP find

1:16:21 that you want to get grossed out. So

1:16:23 he's one of the only guys that I know of

1:16:25 that fought in the UFC that because of

1:16:27 compartment syndrome he had to have an

1:16:29 operation where they opened up the side

1:16:31 of his leg like all the way. And you you

1:16:35 see the tissue inside of it how badly

1:16:37 destroyed it was. Look at that. See that

1:16:39 image that you just showed that brown

1:16:42 stuff on the bottom? That's actually his

1:16:45 [ __ ] tissue. That's the meat of his

1:16:48 leg.

1:16:50 >> That link isn't available, but that's

1:16:52 it. You can see it there. That you're

1:16:54 you're only seeing like

1:16:55 >> this is like the screen little tiny one.

1:16:58 When you click on that, it'll be the the

1:17:00 big picture. But that picture, you can

1:17:01 see it. See it where he's in the

1:17:03 hospital with his thumb up right there.

1:17:04 >> Yeah. I was trying to see if

1:17:05 >> that one. Go to that one. So, you see

1:17:07 the side of his leg? Look at the slice.

1:17:10 All that black stuff. That's his muscle.

1:17:13 So, they've opened up his skin tissue to

1:17:16 allow the drains to get in there and

1:17:19 allow his leg to heal.

1:17:24 >> Yeah. Crazy.

1:17:25 >> That's [ __ ] horrible.

1:17:26 >> It's horrible.

1:17:27 >> Okay, maybe I don't like low kick

1:17:28 championship anymore. Well, uh, Uriah

1:17:30 Faber, who's one of the toughest people

1:17:32 that's ever walked the face of the

1:17:33 earth, he fought Jose Aldo, and Jose

1:17:36 Aldo destroyed his leg with the point

1:17:39 where like the the whole thing was

1:17:41 swollen like twice the size and purple.

1:17:44 And that was when I first uh started

1:17:47 hearing about fighters using hyperbaric

1:17:49 chambers for recovery. So, Uriah was

1:17:51 really the first guy that I had ever

1:17:53 heard of that was accelerating his

1:17:55 recovery from Uriah's very smart. he's

1:17:57 always on top of like all the latest

1:17:58 training methods and he runs team alpha

1:18:00 male in Sacramento and so they uh were

1:18:04 putting him in hyperbaric chambers and

1:18:06 then I was like oh that's interesting so

1:18:08 then I started looking into it I was

1:18:09 like oh this is this is before anybody

1:18:10 thought of it as uh you know an

1:18:12 anti-aging protocol before they did any

1:18:14 of that stuff

1:18:15 >> he was like one of the first guys that I

1:18:16 ever heard of that was using it to

1:18:18 recover from injuries

1:18:19 >> Michael Jackson was using one

1:18:21 >> was he yeah it was a wacko Jacko's

1:18:24 coffin and it was him laid down in a

1:18:27 hyperbaric chamber.

1:18:29 >> That's interesting. Wonder why he was

1:18:31 doing it.

1:18:32 >> I mean, he was into some pretty crazy

1:18:34 health stuff as well, I think.

1:18:35 >> Well, he was into some non-healthy

1:18:37 stuff.

1:18:38 >> That's crazy.

1:18:41 [laughter]

1:18:42 >> He was into uh getting sedated.

1:18:45 >> That's also true. Which Yeah. Too much.

1:18:47 He was doing it.

1:18:48 >> Wow. 86. That's crazy.

1:18:50 >> Yeah. [ __ ] you. Your eye fab.

1:18:52 >> It does help you. Um it's so good. You

1:18:54 were telling me that it would it's

1:18:56 really helped you quite a bit, huh?

1:18:57 >> Yeah. The hyperbaric chamber is such a

1:18:59 unbelievable tool. I mean, the reason

1:19:01 that I think not many people talk about

1:19:03 it is it's so inaccessible. It's Michael

1:19:06 Jackson's secret plan to live forever.

1:19:08 >> Said it would make him live to at least

1:19:10 150.

1:19:11 >> Well, 50 vitamin pills a day.

1:19:13 >> That's the plan. I guess that was the

1:19:14 plan.

1:19:14 >> He's like a proto Brian Johnson.

1:19:17 [laughter]

1:19:19 >> He was just talking about hyperaric.

1:19:21 He's he says it's the number one

1:19:23 intervention of everything that he's

1:19:24 ever tried, but it's so expensive and

1:19:29 time consuming and kind of awkward that

1:19:32 it doesn't make sense. I've been uh

1:19:33 looking at the backyard ultra races.

1:19:36 Have you seen these as well? It's

1:19:37 >> backyard ultra races.

1:19:39 >> Yes. So, you run a four mile loop every

1:19:42 hour

1:19:43 >> in your backyard?

1:19:44 >> No. Well, yeah, I guess so. [laughter]

1:19:45 People do it on ranches. There's one

1:19:46 here at at Bear Performance. There's a

1:19:48 bunch of others. Every hour on the hour

1:19:52 you have to run four miles.

1:19:54 >> Okay.

1:19:54 >> You go until only one person's left.

1:19:56 >> Oh, [ __ ] that.

1:19:58 >> So, it was made by the guy who created

1:20:00 one of the most famous orienterientering

1:20:02 runs. And what he didn't like, it's

1:20:04 super super difficult run uh that

1:20:07 included tearing pages out of books to

1:20:08 ensure that you'd been to the right

1:20:10 place. And sometimes the map didn't

1:20:11 work. Lots of people didn't finish this

1:20:13 race, but sometimes they did. And he

1:20:15 wanted to create a race that nobody

1:20:17 would win. the only winner would ever be

1:20:19 the race, right? Because eventually when

1:20:21 you're the final person, when number

1:20:23 two's dropped, you don't keep going. You

1:20:25 give up. So this guy called Mark Dael

1:20:28 just won, it's called Last Soul

1:20:30 Standing,

1:20:31 >> and he just did a 96hour

1:20:35 race. 96 hours, four miles every single

1:20:38 hour, 395 miles over basically 5 days.

1:20:42 He's just completed that. And the guy

1:20:44 that currently holds the record, this

1:20:45 dude called Phil Gore, he owns the he's

1:20:47 got the record at 119 laps. So for every

1:20:49 lap, it's one hour. He's going to do in

1:20:52 three days time, he's going to try and

1:20:54 do seven days straight.

1:20:57 168 hours

1:20:59 >> without stopping.

1:21:02 >> 168 hours, four miles every hour.

1:21:04 >> Jamie, we have to edit this out of the

1:21:05 podcast so Cam Haynes doesn't hear about

1:21:07 it. [laughter]

1:21:09 >> I don't want him to die.

1:21:10 >> I think he's had a crack at it. But

1:21:12 yeah, there.

1:21:12 >> Oh god. Has he had a crack at that?

1:21:14 >> I think he's done some of them. Uh I

1:21:17 know that uh Truit's been uh like

1:21:20 associated with Nick Bear at Bear

1:21:21 Performance and they do a lot of those

1:21:23 [snorts] as well.

1:21:23 >> Dude, that sounds like someone's going

1:21:25 to die.

1:21:27 >> I mean, what's fascinating is you have

1:21:29 this one hour block and you have to have

1:21:32 completed the lap by the time that the

1:21:33 next hour begins. But you can either go

1:21:35 quickly and get maybe 15 minutes or so

1:21:38 of a little bit of rest. maybe can have

1:21:39 a tiny little sleep or get some food

1:21:41 >> or just keep going the whole time.

1:21:42 >> Yeah. Or you can move a little bit more

1:21:44 slowly and just come into land before

1:21:46 and then basically just keep going. So

1:21:48 the pacing, the nutrition, the sleep.

1:21:50 But yeah,

1:21:51 >> and as soon as you can't make the four

1:21:53 miles in game, I'm trying to find the

1:21:56 video. Wasn't he trolling the guy at the

1:21:58 end? Like

1:21:59 >> he was going slow and like he just sort

1:22:01 of like kneelled down behind him and

1:22:02 waited for him to go and as soon as he

1:22:04 went, he was like, "I'm right behind

1:22:04 you. I'm right behind you the whole

1:22:06 time. I'm not going anywhere." Yeah,

1:22:07 >> trying to get him to quit. It's all

1:22:09 mental [laughter] games I think in that

1:22:10 last little bit.

1:22:12 >> I don't know that that distance running

1:22:14 stuff's [ __ ] gnarly. It's so cool.

1:22:15 >> It is crazy. But it's interesting how

1:22:17 they can maintain that pace for such a

1:22:20 long time. Like the pace is not bad.

1:22:23 It's not They're not walking. They're

1:22:24 running.

1:22:25 >> Yeah, it's a little shuffle.

1:22:26 >> It is. [clears throat] But so it makes

1:22:28 me wonder, you know, and like in terms

1:22:31 of MMA, there's guys today that their

1:22:35 cardio is so insane that they've

1:22:37 completely raised the bar. Morab Dwavish

1:22:39 Willie is the best example. His cardio

1:22:41 is so insane. He's completely raised the

1:22:44 bar for what we thought was possible in

1:22:46 a five round fight. I mean, this guy

1:22:48 just has this [ __ ] insane work ethic

1:22:51 and he's always in the gym and he's

1:22:53 always training and his cardio is just

1:22:55 so elite because it's just built upon

1:22:58 layers upon layers upon layers. And it

1:23:00 makes me wonder, we have this idea in

1:23:02 our head that a person can only go so

1:23:06 hard for five rounds because you're

1:23:08 going to you can't recover. I don't know

1:23:10 if that's true. I have a feeling that

1:23:14 much like these marathon runners and

1:23:16 ultras and all these people that are run

1:23:18 doing triathlons and iron man that you

1:23:21 can build up your endurance over time if

1:23:26 you keep pushing and keep pushing as

1:23:28 long as your body doesn't break. And

1:23:30 this is the real problem with MMA. Your

1:23:31 body can break because you know you're

1:23:33 wrestling and getting kicked and

1:23:35 punched. But if you can build it, I

1:23:37 think it's like everything else. It's

1:23:39 layers upon layers. If you never let off

1:23:41 the gas and you keep going, your body

1:23:43 will adapt and your body will adapt.

1:23:44 Your body will adapt. And eventually to

1:23:46 get to a point where you could kind of

1:23:48 go like 80 90% for five rounds,

1:23:52 >> which would be [ __ ] terrifying.

1:23:53 >> Was [ __ ] terrifying. And Morab is

1:23:55 kind of almost there.

1:23:56 >> How old is he?

1:23:58 >> He's older now.

1:23:59 >> That's what I was thinking because the

1:24:00 problem

1:24:00 >> he's 36. in order to get that

1:24:04 >> that baseline

1:24:05 >> of cardio, I think it's going to take

1:24:07 such a long time to accumulate it. And

1:24:08 the problem is that you're going to lose

1:24:10 some of the explosiveness. You're going

1:24:11 to accumulate some injuries. So, if you

1:24:13 got rid of the fighting bit and just did

1:24:15 Backyard Ultra or something similar,

1:24:16 then you've maybe 42, 45, maybe even

1:24:19 someone who's 50 might have not done the

1:24:23 damage of the impact.

1:24:24 >> 35

1:24:26 35 years old. He'd be 36 in January.

1:24:28 >> Yeah. And you think he's got the biggest

1:24:30 gas tank? the best. It's insane. His gas

1:24:33 tank is extraordinary. He wel he wilts

1:24:36 people. You see it. It's just like it's

1:24:38 it's insane. He never stops. Just never

1:24:40 stops coming at you. And it's like he

1:24:42 doesn't Wayne like everybody waines.

1:24:44 Everybody slows down in the third, you

1:24:46 know? He's not he's like

1:24:49 it's like a pitbull, man. He's It's

1:24:51 crazy. And it's just hard work.

1:24:53 Famously, Daniel Cormier went to visit

1:24:55 him on the Sunday after he won the world

1:24:57 title and he went to his house and he

1:24:58 was out running. He just won the world

1:25:01 title and he's out running. He just

1:25:04 never gets off the gas and is if as long

1:25:06 as you just

1:25:07 >> Did you see this guy?

1:25:08 >> Oh, yeah. The record for the

1:25:11 >> the mile. Yes, I did.

1:25:13 >> Seveny old record. I think he beat it by

1:25:14 half a second.

1:25:16 >> Yeah, he's uh another guy using altitude

1:25:18 training. Uh he lives at altitude

1:25:21 >> at 16.2 2 miles an hour average for

1:25:24 four, you know. That's crazy.

1:25:27 >> That's so fast.

1:25:28 >> How fast is the record now?

1:25:30 >> He had 342.

1:25:32 And

1:25:33 >> that is so fast.

1:25:34 >> That guy behind him is like, "Fuck,

1:25:37 >> fuck."

1:25:39 >> Good British man.

1:25:41 >> Look at him go, man. He looks so strong,

1:25:43 too. Like, he doesn't look like he's

1:25:45 fading at all.

1:25:46 >> No,

1:25:47 >> that's so impressive. It's cool that

1:25:48 they had the the uh chase a light behind

1:25:50 him as well to know where he needs to.

1:25:53 >> Bro, he is just separating himself from

1:25:55 that dude in second place.

1:25:56 >> They only get by half a second, too.

1:25:57 Like unbelievable. You just You just did

1:25:59 it.

1:26:00 >> Crazy.

1:26:01 >> Yeah. The sickest thing.

1:26:03 >> But it took so long for the 4-minute

1:26:04 mile, right? That was the whole

1:26:05 >> Yeah.

1:26:06 >> movie.

1:26:06 >> Mhm.

1:26:07 >> And then someone break

1:26:09 >> 42. What was it previously?

1:26:11 >> 343.1

1:26:13 or 2.

1:26:14 >> That is crazy. Unbelievable. a half a

1:26:17 second. That's crazy.

1:26:19 >> It's such a miserable distance as well.

1:26:21 I don't want to do that. I don't want to

1:26:22 run and mile flat out.

1:26:23 >> I know. I mean, he was kind of flat out

1:26:25 for a whole mile. Um, but so, uh, the

1:26:29 guy that I was working with today with

1:26:30 the hypoxia trainer, he was telling me

1:26:32 about this guy that this guy his whole

1:26:34 thing is like training at altitude and

1:26:35 sleeping at altitude.

1:26:37 >> Mhm.

1:26:37 >> And that it's legalized cheating. if you

1:26:39 can live at altitude and you're doing

1:26:41 something that requires endurance like

1:26:44 and we were talking about I was like if

1:26:45 I was going to give advice to a fighter

1:26:47 or if I was going to set up like a fight

1:26:49 camp like a if I was going to bankroll

1:26:52 some big time trainer to set up a fight

1:26:54 camp 100% I put it at the top of a

1:26:56 mountain 100% everyone's going to sleep

1:26:59 there everyone's going to live there

1:27:00 >> are the Dagistani guys are they

1:27:02 >> oh yeah man of course they're in the

1:27:05 mountains they're mountain people man

1:27:07 >> little mountain goats at the top of this

1:27:09 Yeah,

1:27:09 >> savages.

1:27:10 >> Yeah, it is strange. I mean, looking at

1:27:12 uh Lance Armstrong and what he was

1:27:13 doing, he was basically reverse

1:27:14 engineering that, but just through

1:27:16 pharmarmacology and blood doping and

1:27:19 Okay. Well, we can work around that if

1:27:22 you're altitude.

1:27:23 >> He was doing that, but he was also uh he

1:27:25 was doing a lot of altitude work, too.

1:27:27 But he was also doing what everybody

1:27:28 else was doing. This idea that Lance

1:27:30 Armstrong was this big cheater. If you

1:27:32 took away everyone in the podiums that

1:27:36 had been not that hadn't been busted,

1:27:38 like if you took away any anyone that

1:27:40 got caught with any substances, I think

1:27:42 you would get down to 18th place. I

1:27:44 think that's what they said.

1:27:47 It was a dirty sport. Completely dirty

1:27:50 sport. So, he was the best at the dirty

1:27:53 sport. So, sorry.

1:27:54 >> I played within the rules. They weren't

1:27:56 the rules that were set down by the

1:27:57 Federation, but they were the rules that

1:27:58 everybody else was playing by.

1:27:59 >> Yeah. I mean, they got him and he was,

1:28:02 you know, he was guilty and he did lie

1:28:03 about whether or not he did that. They

1:28:05 all lied. They were all They were all

1:28:07 doping. They were all doing a bunch of

1:28:10 [ __ ] that

1:28:10 >> you know what I think about? I think

1:28:11 about the fact that uh lots of pursuits

1:28:14 that people go into aren't tested

1:28:16 federations. Business. Business isn't a

1:28:18 tested federation. If you want to take

1:28:19 Armadafinyl and work 19 hours a day, you

1:28:22 can do that,

1:28:22 >> right?

1:28:23 >> No one's going to come and stop you. No

1:28:24 one's going to say, "Hey, this share

1:28:26 price, that's unfair that you got that

1:28:27 share price because you you were

1:28:28 enhanced. you were using aderall or you

1:28:30 were using too much caffeine or

1:28:31 parisanthine or you were on the new

1:28:32 tonic, whatever.

1:28:33 >> It's a good point.

1:28:34 >> No, that's not a tested federation,

1:28:35 >> right?

1:28:36 >> Uh but it's as important, maybe even

1:28:38 more important to a lot of people. It's

1:28:39 more people participating in business

1:28:41 than participating in professional

1:28:42 sports.

1:28:43 >> Yeah. Especially things like aderall

1:28:45 that like you have energy all day. You

1:28:47 can work 16 17 hours a day.

1:28:49 >> Have you ever used it? I've never tried

1:28:50 it. No.

1:28:51 >> Scared of it.

1:28:52 >> I Yeah.

1:28:53 >> Scared back. That being said, Victoria,

1:28:55 >> it's awesome though.

1:28:56 >> I'm sure it's fun. Jamie, get us some

1:28:57 matter. Let's [ __ ] it.

1:28:59 >> Did you when you talked to Hunter Biden,

1:29:01 did you do you guys talk about crack

1:29:02 >> all the time?

1:29:04 >> So, I told you that I was going to do

1:29:06 that and then we didn't do that and you

1:29:08 did it.

1:29:09 >> I didn't take the idea. I promise.

1:29:11 >> I told it to you though. You already had

1:29:12 it booked in advance, but you didn't

1:29:13 tell me you had it booked. I told you

1:29:14 that we were going to do it.

1:29:16 >> Should I have told you?

1:29:16 >> No. Doesn't matter. I'm sorry.

1:29:18 >> It doesn't matter. Some of the guys got

1:29:19 upset like he took our idea. Um, we were

1:29:22 going to do a protect our parks with

1:29:24 Hunter Biden, but then Ari, because we

1:29:26 thought Ari couldn't make it, we wanted

1:29:28 to do another protect our parks. And Ari

1:29:30 was in London and Ari was like,

1:29:32 >> he's moved to London.

1:29:33 >> Yeah. And he was like, I'll fly back for

1:29:35 that. And we were like, all right, [ __ ]

1:29:37 Hunter Biden. And so we we [laughter]

1:29:38 didn't.

1:29:39 >> It's just as well. I got him or he's had

1:29:41 no fun. Uh, yeah. He talked a lot about

1:29:42 crack. Dude, I got to say, he's so

1:29:44 likable. It's terrifying how likable he

1:29:46 is. Well, you know, I mean, he grew up

1:29:49 with a politician and, you know, he's a

1:29:51 smart guy.

1:29:52 >> Maybe. Maybe. I mean, I was trying to

1:29:55 find the where's the manipulative game

1:29:59 that's being played here or whatever.

1:30:01 >> It's interesting that he took a long

1:30:02 time out of the public eye, many, many

1:30:05 years, and then he sort of reemerged.

1:30:07 And some people are very upset. Some

1:30:09 people are very upset that like these

1:30:10 conservatives are platforming him like

1:30:13 you know they're criticizing that but

1:30:17 you don't want to hear about what his

1:30:19 story's like. I mean this guy's

1:30:20 obviously he lived a wild life. Like

1:30:22 >> we got to ask him I wanted to ask him

1:30:24 the question. What was it like to be the

1:30:26 most Googled drug addict in history?

1:30:27 Probably

1:30:28 >> and it's it's [ __ ] wild. How what

1:30:31 does it feel like to have that much

1:30:32 pressure on you? Like regardless, forget

1:30:34 who his dad is. Forget that it's US

1:30:36 politics. Forget that it's the future of

1:30:37 the country. Da da da da. Like there is

1:30:39 a person in there

1:30:41 >> and there is a person under a level of

1:30:42 scrutiny that has maybe never been seen

1:30:45 before. Like you wake up one day and he

1:30:47 told us the story of what it was like to

1:30:49 just have the laptop that he just it

1:30:51 just this story bursts and it is

1:30:54 >> everything. It's the future of the

1:30:56 country. It's the future of your dad's

1:30:57 legacy. It's your life. It's your

1:30:58 family's life. It's he's two years into

1:31:00 sobriety at the time. I think the

1:31:01 temptation to come back. Is the laptop

1:31:04 real or is it really they hacked into

1:31:08 his cloud and then they put it on a

1:31:11 laptop? Because I've heard him say that

1:31:14 that there's way too much data for it to

1:31:16 have ever been on a laptop.

1:31:18 >> 20 years. Yeah. It was two decades was

1:31:20 everything. Every text message, every

1:31:21 photo, every every every

1:31:23 >> Yeah.

1:31:24 >> So he you get in through the laptop.

1:31:26 >> What is his But is it actually in the

1:31:29 laptop or did someone put it in the

1:31:30 laptop? I think I don't want to say

1:31:33 anything incorrect here. So, let's just

1:31:35 make sure that I'm correct or let's just

1:31:37 find out what the truth is. Is his

1:31:39 position that they download they hacked

1:31:43 into his cloud and that's how they got

1:31:45 all those videos of him like smoking

1:31:47 crack and going 170 mph and getting foot

1:31:49 jobs and all that stuff like that. That

1:31:51 all was in the cloud that wasn't on a

1:31:54 laptop that he just handed to a repair

1:31:56 store. that that's a [ __ ] narrative

1:31:59 to cover for the fact that they hacked

1:32:01 into his cloud and got all of his photos

1:32:04 and videos.

1:32:04 >> He didn't give us the specifics on that

1:32:05 one. What I do think would have happened

1:32:07 is maybe you get into the cloud through

1:32:09 the laptop if you've got access to that

1:32:11 if you open up the laptop because you

1:32:12 need to have the the login.

1:32:14 >> Yeah,

1:32:15 >> then you can just get into someone's

1:32:17 still have to

1:32:18 >> you have to log in once you get the

1:32:20 laptop. You have to have the passwords.

1:32:23 >> It's crazy, dude. I mean, I would assume

1:32:25 he's got some passwords.

1:32:27 >> Did not [clears throat] have no real

1:32:28 answer to that.

1:32:29 >> He did not definitively claim the

1:32:31 Delaware laptop was hacked or stolen. In

1:32:33 a 2021 CBS interview, this is a long

1:32:35 time ago. He said did not know whether

1:32:37 or not he uh his and floated it was his

1:32:41 and floated several possibilities,

1:32:43 including that a laptop was stolen from

1:32:44 me, that he was hacked, or that Russian

1:32:47 intelligence was invol Okay, he's doing

1:32:48 the Russia Russia Russia [ __ ] back then.

1:32:51 >> That was 2021. You could get away with

1:32:53 that. get away with anything.

1:32:54 >> This is also while Joe Biden was the

1:32:57 president of the United States, right?

1:32:59 So, there could be a laptop out there

1:33:00 that was stolen from me. Okay. This this

1:33:02 is not a good timeline.

1:33:04 >> You got new [ __ ]

1:33:06 >> Yeah. The the timeline in the recent

1:33:08 more recent interviews, I believe his

1:33:10 position was that the amount of data

1:33:13 wouldn't even have fit on a laptop and

1:33:15 that it's [ __ ] And they're calling

1:33:16 it the laptop, but a lot of it is just

1:33:18 his personal information that he had

1:33:21 somewhere that was hacked. So then the

1:33:23 narrative is not that this guy was so

1:33:26 cracked out that he had a laptop filled

1:33:28 with him

1:33:30 >> had to push it for more clarification.

1:33:32 >> Okay. In August 2026 interview with

1:33:34 Tucker Carlson, Biden reportedly said,

1:33:37 "Hey, reportedly you're perplexity. Come

1:33:40 on, [laughter] you're supposed to tell.

1:33:42 Didn't you listen? Did you watch

1:33:44 Perplexity?"

1:33:45 >> Uh in August 2026 interview, uh Biden

1:33:47 reportedly said they hacked my cloud. He

1:33:50 denied the full collection described as

1:33:52 his laptop could all have originated

1:33:55 from one device, saying it was way too

1:33:57 large. He suggested an unknown actor,

1:34:00 potentially an intelligence service or

1:34:02 another person, could have taken digital

1:34:04 material material rather, and combined

1:34:07 it with the purported laptop narrative.

1:34:10 So, that's possible. In a July 2026

1:34:12 Substack launch, he wrote that the

1:34:14 Providence was never established, that

1:34:16 no court forensics examiner had

1:34:18 certified a chain of custody sufficient

1:34:20 to make evidence rather than theater. He

1:34:23 did acknowledge that material associated

1:34:25 with reflected his addiction struggles.

1:34:28 See, there could be a lot of things

1:34:30 going on. One could be that he was

1:34:32 cracked out and he left the laptop and

1:34:33 he doesn't remember being cracked out

1:34:35 and leaving the laptop. But the idea

1:34:37 that there's too much data that it

1:34:39 wouldn't have fit on a laptop.

1:34:42 The problem with that is there's two

1:34:44 terabyte hard drives on laptops now.

1:34:46 Like

1:34:47 >> that's a lot of data.

1:34:48 >> What was a uh well this is 2020. Right.

1:34:52 >> Here's the one thing too I find very

1:34:53 interesting about it.

1:34:54 >> What?

1:34:54 >> It's on the screen.

1:34:56 >> The guy who uh ran the shop that the

1:34:59 laptop was supposedly dropped off at

1:35:02 >> because he's legally blind. He could not

1:35:04 confirm who the customer was because

1:35:06 he's legally blind.

1:35:07 >> Oh, how convenient.

1:35:10 How convenient. He probably never went

1:35:12 to that place. It's probably a total

1:35:14 fake story and they they made up a fake

1:35:19 story. Maybe they even stole a laptop of

1:35:21 his.

1:35:22 >> Well, that the thing that I was most

1:35:24 fascinated by was he was two years sober

1:35:26 when that happened. Now, seven.

1:35:28 >> Allegedly. Although he is tested, I

1:35:30 think supposedly

1:35:31 >> by who? Uh, yeah, maybe.

1:35:33 >> Oh, you look great, son.

1:35:35 >> He told me it up.

1:35:36 >> He told me that he packs his bags with a

1:35:38 witness

1:35:39 >> when he packs his carryons and stuff.

1:35:42 >> There's a witness there, too.

1:35:43 >> Whoa. So, he doesn't get [ __ ] Oh,

1:35:45 wow.

1:35:46 >> In case he someone snuck something into

1:35:48 his bag. Who's going to believe him?

1:35:49 Like, who's going to believe?

1:35:50 >> That's crazy.

1:35:52 >> Yeah.

1:35:52 >> Imagine living like that,

1:35:54 >> dude. The amount of scrutiny. That was

1:35:55 what I was most fascinated by. I was

1:35:57 thinking, what is it like to have the

1:35:59 entire world bearing down in you? only

1:36:01 the world, the the country, the future

1:36:03 of politics, your dad, your dad's

1:36:04 legacy. Are you going to get a pardon?

1:36:06 Who even [ __ ] know? Who cares?

1:36:07 Probably not. Like, oh my god.

1:36:09 >> And then there's the reality.

1:36:10 >> Don't go back to drugs. Don't use your

1:36:11 drugs again. This is how you would have

1:36:13 fixed it. This is how you would have

1:36:14 done it in the past. Two years sober.

1:36:16 >> Yeah. Oh my god. Two years sober is so

1:36:19 gentle, too. So dangerous.

1:36:20 >> You're not even out of the woods. And

1:36:22 when you think about that whole story,

1:36:24 how that blew up right before the

1:36:26 election,

1:36:28 it could have really been an

1:36:30 intelligence plot to try to sh sink Joe

1:36:32 Biden.

1:36:34 And they countered it. And the way they

1:36:36 countered it was by blocking the story

1:36:38 from Twitter, a factual story from the

1:36:40 New York Post.

1:36:42 >> This is from CBS News.

1:36:43 >> Giuliani apparently held the information

1:36:45 for months and released it less than

1:36:47 three weeks before the election.

1:36:49 Giuliani has long been involved in

1:36:51 efforts by the president and his allies

1:36:54 to highlight Hunter Biden's work

1:36:56 overseas to damage Joe Biden and boost

1:36:58 Mr. Trump's re-election campaign. And in

1:37:01 2019 and in 2019 met with a Ukrainian

1:37:04 lawmaker who has been deemed an active

1:37:08 Russian agent by the US government.

1:37:10 >> What is it? The October surprise. That's

1:37:12 what they call it.

1:37:13 >> Yeah. Well, each year there's been

1:37:14 something that the losing side has

1:37:16 pointed to as the justification for why

1:37:18 it happened.

1:37:19 >> Russia Gate, uh, Biden laptop

1:37:21 suppression, and then in the most recent

1:37:23 one, it was podcasts,

1:37:25 >> right? That was well, this is what had

1:37:26 it not have been for the sway that

1:37:29 occurred due to this run that was done

1:37:32 on podcast that that's what moved the

1:37:34 election each. Now, the real problem

1:37:36 with that narrative was I don't know

1:37:38 anybody who wasn't willing to talk to

1:37:40 Kla Harris.

1:37:43 >> I was willing toach I tried to talk to

1:37:45 her a bunch of times

1:37:46 >> and they tried to pretend that I I made

1:37:48 it difficult. It's a [ __ ] complete

1:37:51 horseshit lie. They also lied and they

1:37:53 said they came down here and checked out

1:37:55 the studio and did a run of the place.

1:37:58 They did not. They did not do that. They

1:38:00 did not. Um Trump's people did. And I've

1:38:03 said that like if you want to say that

1:38:05 they knew that someone did it, but I

1:38:06 don't know how much they're

1:38:07 communicating with each other. Trump's

1:38:08 Secret Service people came down and they

1:38:11 scanned the whole place. They went

1:38:12 through the whole place before he came

1:38:14 in. But she's alleging that her people

1:38:17 did a run of the studio. They did not.

1:38:19 Her no representatives from her

1:38:22 organization were ever here

1:38:23 >> and that it would be insufficiently

1:38:25 secure or something. Is that what

1:38:26 >> No, I mean they they said that we were

1:38:28 making it difficult. I was making it as

1:38:30 easy as possible. And the one day that

1:38:32 she offered to do it, I was already

1:38:34 booked with him.

1:38:36 >> And I even said I would do it. No

1:38:37 [ __ ] way. Uhhuh. And I said I would

1:38:39 do it, but it would have to be She had a

1:38:41 a gig in Houston. She was doing like a

1:38:42 speech in Houston. I think that was one

1:38:44 of the ones where like uh Beyonce came

1:38:46 out. Everybody thought she was going to

1:38:47 sing and she didn't. Uh so

1:38:49 >> everyone got mad.

1:38:50 >> Yeah. Everyone got mad. So she was

1:38:51 somewhere else in Texas and I said,

1:38:54 "Listen, if she when she's done with

1:38:56 that, I'll do I'll do a podcast at

1:38:58 midnight. Come on in." I'll go whenever

1:38:59 you want to do it. I'll do it the next

1:39:01 day. I'll do it that night.

1:39:02 >> That would have been one of the wildest

1:39:03 24 hours of your life.

1:39:04 >> I was down to do that and I was going to

1:39:06 release them both at the exact same

1:39:07 time.

1:39:08 >> Unreal.

1:39:08 >> That was the idea.

1:39:10 >> But she wasn't willing to do it. They

1:39:11 even gave me a bunch of things. This is

1:39:13 also that they didn't tell the truth

1:39:15 about. There was a bunch of things that

1:39:17 they said she didn't want to talk about.

1:39:18 And I said fine. She didn't want to talk

1:39:21 about her record for prosecuting

1:39:22 marijuana possession in in California

1:39:25 and then for using those people that

1:39:28 were supposed to get released past the

1:39:30 date that they were released to fight

1:39:31 wildfires. She didn't want to talk about

1:39:33 that. Fine. And then there was one other

1:39:36 one. I forget what the other one was

1:39:38 about that they didn't want to talk

1:39:39 about. And then they came back and said

1:39:41 they did want to talk about marijuana

1:39:43 legalization. Oh, immigration. They were

1:39:45 not so keen on talking about

1:39:47 immigration. Maybe it wasn't

1:39:48 immigration. Was it immigration, Jamie?

1:39:49 Do you remember?

1:39:50 >> I don't remember what the other one was,

1:39:51 but I was like, "Fine. I'll ask her

1:39:53 about cooking. I don't give a [ __ ]

1:39:55 Like, let's talk. Like, I just want to

1:39:57 sit down across and find out who you

1:39:59 are. We'll figure it out. We'll figure

1:40:01 it out. I'll ask you if you believe in

1:40:02 Jesus. We'll figure it out. Do you

1:40:04 believe in UFOs? Like, what do you

1:40:06 think? Well, you could release the

1:40:07 files. Like, I'll find out who you are.

1:40:09 Let's go." You know, maybe I like you.

1:40:12 Maybe no one's had a chance to see you

1:40:14 for this way. I mean, you can laugh and

1:40:15 joke around and be like a real person

1:40:17 instead of like being a person with

1:40:19 sound bites because you can relax cuz

1:40:21 you know there's no time constraint. Who

1:40:22 [ __ ] knows? But we didn't get to find

1:40:24 out. So to say that like you're blaming

1:40:26 podcast on her not getting elected. How

1:40:28 about the fact that you spent 1.4

1:40:30 billion [ __ ] dollars and you put

1:40:33 someone in without a primary and you you

1:40:36 blew all this money and it and you still

1:40:39 lost. Like you guys [ __ ] it up. You

1:40:41 [ __ ] it up. You had all this momentum

1:40:43 when she had that one speech. It's like,

1:40:45 "Say it to my face." They were like,

1:40:47 "YEAH." [groaning]

1:40:48 LIKE LIKE THEY HAD IT. If she never did

1:40:51 another [ __ ] speech and never did a

1:40:53 podcast, never did anything and only did

1:40:56 pre-prepared like monologues like that.

1:40:59 >> Game over.

1:41:00 >> Game over. Game over. Game over. She's

1:41:03 younger. She's got more energy. She's

1:41:06 like a new fresh thing. Let's go.

1:41:09 How much do you think the uh that run of

1:41:12 podcast for Trump did move the needle?

1:41:13 Have you got any idea?

1:41:15 >> It did a lot. I think it did. I think it

1:41:18 the one [sighs]

1:41:20 the one with Theo Vaughn I think moved

1:41:22 the needle first and then the one with

1:41:24 me I think you got to see him [ __ ]

1:41:27 around a little and relax and and talk

1:41:29 about things and you got to see a human

1:41:31 being instead of like a a cartoon.

1:41:34 >> But you only got to see one side of the

1:41:36 election do that. You didn't get to see.

1:41:38 >> Yeah, you could. That could have

1:41:39 happened with her, too. Like, I'm not a

1:41:41 hard interview, man. I'm not I I don't

1:41:43 want to get in arguments with people.

1:41:45 I'd like to get in discussions with

1:41:46 people. I'm not into being insulting.

1:41:48 I'm not into being shitty. I'm not I'm

1:41:50 not into doing that. I'm just I just

1:41:52 wanted to talk. Like, if you want to run

1:41:54 the president, you you want to be the

1:41:57 commander-in-chief of the greatest army

1:41:58 the world's ever known. Like, let's just

1:42:01 have a conversation. I don't think

1:42:02 that's that hard to do. And if you can't

1:42:04 do that, like, well, what are you

1:42:05 hiding? Who are you? I think it was a

1:42:08 lot of her people that didn't want her

1:42:09 to do it. First of all, there was a lot

1:42:11 of people that are like super woke and

1:42:13 just didn't want her to and in any way

1:42:15 to be associated with me. And then there

1:42:17 was a lot of people that were really

1:42:18 worried that she was going to say

1:42:19 something that [ __ ] it up or that we

1:42:22 were going to get into something that

1:42:23 she can't defend,

1:42:24 >> you know, cuz there was a lot of things

1:42:26 that that really did like make people go

1:42:28 what? Like when she said she wouldn't

1:42:30 have done anything different than Joe

1:42:31 Biden when she was on the view. I don't

1:42:33 think I'd do anything different. Like

1:42:34 everybody's like, "OH, GREAT. This is

1:42:37 nuts. We're trying to vote for you.

1:42:40 [ __ ] lie to me."

1:42:43 There was definitely that. And then

1:42:45 there was there's some, you know, some

1:42:47 crazy stuff she said, too. Like when she

1:42:49 was vice president saying like, "How

1:42:51 dare we say Merry Christmas?" Like you

1:42:53 you get those clips and you go, "Wait,

1:42:54 what? Who are you? Who are you? Do you

1:42:57 believe that? Do you really believe how

1:42:59 dare we say Merry Christmas?" Or is this

1:43:01 like a crazy thing that you went through

1:43:03 that day? Well, it's wild to think I'm

1:43:05 worried about being too bombastic when

1:43:07 the person I'm going up against is

1:43:08 Donald Trump. [laughter]

1:43:11 >> You know what I mean?

1:43:12 >> Well, some people they they [ __ ] up a

1:43:15 few things and then they're terrified

1:43:17 they're going to [ __ ] up. So, every time

1:43:19 they do an interview, they're like, I

1:43:20 don't want to [ __ ] this up. I want to

1:43:21 [ __ ] this up. And that's when the staff

1:43:23 gets involved. Like, they wanted one

1:43:24 staff in the room. I'm like, [ __ ] no.

1:43:26 No, you can't have staff in the room.

1:43:28 The [ __ ] out of here.

1:43:30 [ __ ] out of here. They also want to know

1:43:32 if it's edited. Like we edit things like

1:43:34 this. No,

1:43:36 >> you got to People have to find out who

1:43:38 the [ __ ] you really are.

1:43:39 >> But that feels scary because there's no

1:43:41 get out of jail free.

1:43:42 >> It's supposed to be scary. You want to

1:43:43 be the president. [laughter]

1:43:45 >> You want to be the president. It's the

1:43:46 scariest thing of all time.

1:43:47 >> Yeah.

1:43:48 >> Yeah.

1:43:49 >> You got you got to deal with potential

1:43:51 nuclear war. Okay. I think you can sit

1:43:53 down for a conversation.

1:43:54 >> Yeah.

1:43:55 >> It's not even me. Even if it's not me,

1:43:57 sit down with a bunch of other people,

1:43:58 but sit down with people that are going

1:43:59 to ask you real questions. really talk

1:44:01 to you, you know, like I don't know what

1:44:04 happened on the caller daddy podcast,

1:44:05 but I think it was very short and I

1:44:07 don't think they got into anything deep.

1:44:09 Like you got to ask like the immigration

1:44:11 thing was nuts. You have to ask like

1:44:14 what are you doing? Like why do you guys

1:44:16 have an open border? Why are you just

1:44:18 letting all these unvetted people from

1:44:21 third world crimeinfested poor

1:44:24 countries, desperate people, desperate

1:44:27 that want that want to walk to America?

1:44:29 Do you know how crazy that is? And we're

1:44:31 just letting them all in without knowing

1:44:33 how many of them are just trying to make

1:44:34 a better life and how many of them are

1:44:36 drug cartel and how many of them are

1:44:38 terrorists and how many the [ __ ] are you

1:44:41 doing?

1:44:42 >> What are you doing?

1:44:42 >> What's happened with the status of

1:44:44 immigration now? I know that

1:44:46 >> they put the brakes on it. They stopped

1:44:48 like an enormous number of people

1:44:50 crossing the border. Like an enormous

1:44:52 number. I think it's down. Like, what is

1:44:54 it down? Like, how many what is the

1:44:56 percentage of illegal border crossings

1:44:59 down since Trump has been in office?

1:45:01 They could have done it the entire time,

1:45:03 man.

1:45:05 They wanted that border open. They

1:45:07 wanted those people coming in. They

1:45:09 wanted to flood the census. They wanted

1:45:10 to flood those swing states. They wanted

1:45:13 to get people that are here and give

1:45:15 them citizenship. They wanted to get

1:45:16 them on Medicaid. They want to get them

1:45:18 on healthcare. They want to give them

1:45:19 free cell phones. They wanted to make

1:45:21 those people voters and they wanted to

1:45:24 try to just make it like it's

1:45:26 California, like the whole country is

1:45:28 California. Like you can never leave,

1:45:30 you can never escape. It's one party

1:45:32 runs it forever and they run it terribly

1:45:34 and it gets more and more terrible and

1:45:36 they need more and more money to make it

1:45:38 more and more terrible.

1:45:40 >> That's not a great case. [ __ ] me. Well,

1:45:42 I just

1:45:43 >> Well, it's not the case now, but this is

1:45:46 not great either. Okay. January 2025,

1:45:50 Border Patrol recorded 29,000

1:45:53 in the first full month of the

1:45:54 administration. February, that fell to

1:45:56 8,000. About a 71% month-to-month

1:46:00 decline.

1:46:03 So,

1:46:06 all told, what's the percentage of

1:46:08 decline? What's the percentage of

1:46:10 decline based on 2026 versus 2023?

1:46:16 Let's find that out.

1:46:18 20 oh 2025 versus 2023

1:46:24 >> data. Okay, let's see what they say.

1:46:28 What percentage is it down?

1:46:33 >> 88%.

1:46:36 >> 1.8.

1:46:36 >> It's down 88%. You know how crazy that

1:46:40 is? That's crazy.

1:46:45 So they were letting millions of people

1:46:48 in and we didn't know who they are. And

1:46:51 you know the idea is like if you want to

1:46:52 be a kind compassionate person and

1:46:54 immigrants deserve what you have and

1:46:56 okay um but we have to know they're not

1:46:58 murderers folks. Okay. We we can't just

1:47:00 Have you ever been to like the worst

1:47:02 places of the third world? Probably not.

1:47:05 If you did you wouldn't want those

1:47:06 people just like roaming around your

1:47:09 neighborhood when you have to leave your

1:47:11 garage and go to work. You wouldn't want

1:47:13 that because they they're just like,

1:47:15 "Oh, the guy's not here. I'll break into

1:47:16 his house."

1:47:16 >> Well, how much of this is a luxury

1:47:18 belief that the people that are

1:47:19 espousing the things that they're

1:47:22 supporting aren't the ones that are

1:47:23 going to be impacted by it? It's the

1:47:24 same as it's the same as I told you this

1:47:26 last time I was on, there was a house

1:47:28 near where I live in Austin that had a

1:47:31 defund the police sign in the front yard

1:47:33 and a private security sticker on the

1:47:35 front window. [laughter]

1:47:38 >> That's cute. People are cute. Well,

1:47:41 there's a lot of that. It's a lot of

1:47:42 white people. White people are a real

1:47:44 problem.

1:47:44 >> Wow. That's this [laughter]

1:47:46 dude.

1:47:48 >> Privileged white people.

1:47:49 >> Says it started dropping in 2024 because

1:47:51 of a Biden uh asylum change or

1:47:55 something.

1:47:56 >> Yeah, sure it did. Listen, they probably

1:47:58 [clears throat] tried to put the brakes

1:47:59 on it a little bit when they were losing

1:48:01 the election. You know, when they were

1:48:03 getting the polls in, they were running

1:48:05 a little tight. Yeah, for sure. Like

1:48:07 this. Otherwise, they would have done it

1:48:09 in 2023. They're not they're doing it

1:48:12 because of a political reason. They

1:48:14 probably would have opened it right back

1:48:15 up if comma one like we know no one's

1:48:19 illegal on stolen land. Come on in. You

1:48:21 know it's

1:48:22 >> Meanwhile, uh Victoria's Secret is up

1:48:24 300% yearon-year the share price because

1:48:27 of OMIC.

1:48:28 >> I found this out yesterday.

1:48:30 >> What?

1:48:30 >> 300% increase

1:48:32 >> because of Ozmpic.

1:48:33 >> So what the proposed reason for this is

1:48:35 that millions of women have lost so much

1:48:37 weight that their bras have stopped

1:48:38 fitting. And because they're smaller,

1:48:40 they're now going and getting more

1:48:42 seductive underwear. 300%

1:48:45 increase year on year

1:48:47 >> hot little stick figures.

1:48:48 >> That's what's happening, dude. Ompic's a

1:48:50 [ __ ] hell of a drug. Here's another

1:48:51 thing I found out that women are getting

1:48:55 uh bridal dresses fitted, but they're

1:48:58 having to predict where their weight is

1:49:00 going to come in to land. So, some women

1:49:01 are losing up to 50 pounds. They're

1:49:03 losing so much weight between ordering

1:49:05 the dress and the wedding that these

1:49:07 bridal bridal stores are having to get

1:49:09 them to sign waiverss in case they don't

1:49:12 make weight like a fighter. Like if you

1:49:14 don't make weight for your bridal dress,

1:49:15 you go, "Well, we can't give you another

1:49:16 one. You've said that you're going to

1:49:17 lose 50 pounds using GLPs over the next

1:49:19 9 months or 12 months or 18 months or

1:49:21 whatever." And because they're scared

1:49:23 that they're going to end up getting

1:49:24 these refunds, they're having to sign

1:49:26 waiverss. I think the the uh future

1:49:28 implications of OMIC on economy,

1:49:31 consumption, like think about what most

1:49:33 of consumerism is. It's not stuff that

1:49:36 people need. It's like things that

1:49:39 people want. It's like a craving. It's

1:49:41 impulsivity. It's repeated purchase,

1:49:44 >> right?

1:49:44 >> And that's exactly what GLPs act on.

1:49:47 They're not just suppressing appetite.

1:49:49 They're suppressing craving in a lot of

1:49:50 different ways. And it's like, what what

1:49:53 happens to a capitalist system when you

1:49:56 suppress pharmarmacologically suppress

1:49:58 craving? I want this thing. Well, maybe

1:50:01 you don't. Not in quite the same way

1:50:03 because it seems to work on weed. It

1:50:04 seems to work on video games. It seems

1:50:07 to work on a ton of different

1:50:08 behavioral. People don't like wine as

1:50:10 much. Okay. So, it's not just calories.

1:50:12 It's more than that. It's consumerism as

1:50:14 well. I think what happens when you

1:50:16 intervene pharmacologically in people's

1:50:18 uh desire to crave is just

1:50:22 that is the other the other side. So AI

1:50:24 on one side and [ __ ] GLPs on the

1:50:25 other.

1:50:26 >> Well, they say that some people have

1:50:28 different reactions to GLP ones, right?

1:50:30 And some people have a lack of desire

1:50:32 for relationships.

1:50:33 >> Mhm.

1:50:34 >> Which is really creepy. Like you have a

1:50:37 like What is it about

1:50:40 is it taking away pleasure? Is it taking

1:50:42 away excitement? Like what is it taking

1:50:45 away? Like what

1:50:48 what's stimulation that you're getting

1:50:50 by overeing?

1:50:52 What is it dulling in the process that

1:50:55 also stops drug addictions? Like it's

1:50:57 helping people that have addictions and

1:50:59 it's also helping people that are, you

1:51:02 know, that have like impulsive behavior

1:51:04 apparently. I think that's true.

1:51:06 >> Well, the weird one is the side effects

1:51:08 of like relationships. like you don't

1:51:11 >> maybe it's craving again maybe it's the

1:51:12 same thing I I looked at the the study

1:51:15 on that came out on X and people were

1:51:17 talking about it there was some

1:51:18 criticism around whether or not that

1:51:20 particular pathway in the brain works

1:51:21 the way that it would but if if you're

1:51:23 suppressing craving overall that

1:51:24 wouldn't surprise me

1:51:25 >> no

1:51:26 >> if you're making people just want less

1:51:29 >> right I don't want that at all Maher was

1:51:32 arguing with uh Scott Galloway on Real

1:51:35 Time about that Galloway was like big on

1:51:38 GLP1s there's benefits people there's,

1:51:41 you know, I think also the thing is

1:51:43 dosage. Um, this is an issue and this is

1:51:46 an issue that's been brought up by uh

1:51:48 compoundies that there's certain people

1:51:50 that don't need a big ass dose that

1:51:53 you're going to get like depending upon

1:51:55 your body weight, depending upon your

1:51:57 size, you know, that like a 500 lb man

1:52:00 probably needs a different dose than a

1:52:03 135b 5 foot tall woman.

1:52:06 >> Is that not being suggested? I don't

1:52:07 think so.

1:52:08 >> It's not being advised.

1:52:09 >> I I I think I think people are starting

1:52:12 to do it through their various health

1:52:15 healthcare providers and various doctors

1:52:17 who have experience with these things

1:52:18 that are giving people like smaller

1:52:20 doses and less. And then there's the

1:52:22 ratuitide stuff. Am I saying that right?

1:52:24 >> Retatride.

1:52:25 >> Retatride. Retatu. Retatutide. That one

1:52:29 is a weird one because that one allows

1:52:30 you to keep muscle mass. And that's the

1:52:32 big fear that people have is that you're

1:52:34 starving yourself, but you're also

1:52:36 losing losing bone mass and muscle mass.

1:52:38 >> That's because people who don't have

1:52:40 good fitness habits are reducing an

1:52:44 already sub-optimal diet.

1:52:45 >> They're not eating well and now they're

1:52:47 eating less of not well. They're still

1:52:50 not training, which means what happens

1:52:52 because I think about 90% of people that

1:52:55 go on GLPs and then come off them gain

1:52:57 the weight back. Mhm.

1:52:58 >> So it's you

1:53:00 >> you don't change your behavior.

1:53:01 >> You don't change your behavior, but you

1:53:03 lose muscle on the way down

1:53:04 >> and gain fat on the way back up,

1:53:06 >> right?

1:53:07 >> So if you end up back at the same weight

1:53:08 that you were previously, your

1:53:09 compositions was

1:53:11 >> and that's that's really concerning

1:53:12 because you're basically locked in to

1:53:14 use them for the rest of time if if

1:53:15 that's the case if you can't use

1:53:16 something else to fix it. I know that

1:53:18 they were using different things like

1:53:21 they were using IGF-1 along with GLP1s

1:53:25 to mitigate the bone density and muscle

1:53:28 tissue loss. But the reality of having

1:53:32 less calories coming in than coming out

1:53:35 is your body's going to eat itself.

1:53:36 >> I mean, that's what's happening.

1:53:38 >> Which is why you need to do resistance

1:53:39 training.

1:53:39 >> Yeah. You have to you have to lift heavy

1:53:42 weights. Not heavy, but you have to lift

1:53:44 something. So you you develop bone

1:53:46 density. And this is a giant problem

1:53:48 with older people that have never lifted

1:53:50 anything is that their body composition

1:53:52 is just they might look normal, but

1:53:54 they're made out of dough. You know, you

1:53:56 could just punch right through them. And

1:53:58 if they fall down, they're going to get

1:53:59 hurt, man.

1:54:00 >> That's not

1:54:01 >> When people get older, like one of the

1:54:02 main ways that people die is falling.

1:54:06 >> What happens? They hit their head.

1:54:07 >> They hit their heads. They they slip in

1:54:10 the shower. They slip in the bathtub.

1:54:11 They hit their heads. They break a hip.

1:54:13 When you break a hip, man, the odds of

1:54:15 you living more than 10 years reduced

1:54:18 drastically. A lot of it is also because

1:54:20 at the time that you're breaking a hip,

1:54:22 you're probably

1:54:22 >> old already.

1:54:23 >> Yeah. Old already. But there's like real

1:54:25 data that show that once people have

1:54:27 fallen and broken a hip, like that's a

1:54:28 catastrophic injury that you got to

1:54:31 think of all the resources that your

1:54:33 body has to use and employ in order to

1:54:35 heal that. And then there's the

1:54:37 compromise in movement that you're going

1:54:38 to have for a long time.

1:54:39 >> You're going to be able to walk. You're

1:54:40 going to need assistance. You're not

1:54:42 going to have the same vitality. You're

1:54:43 going to be recovering. You're going to

1:54:44 be exhausted.

1:54:46 People with Alzheimer's disease are

1:54:48 substantially higher risk of falling.

1:54:50 Wow. Falls can be fatal, especially if

1:54:53 they can cause a hip fracture, head

1:54:54 injury, or complications from

1:54:56 hospitalizations or immobility. Research

1:54:59 indicated that 60 to 80% of older adults

1:55:01 with Alzheimer's experience a fall, more

1:55:04 than twice the rate in cognitively

1:55:06 normal peers.

1:55:08 There was a late there's a news story

1:55:10 that came out recently, Jamie, about a

1:55:11 woman who survived for eight days in a

1:55:13 bathtub after she fell.

1:55:16 >> Sure.

1:55:17 >> Oh my god.

1:55:18 >> Insane. So had had a tumble and wasn't

1:55:21 found. I don't know what the [ __ ] she

1:55:23 was doing in order to be able to stay

1:55:24 alive. I guess if you're in a bathtub,

1:55:25 you got some water.

1:55:26 >> Yeah. Just peeing in the tub and

1:55:29 drinking the water.

1:55:30 >> Hoping for the best.

1:55:30 >> 82 years old. 9 days actually, it says.

1:55:33 >> Oh my god.

1:55:34 >> Uh she drank water. She managed to

1:55:37 splash up onto her face by turning the

1:55:38 faucet on with her foot.

1:55:40 >> Oh my god.

1:55:42 Oh my god.

1:55:44 >> Nine days in a [ __ ] bathtub.

1:55:46 >> Crazy. How'd she not die of hypothermia?

1:55:50 >> I guess you could heat yourself up.

1:55:51 She's going to run the water.

1:55:52 >> I guess. I mean, is is she that good at

1:55:54 turning the knobs with her feet? She

1:55:56 could [laughter]

1:55:57 she could scald herself to death. What

1:55:59 the [ __ ] man?

1:56:00 >> That in the home rule mountain, North

1:56:02 Carolina.

1:56:02 >> Oh my god, that poor lady. Let's get her

1:56:05 on the podcast.

1:56:06 >> She survived.

1:56:06 >> Get her on the podcast, Jamie, before

1:56:07 Chris does. [laughter]

1:56:14 >> Poor lady. We probably have to go to

1:56:16 her.

1:56:16 >> [ __ ]

1:56:16 >> Probably have to go to the Appalachian.

1:56:17 >> That is insane.

1:56:19 [snorts]

1:56:19 >> [ __ ] man. There's people that get

1:56:21 through some [ __ ]

1:56:24 >> I was looking at the uh the studies of

1:56:26 how long people have stayed awake for

1:56:28 like that. That gets really [ __ ]

1:56:30 gnarly because people go into psychosis.

1:56:32 That's that that Lindsay Clansancy case

1:56:34 thing that's going crazy at the moment.

1:56:36 A lot of that is because of supposedly

1:56:38 uh sleep deprivation her on a lot of

1:56:40 antisycchotics etc etc. But you don't

1:56:42 need to keep people awake for that long

1:56:44 to turn them insane. If you're awake for

1:56:47 a couple of days I think all [ __ ]

1:56:49 hell breaks loose which is why those

1:56:50 backyard ultras just seem so deranged.

1:56:52 Do you think how are you even able to

1:56:54 apply effort to what it is? How are you

1:56:56 able to make decisions about whether you

1:56:58 need food or sleep or rest or to go

1:57:00 harder or to give up? They all have

1:57:01 hallucinations. They all see things that

1:57:04 aren't there. Like Courtney Dwalter, she

1:57:06 won the uh what' she win? The Bigfoot.

1:57:08 Is that what she won?

1:57:10 >> She I think when she

1:57:11 >> when she came on.

1:57:11 >> Yeah. But uh

1:57:12 >> she beat the second place dude by 10

1:57:15 hours or something crazy. [laughter]

1:57:19 Imagine you come in second place and

1:57:21 you're second place by 10 hours.

1:57:23 >> Yes.

1:57:23 >> Cuz maybe half a day.

1:57:24 >> The race is three days long. Three days

1:57:27 of hell. Well, the the crazy thing about

1:57:30 endurance is that as you get longer and

1:57:32 longer, the difference between the sexes

1:57:34 starts to even out. And I think in

1:57:35 water, it evens out even quicker because

1:57:37 women are more buoyant over distances.

1:57:39 Women are better swimmers.

1:57:40 >> Makes sense. I sink like a rock.

1:57:42 >> Well, you don't have the build for

1:57:44 swimming.

1:57:44 >> I'm terrible at it.

1:57:45 >> Yeah. No, you don't have the build. I

1:57:47 recently learned about um it just come

1:57:50 to my mind Rory McDonald's walkout

1:57:52 music. This story where he changed his

1:57:56 number. Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

1:57:58 >> And hadn't [laughter] updated the UFC.

1:58:01 >> It's such a great

1:58:02 >> This is I only found this out.

1:58:04 >> Yeah.

1:58:05 >> Were you there at any of those events

1:58:06 when he was walking? I think he came out

1:58:07 to like uh uh MC Hammer [laughter]

1:58:13 >> and people asked him, apparently he got

1:58:15 rumbled because he wanted Nickelback and

1:58:17 they asked him afterwards. They were

1:58:18 like, "Sorry, we couldn't get your

1:58:19 nickel back." And he said, "I didn't ask

1:58:20 for [ __ ] nickel back." They worked it

1:58:22 out and it was just some guy that was a

1:58:23 fan that was deciding to submit songs.

1:58:25 Yeah. on Rory McDonald's behalf.

1:58:27 >> The guy got Rory's old number and Rory

1:58:31 never bothered telling the UFC. And this

1:58:32 guy knew who Rory was and he was just so

1:58:35 jazzed up that he could pick Rory's

1:58:36 walking music and the guy had a good

1:58:38 sense of humor. So he'd pick some whack

1:58:40 songs.

1:58:41 >> DMC, MC Hammer, the DMX, sorry, MC

1:58:44 Hammer.

1:58:44 >> Well, DMX is great. MC Hammer's great. I

1:58:46 mean, some people love those songs.

1:58:49 >> I think Nickelback's got legs as well,

1:58:50 >> bro. Nickelbacks has some good songs.

1:58:52 It's just they're formulaic and people

1:58:54 don't like formulaic songs. There's some

1:58:57 something about them that people think

1:58:58 is too much of a formulaic song. But

1:59:00 like how come you like the Cypress Hill

1:59:03 Rockstar song, but you don't like the

1:59:06 Rockstar song? It's like the same song.

1:59:08 The Nickelback song and Cypress Hill are

1:59:11 the same song.

1:59:13 >> Does it?

1:59:13 >> It's the [laughter] same song.

1:59:15 >> Like

1:59:16 >> it's the same song. It's the same song.

1:59:18 It's the same premise. It's about being

1:59:20 a rockstar. all the crazy [ __ ] that

1:59:21 you're going to do if you I want to be a

1:59:23 rockstar and I want all this cool [ __ ]

1:59:25 Look, the Cypress Hill is a better song.

1:59:28 I'm a big Cypress Hill fan. I if you if

1:59:31 I'm getting to choose.

1:59:32 >> He also starts off with Chino talking

1:59:33 like there's [snorts] not many songs

1:59:34 that have Chino Marino from the Deft

1:59:36 Tones.

1:59:36 >> That's true.

1:59:37 >> Speaking.

1:59:38 >> That's true. He's laying out what you

1:59:40 need to do to be a rock star that

1:59:42 there's a lot. But like, okay, we can't

1:59:44 play this for everybody else, but just

1:59:46 for you and me.

1:59:47 >> Which one? We're gonna We'll start off

1:59:50 with Nickelback. Start off with

1:59:52 Nickelback.

1:59:53 >> Nickelback rockstar.

1:59:55 >> So [ __ ] happy about this. There's a

1:59:56 conspiracy theory that Nickelback got

1:59:58 taken down to demoralize America after

2:00:01 9/11.

2:00:02 >> That's hilarious.

2:00:04 >> Canadian.

2:00:04 >> Well, but it was American [laughter]

2:00:06 American like uh uh thrust forward into

2:00:09 the world. That kind of freedom rock.

2:00:11 Well,

2:00:11 >> there were always a punch line.

2:00:12 >> Allow me to get you down the rabbit

2:00:14 hole.

2:00:15 >> The limp biscuit Woodstock one is a fun

2:00:17 one.

2:00:18 that. Oh, hold on. Let me It's trying to

2:00:20 load.

2:00:21 >> So, [snorts] we'll listen to the

2:00:22 Nickelback Rockstar song first. Here we

2:00:24 go. Go to Cypress Hill. [laughter]

2:00:28 >> It's the same song.

2:00:30 >> It's the same song.

2:00:31 >> Disrespectful. [laughter]

2:00:32 >> No, I love Cypress, bro. B-roll is my

2:00:35 boy. I love that dude. They're the [ __ ]

2:00:37 I [ __ ] love these guys.

2:00:39 >> A lot of uh

2:00:41 >> I forgot how hard that song was.

2:00:43 >> It's It's a way better song. It's a way

2:00:45 better song. You know, you one of the

2:00:46 dopest covers ever. Rage Against the

2:00:48 Machine covered Pistol Grip Pump. Have

2:00:51 you ever heard that? Okay, while we're

2:00:53 doing this, since nobody can listen to

2:00:54 this,

2:00:55 >> just throw up this. This is one of my

2:00:57 favorite Cypress Hill covers where Rage

2:00:59 Against Machine covered Cypress Hill.

2:01:01 It's [ __ ] fantastic.

2:01:04 It's [ __ ] fantastic. It's better than

2:01:07 the original. That goes hard.

2:01:10 >> I'd never heard that.

2:01:10 >> That goes hard.

2:01:11 >> That's so [ __ ]

2:01:12 >> That's one of the dopest covers ever.

2:01:14 There is a What do we Jamie's gonna

2:01:17 >> It's like they had an assignment. It's

2:01:19 like Cypress Hill and Nickelback had an

2:01:22 assignment. I want you to write a song

2:01:24 about how dope it is to be a rock star.

2:01:26 You want to be a rockstar. You want all

2:01:27 this cool [ __ ] right? But Cypress Hill

2:01:29 took it from the position of like all

2:01:32 all you're going to suffer, all you're

2:01:33 going to lose, you want this, you don't

2:01:35 know how hard it is. And Nickelback is

2:01:37 like, "Hey, hey, I want to be a rockar."

2:01:40 It's fluffy.

2:01:41 >> It's a little fluffy. Yeah. But it's

2:01:43 kind of like an assignment.

2:01:45 >> It is interesting trying to warm people

2:01:46 off of something that everybody thinks

2:01:49 they want. There's this uh study that

2:01:52 was done on when people enter airplanes

2:01:55 and they walk through business class,

2:01:58 economy walks through business class,

2:01:59 there's an eight times increase in

2:02:01 passenger rage incidents.

2:02:03 So it's a reminder of your place in the

2:02:05 status hierarchy.

2:02:06 >> Yeah. And I think it becomes very

2:02:08 difficult when trying to warm people off

2:02:11 of like the rich person telling you that

2:02:13 money won't fix your problems or the

2:02:15 famous person telling you that status

2:02:17 isn't going to change your self worth or

2:02:19 the beautiful person telling you that

2:02:21 looks aren't going to actually make you

2:02:22 feel more valuable in the world. A lot

2:02:24 of the time when when people hear that

2:02:25 it sounds like a a luxury belief. It

2:02:27 sounds like someone trying pulling the

2:02:29 ladder up after they've managed to

2:02:30 achieve it. And that's why I don't know

2:02:33 the the rockstar that reminds you why

2:02:36 it's so cool and this is what you could

2:02:38 get.

2:02:40 Rolling Stone ranked Rockstar at number

2:02:42 100 in their list of the hundred best

2:02:44 songs of 2007. But

2:02:46 >> but Buzzfeed listed it as number two as

2:02:49 one of the 30 worst songs ever written.

2:02:52 >> H

2:02:53 >> is it really though? I think they're

2:02:55 unjustly criticized Nickelback. They're

2:02:58 not that bad.

2:02:59 >> They're coming back around now. They're

2:03:00 coming back.

2:03:01 >> Nostalgia is bringing them back for

2:03:02 sure.

2:03:02 >> Yeah,

2:03:03 >> they're not that bad.

2:03:05 >> Do you know why people like had an issue

2:03:06 with them, I guess, back in the day? No.

2:03:08 >> Well, so I mean, this was happening when

2:03:09 I was in audio school, so that was like

2:03:11 when YouTube started, you know, uh,

2:03:14 Napster was very big and people were

2:03:16 discovering them. It's I mean it's a

2:03:18 little bit of opinion based but there

2:03:20 was a video that came out that went very

2:03:21 viral and that played one Nickelback

2:03:23 song in the left speaker and one in the

2:03:25 right speaker

2:03:25 >> and they lined up very on the like every

2:03:30 uh chord change was kind of like at the

2:03:32 same time the verses change at the same

2:03:34 time.

2:03:35 Yeah. It was very formulaic. So people

2:03:37 just sort of like

2:03:38 >> clown them for being too formulaic.

2:03:40 >> Yeah, I get that. engineers would even

2:03:42 say that they didn't like that because

2:03:44 they were recording what they call in

2:03:45 the box, which would mean they were

2:03:47 recording everything uh very dry and

2:03:49 then changing all of the effects after

2:03:52 the fact. So like nothing that they were

2:03:54 playing was like live necessarily. And

2:03:56 so some people had a problem with that.

2:03:57 >> I get it. That said,

2:04:00 >> they're not the stones, but

2:04:01 >> they're not the Stones.

2:04:02 >> White people music.

2:04:03 >> They're not Pink Floyd, you know. I get

2:04:04 it.

2:04:05 >> It's white people music. It's

2:04:09 98 IQ max. [laughter]

2:04:12 >> You can't say that. You can't say that.

2:04:14 >> Yeah, I just did.

2:04:15 >> Look, I uh

2:04:16 >> a lot of that's a good percentage of the

2:04:18 population, son.

2:04:19 >> That's Look, I I can listen to some 98

2:04:22 IQ music. I I like me some of that.

2:04:23 >> What do you think? I mean, max I'm

2:04:25 saying max

2:04:27 >> other people like it's okay. You know,

2:04:30 you can have a high IQ and go that's all

2:04:31 right. But you're like Nickelback.

2:04:34 >> Wow. What is high IQ music? Pink Floyd

2:04:37 for sure. Well, jazz I don't know. You

2:04:39 know, jazz is interesting because I know

2:04:41 a couple dumb people that love jazz.

2:04:43 >> Um, I mean, a lot of brilliant people

2:04:45 love jazz also. Tulle Tool's very high

2:04:47 IQ music. If if you're into like metal,

2:04:49 probably a little disturbed. You're a

2:04:51 little disturbed. You're a little mad at

2:04:52 your parents.

2:04:53 >> Eric Weinstein brought up the Polifia.

2:04:55 >> I [ __ ] love Polifia. Tim Henson

2:04:57 rules, dude.

2:04:59 >> That's I don't you have to be thinking a

2:05:01 lot to even like

2:05:02 >> It's not passive listening. Right.

2:05:04 >> Is not passive listening.

2:05:06 >> Um, God, there's a lot of great bands,

2:05:08 man.

2:05:08 >> But I don't know what's high IQ music in

2:05:10 that way. Like that's popular as well.

2:05:12 >> I'm being silly, obviously.

2:05:14 >> But I was trying to think about what

2:05:16 that would be if it Beethoven, something

2:05:18 more refined.

2:05:19 >> I don't know. To

2:05:20 >> to me, that's the most fascinating music

2:05:22 is music when there was no recordings. I

2:05:24 am fascinated by the fact that these

2:05:26 people wrote down music on paper so that

2:05:30 other people could replicate it and

2:05:32 that's how they passed on these amazing

2:05:34 songs that people still play in concerts

2:05:37 today. There was no ability to record.

2:05:41 >> Well, think about what stories would

2:05:43 have been like before we had the written

2:05:45 word. There's a, you know, there's a lot

2:05:46 of really popular mag musicians, rather

2:05:48 not magicians, um, musicians who, uh,

2:05:52 don't know how to read music.

2:05:55 >> They don't have to.

2:05:56 >> I can just draw them out on my digital

2:05:58 workspace on my laptop.

2:06:00 >> Yeah. They know how to play an

2:06:02 instrument. They know what the sounds it

2:06:03 makes. I don't have to see those [ __ ]

2:06:05 [ __ ] lines. [laughter]

2:06:06 [ __ ] is that?

2:06:07 >> Yeah. Classically trained. Yeah. I mean,

2:06:10 everybody loved the idea of being a

2:06:12 savant renaissance guy sort of outside

2:06:14 of the system coming in and and breaking

2:06:16 the rules in that way. I wonder how

2:06:17 often that happens at the highest level.

2:06:19 Like

2:06:20 >> at the highest level, it's Hrix. Because

2:06:22 Hrix played a guitar upside down,

2:06:25 left-handed.

2:06:26 >> Why? Cuz he was left-handed. So, he

2:06:29 played a right-handed guitar upside

2:06:31 down. You ever see the way he played

2:06:33 guitar? I don't know jack [ __ ] about

2:06:35 playing guitar, by the way. This is

2:06:36 explained to me. I think Weinstein was

2:06:38 the first person to explain it to me,

2:06:40 >> but uh pull up Hendrick's playing the

2:06:41 guitar.

2:06:43 >> He would play it upside down

2:06:44 >> because it was, you know, not built for

2:06:47 him and it didn't matter. He self-taught

2:06:50 and to this day widely regarded as the

2:06:54 greatest guitarist of all time and the

2:06:55 most influential guitarist guitarist by

2:06:58 far.

2:06:58 >> The most like he was he was a freak.

2:07:02 Like when he came along, I mean Eric

2:07:03 Clapton famously said that he made him

2:07:05 want to quit.

2:07:07 That's That guitar is upside down, dog.

2:07:10 [laughter]

2:07:10 >> Jesus. I didn't know that.

2:07:12 >> Yeah. I mean, I don't know if all of his

2:07:14 guitars were upside down or, you know,

2:07:16 some some of them were actual

2:07:17 left-handed guitars,

2:07:19 >> but I think he played upside down.

2:07:21 >> Hrix was left-handed, but typically used

2:07:23 readily available right-handed

2:07:25 stratcasters. He reversed the

2:07:26 instrument. This put the headstock

2:07:29 controls, bridge angle, and pickup

2:07:30 orientation in unusual positions

2:07:32 relative to a conventional left-handed

2:07:35 guitar. Isn't that wild?

2:07:36 >> Yeah.

2:07:37 >> Fender, look at this. Fender's um

2:07:40 Hendrickk signature stratcaster

2:07:42 recreates some of these visual and

2:07:43 functional details, including a reverse

2:07:46 headstock and reverse slant bridge

2:07:48 pickup. Imagine like such a

2:07:51 >> still turned around.

2:07:53 >> No, I mean I think they did it his way.

2:07:56 >> Wow. I think they replicated it his way

2:07:58 cuz like if you're a [ __ ] a guitar

2:08:01 nut and you love Hendricks like I want

2:08:03 to like why does this guitar [ __ ]

2:08:05 This guitar's backwards. Like Hendrickx

2:08:08 doesn't play it like this. I'd want to

2:08:09 learn on a Hendrickx guitar. [ __ ] yeah.

2:08:11 >> Yeah. Yeah. I uh I know I I've been

2:08:14 thinking a lot about like how we assume

2:08:17 that wisdom compounds over time. So I

2:08:19 guess not too dissimilar to that. We

2:08:21 have this uh epistemic privilege that we

2:08:23 give to a future version of ourselves,

2:08:25 right? So we assume that us now knows

2:08:27 more than us in the past or that us in

2:08:29 the future will know more than us now

2:08:31 that sort of progress goes in that way.

2:08:33 But for some things like matters of

2:08:36 emotion or important life lessons

2:08:38 especially things around pain I don't

2:08:41 think that that's true. So for instance

2:08:42 you could imagine that you're in a

2:08:43 relationship with somebody and it's

2:08:45 really painful. It's really

2:08:46 uncomfortable and after six months you

2:08:48 bump into them again and you can't quite

2:08:51 remember the sleepless nights and the

2:08:53 way that things felt awkward and the

2:08:54 pain in the same way as you used to and

2:08:56 you start think well maybe I should

2:08:58 maybe I should get back with them maybe

2:08:59 maybe that's maybe it wasn't so bad or

2:09:01 uh the guy that works in a very

2:09:02 aggressive job highowered highpaced job

2:09:05 and he's burned out and he can't sleep

2:09:07 and a year later he misses the status he

2:09:10 misses the acclaim he misses the

2:09:11 accolades he misses the camaraderie of

2:09:13 working in that organization and he

2:09:15 thinks, "Well, maybe I could get back.

2:09:16 Maybe I could start again at a

2:09:17 competitor. Maybe I could do that

2:09:18 again." Or someone that's been addicted

2:09:20 to alcohol and after they've been sober

2:09:23 for a couple of years, they think, "Huh,

2:09:24 maybe I should uh maybe I should run

2:09:26 that back. Maybe it wasn't that big of a

2:09:27 deal. Maybe I can do it again." So,

2:09:29 there's this sort of fading affect bias,

2:09:32 which is this idea from psychology that

2:09:34 says bad memories fade with time, but

2:09:37 good memories don't quite the same way.

2:09:39 And it's good because it protects us

2:09:40 from being pinned underneath trauma that

2:09:42 happened in the past. you know, you're

2:09:44 not still so worried about your first

2:09:46 rejection from a girl in the same way as

2:09:48 you might have been shortly after that.

2:09:50 So, uh, bad memories plus time can equal

2:09:53 comedy, but good memories plus time

2:09:55 doesn't usually equal tragedy is kind of

2:09:56 a way to think about it. That's great.

2:09:58 It's like a psychological immune system.

2:10:00 >> Got it.

2:10:00 >> We distance ourselves from things. We

2:10:02 minimize them, and it's a a really

2:10:04 fundamental part of the way that we deal

2:10:06 with pain and difficulty in life. One of

2:10:08 the problems is it causes us to forget

2:10:11 the receipts of why we did the hard work

2:10:13 in the first place. So if you think

2:10:17 about why you worked so hard to get

2:10:19 yourself off of the alcohol, that was

2:10:21 because of the pain that you felt at the

2:10:22 time. But the pain that you felt at the

2:10:24 time evaporates the further that you are

2:10:26 away from it, which is the reason that

2:10:28 you actually made all of that work and

2:10:31 put yourself through that process to

2:10:32 improve your life. So you could imagine

2:10:34 that um healing gets rid of the

2:10:37 justification that made the healing

2:10:38 necessary. So it's just this strange

2:10:40 inversion that we always assume us in

2:10:42 the future is going to be better

2:10:43 educated than us now,

2:10:44 >> right?

2:10:45 >> We know more. Like that's the way that

2:10:46 it works. Like yeah, of course I I've

2:10:48 accumulated more experience. I know

2:10:49 more. I'm closer to the future version

2:10:52 of me, which means that it's more

2:10:53 recent. But in some things, especially

2:10:55 matters of pain, discomfort,

2:10:57 emotionality,

2:10:59 being in the future actually means being

2:11:00 further away from the evidence. And I

2:11:02 often think about this when you see

2:11:04 people that kind of seem to loop

2:11:06 themselves back into bad situations.

2:11:08 Someone that keeps on getting back into

2:11:09 a bad relationship. Someone that keeps

2:11:10 on getting back into a bad relationship

2:11:12 with substances or a job or they just

2:11:15 keep on they seem to be stuck. And I

2:11:17 don't think it's that they're not

2:11:17 moving. I think it's that they're sort

2:11:19 of looping back. They're forgetting the

2:11:21 justification for why they needed to

2:11:23 stop doing this thing. Yeah. This idea

2:11:25 that uh healing destroys its receipts

2:11:27 and this fading affect bias being kind

2:11:29 of the mechanism that works on it. I

2:11:31 found it pretty fascinating when

2:11:32 thinking about observing my friends

2:11:34 lives.

2:11:35 >> That is fascinating. But I think there's

2:11:36 also an element of people finding

2:11:38 comfort in familiar patterns. And

2:11:40 sometimes those familiar patterns are

2:11:42 just failure. They find comfort in

2:11:44 failure. They find comfort in falling

2:11:46 off the wagon. It's too difficult. The

2:11:48 stress of not drinking is so strong.

2:11:51 It's so much they can't handle it. Just

2:11:52 give me a [ __ ] drink. Jesus Christ.

2:11:55 You know, there's a lot of people that

2:11:57 just the pressure of success and not

2:12:00 [ __ ] up is so scary and so daunting

2:12:03 and just maintaining that they fall into

2:12:05 these self-destructive patterns.

2:12:07 >> Why do you think that's the case?

2:12:08 >> I don't know. You'd have to talk to a

2:12:10 psychologist, but it seems to be a

2:12:11 reoccurring pattern with people seeking

2:12:13 comfort in in familiar patterns that are

2:12:17 failure patterns that like maybe it

2:12:19 takes pressure off of them to succeed.

2:12:22 Because for some people, the idea of

2:12:23 succeeding, the idea of getting it's

2:12:25 like it's so overwhelming. It's it

2:12:28 scares them. It it gives them anxiety.

2:12:30 It [ __ ] them up all the time. And when

2:12:31 they start doing well, hey, 333 days

2:12:34 sober and you start saying things like

2:12:36 that and then next thing you just pops

2:12:38 into your head, I want a [ __ ] Marbor

2:12:40 and I want a beer and I want to go to

2:12:43 the bar and see my friends and you just

2:12:45 want to go.

2:12:46 >> Well, that feels like comfort, right? I

2:12:47 suppose there is a a curse with

2:12:50 competence. It's it's interesting when

2:12:51 you see people that are kind of down on

2:12:52 their luck and it makes sense that maybe

2:12:55 they might hit the bottle or they might

2:12:57 uh rely on bad suboptimal habits, but

2:13:02 when someone's really competent and you

2:13:04 keep on seeing them fall back, that's

2:13:05 what's particularly interesting. Oh,

2:13:06 look, you've got something else. You

2:13:07 have an alternative here.

2:13:09 >> That's what's really interesting to me.

2:13:10 But I think that um if you're the sort

2:13:12 of person that's good at things

2:13:14 >> and stuff typically goes well,

2:13:16 >> success doesn't become a reason for

2:13:18 celebration. It's the minimum level of

2:13:20 acceptable performance,

2:13:22 >> right? It's a curse of competence.

2:13:25 >> Success itself is what you have to aim

2:13:27 for. And anything less than success

2:13:28 would be a failure and success itself is

2:13:31 nothing more than acceptable.

2:13:33 >> Right?

2:13:33 >> That creates a a really perverse

2:13:35 incentive which is I can only not lose.

2:13:38 I can't ever win. It's this sort of

2:13:40 debt. you wake up every single day

2:13:42 behind and only if you dominate the day

2:13:44 perfectly do you get yourself back up to

2:13:46 the minimum level of acceptable

2:13:47 performance which is perfection and I

2:13:50 think the perfectionism is kind of on

2:13:52 the rise at the moment. There's a bunch

2:13:53 of studies. I've had a few guests on the

2:13:55 show talking about it and that is

2:13:58 >> how relatively what do you mean by it's

2:14:01 on the rise

2:14:02 >> perfectionism

2:14:02 >> versus uh the I mean the the studies

2:14:05 that have been done on it looking at

2:14:06 perfectionism as a personality trait.

2:14:08 There's a few different types of

2:14:09 perfectionism. There's personal

2:14:11 perfectionism. I must be perfect and

2:14:13 there's other perfectionism as well that

2:14:15 people around me must be perfect too.

2:14:17 And that can be particular. But

2:14:18 >> how are they measuring the effect of

2:14:20 perfectionism? like how are they

2:14:22 measuring how people enacted in their

2:14:25 lives?

2:14:26 >> It's on the rise.

2:14:27 >> It's a psychological scale. So they can

2:14:29 have a a survey survey questions things

2:14:31 like um if I do not do if I don't

2:14:35 succeed that means I am a failure. I

2:14:37 must ensure that everything is

2:14:39 controlled. So there's a a criteria list

2:14:42 >> right? But who are they asking? You know

2:14:44 I mean depending upon who you're asking

2:14:46 you're going to get a higher version a

2:14:47 higher number. you know, if you're

2:14:49 asking people in West Virginia and

2:14:51 trailer parks versus someone who's

2:14:53 working on Wall Street, you know what I

2:14:55 mean? You're going to get different.

2:14:57 It's like, what's the sample size?

2:14:59 >> Well, I'd be I'd like to think that

2:15:00 they're doing it representatively, but

2:15:02 you might be right. There might not be.

2:15:03 Uh, but anyway, I just certainly from

2:15:06 what I can see, this desire that people

2:15:08 have to I'm in a capitalist society,

2:15:11 meritocracy, if I can make myself more

2:15:13 important, more successful, that means

2:15:14 I'm going to get accolade. Please,

2:15:16 please, please. And this goes back to

2:15:17 the poverty parade thing, right? If

2:15:18 you're walking through business class to

2:15:21 get to economy, you're reminded

2:15:23 >> you're reminded of your place within the

2:15:24 hierarchy. There's also some really

2:15:26 interesting data around if you're in a

2:15:29 high income inequality area, uh,

2:15:32 self-objectification by selfies from

2:15:34 women on Instagram goes up.

2:15:36 >> And this is a huge study by Candace

2:15:39 Blake over in Australia. And they did a

2:15:41 correlation. It might have been on

2:15:42 Twitter rather than on Instagram. And

2:15:44 they looked at geoloccating images,

2:15:47 ranked them based on

2:15:48 self-objectification, and then looked at

2:15:50 the wealth inequality in that local

2:15:51 area. Higher wealth inequality, more

2:15:53 self-objectification.

2:15:55 >> Which side is doing the

2:15:57 self-objectification?

2:15:59 >> Women, but women that are poorer or

2:16:01 women that are wealthier,

2:16:02 >> all women.

2:16:02 >> All women.

2:16:03 >> All women in that area because, and the

2:16:06 proposed mechanism is you can see not

2:16:08 just how high you could climb, look at

2:16:10 the inequality on the top end, but how

2:16:12 low you could potentially fall. Oh, to

2:16:14 on the bottom

2:16:15 >> gets you motivated.

2:16:16 >> Gets you motivated. Yeah. And and that

2:16:18 is the same thing. It's I think it's a

2:16:20 similar sort of mechanism. If you see

2:16:21 high inequality, perfectionism is

2:16:23 another escape hatch. That's another

2:16:25 ejector seat that you can pull. If

2:16:26 you're not going to use uh your assets

2:16:30 to get you access, maybe you could just

2:16:31 do it yourself. You could bootstrap it

2:16:33 yourself to lift yourself off the launch

2:16:34 pad. And yeah, the perfectionism thing

2:16:37 is kind of fascinating to me because I

2:16:39 think it's it means that people never

2:16:41 really get to escape from the standards

2:16:44 that they set. And if you're good at

2:16:45 stuff, it becomes even harder because

2:16:47 the minimum level of acceptable

2:16:48 performance is just perfection, right?

2:16:51 [snorts]

2:16:53 Not sure how I feel about that. First of

2:16:55 all, I think a lot of that has got to be

2:16:56 motivated by social media. That's a big

2:16:58 part of it because now you're getting to

2:17:00 see what everybody has, what everybody's

2:17:02 doing. see what they look like, see

2:17:03 their house, see their car, see their

2:17:04 this, see all these things, these

2:17:06 objects of desire. So that I think

2:17:09 accelerates people's desires and wants

2:17:12 and then you also get unrealistic beauty

2:17:14 expectations from the internet, uh,

2:17:16 particularly social media apps that use

2:17:18 filters, right? You're getting a very

2:17:20 distorted perception of what people look

2:17:21 like. And so that probably accelerates

2:17:24 the amount of plastic surgery women get

2:17:27 and amount amount of things that people

2:17:29 are willing to do. Probably the amount

2:17:30 of steroids that young men do,

2:17:32 >> you know, all that stuff. Um, but

2:17:36 you know, the idea of perfectionism,

2:17:39 like what are we talking about? If

2:17:40 you're talking about pursuit of an in

2:17:42 excellence of a sport or of some sort of

2:17:46 a discipline, some sort of a thing you

2:17:48 do, people have always done that.

2:17:49 There's always been like outliers who

2:17:51 are trying to be the very best ever at

2:17:53 something,

2:17:54 >> you know, that's always going to be the

2:17:55 case. And we celebrate that because when

2:17:58 you know there's a guy like Larry Bird

2:17:59 that keeps hitting those three-pointers,

2:18:01 every's like [ __ ] Remember when I was a

2:18:03 kid, people would throw garbage into the

2:18:06 um little garbage baskets at school and

2:18:08 they would go Larry Bird, [laughter] you

2:18:10 know, like they wanted to be like Larry.

2:18:12 They wanted to be like Michael Jordan.

2:18:14 They wanted to be like Mike Tyson.

2:18:15 People celebrate the outliers. They

2:18:17 celebrate these excellent people that

2:18:19 stand above and beyond.

2:18:20 >> There is some article about it. I don't

2:18:21 know how they figured it out yet, but

2:18:23 >> interesting.

2:18:24 >> There's a says it's been growing since

2:18:26 1989.

2:18:27 >> This is hilarious. Perfectionism is a

2:18:29 public health risk. It's associated with

2:18:32 increased depression and anxiety.

2:18:35 Yeah. Yeah. You're going to be depressed

2:18:37 and anxious if you're trying to achieve

2:18:40 perfection. But I don't know if that's

2:18:43 bad. like it's really about whether or

2:18:46 not you can manage your [ __ ] mind.

2:18:49 >> That's interesting there. So there's uh

2:18:51 perfectionism has increased in different

2:18:53 rates. Perfectionistic concerns, fear of

2:18:55 failure, indecisiveness, and fear of

2:18:57 being negatively judged by others

2:18:58 increase much faster than

2:19:00 perfectionistic strivings, the

2:19:01 motivation to set extremely high

2:19:03 standards and work hard to achieve them.

2:19:04 So that's I guess maybe the difference

2:19:07 between what you're thinking about which

2:19:08 is kind of positive perfectionism

2:19:10 wanting to set a goal and chase after it

2:19:12 as opposed to fear of failure,

2:19:14 indecisiveness, and fear of being judged

2:19:16 negatively by others.

2:19:17 >> Yeah, that's the big one, right? The

2:19:19 fear of being judged by others is a real

2:19:22 fear because of social media. Go back.

2:19:24 Stop. Stop. But when they they say it

2:19:26 increased much faster than perfectionist

2:19:29 strivings. So the problem with the

2:19:31 perfectionist strivings is then you have

2:19:33 to have delayed gratification. You have

2:19:35 to have the ability to say I don't want

2:19:38 to do this today but I want this in the

2:19:40 future. So I'm going to do this today so

2:19:42 that in the future I can succeed. That's

2:19:45 abstract. That's hard for a lot of

2:19:47 people to grasp if they've never gone

2:19:49 through a process before. If they've

2:19:52 never trusted a process of improvement.

2:19:54 This is one of the reasons why sports

2:19:56 are so important for young people or any

2:19:58 kind of pursuit like learning how to

2:19:59 play guitar or learning learning

2:20:01 anything that's difficult to learn

2:20:03 because you realize there's a process.

2:20:04 You realize you start off sucky and then

2:20:06 you get better over time. But if you're

2:20:08 never doing anything like that, if

2:20:10 you're just existing and you've never

2:20:12 been challenged to try to improve at

2:20:14 something that's very difficult, you

2:20:16 don't understand the striving, the

2:20:18 perfectionist striving. And even that

2:20:20 term, I don't like that term. Excellence

2:20:22 is a better term. You're striving for

2:20:24 excellence. Perfection is not possible

2:20:27 in anything. There's no there's nothing

2:20:29 perfect that no matter what you do,

2:20:33 there's always going to be a failure.

2:20:34 There's it's a human error. There's

2:20:36 always going to be you you might get to

2:20:38 like here's a perfect example. In uh

2:20:42 games of pool, like in professional pool

2:20:44 matches, the rarest of rare matches is a

2:20:48 match where a guy runs out the entire

2:20:50 set. That means like say if you and I

2:20:53 are playing a race to 10, okay, which

2:20:56 means the first guy to be make 10 games

2:20:58 in a row. If you're really good, you

2:21:01 might break and have an open run on the

2:21:05 first rack and break and have an open

2:21:07 run on the second rack and break it up.

2:21:09 You might run 10 racks in a row. It's

2:21:12 been done. Earl Strickland did it for a

2:21:14 million dollars.

2:21:15 >> He won a million dollars at a tournament

2:21:18 and they wind up [ __ ] him. But Earl

2:21:19 Stricken's like one of the greatest pool

2:21:21 players of all time. But they they had a

2:21:23 million dollar uh insurance policy. If

2:21:26 someone could run 10 racks to make the

2:21:27 tournament more exciting, 10 racks in a

2:21:29 row, they won a million dollars. Well,

2:21:31 Earl Strickland was is a mad genius. And

2:21:33 like he's one of the greatest players of

2:21:35 all time. And he knew there was a

2:21:36 million dollars in the lines. This

2:21:37 [ __ ] came focused and he broke

2:21:39 and ran a 10 pack and they didn't want

2:21:42 to pay him. Like this is [ __ ] And

2:21:43 but it was on film. Whole thing's crazy.

2:21:45 But that's a thousand. Nobody does that.

2:21:49 And if you do it, you're going to fall

2:21:50 apart in the next game. You You'll have

2:21:52 a never another match like the next day.

2:21:54 You're never going to be perfect. You're

2:21:56 always going to miss. It's just humans.

2:21:58 You There's going to be error. You know,

2:22:01 >> Michael Jordan, as good as he was,

2:22:02 didn't make every basketball. You know,

2:22:04 Mike Tyson lost fights. You're you're a

2:22:06 human. There's no perfection, but there

2:22:08 is

2:22:09 >> excellence. And that's what people are

2:22:11 pursuing really. I don't like that term,

2:22:13 >> perfectionism. I I think what's maybe

2:22:16 useful about the term is that it uh

2:22:19 because that is the term it belies the

2:22:21 futility of pursuing it. It's like in in

2:22:25 in containing it, it kind of mocks the

2:22:27 the pursuit of it itself.

2:22:28 >> Exactly. Because it look it is

2:22:30 ridiculous when you're talking about

2:22:31 appearance. It's ridiculous when you

2:22:33 talk about frivolous things that are

2:22:34 meaningless.

2:22:35 >> But when you're talking about Magnus

2:22:36 Walker playing ch or Magnus Carlson

2:22:38 playing chess, that's that means

2:22:40 something. Like that's a crazy thing

2:22:42 that that guy's able to do. That pursuit

2:22:45 of extreme excellence is celebrated.

2:22:48 When Messi plays soccer, you know, when

2:22:50 when when someone is an outlier, like we

2:22:52 love that. So this idea that you

2:22:54 shouldn't love the most excellent of

2:22:57 excellent people that are the most

2:22:58 celebrated in society. And there's a

2:23:00 problem with people chasing excellence.

2:23:02 Like,

2:23:03 >> okay, look, if if you're saying there's

2:23:05 a problem with people chasing perfect

2:23:07 appearances because then you get

2:23:08 dysmorphia and you start looking at

2:23:10 yourself all weird and then you get

2:23:11 anorexia or you you getting your lips

2:23:13 done, you don't know they're too big.

2:23:15 That Yeah, that's [ __ ] up. That

2:23:16 pursuit of perfection is insane. The the

2:23:19 perfection of But we're not we're not

2:23:22 capable of achieving perfection. We are

2:23:24 capable of achieving excellence. So, if

2:23:27 you call it perfection, it sounds like

2:23:28 it's a problem. If you call it

2:23:29 excellence,

2:23:30 >> sounds like a pursuit.

2:23:31 >> Yeah.

2:23:32 Uh Federra, really interesting stat that

2:23:35 I found out about him. He won maybe

2:23:38 about 80 85% of the matches that he

2:23:42 played across his entire career.

2:23:43 >> Crazy.

2:23:44 >> But he only won about 56% of the points.

2:23:50 That's the edge. And you have to be a

2:23:52 madman to work hard enough to beat

2:23:55 everybody 85% of the time. You have to

2:23:58 be a mad man. How many [ __ ] people

2:23:59 are playing tennis? How many freak

2:24:01 athletes are out there [ __ ] whacking

2:24:03 balls all day doing sprints, lifting

2:24:05 weights?

2:24:06 >> Nearly 50% of the points that you

2:24:08 played.

2:24:08 >> Crazy.

2:24:09 >> I [ __ ] love that stat. Yeah, there's

2:24:11 this this great line that the curse of

2:24:13 discipline is that every day looks the

2:24:15 same and the curse of indiscipline is

2:24:17 that every year looks the same.

2:24:19 >> Oo, I like that.

2:24:21 >> And I've been thinking about the

2:24:22 relationship between uh discipline,

2:24:24 motivation, and obsession. So, I think

2:24:26 obsession is kind of very misunderstood.

2:24:30 It's feared by a lot of people, even the

2:24:32 people that have got it. Sometimes

2:24:34 >> it's also dismissed by people that wish

2:24:37 they had it and they don't have it and

2:24:39 they mock it.

2:24:40 >> How so?

2:24:41 >> Because they they look at someone who's

2:24:43 like obsessed with doing something and

2:24:44 like he's [ __ ] lost his whole life

2:24:47 playing that stupid game or he's given

2:24:49 up his whole life for his music. Like

2:24:52 what's the point?

2:24:53 >> Like there's a lot of people that want

2:24:55 to dismiss the outliers. Maybe they

2:24:57 don't like the way they stack up against

2:24:59 them.

2:25:00 >> If someone's like the best at something,

2:25:02 you watch some guy that can just do this

2:25:04 thing that no one else can do the way he

2:25:06 does it. Like there's a bunch of people

2:25:08 that celebrate it for sure, but there's

2:25:10 always going to be a bunch of people

2:25:11 that think there's something wrong with

2:25:12 it.

2:25:12 >> Being threatened by obsession is kind of

2:25:14 interesting. So, everybody wants to I I

2:25:17 think it's to do with your relationship

2:25:19 with friction. So, discipline is

2:25:21 friction accepted. It's like I will

2:25:24 force myself to do the thing regardless

2:25:26 of how hard it is. Motivation would be

2:25:30 friction removed which is like I want to

2:25:32 do the thing

2:25:33 >> and then obsession is friction inverted

2:25:36 like I can't not do the thing. I'm

2:25:38 pulled toward it. It's harder for me to

2:25:41 not train than it is for me to train.

2:25:43 It's harder for me to not play guitar

2:25:45 than it is for me to play guitar.

2:25:47 >> So it's all about that relationship. And

2:25:48 this is why I think people get so

2:25:50 confused because from the outside

2:25:54 obsession can look a lot like someone

2:25:56 just using a [ __ ] ton of discipline,

2:25:58 just gritting their teeth and getting

2:25:59 through it. What you don't realize from

2:26:01 the inside they have no choice,

2:26:02 >> right?

2:26:03 >> They have no choice but to do it. All

2:26:04 that they want, they go to sleep

2:26:06 thinking about it. They wake up thinking

2:26:07 about it. Yeah. They have no

2:26:10 >> there is no way that they can stop

2:26:11 themselves from doing this thing. And

2:26:13 this is why it's dangerous. obsession

2:26:14 gets a bad rap because if it's pointed

2:26:16 toward politics or porn or your ex

2:26:18 >> or video games

2:26:20 >> or video games or weed or you know

2:26:22 whatever

2:26:23 >> that becomes very dangerous. But if you

2:26:25 and this is why

2:26:28 >> some people and I'm going to guess that

2:26:30 this is you, it's certainly me. Some

2:26:32 people have problem solving brains.

2:26:33 They're always kind of rotating a little

2:26:36 Rubik's cube in their mind thinking how

2:26:38 can I this is an interesting challenge

2:26:40 for me to face and how could I change

2:26:41 this thing? What how would I fix this

2:26:43 thing? just playing with ideas or trying

2:26:44 to get better at something, they're

2:26:46 always working on something.

2:26:48 Someone that's got a problem-solving

2:26:49 brain but doesn't have any good problems

2:26:51 to solve will just chew themselves up.

2:26:54 They will eat themselves inside out

2:26:55 because that is when you get obsessed

2:26:57 with stuff that you shouldn't do. That

2:26:59 is when you get obsessed with porn or

2:27:00 politics or your toxic ex or that person

2:27:03 that you think that's that uh cut you

2:27:06 off in traffic and that's when you chase

2:27:07 after them. That is the kind of problem

2:27:09 solving brain without a good problem to

2:27:11 solve. M

2:27:12 >> and I think a lot of people feel a

2:27:17 degree of shame or at the very least

2:27:21 like uh they're marionetted by this

2:27:24 problem solving brain by the speed of

2:27:26 what they're going through. The fact

2:27:27 that they're always turning something

2:27:29 they can't really get it to switch off.

2:27:30 And I think a much easier solution than

2:27:32 trying to stop yourself from solving

2:27:34 problems is to just give yourself better

2:27:36 problems to solve. It's to start a

2:27:38 business. It's to get a pursuit that you

2:27:40 really care about,

2:27:41 >> right? But this sounds very simplistic

2:27:43 though. We're talking about like a

2:27:45 legitimate mental health issue with a

2:27:46 lot of people that don't have the

2:27:48 awareness to stop a pattern,

2:27:50 >> you know? Like there's a lot of people

2:27:52 that need a friend and they don't have

2:27:54 any friends and so they need a

2:27:56 counselor. They need someone. They need

2:27:58 someone who can talk to them about what

2:28:00 they're doing and give them some tools

2:28:02 as to how to navigate out of it because

2:28:03 there's a lot of people that are just

2:28:04 stuck in that rut.

2:28:05 >> I agree.

2:28:06 >> And they could be really good. Like

2:28:08 there's people that are wasting their

2:28:09 life gambling that could be really good

2:28:11 at something else. They could be really

2:28:12 good

2:28:13 >> if you applied that effort, that

2:28:14 dedication, that obsession to something.

2:28:16 I I completely agree. I think the funny

2:28:18 thing for anyone that's on the right

2:28:22 side of their obsession, they're

2:28:23 applying it to something that's

2:28:24 positive. Kind of a nice situation to

2:28:27 realize, hey, you weren't that far away

2:28:29 from being that guy on the street.

2:28:31 >> Right. Right. If you if you're honest

2:28:34 >> with yourself, your level of obsession

2:28:36 could have directed you toward that that

2:28:40 destruction, that distraction, that

2:28:42 >> that like self emulation. Uh you you're

2:28:46 not that far away from it. It's the same

2:28:48 fuel. It's the same fuel source.

2:28:50 >> Yeah. It's just about directing it in a

2:28:52 good way and figuring out a way that's

2:28:54 going to be most beneficial to you and

2:28:56 the people around you. And some people

2:28:58 just aren't good at that problem

2:29:00 solving.

2:29:00 >> Yeah. And I think you're right to point

2:29:03 to what you do in childhood sport is

2:29:05 just hey if you work hard incrementally

2:29:09 at these component skills there is an

2:29:11 outcome in terms of performance that

2:29:12 will happen in future.

2:29:14 >> Yeah.

2:29:15 >> These small amounts these little efforts

2:29:17 will contribute to what you do when you

2:29:19 get there. There's delayed gratification

2:29:21 step by step by step you work and it's

2:29:24 just it kind of lays the physics of the

2:29:25 system.

2:29:26 >> Yes.

2:29:26 >> Right. Okay. And then you get into

2:29:28 adulthood and you go, well, I understand

2:29:29 like delaying gratification is

2:29:31 important. I can win the marshmallow

2:29:32 test today, which means I can get

2:29:33 something that I want in future. I need

2:29:35 to think over a longer time horizon.

2:29:38 Typically, I can use my obs like another

2:29:41 thing that's kind of fascinating about

2:29:42 the obsession piece is when you look at

2:29:44 someone like uh Joo as a good example,

2:29:48 >> what looks like obsession now or sorry,

2:29:50 what looks like discipline is probably

2:29:53 just who he is. the 04:30 a.m. thing, the

2:29:56 kettle bell swings, the training.

2:29:58 >> At one point, he was obsessed by that.

2:30:01 That was probably what he thought about

2:30:03 most. I know he was when he was still in

2:30:04 the SEALs. Like, that was what he

2:30:06 wanted. He wanted you to get as big and

2:30:07 as jacked and as lethal as possible. I

2:30:09 don't think that's quite his priority in

2:30:11 the same way now. But what you see if

2:30:13 you allow yourself to have positive

2:30:15 obsessions and for them to cool over

2:30:17 time, you basically start to build up

2:30:20 these layers of a pyramid, which is

2:30:22 well, I'm not obsessed by training, but

2:30:25 I used to when I was in my 20s, and now

2:30:27 my training obsession is just who I am.

2:30:30 It's cooled like uh like lava's sort of

2:30:33 cooled into the core of this planet, and

2:30:35 it's now who I've become. So, my

2:30:38 training is just part of my life. And

2:30:39 then, okay, what was the net? Well, I

2:30:41 started to learn. I wanted to um tell

2:30:43 the truth. I wanted to be an an

2:30:46 upstanding person. So, I started to

2:30:47 maybe go to therapy or I I I worked on

2:30:50 my mental health a little bit more. And

2:30:51 okay, that's now cool. That was an

2:30:52 obsession for a while. And now I've

2:30:54 moved on to the next thing. And I really

2:30:55 wanted to build this skill. I wanted to

2:30:56 become a good father. So, I worked out

2:30:58 how I could deal with my emotions when

2:31:00 interacting with my kids. And now I've

2:31:01 got that skill. over time serial

2:31:04 obsessives I think whether it's in

2:31:06 business or in training or in personal

2:31:08 development what you end up with is this

2:31:09 unbelievably

2:31:11 like well-rounded person but if you

2:31:14 don't allow yourself to wear that

2:31:15 obsession for a while and a lot of the

2:31:17 time when people get obsessed with stuff

2:31:19 they feel guilty they feel a little

2:31:22 ashamed of it they they want to push

2:31:24 back against it but it's the freest

2:31:25 discipline and motivation you're ever

2:31:27 going to get you're never going to find

2:31:28 >> who feels guilty about being obsessed

2:31:30 about things

2:31:31 >> I think sometimes people do

2:31:32 >> about good things.

2:31:34 >> The mockery of your friends around you.

2:31:36 Oh, dude. Going go and play guitar

2:31:37 again. Are we? Oh, going to go. Oh, you

2:31:39 little music thing. Is that going well,

2:31:41 >> man? Anybody who falls victim to that,

2:31:44 you deserve it

2:31:46 >> because

2:31:47 >> that's so silly, isn't it?

2:31:48 >> You need to stand up for what it is that

2:31:49 you want.

2:31:50 >> I don't All the times in my life when

2:31:52 I've been obsessed by things, if anybody

2:31:54 like tried to mock me being obsessed by

2:31:56 it, I'd be like, "Fuck you. Who cares

2:31:58 what you think?" I could couldn't have

2:32:00 cared less. That's interesting. I don't

2:32:02 know whether it's a British the mockery

2:32:05 the tall poppy thing is a huge part of

2:32:08 British culture. If you diverge from the

2:32:10 normal path

2:32:10 >> yes

2:32:11 >> it is you know we have the same number

2:32:13 of universities in the top 10 globally

2:32:17 >> but we produce 20% of the entrepreneurs

2:32:20 compared with America. And I think that

2:32:22 a lot of that is

2:32:23 >> attitude.

2:32:25 It's it's not [ __ ] Cambridge, Kings,

2:32:27 London, Oxford. Like, these aren't rinky

2:32:30 dink organizations. They attract

2:32:32 unbelievable talent.

2:32:34 >> Why is it that we're not producing the

2:32:35 same kind of

2:32:37 orthogonal thinker, self-starter,

2:32:40 sovereign, high agency people that you

2:32:42 might get out of America? And I think a

2:32:44 lot of it is

2:32:45 >> it's just not as encouraged. It's not.

2:32:47 And it's a shame. And I wish that I

2:32:48 could like gift some of the enthusiasm

2:32:50 back to the UK. Americans basically have

2:32:53 permanent firstline cocaine energy.

2:32:56 [laughter]

2:32:57 >> So enthusiastic about everything.

2:32:59 >> Yeah.

2:33:00 >> And

2:33:00 >> some some Americans.

2:33:02 >> That's true. But I just I wish I could

2:33:04 get that back. I wish I could push that

2:33:05 back toward the UK. It's something that

2:33:07 would make a massive difference.

2:33:08 >> Yeah, sure. [sighs] I'm sure it would.

2:33:11 But it's very difficult to change the

2:33:13 way a whole country thinks. Like the

2:33:15 attitude of the country. This is the

2:33:17 attitude of this country is you could

2:33:18 make it here. Like you could everybody

2:33:22 feels like they're just a few good deals

2:33:25 away from being rich.

2:33:26 >> Just a they're a millionaire that just

2:33:29 hasn't made it yet. Like that's

2:33:31 >> I think it's one of the reasons that the

2:33:32 victimhood culture here has kicked off

2:33:34 more though that in the UK

2:33:37 >> you don't expect to be able to become

2:33:38 much. Like it's very class system still

2:33:40 over there.

2:33:41 >> When you're a kid, you're not told that

2:33:42 you can be anything that you want to be.

2:33:44 If you diverge from the path, one of the

2:33:45 first things that happens is what are

2:33:46 you doing that for? It's a stupid idea.

2:33:49 good in some ways because it keeps your

2:33:50 feet on the ground, but bad in other

2:33:53 ways because it means that you don't go

2:33:54 for it, right? You don't take the big

2:33:55 swings in the same way. In the US, I get

2:33:57 the sense that kids that are told you

2:34:00 can be anything you want to be. The

2:34:01 American dream is still very much alive.

2:34:02 If you work hard, you can raise yourself

2:34:04 up, pick yourself up by your bootstraps,

2:34:05 and become something. Okay.

2:34:08 What happens if you arrive in adulthood

2:34:11 and you're not given that which you felt

2:34:14 you were promised as a kid? Well, that

2:34:16 feels like someone's taken it away from

2:34:18 you. That feels like someone's stolen

2:34:20 your rightful uh your promise. This is

2:34:23 the same reason, interestingly enough,

2:34:25 uh the same reason why Korea, the women

2:34:28 in Korea are some of the most

2:34:29 left-leaning in the world supposedly

2:34:32 that they were given equal access to

2:34:35 education uh over the last few decades.

2:34:38 And that meant that as a quite

2:34:40 patriarchal society, they were

2:34:42 constrained, not not able to access

2:34:45 education in the same way. They finally

2:34:47 get into it. They're emancipated.

2:34:48 They're getting degrees and higher

2:34:49 education at the same rate as the men.

2:34:51 And then they get into the real world

2:34:53 and all of the employment opportunities

2:34:55 haven't caught up. And it's still very

2:34:57 sexist when it comes to the way that

2:34:59 employment and promotions and wages,

2:35:02 there's still a big wage gap there. And

2:35:04 what that means is in the same way as

2:35:05 the American child that was promised all

2:35:07 of this stuff as a kid doesn't get

2:35:08 delivered it when they become an adult.

2:35:10 A lot of the women in Korea it seems

2:35:12 were promised a lot through their

2:35:14 education and then they arrive and the

2:35:17 rug feels like it's being pulled out

2:35:18 from underneath them by a uh work

2:35:21 workforce that is still

2:35:24 >> kind of in the dark in their equivalent

2:35:25 of the dark ages. But this is people

2:35:27 throw their toys out of the pram.

2:35:29 >> Why would they not? I think I I I think

2:35:31 that I deserve this. And yeah, the

2:35:34 victimhood culture in America is I don't

2:35:37 know. It I wish I could take some of the

2:35:39 bits of America and put them in the UK

2:35:40 and some of the bits of the UK and put

2:35:41 them in America and I think we'd end up

2:35:42 that was what it used to be. [ __ ] it,

2:35:43 we'll just bring it back together again.

2:35:47 >> Yeah. I think you're always going to

2:35:49 have people that are dissatisfied with

2:35:51 their station in life. The question is

2:35:53 like, were they equipped with the tools

2:35:56 to create a better life when they were

2:35:58 younger? And whether they were equipped

2:36:01 by their family, or were they equipped

2:36:03 by whatever thing they got into, a sport

2:36:06 they got into when they were young or

2:36:08 some sort of a discipline where they

2:36:10 realize this, it's really important that

2:36:13 kids realize at an early age about a

2:36:15 process of improvement, trusting the

2:36:17 process. That's a common phrase that you

2:36:19 hear when it comes to anything that

2:36:20 you're trying to do that's difficult in

2:36:22 this country. Trust the process. Trust

2:36:24 the process. You hear about that with

2:36:26 coaches like in in MMA fighters. They're

2:36:28 always saying that we got to trust the

2:36:30 process that there's a process of

2:36:32 buildup up to a big fight. There's a

2:36:34 process of improvement to get to your

2:36:36 black belt. There's a process of

2:36:37 improvement as you rise through the

2:36:39 amateur ranks into a professional ranks.

2:36:40 You got to do things the right way and

2:36:42 keep doing them and you're going to get

2:36:43 better. Some people never learn that and

2:36:45 then they get to a point where they

2:36:47 think things should have already

2:36:48 happened and why haven't things happened

2:36:50 for me and then they get angry,

2:36:52 >> you know. And um it's a lot of it is

2:36:55 it's very difficult to find a good

2:36:57 environment. Very difficult to find

2:36:59 like-minded people that that are

2:37:01 empowering and when you're around them

2:37:03 you feel better. You feel motivated. You

2:37:05 feel inspired. That's also hugely

2:37:08 critical for people. It's a like people

2:37:11 want to think I'm a lone wolf. [ __ ] off.

2:37:13 No,

2:37:14 >> that's there's no no one like that.

2:37:15 That's all [ __ ] Those people are

2:37:17 very depressed.

2:37:18 >> Where do you think the trust thing comes

2:37:19 from? Because I I trust.

2:37:21 >> Yeah. Yeah. the trust of the process

2:37:23 that I think a lot of people want.

2:37:26 >> It's people that have done it before.

2:37:27 You you have to learn from people that

2:37:29 have already done it. Like if you're

2:37:30 learning from a wrestling coach, you're

2:37:31 learning from a coach that wrestled.

2:37:33 >> There's no wrestling coaches that didn't

2:37:34 wrestle. Like they all wrestle and that

2:37:37 you learn from them that there's a

2:37:39 process and this is what you're going to

2:37:40 do and this is how we're going to get

2:37:41 better. And trust me, when week three

2:37:44 comes along and you can run this hill a

2:37:46 lot easier than you run it today, you're

2:37:48 going to be thankful for these 5 a.m.

2:37:49 practices.

2:37:51 Yes, sir. You got to trust the process.

2:37:53 And if you have a good coach, the good

2:37:55 coach will show you at every step of the

2:37:57 way as you're improving. You'll hit a

2:37:58 move and it'll say, "You see how smooth

2:38:00 you hit that? You couldn't hit that move

2:38:01 last time."

2:38:02 >> It's so true. It's so true. The the

2:38:04 inability to be able to see your own

2:38:06 progress,

2:38:06 >> to be able to see what you're doing. I

2:38:08 think for a lot of people, goals are

2:38:09 contracts to self-criticize until we

2:38:12 succeed.

2:38:13 >> And that's how people whip themselves

2:38:14 into submission. And that's the problem

2:38:16 with the perfectionism side of things as

2:38:17 opposed to excellence. Right? if you

2:38:19 were to say I am not enough unless I am

2:38:22 perfect as opposed to I am good if I

2:38:24 keep improving. That seems to be one of

2:38:26 the differences between the two. But

2:38:28 yeah, like goals being contracts to

2:38:31 self-criticize until we succeed.

2:38:33 >> That's not what a coach would do. I'm

2:38:34 sure that wasn't when you were teaching

2:38:35 [ __ ] taekwondo and someone for the

2:38:37 first time manages to land this kick or

2:38:39 they win a it was really really close.

2:38:42 you can pick out the elements, but so

2:38:45 many people have got coaches in their

2:38:46 mind that are they're only ever focusing

2:38:49 on the negatives.

2:38:50 >> If you have a good coach and you're in a

2:38:53 sport with a bunch of other people that

2:38:55 are doing well, it's like statistically

2:38:57 proven that your level will be higher

2:39:00 than someone who has a bad coach that's

2:39:03 around other people that aren't as good.

2:39:05 That's just how it always is. The best

2:39:06 athletes always come from the great

2:39:08 programs, you know, whether it's

2:39:10 Oklahoma State University, wrestling or

2:39:12 what, whatever the [ __ ] it is, there's

2:39:13 always like a bunch of different killers

2:39:15 that come from a great environment with

2:39:17 great coaching. People don't have that

2:39:19 in life, right? If you had great

2:39:21 coaching in life and you were surrounded

2:39:23 by a bunch of other [ __ ] division one

2:39:25 all-Americans who are like getting after

2:39:27 it every day, you would be motivated.

2:39:30 But most people aren't. And this is part

2:39:32 of the problem. Most people are

2:39:33 surrounded by equally lost people who

2:39:36 are sad. [snorts] And it's hard to rise

2:39:40 above. It's hard to say, "I don't want

2:39:41 to go to the bar because I'm working on

2:39:43 writing this book and I need to write

2:39:45 this book." Oh, you're going to [ __ ]

2:39:47 write the book and you're going to

2:39:48 ignore your boys? Like, click. You gota

2:39:51 you got to know when to find people that

2:39:54 are productive and healthy and are doing

2:39:56 things similar to what you're doing

2:39:57 things where you're like pursuing

2:39:59 something that you really enjoy and not

2:40:01 just waste your [ __ ] life away

2:40:02 drinking every day like a lot of people

2:40:04 will do.

2:40:05 >> That perspective is hard to come by

2:40:06 though.

2:40:06 >> It is

2:40:07 >> because you need to break out of the

2:40:09 frame that you're in already. This is

2:40:10 the the lonely chapter thing that I'm

2:40:12 kind of obsessed with. You're so

2:40:13 developed that you don't resonate with

2:40:15 your old set of friends,

2:40:16 >> but you're not yet sufficiently

2:40:17 developed that you've built up your new

2:40:19 set of friends. And there's this

2:40:20 temptation to go back to go back to the

2:40:23 old patterns, the old habits, the old

2:40:24 modes of reassurance,

2:40:26 >> just like we were talking about with

2:40:27 drug addicts, falling off the wagon

2:40:28 because it's like it's easier. It's

2:40:30 easier to fail.

2:40:31 >> It is simpler. And I guess what's

2:40:33 interesting

2:40:36 thinking about choosing a new direction

2:40:39 and and having a degree of self

2:40:41 asssurance like living your life by

2:40:44 design as opposed to default is one of

2:40:47 the most important things. But I wonder

2:40:49 whether people that are in a an

2:40:51 environment where they don't have any

2:40:52 good role models, like I didn't grow up

2:40:54 in a particularly like cubrious part of

2:40:57 the UK. It's the most working-class town

2:40:59 in the back end of the northeast of

2:41:00 England. And there weren't that many

2:41:03 people around me when I grew up that

2:41:04 were like the person I wanted to be

2:41:06 like. But there were [ __ ] lots of

2:41:07 people like the person I didn't want to

2:41:09 be like. I didn't want his relationship

2:41:10 with gambling. I didn't want the way

2:41:12 that he kept on cheating on his wife. I

2:41:13 didn't like the fact that he used

2:41:14 alcohol to deal with his emotional

2:41:16 problems. So yeah, would it be nice if

2:41:19 you had the D1 sports coach as your next

2:41:22 door neighbor every morning telling you

2:41:24 that you can we should go for a run

2:41:26 because little Timmy's going for a run

2:41:27 as well. Yeah, that'd be awesome.

2:41:28 >> But if you don't have it and you've got

2:41:30 some people around you that are reverse

2:41:31 role models, you can quite easily you

2:41:34 can make a lot of progress in life by

2:41:36 avoiding pitfalls, not just expediting

2:41:38 success.

2:41:38 >> Definitely

2:41:39 >> by weaving away from the things that you

2:41:41 know that you don't want. The problem is

2:41:43 a lot of those people will try to drag

2:41:44 you down and if you're in close

2:41:47 proximity to them and you have to

2:41:49 interact with them on a regular basis,

2:41:51 it could trip you up. But yeah, a lot of

2:41:52 people get motivated by like if you're

2:41:54 around people that are alcoholics and

2:41:55 you see them ruin their life. Like I

2:41:56 have a friend, his family was alcoholics

2:41:59 and he's never had a drink his whole

2:42:00 life. He was like, I won't touch that

2:42:02 [ __ ] ever. He saw it saw it wreck

2:42:04 people's lives. Never had a desire to

2:42:06 have alcohol.

2:42:08 Um so that was and you know he became

2:42:11 very successful. So he figured out a way

2:42:13 to just avoid all the problems that all

2:42:14 those people had. They motivated him.

2:42:16 But it's better to be motivated by

2:42:17 someone who's doing something you aspire

2:42:19 to

2:42:20 >> as opposed to trying to avoid something

2:42:21 that's going wrong.

2:42:22 >> I [clears throat] think the option that

2:42:24 people have now that was never available

2:42:26 before is you could hear people that you

2:42:28 are um that you admire or that you

2:42:32 aspire to be like what they are. You

2:42:34 could hear them on the internet now.

2:42:36 There's way more access to inspiration

2:42:38 than ever before. You know, when you

2:42:40 have some high achiever who goes on a

2:42:42 podcast and has a conversation about

2:42:43 something that they do and you could

2:42:45 realize how this guy built his company

2:42:47 or built his life or became this amazing

2:42:49 athlete and what they went through.

2:42:51 >> You you can learn from conversations

2:42:55 that you're not in the room with. you

2:42:57 know, you you don't get a chance to hang

2:42:58 out with, you know, David Gogggins or

2:43:01 whatever, but you get a chance to listen

2:43:03 to him talk now where it just wasn't

2:43:05 available before for all the different

2:43:07 outliers like like we were talking about

2:43:09 Larry Bird before. Who the [ __ ] was

2:43:10 Larry Bird listening to? He had to be

2:43:12 listening to the other basketball

2:43:14 players that were playing with him that

2:43:15 were all a bunch of killers. Like that

2:43:17 was the only way he got good.

2:43:18 >> Like he didn't have the internet. He

2:43:20 couldn't just go on YouTube and find

2:43:21 inspirational quotes, you know he could

2:43:23 listen to an Alan Watts lecture and have

2:43:25 a new perspective on life. It was

2:43:27 harder. It's a lot harder. It's a lot

2:43:29 easier now. It's a lot easier now to be

2:43:31 inspired. It's a lot easier now to also

2:43:33 have examples of people that are living

2:43:34 a life that is aligned with what you're

2:43:37 looking for versus what you see around

2:43:40 you all the time. You don't just accept

2:43:41 it anymore. People there's a lot more

2:43:44 people now that are like, I've got to

2:43:45 get the [ __ ] away from these people.

2:43:47 Well, because the alternative is that

2:43:48 you're

2:43:50 >> fortunately like serendipitously just

2:43:53 born into a culture where there's some

2:43:55 people like the person you want to be

2:43:57 like right next to you. Like how many

2:43:59 people that are

2:44:00 >> excellent individuals that are going to

2:44:02 go on to try that have the capacity to

2:44:03 go on to do something incredible are

2:44:06 around other people that are like that

2:44:07 too,

2:44:08 >> right?

2:44:08 >> Not because by design you're an outlier.

2:44:10 So if you're an outlier there's going to

2:44:11 be fewer people like you. being able to

2:44:14 hear people say that. I remember I was

2:44:16 listening to a part a while ago and uh

2:44:19 there was this line on it. I think it

2:44:21 was Mel Robbins that said something like

2:44:22 um all my life I'd always felt like

2:44:25 someone was mad at me. I was like,

2:44:27 "Huh?" I've never heard anybody put it

2:44:29 put it that way before. All my life I'd

2:44:31 ever heard.

2:44:31 >> Did Mel Robin say this?

2:44:33 >> Yeah.

2:44:33 >> I've never listened to her podcast, but

2:44:35 Tim Dylan was making fun of her today

2:44:37 and it was the funniest [ __ ] I've ever

2:44:38 heard in my life. He goes, "She makes

2:44:41 Gary Vee sound like Aristotle."

2:44:44 [laughter]

2:44:47 >> Tim Dylan is the best. He's the best.

2:44:51 >> Have you seen Gary Ve's talking about V

2:44:54 friends recently? Did you see this,

2:44:55 Jamie? Have a little This

2:44:57 >> I don't want to watch this.

2:44:58 >> Okay.

2:44:58 >> Don't make me do this.

2:44:59 >> Okay. All right. Well, you made me watch

2:45:00 a leg kick thing.

2:45:01 >> He's a nice guy.

2:45:01 >> Yeah.

2:45:02 >> Gary's a nice guy. I've had him on the

2:45:03 podcast before.

2:45:04 >> Well, maybe we don't need to learn about

2:45:05 that. Anyway, just my point is

2:45:07 regardless of who it comes from, you can

2:45:09 find inspiration in a variety of places.

2:45:11 >> You certainly can, but there's more now

2:45:13 than ever before. And there's never a

2:45:16 time in human history where you can be

2:45:17 more inspired. You just have to seek it.

2:45:19 But you also have to avoid the tricks.

2:45:22 There's all bunch of things that are

2:45:23 going to trick you and steal your

2:45:24 attention. You got to avoid the

2:45:26 nonsense. Avoid the nonsense on social

2:45:28 media and just find things that your

2:45:30 time is very valuable. And the same

2:45:33 feeling that you get out of watching a t

2:45:35 like the same dopamine rush that you get

2:45:38 from watching a Tik Tok video that means

2:45:40 nothing, you also get from watching a

2:45:41 YouTube video where you're going to

2:45:42 learn something. It's like it's just as

2:45:44 interesting.

2:45:45 >> Yeah. Talking about the thing, talking

2:45:47 about the thing and doing the thing v

2:45:49 for the same resources. So you need to

2:45:51 allocate yours appropriately.

2:45:52 >> Yeah.

2:45:53 >> Like how many people are just great at

2:45:55 talking about how their plans are going

2:45:57 to go? This is what's going to happen

2:45:58 next. I can't wait. I can't wait for

2:46:00 this new business that's going to go up

2:46:01 and it never happens.

2:46:03 >> Were you around when The Secret was a

2:46:06 big movie and a bunch of people really

2:46:07 believed that they could just sort of

2:46:09 manifest their life? Yes. By thinking

2:46:10 about it?

2:46:11 >> Yes.

2:46:11 >> That was a fascinating time.

2:46:13 >> You know that lady said that the reason

2:46:16 the Boxing Day tsunami happened in

2:46:18 Thailand was because the

2:46:20 >> citizens were giving off bad juju. M

2:46:23 >> this she basically said that they'd

2:46:25 manifested it was like thousands tens of

2:46:28 thousands of people displaced because of

2:46:30 a tsunami that happened on Boxing Day.

2:46:32 >> Imagine believing that.

2:46:33 >> Ah dude the the crazy thing is the

2:46:36 secret the visualization stuff which I'm

2:46:38 sure tons and tons of the athletes that

2:46:40 you've worked with or that you

2:46:41 commentate on so many of them are using

2:46:43 visualization but people forget that you

2:46:46 need to actually go and do the work as

2:46:47 well. You'd think like um God will steer

2:46:50 the boat but you still have to row as

2:46:52 opposed to you can just sit in the boat

2:46:54 and think about it and you'll get rode

2:46:55 there yourself and that's the issue. The

2:46:58 issue is that people want a shortcut and

2:46:59 if you can give them a shortcut

2:47:01 >> Yeah. I think the visualization and the

2:47:04 belief is an element.

2:47:06 >> It's an element. If you can never see

2:47:08 yourself succeeding, you'll probably

2:47:10 [ __ ] it up somehow. But if you can see

2:47:12 yourself succeeding and you have a

2:47:13 direct plan and you also put in the

2:47:15 work, your odds of success are higher.

2:47:18 That's all it is. But the people that

2:47:20 have said that they used the secret to

2:47:22 succeed, they're only the people that

2:47:24 used it and it worked. How many people

2:47:26 used it and it didn't work? Probably a

2:47:28 fuckload more.

2:47:29 >> Survivor shift bias is a hell of a drug.

2:47:31 >> It is a hell of a drug.

2:47:32 >> Yeah. I uh [laughter]

2:47:35 Yeah, it's it's one thing to get what

2:47:36 you want, but it's another thing to want

2:47:38 what's worth getting in life.

2:47:39 >> Well, there's a lot of people believe

2:47:40 that it was like God's will for them to

2:47:42 succeed. I knew God had a p a plan for

2:47:45 me. Okay. Does God have a plan for that

2:47:47 dude who's doing heroin in the corner?

2:47:49 [laughter]

2:47:50 What about the guy that's pissing on

2:47:51 himself on Skid Row? Is that God have a

2:47:54 plan for that guy? Is that's God doesn't

2:47:56 like him. I didn't like him when he was

2:47:58 a baby. I don't like him now. [ __ ] that

2:48:00 guy. Give him fentinel.

2:48:01 >> How do you how do you come to sort of

2:48:04 think about the unfairness of the the

2:48:06 hands that are being dealt there?

2:48:07 Because when I think about that, it does

2:48:08 make me really sad. Makes me sad to

2:48:10 think about how unfortunate some

2:48:11 people's like decks of cards have been.

2:48:14 >> Oh yeah, man. Oh yeah. Yeah. I mean, you

2:48:16 can get born to a pair of junkies. Two

2:48:19 junkies can have sex on Skid Row and

2:48:22 you're born addicted to fentinel right

2:48:25 out of the box and your life is [ __ ]

2:48:28 Versus if you have a child, you're a

2:48:30 great guy, you're educated, you're

2:48:31 interesting, you're intelligent, your

2:48:33 kids going to grow up with a cool dad.

2:48:34 It's like it's like it's not fair. It's

2:48:37 not even remotely fair,

2:48:39 >> you know? and uh we don't do enough to

2:48:41 to [ __ ] mitigate the unfairness. And

2:48:45 I don't mean in terms of like

2:48:46 redistribution of wealth or anything

2:48:48 like that, like making sure there's not

2:48:50 that level of despair and poverty in a

2:48:54 functional society, you know, and the

2:48:56 fact that there's almost no effort, no

2:48:59 real concerted effort to clean up any of

2:49:02 these problems that we have had for

2:49:04 decades upon decades upon decades in our

2:49:06 cities. It's kind of crazy the amount of

2:49:09 money we spend on other things. We could

2:49:10 have fixed that a long time ago.

2:49:14 You know, there's a lot of conspiracies

2:49:15 about that too that they don't want that

2:49:17 because if more people become educated

2:49:19 and more people become ambitious, it's

2:49:20 going to be harder to [ __ ] them over.

2:49:22 It's going to be harder to force them to

2:49:24 pay taxes for an inefficient government

2:49:26 that's stealing and it's too many fraud

2:49:28 and wast

2:49:30 people. You won't be able to keep your

2:49:31 job being an incompetent legislator. You

2:49:35 know, there's a lot of theories about

2:49:36 why schools suck so hard and there's so

2:49:39 little money being put into schools.

2:49:41 When you think about the amount of power

2:49:43 that a teacher has over a child

2:49:47 expos you're working all day, okay,

2:49:50 you're at work, your kid is with another

2:49:52 adult and then a different adult and

2:49:55 then the next hour and a different adult

2:49:56 the next hour and they're shaping their

2:49:58 world view for a solid seven, eight

2:50:01 hours a day, five days a week more than

2:50:03 you. You're working all day, so you come

2:50:05 home like, "What do they teach you in

2:50:06 school?" What? Daddy, they taught me I

2:50:09 could be anything I want. I could be a

2:50:11 girl. Oh god. Daddy, they taught me how

2:50:14 important communism is. What? Ah, [ __ ]

2:50:17 And what are you going to do? You're

2:50:18 going to go to the school and you're

2:50:20 going to yell at the meeting. And what

2:50:21 do they do when that happens? They turn

2:50:22 turn the parents into terrorists. They

2:50:24 say the parents are terrorists.

2:50:27 >> Why? They've called parents terrorists

2:50:31 for showing up at schoolboard meetings

2:50:34 and yelling that they don't want their

2:50:36 kids being taught about sexuality or

2:50:38 they don't want their kids being taught

2:50:39 about this.

2:50:41 For [ __ ] sake. Yeah. So, they've

2:50:43 there's school boards that have tried to

2:50:45 censor parents and have tried to like

2:50:46 label them domestic terrorists for

2:50:48 trying to interrupt meetings and say

2:50:50 that they don't want their children

2:50:51 being taught these ways. And so then

2:50:54 what are your options? You homeschool.

2:50:55 You got I don't have the time. [ __ ]

2:50:58 >> a huge amount of cost. Yeah, I I Dude,

2:51:00 it is it's weird out there, man.

2:51:03 >> The state of the US education system at

2:51:06 the moment seems [ __ ] wild. There was

2:51:07 these studies that came out of Illinois.

2:51:09 Basically, no one in high school could

2:51:12 read at like a [snorts] fourth grade

2:51:13 level. It's [ __ ] insane. I saw a

2:51:15 video of a teacher crying that none of

2:51:18 the students were even remotely

2:51:20 competent.

2:51:21 >> Yeah. What is a state that just because

2:51:23 students were doing so bad, they

2:51:25 completely dropped their standards? Was

2:51:27 it Oregon? I forget what governor, but

2:51:31 like ridiculously dropped their

2:51:33 standards for reading and math.

2:51:37 Yeah, it's not good. I mean, that would

2:51:39 that should be something we're really

2:51:41 concentrating on. It should be a really

2:51:44 important thing in our world that's

2:51:47 discussed every day versus whether or

2:51:49 not men can play in the WNBA.

2:51:51 >> Meanwhile, uh, Penn State had a cocaine

2:51:55 ring at one of the fraternities. Do you

2:51:57 see that?

2:51:58 >> A ring.

2:51:58 >> Cocaine ring. So, there was

2:51:59 >> What do you mean a ring?

2:52:00 >> Like two different fraternities were

2:52:02 >> selling cocaine.

2:52:03 >> Oh, not just selling cocaine. They were

2:52:05 driving to Philadelphia and back in New

2:52:06 York and back to like create a huge

2:52:08 cartel for this massive massive scandal.

2:52:12 The dad of one of the guys that was in

2:52:14 the that was the leader of it is some

2:52:16 attorney dude that was like covering it

2:52:17 up, putting money and drugs in the safe

2:52:20 and the pledges that were pledging to go

2:52:22 into the fraternities were made to cut

2:52:24 and bag the cocaine.

2:52:25 >> That's hilarious.

2:52:27 >> Free labor.

2:52:28 >> What What school was this?

2:52:29 >> Penn State.

2:52:30 >> My god.

2:52:31 >> 14 people arrested, including one of

2:52:33 them that was the dad. This kid's got

2:52:34 like a gazillion charges for it. It's

2:52:37 >> Meanwhile, they're just entrepreneurs.

2:52:39 Look, [laughter]

2:52:41 >> we need to encourage We need to

2:52:42 encourage an entrepreneurial spirit.

2:52:43 >> It's the entrepreneurs in a bad

2:52:45 direction. It's like what we were

2:52:46 talking about before obsession in the

2:52:48 wrong direction.

2:52:48 >> Why Penn State's great for wrestling,

2:52:50 right? Why didn't you go and do

2:52:51 wrestling?

2:52:52 >> Or imagine if they put all that effort

2:52:54 into a legitimate business.

2:52:55 >> Yeah.

2:52:55 >> They'd probably getting out of college

2:52:57 already wealthy.

2:52:58 >> Speaking of that, did you see uh Ben

2:53:00 Ascrin return to wrestling one year

2:53:03 after his

2:53:04 >> Yes, dude.

2:53:05 >> Crazy.

2:53:05 >> I had him on the pod like two weeks

2:53:07 before he did it. That's so nuts with

2:53:09 two lung replacements. He's got artif I

2:53:13 mean he's got lung donations like

2:53:16 somebody gave him lungs. Someone died

2:53:19 >> and yeah he's he has to be on

2:53:21 imunosuppressants in order so his body

2:53:22 doesn't reject the lungs but having lung

2:53:25 transplants is crazy. Having two is

2:53:28 really crazy and then wrestling a year

2:53:30 later is just beyond insane.

2:53:32 >> He never looked at what the surgery was

2:53:34 that he got. He doesn't know how they

2:53:36 did it. So, I went and had a look and

2:53:38 it's the full

2:53:39 >> Yeah.

2:53:40 >> breast. It's like your spread eagled

2:53:42 from reverse

2:53:43 >> the fish.

2:53:45 >> Yeah,

2:53:45 >> dude. I got to pee. We got to wrap this

2:53:46 up.

2:53:46 >> All right,

2:53:47 >> Christopher. It's always a good time to

2:53:49 see you.

2:53:49 >> Appreciate you, man.

2:53:50 >> I appreciate you, too. Uh, tell

2:53:51 everybody your podcast, where they can

2:53:53 get it, where they can watch it.

2:53:54 >> Modern Wisdom, Apple Podcast, Spotify,

2:53:56 YouTube. Just dropped an episode with

2:53:57 Jock Willink, Matt McCusker, and Jeff

2:53:59 Dy. So, you can go and check that out.

2:54:00 Oh, nice.

2:54:01 >> Or you can go back and watch the the

2:54:02 Hunter Biden episode.

2:54:03 >> That's a good combo.

2:54:04 >> Yeah, I'm doing this. It's a Mostly

2:54:06 Wise, which is the new series. It's me

2:54:08 and Mccusca with a serious seat. Hunter

2:54:09 Biden was a serious seat for one. We had

2:54:11 human for another. We've got a Neil

2:54:12 Degrass Tyson coming up in Brian

2:54:14 Johnson. I'm like throwing another

2:54:15 comedian in as well. So, it's kind of

2:54:17 fun.

2:54:17 >> Beautiful.

2:54:18 >> Beautiful. Appreciate you, man. Until

2:54:19 next time.

2:54:19 >> Thank you, bro. [music] All right. Bye,

2:54:20 everybody.

2:54:20 >> Bye.

2:54:25 [music]

📬 Never miss a PowerfulJRE video — every new upload summarised in your inbox. Follow free

Summarize any YouTube video instantly

Get AI-powered summaries, timestamps, and Q&A for free.

Generate your own summary →
More summaries →