There is nothing more stupid than a boy
sitting here defending a state that
allowed Epste. I should defend Muslims
to rape children. No, I want I No, no,
no, no. DON'T DEFLECT NOW. DON'T
DEFLECT.
>> OH, THE GUY THAT DEFLECTED TO EPSTE
doesn't want to deflect to his pedophile
prophet. Wow. Call me. I'm so shocked. I
am so shocked. He He deflected to
Epstein when nobody brought up Epstein.
BUT THE SECOND I BROUGHT UP ISLAM, he's
like, "No, no, no. Please don't deflect.
>> We can talk about that."
>> Muhammad's Aisha was four to 5 years
younger. Four to 5 years younger than
Epstein's youngest victim. And they're
both equally disgusting.
>> Are you not going to click this link?
You wanted this link before I couldn't
source it and I'm sourcing it.
>> Let me read it real quick. Robert
Maxwell threatened. Oh, it says he
threatened. He would expose all he had
done for them to the Kremlin. Huh. To
the Kremlin. That's interesting. Wait,
are you going to ignore that part? And
to the corridors of power throughout
Europe. Oh. Oh, not just Russia. Also
European powers. Okay. Interesting.
Giving powers to Russia and Europe. This
is really debunking you. Let's keep
going. What is the subject line?
>> They tolerated his reading. Let's keep
reading. This is great.
>> We've started with 1948. I I'm very glad
we started that.
>> Why did we start with 48? When did the
war start? You said 48.
>> Yes.
>> In 1936 when they slaughtered targeted
and slaughtered 510 Jews during the
third Jaffa riots. What was the reason
for that if it didn't start till 48?
Nico,
>> we're talking about this land. These
people,
>> it was literally I'm talking about the
exact same land.
>> What up?
>> How are you?
>> I'm good. I see you got the three flags
up.
>> Yeah.
America, Israel, and Iran.
>> How come?
>> Who I support? I served the military for
about 12 years in the American military
and I not Jewish, but I support Israel.
I'm not Iranian and I support Iran.
>> You is that a Palestine necklace?
>> It's an Israeli necklace.
>> Okay.
>> It has the Golden Heights, right? You
don't think the Palestine controls the
Golden Heights?
>> Let me ask you, why do you support
Israel if you're not Jewish?
>> You don't have to be what? Are you are
you Palestinian?
>> It's a simple question.
>> Right. And I'm answering by asking you.
Are you Palestinian?
>> No.
>> Do you support Palestine?
>> I want them to be freed.
>> Okay. So, you support them. Wow. You
just answered your own question. Good
job.
>> Yeah, but you didn't answer my question.
I answered because they should be freed.
>> No, no, no. I I support Palestine
because they're being genocided and they
need to be freed from this genocide and
they are predominantly Muslim brothers
and they are good people.
>> Right. And you didn't
>> that's a clear I gave you clear
evidences. I gave you clear examples why
I support Palestine. Why do you support
Israel?
>> Right. So that's not what you originally
asked. That's your new question. Your
original question is why do I do it if
I'm not Jewish? So if your new question
is why do I support Israel period?
Right. My answer is that I think they
should be free from terrorism and
terroristic state and IRGC proxy group.
Doesn't mean I particularly dislike any
Arabs living in the land.
>> Why? So, so why do you support Do you
support them because terrorists are
attacking them?
>> No, there's many reasons. I'm just
trying to simplify an answer. Just for a
vague question, I'm giving a vague
answer. Obviously, we can expand.
There's more to it. I also don't believe
it's a genocide because it doesn't meet
the definition of genocide convention of
48 that was ratified in 51.
>> Have you seen Gaza today and have you
seen it 2023? Right. They're cutting off
the food supply, cutting off the water
supply. They have kept on shooting after
the ceasefire. They've made it clear
they want to expand to greater Israel.
They want to ethnically cleanse them.
It's been completely destroyed the
Jewish Zionist controlling Israel.
>> All of them or some of them, 10% of
them, 100% of them. I know some people
have said that. Of course, there's
people that are allowed to agree with
that. There's some people that want
America to expand, too. And there's some
people that disagree with it. But that
wouldn't mean I would attribute that to
Donald Trump or the administration. But
before we You kind of labeled a huge
list.
>> You're going You're going everywhere.
Okay. Well, okay.
>> You went everywhere. That's my point.
I'm trying to bring us back. You just
labeled a whole thing. I'm trying to go
back to the genocide.
>> I didn't even I didn't even mention
Trump and you you you went over to
Trump. I want to go back to the original
question. So,
>> so you don't want to talk about
genocide.
>> I do want to get there, but I have to
figure out what you believe in. I don't
know who you are and why you're
supporting Israel.
>> Okay, fair enough. Go back.
>> Why Why are you upset? I'm literally not
upset. I said, "Fair enough. Go back."
>> Okay. So, why do you support a state
that was created in 1948
by Jews to support the greater Jewish
cause and you are not Jewish? What are
you? What do you believe in?
>> Uh, like by religion or I'm I'm Italian
and Spanish mostly. I mean, my dad's
from Mexico. I'm just um I'm not I'm not
Jewish. I'm just I'm American. I don't
know what you're asking. Like
>> Okay. Well, what's your faith? Would you
grow up Catholic? Spanish Italian is
probably Catholic.
>> I I'm a cradle Catholic, but um I'm not
a Catholic anymore. I do believe in God,
but I'm not particularly a religious
person. At least like a practice
religion. I do believe in God for sure,
>> but I I believe in the seven like I
believe in seven laws of Noah. I'm not
Jewish. I'm not really Christian
anymore. Again, I was a cradle Catholic
and I did believe, excuse me, believe
that for a little bit, but I kind of
left the church as I started having
questions.
>> So, you just believe in God and God
alone.
>> That's correct. Uh, I have read the
Christian Bible. I've read the Quran
twice. I've read over about 20,000 had.
Uh, I've read the Hebrew Bible, the
Tanakh, the Torah, whatever. Um, but
yeah, just not any of the three those
three faiths. So, you're against
organized religion?
>> No, I'm not against it, per se. I guess
it depends on how that organized
religion plays out. Uh, but I'm not I
don't like harp on anyone if they're
part of an organized religion. That's
fine.
>> And you said you read 20,000 hadith,
>> 15 to 20,000.
Read all of Albukari, which is about
7,500 hadith. I've read all of Saki
Muslim. And I've read some of the ones
beyond that.
Right. Google's saying it's around like
2,000 to 7,000. But
>> maybe your own Nope. No, that's okay.
First off, the fact, aren't you Muslim?
>> Yeah. Again, there's aliat
7,500 had by itself, dude. How do you
not know this?
>> Again, there are different
clarifications on how many hadith you
could believe and how many are
specifically reliable. There's different
interparable.
It's saki which means authentic. Do you
know what saki means?
>> Yes. Look, the point is
>> that there's different schools of
thought and different people believe in
different amounts of hadith. Correct.
The first time I say 20,000,
>> dude. Well, first off, I don't know what
you googled, but Sunni had sah albkati
is Sunni. Okay. Sahi albucati by itself
before you even get into saki Muslim is
7500. I What did you Google exactly? How
many had there? I'm going to Google that
just to see what mine says.
>> How many total hadits are there?
>> Yeah. So, what I got is
it estimates range from tens of
thousands to over a hundred thousand as
you can know it's not focusing but or
over a million actually. It says tens of
thousands to over a million. So, I don't
know what you read.
>> Total hadith. It depends. Again, it's
debated about how many specific hadith.
No one in the world would say there's
only 2,000 or whatever you said.
>> I I wasn't I wasn't refuting you if
you're coming here to like to do this
like gotcha moment. I was asking because
this is the first time I've heard
somebody say that they've read that many
or that there were that many. Most of
the people that I've spoken to say there
around 7,000 as
>> Bro, it I promise you it wasn't to be a
gotcha. I just never heard a Muslim say
that. But yeah, I know a lot of people
I've read way more than me. Uh but sure,
I mean they're not that long. It anyways
whatever it doesn't matter. The point is
is that I'm not Christian or Muslim or
Jewish.
>> Let's go back to the to the original
question.
>> Sure.
>> So, do you believe that that land, which
is the Zionist belief, was promised to
them 3,000 years ago?
>> What do you mean by that land? So, like
Genesis 15, for example, says from the
Euphrates River to the river of Egypt,
which some people say is the Nile River,
but that's actually not correct. It's
actually the Awati area, which is in the
Sinai. But if you go into the book of
like Joshua, Numbers, it actually is
smaller. The borders are actually
smaller. So it just depends on what you
mean by that land. Uh yes, I do believe
God literally said that. But I don't
generally need to use religious beliefs
to defend my position with Israel. We
can talk about religion, but I don't
particularly
>> But if you if you don't believe in
religion, then why do you believe this
aspect of religion?
>> I do believe in the word of God. I'm
just saying organized religion. Like for
example, the Catholic Church I left not
because I was against uh certain things
in the Bible. It's because of organized
religion. And when I say I'm against it,
again, I'm not saying other people I
like condemn them for it. That's fine.
I'm just saying me personally. But yes,
I believe in the words of God.
>> So you believe in the word of God, but
you don't believe in organized religion.
But in the word of God, it clarifies
organized religion
>> where
>> all over like the Torah saying that the
people it comes from the tribe that the
>> I'm not from that so that's not to me.
>> But you're using that you're using that
as an example.
>> Okay. So if you read you're talking
about like Deuteronomy and Leviticus
what it says is to the Hebrews dot dot
dot. I'm not part of that. So you're
correct. It does say that but that
wouldn't apply to me.
So, you believe that they're right, but
you're not part you don't I'm trying to
figure out. So, you agree and disagree
with them?
>> No, you're just Wow. Okay. Um, what I'm
saying is that was laws given to the
Hebrews and their descendants, the
children of Israel, or if you're a
Muslim, they say Bonnie Israel. I'm not
part of that.
>> Are they correct? Are they correct?
>> Is what correct? Did I do I believe God
said that to them?
>> Are they correct in believing that that
land was promised to them 3,000 years
ago? I do believe God promised that to
Abraham and that covenant went through
Isaac and Jacob. That is true. But
again, I want to make it very clear
because I know you're trying to like
pivot to this. I can defend my position
of Israel.
>> I got you.
>> I don't know who I want to figure out
why. So, I'm asking you like very, you
know, important questions.
>> My defense of Israel.
>> My defense of Israel can come absent of
religion.
>> I do not need to bring up religion to
defend Israel. Like if you're asking, do
I only defend it because I think it's
God's promise? That's not the answer.
>> Okay. So then 1948, the land was sold
from the British to the Rothschild
family and it started the formation of
Israel. Do you agree? Do you believe
that that was right?
>> No. First off, the letter to Rothschild
was in 1917 48. Um the 48
>> I didn't say the letter. I said it was
purchased. I said it was that's when the
transaction went through.
>> No, actually the partition 181 alone was
in 1947, November 29th, 1947. So again,
that's just not right.
>> All right. Okay.
>> I don't know why you're laughing. It's
just not right.
>> No, that was the partition plan.
>> All right. Okay. It started 1948.
Correct. That's when Israel started to
>> move and that's when the land finally
the transaction went through officially.
>> No. When they started to move, the first
major aliyah was in 1881.
>> Okay. So, no, it wouldn't have started
in 48.
>> If you're asking when they declared its
establishment, May 14th, 1948. If that's
what you're asking about
>> talking about that's when the
declaration was and that's when it was
official. That's when it went through.
That's the important part of this
conversation.
>> Okay. Yes. If you're asking when they
establish
>> you've done you've done a lot of
research on on these dates and things.
Are are you here streaming to debate me?
>> I I would love to debate you. If you
don't want to, you don't have to.
>> No, no, no. But is this the purpose of
this? You were trying to find me. I was
literally just on OMI TV and I skipped
the last person I was talking to who
pointed a gun at me and he had like a
swastika and then I was like I'd like to
talk to you and then he skipped and then
I connected with you literally.
>> Okay. So was this correct? Because
afterwards there was a genocide that was
reported called the Nagba, the expulsion
of the Palestinians there.
>> That was a genocide too,
>> right?
>> Yes. It's been a continuous genocide but
that's a major event in the ongoing
genocide since 1948. Do you agree of
that expulsion? So there was purchased
the land was purchased by the
Rothschilds.
>> Okay. No, I don't agree that
>> Yeah, I don't agree that was a genocide.
Genocide is defined specifically the
second to last page of the genocide
convention says cultural destruction
does not suffice, nor does simply
dispersing a group of people. Those can
be violations of the Rome Statute, but
that is not the same thing as genocide.
It wouldn't meet the dole specialis
genocide.
>> What what do you what do you consider to
be the definition of genocide?
>> Doesn't matter what I consider. It's
just the definition. So I would go with
the 1948 convention that was ratified in
51. And if you look that up, you will
see the definition, but you'll also see
the definition of dop specialialis. What
that means, the hierarchy of
international law from just Kogan's
norms, right, all the way down to
article 107. And then before that, or
under that would be the mix between
customary international law and treaty
law.
>> Okay. Well, on Google it's saying coined
by Raphael Lenin in 1944 is a recognized
crime under international law involving
acts like killing causing severe harm or
preventing births within the targeted
group. Genocide is the deliberate
>> in every war in history has been a
genocide by that definition
>> in Holland part of an ethnic, racial,
religious or national group. So the land
was purchased and then
>> are you using Google instead of like
legal terminology?
>> Right. This term was coined in 1944.
>> That's correct.
>> A crime under international law. So this
is a legal term,
>> right? And the UN convention was in
1948.
>> So you're correct. 44
>> years before by the definition under
international law. So again, if you
don't like Google definition, this is
the international law definition.
>> Oh, you are.
>> Okay. I accept your apology. Is this not
genocide by this definition?
>> No.
How come?
>> So am I answering about the Nagba or am
I answering post October 7th because you
brought up both?
>> Nagba.
>> Okay. So the Nagba would do you believe
that they had an intent to wipe out a
group in whole or in part of a protected
status because I'm pretty sure the Nagba
is defined by the Palestinians
especially post 1964 polit political
movement right uh with the PLO. When you
look at the Nagba it's talking about
750,000 that were displaced. Twothirds
of them never actually even cross
international borders, which is what's
required of as a refugee unless you're a
Palestinian. They made up a new
definition for them. Hold on, almost
done. Just one more sentence.
>> And so you're saying that displacement,
even if you counted all that, you're
counting that as genocide. That's not
what genocide is.
>> So they were just displacing people,
killing them, and kicking out of their
homes.
>> Not genocide.
>> That's not genocide. Now,
>> okay. Should you kill, displace, and
kick them out of their homes because it
was purchased by the Rothschilds. Is
that is that morally right?
>> That's not what I'm saying at all
because that's also not accurate.
>> No, I'm not saying that's what you're
saying. I'm asking you. So, what what do
you think happened after 1948?
>> Sure. So in November 29th, 1947, a
minute after the partition plan vote, uh
there was actually uh the leader of the
Arab committee at the United Nations 4
days before that said that we will fight
to the last Arab to prevent any Jewish
state ever. Right? And then a minute
after the partition plan vote, they
started attacking just Jews. You can't
say Israel because Israel didn't even
exist yet for another about 6 months,
right? So they started attacking Jews.
There was 10 different Arab factions uh
that attacked Jews in 1948 after the
establishment of Israel. So I would call
it a war that they lost. 70,000 Jews
were displaced in the first week of the
war alone. Many of them killed and many
of them never got to return to their
homes because Jordan ended up annexing
illegally what they call the West Bank.
Would you say that was a genocide if
we're just pretending killing and
displacement equals genocide now?
>> I wouldn't say that. I'm asking would
you say that?
>> Pretending. So your question is is
killing and displacing people genocide.
>> I'm saying it's not. It could be, but
it's not.
>> Okay. This is a separate
What happened in 1948? What was that?
You're not calling it genocide. You
didn't answer the question. Was that
>> I answered it already. I said it was a
war.
>> So once there was purchased, it was
declared war
by the Rothschild family who purchased
it.
>> Heart me. Do whatever you can. Again,
what is your question?
>> So the Rothschild family because they
purchased it from the British, this
justifies the war that happened
afterwards and they were entitled to do
this. So clearly it started from them,
right? The land existed before. There
was a there was a country there. They
were existing had a
>> Then what?
>> Well, you said there was a country there
before. It wasn't Palestine.
>> Palestine's a regional name.
>> Okay. It wasn't recognized as Israel
before then. It was widely recognized as
Palestine. You're going to say that
different people didn't consider it as a
state. That's a further
>> Nobody considered it as a state.
Literally nobody.
You can read the 1922 League of Nations
mandate. You can read the Ottoman times.
They had vile and none of the viles by
the way were mentioned as Palestine.
Palestine is a European word that comes
from the Europeans. It was officially
put in by Roman Emperor Hadrien. Even
people like Heroditus who was Greek, he
also used that word, right? It comes
from the uh ancient.
>> So what was it called? Okay, so you're
not saying it was called Palestine. What
was it called?
>> No, I said there was no country there.
Of course, the region name
>> there was nobody. So okay, so there's
people there and the region is
Palestine. The people that were there,
their land was sold by people that don't
live there. The British sold that land
>> afterwards.
>> Actually, no. Most of the land was
actually bought by most of the land was
bought against Arab absentine land
owners by far. So just so you know about
47 to over 50% of the land was actually
stateowned land during the Ottoman time
when the British took that from the
Ottomans after the 1917 fall of
Jerusalem when they lost that battle.
And then the British took over
officially 1922. Okay, they took over
that stateowned land. About half of it,
some sources say a little over half was
stateowned. And then there was a general
amount that was owned by Arabs, mostly
by Arab absentee land owners out of
Jerusalem, uh, Beirut and Damascus. And
then there was about six to 10% by the
end that was owned by Jewish uh,
organizations, communities, etc. Like
there's a lot of Sphartic Jewish
communities that bought it. Ron Litzion,
for example, was started by 40 Jewish
families and that economic opportunity
brought in.
>> You're saying a lot of Okay. You're
saying
>> I'm correcting your statements events.
Okay. There were people the important
aspect is there were people living
there. They had Palestine palestinian
passports and then they were kicked out
of their land because of a purchase from
the Rothschilds from the British. No.
Then they were kicked out. They were
killed. They were displaced from their
homes because they said we are entitled
to this now because of the Rothschilds
purchasing it from
>> Nobody said that.
>> Is this correct?
>> No, it's not correct. Nobody said that.
It was because of a war that they
started and people get displaced in war
all the time. Who
>> started who started
>> the Arab war?
>> The Arab pirate league started the war.
they start the war. Why did they start
the war?
>> Because again, 4 days before the
partition plan vote, uh the higher
committee specifically said, "We will
fight till the last Arab to ensure there
will never be a Jewish state
because who was living there before and
then who lived thereafter after the
transaction?" That's the whole point.
There was a transaction and then they
said, "We are now entitled to this and
even though we aren't there and they
sent people, they sent European Jews
into a land that was predominantly
Arab."
Okay. So, when you say they sent the
white papers actually shows that you're
wrong. Not only did they not send them
there, they actually you remember that
famous photo that
>> So, where did they come from? Where
where did they come from?
>> Well, I'll get that I'll get to that in
a second, but just let me answer your
first point real quick. Uh, so you
remember that famous photo that
Palestinians love to show where the Jews
had the sign that said, "The Nazis
destroyed our homes. Don't destroy our
hopes and dreams." And they say, "Oh,
look, we welcomed you with open arms."
That was actually from the Aliabad ship,
Theodore Herzel. That ship never
actually made it to the Palestinian
region. The British actually captured
that ship and sent them to interment
camps in Cyprus. The white papers
limited the British or excuse me the
Jews from going to that land. So when
you say they brought these European Jews
in and like the British were just
pumping it. Not only did that not
happen, the British actually took 78.
>> I didn't say the British went there. I
said that once the the transaction went
through, Jews went from Europe into a
land that was predominantly Arab Muslim.
Correct.
>> Well, first off, first off, a couple
things. One, there was a lot more than
just Arabs. I would say Muslim. Yes. Way
more than just Arabs. Two, they sold One
second. I'm trying to answer you. They
sold the land. You
>> Okay, I understand you're getting
frustrated, but they sold the land.
Dude, if you want to talk about genocide
today in today's conflict, we can. But
you're not going to beat me in history.
Okay, I'm telling you what happened.
>> I'm not trying to beat you in anything.
I'm not trying to beat you in history
either. I'm asking if you think that
it's morally okay to displace and kill
people after purchasing the land from
people.
>> I'm not saying that. This is a strong
man inhabited and people already live
there.
>> This is not a strong man.
>> I'm not literally advocating for an
ethical question. I'm not making Are you
This is not asking you a question so I
could
>> I'm answering you. No, I don't think
that's okay. But I also don't think
that's what happened. That's the
problem. You're asking me to answer a
question on something that didn't exist.
That's not what I think happened. And
you're asking me to assume that position
and then answer for that position. I
don't assume that position in the first
place. So again, I'm trying to answer.
I'm trying to keep up. You brought up
genocide. Try to go to that. And you're
like, "No, I want to go back to this."
I'm trying to tell you they sold the
land. Are you asking me is it okay that
they sold the land? It happened. That
happens all over the world. Do you think
United States of America do you think we
should be demolished?
>> The the the important question is it is
that right for people to get displaced
from their homes and murdered because of
a purchase that they were not involved
in. That's correct.
>> Okay. So again, you're asking me to
assume a position. Okay, I am not
assuming that position. Do I think it is
right? It's a moral question.
>> Do you think is it right to kick people
out of the homes and kill them because
of a purchase that was made by somebody
that was not them?
>> Again, no, but I don't assume that
position. This is this is what you're
doing
to assume a posal
trying to answer.
>> I'm asking you to assume any position.
I'm not I'm not assuming any There's no
no positions assume. I ask you a moral
question. Is it okay to kill people and
kick them out of their homes because of
a purchase that they didn't make? You
said no. Let's move on to October 7th
now.
>> No, I want to be able to At what point
do I get to ask or answer some
questions? Like you're just asking me
questions. You're forcing just one
position. You're saying, "Oh, because he
uh specifically bought the land, is it
okay?" No, I think it's okay to when
someone wages war against you, I think
it's totally okay to defend yourselves.
And if that leads to displacement and
people dying on both sides, that
happens.
>> Now we know why. That's what I think is
morally wrong. If you that believe that
was morally wrong and that they were
kicked out and that they were killed
because of something that they were not
involved in and you believe that that's
>> they were involved. The Arab Liberation
Army was made up of what you would call
Palestinians. They didn't call
themselves Palestinians then but what
you would call them.
>> Not not the people and they weren't
responsible for that. So you agree that
that's morally wrong.
>> No.
>> Let's talk about today because this is
going on. So you have the Iran flag, you
have the Israeli flag. You represent it.
You're not even Jewish and you're
representing the Jewish state of Israel.
>> You you side with them, right? The
people that call you [ __ ] they don't
practice you three the same way with
you. You are here shilling for a country
that believes
>> you're Muslim started. You're Muslim.
You think you guys treat the
>> I will get started.
>> Yeah, I listen.
>> I will get started. I support my people.
I I support my people. You're supporting
people that call you goyam that don't
think that they can practice the same
baking with themselves that they
practice with you. Yet here you are
shilling for the state that you believe
started off of a moral incorrection
>> even though once again I want to make it
sure I don't think that at all.
>> You think I think that because you're
No, I said you're hypothetical. No, I
said you're forced hypothetical.
>> Great. I said you're forced hypothetical
if you're forcing me into that position.
I can say certain things about that
would be wrong. No, I understand you
don't think so. That's why you keep
cutting me off and you don't want me to
answer why you're wrong and what
actually happened. You're cutting me off
because you're saying
>> it's not a hypothetical. It wasn't It
wasn't assuming a position. I said, "Is
that morally wrong?" You said, "Yes,
that's morally wrong." That's not
morally.
>> Now, you're supporting Okay, but I'm
looking at I don't know you. You have
the flags behind you. And you said it.
Hold on. You started off by saying that
you support the state of Israel, the
Jewish state of Israel,
>> right? And you're not Jewish. Okay.
These people think that you are Goyam.
>> Yeah.
>> Okay. these people think you're goyam
and they think that they're going to
have 2,800 goyam slaves when their
messiah comes.
>> Why do you support these people
especially if you believe in their right
to exist as a religious ethnostate? Why
do you support them if they believe that
you're subhuman?
>> So I'm not a leftist. I don't know if
you are or not. I don't know what your
position is politically. I don't I don't
believe in that. I'm
>> I got you. Yeah.
>> Yeah. Let's talk about what you guys
believe about the kufur. But anyways, I
don't believe in this whole like, oh,
it's an ethnostate. Like, dude, that
that kind of buzzwords isn't going to
work on me. I'm sure a lot of leftists
that probably works. Doesn't work on me
at all. Most countries in the world
would by your weird definition of
ethnostate would be an ethnostate other
than maybe like some multicult
>> Judaism or Jewish.
>> Is Jewish an ethnicity?
>> Jewish is an colloquially is called an
ethnoreig. I don't really like the term.
I would say it is a a tribe of people, a
nation if you will, but sure. Ethno
religion is what they colloquially call
it today.
>> Right. So, so you just said you don't
believe it's an ethnostate. And so, you
do or you don't believe it's an
ethnostate?
>> I think there's a lot of ethnicities.
That doesn't make something an
ethnostate.
You just asked me, are Jews an
ethnicity?
>> Are they?
>> 20% of the population are Arabs. Another
5% are non-Jewish, non-Arabs. One in
every four person you see in Israel are
not Jewish.
>> I'm sorry. What?
>> Okay. But but Judaism Judaism is an
ethnore religion.
>> What? Yeah. Jew Jews are an ethnore
religion.
>> Okay. So you support this and you're not
that ethnicity. You're not that
religion. And they also believe that you
will be enslaved because you're a [ __ ]
>> Yeah. So that's a notoria belief. And
it's an extremely fringe group that most
Jews, including other religious Jews,
condemn. So you're asking me to go off
of this based off of a fringe group
that's less than 1%. This is like me
saying all Muslims must be al Qaeda or
the Taliban. And they think this, so
Sneo must think it, too. That's how
ridiculous you sound.
>> Al Qaeda. Al Qaeda that's separate from
the Taliban. This is CIA funded just
like ISIS. This is separate conversation
operative of the religion. And if Okay,
so you're gonna say that not all Jews
Are you saying they're not? Are you
saying they're not Muslim? Regardless if
you think they're funded by one group or
not, I don't really care. Are they
>> al-Qaeda?
>> Yeah.
>> ISIS and al-Qaeda. No.
>> Okay, fine. But that's my point because
you don't agree with their beliefs.
Correct. You don't think their beliefs
represent uh Islam,
>> right? That them as a group and their
actions, what they're doing, they are
clearly funded by CIA MSD. This stuff
has been proven.
>> Okay. How about Boo Haram? Are they also
funded by CIA or MSAD or both?
I haven't looked that up.
>> Okay, fine. How about
>> both of you? You brought up al-Qaeda.
Hold on. Let's where you're going. We're
going off on tangents, right?
>> No, I'm saying your point about Ntori
Carta, who you're quoting and trying to
apply it to Judaism as a whole is like
me saying fine, I won't use al Qaeda.
I'll say boo haram and I'm following
your line of logic. I'm saying so if you
think it's fringe groups that believe
that the goyam will be slaves and
they'll have 2,800. Fine. What's
believed in the Torah, right? because
you also agree that this is the word of
God and this is this is true to them.
>> They say okay in the Torah
>> it states that they will not practice
the same type of banking with goyam you
that they practice with each other. So
they don't charge interest on loans
between each other but to you they do.
Do you agree with that?
>> Okay. Yeah, I'll answer that. So that's
actually not really the context of the
Torah, but I will answer it so I don't
go off on a different topic because I
know you don't like that. So, I don't
particularly care about what people who
I don't even believe in their religion
think. I care about their action, right?
I don't believe in Islam. I don't
believe in Judaism. Yes, I believe in
some things because like you said, I
believe it's the word of God. But like I
don't follow the Talmud. I don't believe
in it. That's rabbitical Judaism. That's
for them. The Quran is for Islam.
Christians, they follow the New
Testament. So, when you ask me like,
well, this one verse says this, I don't
really particularly care. Now, if
they're doing it to me, and there's
actions today that I can see, then I'd
be more than glad to. They've never done
it to me, so I can't I can't comment on
it.
>> No, they are right now. And the same
people who purchased the land from
England, the Rothschild family, they
predominantly control the central bank
system, and this is how that system
works for them, right? Christians and
Muslims did not practice usery within
each other. It's forbidden in those
religions. Jews believe that this is
part of this is something that they can
do. Mhm.
>> this type of banking and this type of
money that they make interest on loans.
This is how the Rothschild
>> Christians don't do that today or
Muslims they don't do that today at all.
>> They weren't doing it. Muslims don't. I
mean people have corrupted it. But at
the time when when Israel even before it
was founded
>> ask one more time. Do they do that
today?
>> Cuz I asked you about this day. I said I
will Muslims and Christians are are are
involved in that type of banking. But
this belief is what created the central
bank system that we're all a part of.
That's how the Rothschild family made
the money in order to buy the land that
you're supporting.
>> I do not Yeah, sure. I don't disagree
with people purchasing stuff. And if
there is a legal purchase, I don't care
if you're Jew, Christian, Muslim. Dude,
Arabs were purchasing the land, too.
Arabs during the Russo Turkish wars,
there was so many uh Muslims that moved
into Anatolia and the Leavant after. I'm
not going to criticize them either
because that's what people did. again
you're trying to use today by keep going
back to 1948.
No, no, no. But I'm talking about hap
what's happening now, right? So they
maintain so much power and that land
exists because of the Rothschild family,
the same family responsible for the
central bank system that all the goyam
are involved in and that's how they
created the power structure that they
have. Okay? So you're supporting a
people that wouldn't exist without this
and you will not benefit off of it if
you really are going.
>> America also wouldn't exist without a
lot of atrocities either and I still
think America should exist. So I'm going
to ask you a question now because you
keep asking me. Do you think America
should be demolished?
Because they also wouldn't. Okay, so
perfect. I agree. So even if you were
right, which you're not, but I know
every time I try to correct you, you
keep forcing me to go back to this
conversation. Uh even if you were right,
though, you're telling me, well, this
happened and it was atrocious. It was
bad before and you're supporting it
today, so therefore you agree with it.
That's as dumb as saying that I should
agree with slavery because I support
America. I don't believe in this whole
like it's an
I don't care, dude. Like I'm not a
leftist. Those buzzwords aren't going to
work on me. I don't care. Even if it was
an ethnostate,
>> it's not a buzz word. You also agreed
with this. Literally a buzz word.
>> Agreed with that.
>> Agreed with what?
>> You just agreed that it was an
ethnostate.
>> No, I don't. I said 25% of Israel. No, I
said Jews are an ethnore religion. I
didn't say
>> Israel is an ethnostate. It's so
ridiculous.
>> Israel is Israel a Jewish state?
>> Yes, of course. Just like Germany is a
German state.
>> Okay. So then therefore wait so
therefore Israel is an ethno
>> perfect is Germany an ethnostate is
Germany an ethnostate
>> no not by def no it's not
>> okay is German is one second is German
are Germans an ethnicity
>> yes different are most people is Germany
Hold on I'm almost done bro you've asked
me all these questions just let me ask
is Germany a German state
>> yes
>> okay perfect so notice how I asked the
exact same questions You asked me word
for word. I just replaced Israel with
Germany and Jews with Germans. You
answered the exact same way I did. Do
you understand how ridiculous?
>> You want to know what the difference is?
>> Sure. Go ahead.
>> The difference is Israel has the right
to return or if you're Jewish, which you
agreed is an ethno religion. They have
the right to go to Israel and take land
from people
>> that were living there before. So Jews
around the world can go to Israel and
they have the right to go there. Even if
they've been convicted of sex crimes
like Jeffrey Epstein, they could flee to
Israel and they don't get extra to
America.
>> Flee to Israel
>> 100% after 2008. You don't know this.
>> What do you mean?
>> I'm talking about right. No, I thought
you meant you believe he's in Israel
right now.
>> There's some people on that say he is.
So I was wondering if you were one of
those.
>> No, no. Okay. Yeah, but after 2008 when
he was convicted of sex.
>> I want to go back to the conversation.
>> Hold on. Wait, wait, wait. No, no. This
is the same conversation. It's not
>> I think it's funny when I try to correct
you on something. You do not like it at
all and now you're trying to go to I
want to go with you said that Jews have
the right
>> brought up the example of Germany. So
I'm comparing you you you made an
analogy and I'm correcting your analogy.
The difference is they have the right to
return. They believe that they are
entitled to this place if they're Jewish
which you agreed is an ethno religion.
Israel is a Jewish state. They have the
Star of David on the flag right behind
you even as a [ __ ] This is an ethnostate
by definition.
David, just FYI.
>> It's it's not it's not a liberal
ideology. That's not a leftist argument.
It's something that you have also
conceded. It's true.
>> No, I again you are forcing me not to
answer but a couple words at a time and
then you say I conceded all these
things. I haven't conceded that. First
off, the Star of David has used using
Christian churches, been using an
Islamic mosque also. Have you ever been
to Israel or the Palestinian
territories?
>> Of course not. No.
>> I don't know why you said of course not.
I don't know why that's like whatever.
It doesn't matter. Anyways, I've been
there. This idea that you think
>> they wrote my names. Of course you have.
They wrote my name on missiles. If I go
there, there would be major problems.
Yeah, I'm sure. But Israel is a Israel's
is a Jewish state. Is Israel not a
Jewish state? I don't know why you're
like disagreeing with this.
>> Just like I think Germany is a German
state and China is a Chinese one. Yes, I
do believe Jew uh uh Israel is a Jewish
state. That is true. I don't see why
that's a problem other than like
America, Canada, arguably Australia. All
of these states by your definition would
be ethnostates. And by the way, I don't
think that's a problem. That's the
problem is you think like you're getting
me because you're like, "Oh my god, this
guy agrees with
>> the ethnostate the that's not a gotcha
question. These are definitions that we
need to clarify
>> by your definitions with the questions
you ask me. It applies to so many
countries around the world and I think
those countries are equally just fine. I
don't understand what this hyperixation
on Israel is. Do you do you you know
about the right to return? Correct.
Where Jewish people are entitled to this
land because they're Jewish and then
they have a safe home in Israel.
>> Some do. Yeah.
>> It's not really
>> what Jews don't.
>> Yeah. Some Jews uh actually don't.
There's actually even pushes for them to
uh take and I'm not saying I agree with
this, but really doesn't matter to me.
Like if someone were to converge reform
today, as of right now, it it does work.
Some are trying to push that out.
There's a 1970 addendum in Saudi Arabia.
If you want to get citizenship in the
kingdom, your mom has to be Saudi. You
have to be able to speak Arabic and you
have to be Muslim. And that's okay.
They're their country. If they want to
say if a country tomorrow wants to say
we are only allowing people in that have
uh uh one leg, I think that's weird, but
just for like a hypothetical, they want
to do that, they can do that. If Israel
tomorrow wants to say this is what we
want uh for our citizenship, they can.
If Palestine ever becomes a second state
and they say this is our requirement,
then let them do whatever the [ __ ] they
want. If America tomorrow says this is
our requirement to be a citizen, right?
So what? I don't understand what your
point is.
>> Okay. But but was I was asking you a you
said that not all Jews are entitled to
the state of Israel. I'm the first time
I'm hearing that. So I'm asking you.
>> No, I'm saying after the 197
>> right I already answered this. after the
1970 amend uh amendment that they had uh
addendum there's uh some like
patrineials or those that have left the
tribe where even if they were like the
original um point from Ben Gurion was if
you had one Jewish grandparent that was
it and the reason he said that was he
was quoted saying that the Nazis
determined that you were Jewish if you
had one Jewish grandparent so therefore
that's what we're going to determine
it's been amended since 1970 I'm not
particularly saying that's right or
wrong I don't particularly amended to
what? So, so now it's both your parents
have to your mother has to be what is
the agreement now?
>> Yeah, you have to be you have to
identify as Jewish someone who hasn't
left the tribe or denounce their
Judaism, right? So, it's not so much
based as much on ethnicity, but it still
is. And there's some, it hasn't
happened, there's some that are also
trying to push out um reformed Judaism,
right? If they've converted via reform
instead of orthodox. Again, not for me
to say that's right or wrong.
>> Good idea. And again, yeah, that does
reinforce the ethnostate idea you're
against. The second one is
there's so many how many people in
Israel, do you know the the stats? How
many of them are atheist Jews or secular
Jews that don't even really follow the
commandments?
>> Yeah, I'm I'm not sure of that. I can
look it up. I don't know the exact um
number. Do you?
>> I think it's around 50 to 60% they're
ethnically Jewish, but they're not
practicing. So, it's a very secular
country. When you say practicing, do you
mean like atheists or just like maybe
they're not orthodox
>> practicing consistently going to
synagogue following the commandments?
>> That's that's why it's an ethn religion.
That's that's so they could be
practicing. They're just not
consistently going to synagogue is what
you're saying.
>> What I'm saying is the priority is
ethnicity for them. As long as they are
Jewish by ethnicity, that's what matters
more to them than faith. Then Tel Aviv
wouldn't be the gayest city in the world
as they Yeah. Yeah. So, the Times of
Israel brags about how Tel Aviv is the
gayest city in the world. They boast
about their gay pride parades. Stuff
like this is forbidden in Judaism, but
it's so accepted in Israel because it's
a very secular place. So, even though it
is a Jewish ethnostate, they still allow
for so many atheist Jews and secular
Jews to practice gay pride parades
because the priority is the ethnicity,
not the faith.
>> Yeah. Again, uh there's a lot that
actually disagree with that in Israel
and there's a lot that don't. That's why
it's a democracy. There are there are
parties that say it's okay and there are
some that absolutely hate that. Um
that's
>> it's a democracy. But Palestinians get
arrested in Israel if they say free
Palestine. The IDF
>> I literally have a video on my page at a
pro Palestinian protest on in Hifa. They
didn't get arrested. They were saying
free Palestine when they started
chanting globalize the inifat. And even
still many of them weren't arrested.
Just the ones that chanted that then
they arrested them and they were
released immediately but they were put
to a stop. They were screaming and
holding signs that said free Palestine.
You're literally lying right now, dude.
I was in high five.
>> I just spoke to two other people. I'm
I'm in the I just spoke to two uh
actually two two or three today and
three yesterday that said the same
thing.
>> The Tel Aviv University the Tel Aviv
University had the Palestinian flags
flying at a protest and they weren't
arrested. You're saying they get
arrested just for saying
>> you were using anecdotal evidence. You
were saying using anecdotal evidence
saying you went to Israel. of course
>> that I have a video of
>> and you saw and you Yeah, of course
saying that you saw protests. I'm using
anecdotal evidence. I just spoke to two
or three people and I think it was two
or three yesterday that said the same
thing that they will get arrested and
they're under threat if they vocalize
the fact
>> and the the Palestinian and they don't
say Israeli. And also
>> the second example I gave up, you can
look up on the internet. It's not
anecdotal.
>> Oh, you you presented it as anecotal
evidence.
>> No, I'm saying the second example I gave
was not anecdotal. You're right. The
first one was
>> okay. Let's speak about Epstein, right?
Because uh you agree that Epste was
horrible.
>> Yes, he was horrible person. I don't
care about how you keep trying to
deflect. I'd like to focus.
>> I'm not trying to deflect there. There's
no there's focus.
I want to go to the original 80% of the
time.
>> 80%. I promise you it's not been 80%.
You have asked almost every question and
you originally brought up genocide. We
talked about it for very little and then
you moved on from it. I want to know why
you think it is a genocide today.
>> Because they have wiped out the entire
civilization. They made it clear that
they want to starve them out. They're
cutting off the water supply. The ratio
since October 7th of murder has been 70
to1. This follows so many definition.
You can look up
>> 70 to1 what?
>> 70 to1. They said it's they said it's a
war, but the ratio of deaths is about 70
to1 and that's just
>> 70 to1. What? What are you saying? Are
you saying combatant to civilian or
civilian to combat?
>> This is what like you're getting really
angry. This is ratio.
>> This is the ratio of deaths, right? This
is why I'm saying it's a genocide, not a
war. October 7th, what which Israel had
>> tell me what the ratio is. You still
haven't told me.
>> I just said death.
>> What do you mean?
There's been 70 70% 700% more death on
the Palestinian side than there has been
on the Israeli side. It's been around
>> that's not what genocide as.
>> I I'm I just cited multiple reasons and
this is part of the reason why.
>> Can you tell me why
>> before you Okay, you get angry when you
ask question
and I'm answering your question.
>> Okay, but you're you're interrupting and
I'm answering your question. You said
why is it a genocide? Okay. And I'm
explaining since October 7th which
Israel had for knowledge of it said
around a thousand Israelis were killed.
Okay.
>> Maybe it was 800. Maybe it was 900. They
said that there were 40 beheaded babies.
That never happened.
>> They never said that. They never said
that. That was a French push.
>> That was a French reporter who misqued
that and was corrected. Was allegedly
saying this.
>> Yes. They all got that wrong. Corrected
immedately. Yep. It was actually got it
wrong. 40inut that was a lie.
>> Wasn't by Israel. That was a French
reporter who got that wrong and Israel
was the one.
>> If you don't think Ben is Israel, then
that's okay. That was a narrative that
was a mainstream Zionist narrative at
the time of October 7th.
>> Since then, the ratio of deaths on each
says,
>> you look like you do.
>> I you you said the Israeli government
said it. I don't If Ben Shapiro said
that and got it wrong, then great. He's
wrong.
>> I didn't say that. I didn't say that.
>> So when you said they, you meant Ben
Shapiro. That's your argument. I meant
the
>> I meant Jewish supremacists and Zionists
as a whole, not the Israeli government,
which you said.
>> Gotcha. Okay, cool. Can we get back to
what Israel did and how it's a genocide
then? Not their lies that you think they
did. Just why is it a genocide? Just
tell me why it's a genocide.
>> I'm answering you to keep I'm answering
you to keep interrupting.
>> Got it. It's a genocide because Ben
Shapiro lied about
>> I can't answer the question. I I can't
answer I can't answer the question. Wow.
>> You answer the question. You ask me why.
>> Yeah,
>> I didn't answer you. Are you not letting
me talk or you keep on and you keep
going? Do you want to hear the answer?
>> If you answer the question asked, yes, I
do.
>> Okay.
Are you okay now?
>> I'm literally waiting.
>> You're good. Okay. Since October 7th, 70
times more Palestinians have died than
Israelis. Israel had foreign knowledge
of October 7th. They allowed this attack
to happen. They used this to justify
killing, bombing, destroying Gaza
completely. Now it's completely leveled.
There are almost no buildings there.
Mostly people live in tents. This is not
the city that it was beforehand. October
7th was the pretext.
>> The city before
>> most of the people in Gaza, most people
Yes, it was. Most people in Gaza are
children.
>> They have predominantly I think over 50%
of the population are under 18. Since
then, there's many videos of IDF trying
to shoot the electricity supply to turn
off their power.
>> Still,
>> destroying their water supply.
>> Just genocide. I'm still
>> This is what genocide is.
>> Starvation is part of it. If they just
wanted to retaliate, if they just wanted
to defeat Hamas, they said that they
were using human shields. This is how
they they justified bombing hospitals.
>> At what point do I get sir? I got I got
it. You're you're bringing up possible
war crimes. This is still not genocide,
but uh a couple things so many war
crimes. I didn't even finish. I didn't
even finish because you get to the
genocide part. The
>> do so many reasons why it's genocide.
>> Okay. It's concrete, you guys. They
destroyed all the buildings. Got it. No,
I I and I said that they killed 70.
>> Also, he thinks the Gaza Strip is a
city.
>> Yeah, not anymore.
>> It's wasn't a city before.
>> The the the infrastructure is completely
level.
>> All right. Just so you know, Gaza Strip,
FYI, the Gaza Strip is not a city. It
has cities in it. It's actually five
governance. Just FYI.
>> The point is you are I'm differentiating
between war and genocide. If it was a
war, then the human shield lie that they
purported. They said Yaya Sinwis was
hiding behind human shields. They found
him fighting on the front lines without
human shields.
>> He wasn't in the front lines. The front
lines was in Gaza City at the time. He
was in Rafa, which is on the other side
of the Gaza Strip. It's not even close
to
>> He was not hiding. The important part
was he was not hiding behind the human
>> with two bodyguards.
>> This is the This Yeah. Not human
shields. This is the justification they
used to bomb every building,
>> to bomb hospitals, to bomb schools.
>> Can I answer at any point?
>> They said there were human shields and
they said, "We need to go get Hamas. We
need to go kill Hamas." Okay. the
hospitals that they that they destroyed.
Hamas wasn't there. They were fighting.
>> So Muhammad Sir was where?
>> Yaya Senoir.
>> Muhammad Senoir. His brother [ __ ]
>> The other guy. The other Senoir.
>> Why? Why do you get zesty when you talk
about genocide?
>> It's not about that. You try to correct
me. You don't even know who Muhammad
Sinir is. You're like, you mean Yayo
Sinir? Muhammad Sar is the other dude.
>> I was talking. I didn't mention which is
why this
>> I understand. You said there was no
Hamas guys under hospitals. I'm asking
you. I'm not talking about his brother.
This is what they they said Yaya Simar
was hiding behind human shields. He
wasn't.
>> First off, I don't know anyone that said
that. They came out and said they killed
him in Rafa. He was about a week or two.
I'm just going to answer you real quick
about I haven't even finished answering
your first question.
>> But you're going so many points. At what
point do I get to like at least answer
one of the points?
>> Proof that it's not war. This is proof
that
>> Yeah, but you don't want to hear But you
don't want to hear any counters because
you're scared to hear the counters.
>> I'm I'm not scared. Do you think I'm
scared of you? If they are purposely
civilians
>> if they're if they're if they're
definitely targeting civilians under the
guise and under the lie that they're
just attacking Hamas, that is proof of
genocide and not war. They don't care
about eradicating
propag.
>> You guys notice how he doesn't want me
to answer.
>> Okay, perfect. I haven't finished it.
Even I understand you probably have many
buzzwords and points. I'm sure you do,
but we can talk about it.
>> Sne got it. We can still talk about
something. It doesn't mean it's over
after that. We can expand after. I know
you know how conversations work. It's
okay. I just if you go down, you got
angry. You got angry that you could ask
ask a question that I would You said I'm
afraid of your questions. While I'm
answering your question,
>> I got you.
>> While I'm answering the question that
you got angry about,
>> I'm literally not angry. I know you keep
saying I'm angry. I'm speaking at a very
normal voice. I'm not angry. And I know
this is like what people say when
they're like crashing out. They're like,
"Oh, you're so conversation." There's no
one crashing. You you you're doing like
snarky things. You're like,
>> "That doesn't make someone mad. That
just Okay.
>> Then sassy. Then you're you're being I'm
answering your question and you become
sassy."
>> Okay. And you're answering incorrectly.
And I can't tell you why it's incorrect.
So you've said a lot of things. So you
said amongst many things cuz it's very
easy to label 30 points in 30 seconds.
It's not easy to break down 30 points in
30 seconds. And I know you know this.
You debate. You understand this. And so
that's what a lot of pro palies do is
they want to no no I'm still answering.
I'm still answering. And they go b and
then if you get to maybe answering one
or two points then they pretend they
still won because 28 points weren't
answered. So you said no Hamas members
are hiding in hospitals or under them or
anywhere near them, right? And I asked
you what about Muhammad Sinoir who was
the leader of Hamas after his brother
died. He died hiding underneath the
European hospital, right? So yes, they
do. And furthermore, with the water
being cut off, let's start with that.
That was one of the first things you
mentioned. I forgot a lot of what you
said. So the water being cut off, are
you saying the water was cut off like
permanently or just temporarily? because
about only
>> videos of IDF soldiers shooting the
water supply,
>> right? So 90 about 85 to 90% of water
actually comes from inside Gaza via
aqueducts and uh deselination, right?
Only about 10 to 13% of water comes from
three separate pipelines from Israel. So
even if you're saying they're shooting
the pipelines, that's not cutting off
the water. That would be one pipe,
assuming you're telling the truth, but
that's not cutting off the water. First
off, how long do people live without
water?
>> Well, no. I first I don't even know what
you're I have no idea what you're
talking about. But regardless, this idea
of they cut off the water, first off,
they would all be dead. All 2.1 million
people in Gaza would be dead.
>> That's the intention to shoot. That's
that's the intention to cut off.
>> So why wouldn't they just cut off all
water if that's what they wanted to do?
That's what their intention was. Just do
it all then.
>> Yes. Obviously that would be horrible
optics upon Israel, but their soldiers
are doing it. They definitely took
orders to do that. But if it was that
explicit, then people like you wouldn't
be shilling for them.
>> So wait, hold on. So you're saying that
that's their intention? They were
ordered to do it, but they also at the
same time don't want to do it because it
would be bad optics. How the [ __ ] does
that make any sense? Was it really bad
>> optics orders? Maybe it was the specific
intentions. Obviously, they aren't being
punished if they're able to do it that
way. IDF soldiers are shooting the water
supply. Whether or not they got specific
orders, maybe it was not.
>> Wait, so you're admitting you made that
up?
>> Declaration of the
>> No, I made it up. There's videos of IDF
soldiers shooting the water supply. Oh,
I meant the getting orders from the
higher whoever, whether it's their
security higher up or the government or
BB himself. I don't know.
>> No, the the point is if they feel
comfortable enough to do this, they know
they can get away with it. So, yeah, I
didn't ask. You said they got orders
from the higherups. Did you make that
up?
>> No, I said potentially. I said
potentially.
>> Potentially. Okay, good. So, you made it
up. Perfect. So, next point.
>> I said the IDF No, no, I didn't make up
the fact that IDF soldiers are shooting
off the water supply
videos exist of them destroying the
eggs. when the food goes in, they
destroy the crates.
>> They made it an effort to starve them
out and IDF soldiers are making an
effort to make them.
>> So, over two million tons, according to
UNRA, the United Nations, and uh uh even
the Israeli government, but you don't
believe them, so I'll go with the other
two. Over two million tons of food had
went into the Gaza Strip. According to
the World Food Program, about 90,000
tons lasts the Gaza Strip about two
months, right? Because they said it's 1
million people for four months. There's
about two million people in Gaza. So for
about two months, even if you reverse do
the math, that would be about two and a
half to three years of food, give or
take, right? Just doing quick math.
According to the World Food Program,
this isn't like some issue source. This
is the World Food Program. That's what
they said would last the Gaza Strip. So
when you're saying they're trying to
like starve them out, why would they
allow over 2 million tons of food to go
into the Gaza Strip? And this wasn't 2
million tons that they wanted to but
didn't. This is the ones that actually
went into the Gaza Strip.
>> The point is it's genocide because
cutting off the food and water is not
intentionally to get Hamas.
>> All the civilians are all they all need
food and water. And if you don't believe
it, the UN agencies particularly the
UNRWA and the WFP.
>> Are you saying UNRA
>> food program?
>> Yeah. They have reported that this is
the abbreviation is a Palestinian
organization. Just FYI,
>> right? the UN, but this is coming from
the UN agency. They report Israeli
authorities. This is not just soldiers.
So, I stand corrected. These are Israeli
authorities, not specific soldiers. They
have blocked and restricted food convoys
into Gaza,
>> right? For two months, they did that,
which is allowed per article 51 of the
Geneva Conventions. It specifically says
that you're allowed to temporarily block
food, right, for security measures as
long as adequate foods in there. They
had eight months saved up before that
moment when they saw, I think it was
from January to March. It was about two
maybe two and a half months. I think it
was in the middle of March that they uh
blocked food. They're allowed to do that
per article 51.
>> They're allowed to block food in Assad
>> temporarily. Correct. As long as there
is adequate food, which the UN was about
8 months.
>> How long?
>> It's not temporarily starving them.
>> Okay. When did that happen?
>> That was actually before the starvation
claim even actually came out by the IPC
report. So there was actually no even
starvation claim even when that was
happening.
>> That was 20
>> 2024 I believe it was. Okay. And then
again, they did it in 2025. The World
Food Program reported that food stocks
for hot meals, they ran out in April 25
following a seven-week block on aid. So,
Israeli authorities.
>> Okay. So, then it was 2025. I'm talking
about
>> seven weeks,
>> right?
>> No, that's a separate one. You said it
was it was several months. This is seven
weeks and this is afterwards. This is
>> I said two months. I hope you know seven
weeks is about two months. You
understand that, right, Sneo?
>> But you said it was in it was the years
prior.
>> I said it was January to March. I
couldn't remember if it was 2025 or
2024. I'm assuming you're reading
January to March of 2025, right?
>> No, this is April.
>> April.
>> April. April 2025.
>> Right. That's after
>> program,
>> right?
>> You said that was after the blockade. So
you are talking about January to March.
April would be the month after March. So
it's talking about what already happened
>> be starting in January. Seven weeks.
Seven weeks is not until January. The
point is
>> January plus seven weeks would get you
to March unless you not January 1st. I'm
saying in January. Do you understand
there's four weeks in a month, right,
Sneo?
>> Yeah, 100%. The point is that this is in
this is intentional starvation. That's
the point.
>> Okay. So, how many people how many
people
>> how many people starved in Gaza like
died from starvation? They're saying,
okay, from the humanitarian crisis, this
is again from the World Food Program,
over two million people in Gaza are
severely food insecure with famine-like
condition.
>> I ask you, how many people die from
starvation?
>> I don't have that stat off the top of my
head.
>> Yeah. According to
>> two million people, the World Food
Program, so okay, people can die for
many causes. Starvation is a gateway to
different diseases, to different
sickness. This is a way to kill people
slowly. So, say they have COVID after
they have been starved with famine-like
conditions. When did they start death?
They are still being starved.
>> I got you. I I'm telling you why you're
wrong. So, when was the when did the
starvation start? Was it October 8th,
2023? When did they say we are now going
to start starving them?
>> October 7th, 2023.
>> Okay. So, and it went throughout the
entire war. Correct.
>> On and off since then. Yes.
>> Okay. Okay. So, for about 2 years, these
magical people were being starved, which
starve is when your body literally
starts to eat itself. You're saying that
these people, strongest people in
history, I guess they were all being
starved. Yet somehow, even at the end of
the war, Hamas claimed those that died
from not just starvation, but just
malnutrition
was less than, according to Hamas, I
don't believe their numbers, but let's
go with it, was less than 400 people in
a society of 2.1 million. Hold on one
sec. 2.1 million people. Hold on.
>> 2 million people. Hold on one sec.
>> 2 million people with salmon like
>> 2 million people. So Okay.
>> You said starvation starving to death.
>> That's not the same. No. Starvation is
level five. Okay. I'm trying to answer
you, but you keep cutting me off. So
starvation according to
the point. The point doesn't want to
hear the bigger point. Okay. You wanted
to just so everyone knows level five is
what's required for starvation. Level
five is what's required for starvation.
>> They are cutting off the food supply to
kill them.
>> That's the bigger point of starvation. I
know you want to harp on definitions. 2
million people have reported having
famine-like conditions according to the
world.
>> Famine is not even close to starvation.
Most war zones have famine.
But
>> so you're changing you're moving the
goalpost from starvation to normal
things that happen in a lot of wars,
especially in urban warfare conflict. I
agree with you. There was a lot of
people that had food insecurity that
happens in urban warfare. You didn't say
that. You're moving the goalpost cuz
you're getting proven wrong. You said
they were starving to death. You
understand the difference between
starvation and famine?
>> Oh my lord.
>> Famine has five levels according to the
IPC. Level five would be starvation slow
process and the intention is to weaken
>> so slow that after 2 years less than 400
people died according to Hamas by the
way very very very slow process they had
70,000 birds you know what happens
during starvation
>> got it happens
>> 2 million people with famine what's the
other intention besides killing and
weakening
>> yeah that happens in urban warfare
that's not an Israel specific thing or
Gaza specific thing urban warfare
creates these conditions
>> is that correct I think war is always
wrong.
>> Is that starving history?
>> Sure. I'd be more than glad to answer
you. I I think war Okay.
>> It's funny how you ask me a question,
but you don't want to hear the answer.
This is what people do when they're
losing a debate.
>> I understand.
>> You have something to say. I don't hear
it.
>> You asked me a question.
>> The intention of cutting off food supply
is you're just repeating yourself.
>> That's the bigger point. If you want to
define famine specifically, the greater
point is Israel is trying to starve them
to death.
>> Okay. Can I answer now? Because you're
just repeating what you've already said
three times.
>> I didn't ask you a question. I didn't
ask you a question.
>> Actually, you did. You asked me, "Do I
think it's wrong?" You did literally
asked a question.
>> And you and you agreed. I didn't agree.
You said I agreed. I never did.
>> You said you just said is wrong.
>> No, I didn't say that. See, that's the
problem. I said it. Okay. See, this is
the problem. when you're trying to
you're losing so bad. You're trying to
just yell over me.
>> We all heard it.
>> I'm literally recording this. I promise
you I didn't say it. I said I believe
war. I got it. I said I believe war is
bad. That's true. I didn't say what you
said was bad. War does create
>> said urban warfare. You said starvation
is urban warfare. Then you said war is
bad. Therefore starving people for
famine is bad.
>> Famine not starvation. I said famine act
of urban warfare.
Right. Not starvation. You notice how
you changed my words. So, I didn't say
starvation was an act. No. No.
>> Okay. He's cutting me off again. Go
ahead.
>> Okay. Okay. What? You want to follow
these legal definitions? Do you think
it's
>> not? That's actually not a legal
definition. This is just actually just
reality. I'm not even saying anything
legal right now.
>> Just Just ask you as a person. So,
you're not going to let me answer.
>> Okay.
>> I'm not asking. This is the question I'm
asking you. Do you think it's right that
two million people in Palestine have
famine conditions?
>> Do I think it's right based off what?
Like do I think Israel is doing that or
do I think the world do you think that's
mor do you think that's morally right
while the world is watching and you're
defend
>> you're defending a place and you're
against it right?
>> 2 million people have famine like
conditions. Is this something Is this
something you're okay with?
>> Yeah. So I'm going to answer this but I
I need you to let me answer. Okay. I
think it's very easy to ask these virtue
signaling questions like, "Hey, do you
think cancer is wrong?" "Hey, do you
think war is bad?" "Hey, do you think
yes, Sneo, I think all these things are
wrong. What I don't want to answer is
when you remove context from a situation
and force this like leftist style
argument where you force people to
answer." I'm trying I'm trying to finish
one more sentence and I promise I'll let
you go. When you force these arguments
to ask vague questions and when someone
answers that vague like do you think
cancer is bad question and I say yes
then you go see he says cancer is bad
why doesn't he put more funding into it
that yes I think war is bad oh my god is
war bad yes I do I do
>> you you agree it's bad that two million
people have famine-like conditions in
Palestine do you also agree that Israel
is the nation responsible for this
famine no
they're not responsible for it who's
responsible responsible.
>> So, can you just real quick, I'm gonna
ask you a question.
>> Oh my lord.
>> I'll tell you who's responsible.
>> Who's who's responsible? I mean, look.
So, so this is according to the NGO
challenges say that nearly 90% requests
for aid were rejected.
>> I I provided evidence that Israel is
cutting off the food supply. So, they
are clearly directly responsible.
>> This is coming from the UN. This is
coming from the World Food Program that
Israel is responsible for the famine of
two million people.
>> Great. So yeah, they
>> So you're saying that it's close to
cancer? Yes, cancer is like it's bad
that people have cancer, but
>> if we could prevent it, we should. So we
can prevent the starvation and you're
supporting the nation that's responsible
for it.
>> It's not starvation. And I'd be more
than glad to answer, but you really
don't want me to.
>> Famine. The nation that you're defending
>> is responsible. Is the nation you're
defending responsible for this famine?
>> You already asked that, Sneo. Do you
forget already?
>> You have you have you have many sources.
Why? There's no what's the other
explanation?
>> Yeah. So again, the when you remove all
context with these vague virtue
signaling questions, it's very easy to
just get yes or nos because that's what
you're looking for. You're not looking
for explanation. So what I'm going to
say is, can you name for me, cuz I'm
going to ask you a question. I know it
might be hard. Can you name for me any
urban warfare where uh even a city, a
state, borders, whatever you want to
call it, big or small, that was isolated
by the uh other belligerent that gave
more food or even as much food as Israel
has sent in even with all that 90%
denial has sent into the Gaza Strip. Can
you name one time in all of even just I
was going to say modern history but even
history where they allowed more food or
even as much food as even according to
ENRA the United Nations has gone into
the Gaza Strip. Can you name How about
Saudi Arabia with Yemen?
Has Saudi Arabia in 10 years given more
food? So
>> you're not going to answer, are you?
>> So you're answering you're not going to
answer the question. The question was
who's responsible for this starvation?
>> Yeah. So I think war again I don't think
there's a mass starvation. You are
trying to use the word famine apply mass
starvation. First off even the IPC
didn't even say there was starvation
across the whole Gaza strip. They only
classify that government.
>> You want to bring up the IPC.
>> Please bring it up. I read all 87 pages.
Please bring it up. I will [ __ ]
school you on the IPC report. It says
Gaza govern was labeled as a level five.
Do you know what the Gaza governant is,
Sneo?
641,000 people were projected to be in
IPC phase 5 starvation,
>> right? Projected. When did they actually
claim it? Projection is not when they
actually label it.
>> So, can you tell me
>> this is a lie?
>> No, of course not. What I said was is
projection is what they do. The way the
IPC reports do is they make a projection
and then they determine if that
projection is correct. There was only
one time that they actually determined
that and it was for the Gaza govern. Do
you know what the Gaza governor is? For
the second time, I'm asking,
>> you're still deflecting who's
>> literally the same exact subject.
>> Who is responsible for the famine?
>> I've already answered this. War and
urban warfare caused
>> So war is responsible. War is
responsible for the famine.
>> So no, I'm trying to answer beyond that,
but you only let me say one or two words
and then you cut me off.
>> So war war is not people that are
cutting off supply. War is not
responsible for the acts. You notice how
he was very cordial at the beginning and
then when he started losing he cuts off
a lot.
>> Very very cordial right now because
you're
>> you're not letting me answer beyond one
word. I was trying to answer.
>> War is a very
>> You're correct. That's a dumb answer
because it's not the full answer. You're
right. That's true, Sneo. When you cut
people off after one word, it does kind
of
>> because it's a people responsible for
it. What people are responsible for?
>> Well, actually, that's not particularly
true. I say it's a group. I wouldn't
just say it's just a people.
>> Group of people. So what I would say is
who started the war? War causes these
Let me say more. I can already tell
you're about to interrupt. War causes
these conditions in every urban warfare
conflict in all of modern history. The
fact that you think it's like some kind
of specialty for just Gaza or Israel is
laughable. So when you ask who started
the war, very clearly this war post
October 7th was started by Hamas and the
collaborators of Hamas like the PI,
PFLP, DFLP, Army of Islam, PRC,
Mujahedin brigades, etc. So that's the
full answer. I just needed to get to it.
Go ahead.
>> They have been bombed. We started with
1948. I'm I'm very glad we started
there.
>> Why did we start with 48? Why would you
start with 48?
>> Because they've been kicked out of their
homes because this does not start on
October 7th. This has been agree. It
didn't start on October 7. This is when
this is when it was this is when it was
declared a war. You said that war was
possible. And we we have clarified in
the beginning
>> who started taking the land. Therefore,
the people that moved in were there was
already a civilization. They are
responsible for the war.
>> They are the ones who started.
>> So when when did the when did the war
start? You said 48.
>> Yes.
>> In 1936 when they slaughtered targeted
and slaughtered 510 Jews during the
third Jaffa riots. What was the reason
for that if it didn't start till 48?
Sneo, can you answer that without
deflecting?
>> We're talking about this land, these
people.
>> It was literally I'm talking about the
exact same land, Sneo. I'm not talking.
It literally been Palestine. Why? Why
did they target and slaughter 510 Jews
in uh during the Third Joff riots? That
was 12 years started 12 years before
1948. So you said, and I quote, it
started in 1948. I wanted to make sure I
heard you say that. So can you explain,
without deflecting, can you explain why
they did that?
>> States. No, no, we're talking about the
the states of Israel and Palestine.
>> Oh, so you want to purposely start it
only on the convenient year for you and
you want to ignore everything because
you will move because you are trying to
talk about it's a conflict between two
nations. So if we're going to talk about
conflict between two nations because
you're saying wars
>> I didn't say two nations. Hamas is not a
nation. That was a stupid point. That
was a really stupid point,
>> right?
Clearly the resistance that's the
resistance of a nation. Not of a nation.
That's like saying okay IDF is Israel.
What is Hamas?
>> It's a political organization that was
not a nation voted in.
>> Not of a nation.
>> According to you,
>> according to international law,
according to anyone that's not
delusional,
>> keep on going about semantics. So,
you're saying that war is responsible.
So, it's between two groups of people.
>> Right? So, answer my question about 36.
What was the reason? You notice how he
won't answer it. Why? If you said it
started in 48, what was the reason for
slaughtering 510 Jews in 36? Why is that
such a hard question to answer? It's not
a ridiculous question. You said it
started in 48.
>> Tell me. Tell me.
>> Well, I I can tell you it's because it
it isn't just about Zionism or Israel.
It's about Jews. But you don't believe
that. So, I have to ask you. Don't ask
me to answer for you just cuz you don't
have an answer. Why would I answer for
you?
>> I I'm I'm answering your question
between two groups of people. This could
only be because you were going on about
semantics and legal definitions. It
started in 1948. This is when this
conflict started. Wow. How convenient.
What is the pretext for what happened on
October? It's not convenient. So the
Balfford Declaration wasn't involved at
all because that was in 1917. It it did
it did not come into action until 1948.
Oh,
>> actually the Balfford Declaration never
came into Wait, wait, stop. You just got
something else wrong. The Balfer
Declaration never applied because the
Balfford Declaration was prior to 1921
when the British correct the British
created the uh Trans Jordan, the Emirate
Trans Jordan in 1921. So the Bowford
Declaration actually referred to all of
today's Jordan and today's Israel,
Palestine, whatever you want to call it,
and they took 77 really 78% of the land,
gave it to the Arabs, kicked out all the
Jews, by the way, that lived there and
legally own land there. Kicked them all
out and said no Jews were allowed to
migrate there. Ironically, Jews didn't
seem to become [ __ ] terrorists after
that. They didn't start screaming.
Actually, why is there no free Palestine
movement in Jordan today? They took the
Palestinian land. They don't call it
Palestine. The governing uh power in
Jordan are not Palestinians. Why is it
that they don't call for a free
Palestine? And we're not talking about a
tiny portion. It's 78% of the entire
land.
>> Mhm. Okay. So now you went to Jordan. We
went off of several different topics. We
>> Oh, we don't have to go to Jordan if you
want to answer about 36. That'd be great
since you deflected from that.
>> Right. So I mean Jews have been kicked
out of land. They've been kicked out of
100.
>> I don't know what that has to do with my
question. This is a total deflection.
Why did they if it didn't question? This
is a deflection. This is a separate
subject.
>> If it didn't start until 48, then why
did they kill Jews in 1936 if it had
nothing to do with this conflict?
>> Cuz you said it didn't start till 48. So
please,
>> if you want to take Okay, but the reason
it's is it's a deflection because if you
want to talk about the expulsion of
Jews, if you want to talk about the the
fact that they've been kicked out of
countries,
>> I'm not talking about that at all.
You're talking about that. I never
mentioned that once. I said why
>> you're bringing that was separate from
Israel and Palestine.
>> Literally talking about in Palestine in
Palestine in the land in 1936
they slaughtered 500. How about this?
1929 in Hebrron. Do you know where
Hebrron is, Nico?
>> Do you agree that's Palestine?
>> Separate separate conversation. So
>> it's the same thing. We're talking about
the conflict.
>> Mhm.
>> So in 1929
>> saying 1936. Let's answer this one. You
said 1936.
>> I do want to answer it. So somebody
finally gave you the answer. Cool. Let's
hear it.
>> All right. You've been listening to AI
and reading your thing.
>> I know it was riots and even then it's
>> literally looking at the screen.
>> Yeah. It it was riots, right? So people
die. People die in riots. There's always
infiltration from different intelligence
groups and actually Arabs defended the
Jews in these riots. They're not
>> Oh, really? That's why they slaughtered
them. Interesting. How about in 1929 in
>> Hebron? How do you blame that? How do
you Arabs that were defending the Jews?
>> Yeah. So again, I'm telling you about
what happened physically, right? This
idea whatever your friends sent you is
ridiculous. In 1929, they went to an
anti-Zionist community. Ones that were
so anti-Zionist that the Hagen went to
go defend them and they said, "Get out
of here, you Zionist." They went to them
and they Great. They went Hagen. No,
you're thinking maybe Urggon, but Haga,
what are you talking? Whatever. You're
just trying to deflect. 1929, they went
to an anti-ionist community and
slaughtered them. Why did they do that?
I thought it was about Israel and
Zionism. What was the purpose of
slaughtering anti-Zionist Jews for?
>> Well, Arabs were defending. To call that
a genocide is not equivalent to what's
going on.
>> I didn't call that a genocide. I never
called that a genocide. I don't even
know why you said that. That was a
stupid answer.
>> Applying this response completely to
Arabs or Muslims is
>> I'm applying it specifically to you
saying the conflict started in 48. I
think it's very convenient to say it
started. I think it's ridiculous when
people say the whole conflict started on
October 7th. It's stupid. It's dumb. Of
course, the conflict didn't start on
October 7th. This specific context
started on October 7th, but the
conflict, of course, it didn't. It's
equally as stupid to say it started on
this arbitrary date. It's ridiculous.
You sound just as dumb. You sound just
as dumb as people who say it started on
October 7th.
>> I sound dumb. It's as stupid as somebody
like you, a Goyam, defending a state
that
>> [ __ ] Goyam is plural genius.
>> Just an FYI.
>> Okay. Goyam, you're a [ __ ] [ __ ] is
whatever. I'm glad you know it because
you are one and you're one of the top.
It means nation. They're calling it
stupid. I know. There's there's nothing
there's nothing more stupid than
somebody here who's defending a state
that was using pedophile blackmail to
get American politicians money right
here. So, who did Epstein work for? If
you're going to say I'm stupid, you're
here.
If you really are white,
>> can't just because you're going to talk
about stupidity. There's nothing more
stupid. Yeah,
>> there is nothing more stupid than a boy
sitting here defending a state that
allowed Eps
Muslims to rape children.
>> I guess I should defend Muslims.
>> Why are you supporting the state?
>> No. Convince me. Tell me why I should
defend Muslims.
>> No, I want I No, no, no, no, no, no.
Don't deflect now. DON'T DEFLECT NOW.
>> OH, THE GUY THAT DEFLECTED TO EPSTEIN
doesn't want to deflect to his pedophile
prophet. Wow. Call me. I'm so shocked. I
am so shocked. He He deflected to
Epstein when nobody brought up Epstein.
But the second I brought UP ISLAM, HE'S
LIKE, "NO, NO, NO. PLEASE don't
deflect."
>> We could talk about that. We could talk.
We could talk.
>> No, we don't have to. I just find that
hilarious. I find that ironic as [ __ ]
>> There there's nothing There's nothing
more hilarious than a [ __ ] defending a
state.
>> Yeah, I got it. Yeah, you've said that
already. I got it. Yeah, I'm the best.
>> Let's talk Let's talk about this. We
could talk We'll talk about anything
that you want to talk about. Let's talk
about Epste right now. Who did Epste
work for? So, so you're allowed to
deflect to something else, but I can't
deflect.
>> You don't want to talk about it. You I I
>> It's not about wanting to talk about it.
I just find it ironic when this whole
time you keep saying
I didn't even come close to answering
anything.
>> We went to October 7th. We went to your
famine definition. We went to your
starvation definition.
>> Who did Epstein work for?
>> Yeah. Again, I this idea Epste was a
disgusting piece of [ __ ] just like the
prophet Muhammad. I think they're
equally bad. I don't like pedophilia.
Disgusting. If anyone's a pedophile,
they should be castrated. Just so you
know, Muhammad's Aisha was four to five
years younger. Four to 5 years younger
than Epstein's youngest victim. And
they're both equally disgusting. See how
he doesn't want to. NO, NO, NO. I DON'T
WANT TO TALK ABOUT THAT. PLEASE.
>> MASHALLAH, PLEASE.
>> UH-HUH.
>> I thought you were a Hadith expert.
First off, this is not confirmed a
reliable hadith. AI Albakardi 5133
narrated by Aisha herself. It says, "He
married me when I was six."
>> When Epste Yeah,
>> disgusting is not is
>> This is not part of the
>> Sahi Albaki. It's Sahi Albakotti. The
most accepted had in the world.
>> Nick is so hot right now.
>> We haven't You still haven't answered
the question. I've answered every single
one of your questions. You you you're
going to Hadit. You're going to your
different thing.
>> He said Sah Albakardi is not accepted.
That is insane. It's the most accepted.
>> Not accepted as confirmed. Had is up to
>> What does Saki mean? What does
>> Answer the question before you keep
deflecting. I answered all your
questions. Who did Epstein work for?
>> Who did he work for?
>> So hot.
>> Yes.
>> I have no idea who he work for.
>> You have no idea.
>> My guess I I'll answer my guess. I think
he was a I'm going to answer.
>> You have no idea. I have no idea who he
was.
>> Sure. I'd be more than glad. I will tell
you there are many people that he had
connections with including Israelis like
Ahoud Barack. Disgusting. He had uh
relations with a lot of Arab leaders
including getting the Cabba to the cloth
of the Cabba to his own personal self.
Also disgusting people. He had relations
with US government personnel and
government officials. Also disgusting.
He had a lot with Russian also
disgusting. I think they're all equally
disgusting. In fact, the Israeli
government people like Benjamin
Netanyahu and Smootridge both called out
Eud Barack years before America was even
talking about it because of his
relations with Jeffrey Epstein. Yes,
you're correct. He had relations with a
lot of people.
>> Who Who did No, no, no.
>> You believe he worked for the MSAD? You
believe he worked for the
>> I'm I'm asking what I believe. I'm
asking you who did Epstein work for?
>> I have no idea.
>> You have no clue who he worked for.
>> There's over like four million pages
that have been released so far. I have
not read them all. Why don't you tell me
who he was?
>> You have no idea what state he
supported. You have no idea about the
emails to go. You have no idea about
former Israeli prime minister. Okay.
You've read those. So, you have the I'm
just confused real quick. Do you think
Goyam is automatically I'm answering
your point. Do you think Goyam is like
automatically just like a derogatory
term?
>> You're you're you're DEFLECTING AGAIN.
EPSTE.
>> YOU LITERALLY just said it, dude. How am
I deflecting? You just said that. You
said the email saying Goyam
>> and I'm answering you. Yeah, Epste
definitely used it as a derogatory term.
Who
>> do you think I'm going to defend Epste?
He was a pedophile. Yeah, disgusting
person.
>> Yeah, you 100% are saying that he worked
for Russia or worked for Saudi Arabia.
>> I didn't say that at all. I said he had
relations with these people. He
literally did. Are you denying Wait,
real quick. Can you just say that for
the camera? Are you saying Are you
denying that he didn't have any
relations with these people?
>> Of But who was he working for was the
question and you deflected off of that?
I just I didn't deflect. I said I have
no idea.
>> No. Oh, you said you said relations when
the question was work. Somebody running
cover.
>> My very first answer.
>> My very first answer was I have no idea
who we work for.
>> He is crashing the [ __ ] out.
>> You are running cover for Epste.
>> How was me? Can you just answer a quick
question before? Can you just answer a
quick question before you run away?
>> No. No. You're not answer my You said
you you said you have no idea who we
work for. So, I'm going to follow up
because let's stay on this. Tell me who
he worked for.
>> Okay, I tell you. I'm just like you. I'm
doing research. We're trying to find
>> So, why is your answer different than
mine?
>> Don't let him run.
>> You said you have no idea, right? But
you know that Hubarak, former Israeli
prime minister, not only more than a
couple words.
>> No. No, you can't.
>> He's trashing the [ __ ] out.
>> He doesn't want to hear an answer.
>> He said that he was going to meet with
your prime minister Netanyahu flag you
have behind you. You're representing a
flag where the prime minister visited
Epstein what allegedly 30 times and is
>> saying Benjamin Netanyahu visited
Epstein.
>> I said and who rocked it dummy.
>> Yeah, I think he was going to have
>> Okay. The former one, just not the
current one. He said he was going to
meet
>> just like I think Clinton is disgusting.
The former president. What a stupid
point. Clinton was a former president. I
think he's disgusting, too. What was the
point?
>> Look at you. Look at you deflecting and
trying TO TALK ABOUT HIS
>> NO, I'M SAYING I THINK IT'S THE same
thing. What's the point?
What state was he benefiting and who was
heating
him? Was he Russian?
>> Leslie Wexner. Was he Saudi? This is the
people that turned him into a
billionaire that funded this island.
Were these people spies for Qatar?
They're all wrong. So, okay, now that
you know when it's disgusting now you
are willfully ignoring the evidence in
front of you. Okay, so Jewish Zionist
funded him. His girlfriend Gelain
Maxwell, right?
>> Her father was Msad. What?
>> Her father wasn't her father. Her father
wasn't the MSA. That comes from a book,
just so you know. Can I answer?
>> You're saying Robert Maxwell wasn't
Robert Maxwell was a MSAD.
>> No, I'm saying it's not been confirmed.
Let me just answer more than a couple
words. You're like literally yelling,
screaming.
>> I yelling and screaming. Oh, don't
victimize yourself now.
>> Can you take a breath?
>> Cover for pedophile island. I can't take
a breath. He
>> really doesn't want me to answer.
>> You're ignoring right now. No. No. No,
no, no. Robert Maxwell was 100%.
>> Okay. Can you just tell me how? Maybe
I'm wrong. Can you tell me how you know
that?
>> He's been credited by Israeli officials
at the founder in being the arms. This
comes from Israeli officials. This comes
from Can you tell me who
>> he was being paid by MSAD? He was being
paid by Israeli government.
>> Can you just tell me who? You just keep
saying that this happened to us.
Perfect. See, you have to Google so you
don't know. It comes from the book that
was actually promoted on Candace Owens's
show. I actually read that book and it
is
>> long before No, this came a long before
Candace Owens.
>> If you just No, I said she promoted it
on her show. I didn't say she wrote the
book. Dude, you have to listen before
you answer.
>> You said it came from her show.
>> I didn't. I said she promote Again, I'm
recording it. You'll see the clips. I
said she promoted it. I promise you I
said that. Anyways,
>> guys, shout out to my YouTube. You'll
see this. Anyways, so it said Yeah.
Okay. Uh, so again, she promoted it, not
it came from her show. Of course,
Candace Owens doesn't write that [ __ ]
So anyways, what it says is this guy who
wasn't even actually an official
anymore. He said that it was alleged
that there were people who believed, and
this is what his book says, that Robert
Maxwell did work, not even worked for
the MSAD, but did work with the MSAD.
Now, it's possible. Hold on one sec.
Relax. Don't crash out again. You're
doing good. So, it's possible because he
said that somebody alleged that this is
true. Now, is it possible he's right? Of
course it is. But that's not the same
thing as evidence, Sneo. That's someone
saying that he heard someone else say
it. Of course, it could be right. And
guess what? If it is right, well, I'm
not going to blame him, but Gain
absolutely disgusting. She shouldn't
even be in just prison. She should be
executed. Jeffrey Epste I wish could
survive. So, they castrated him. You're
saying I'm writing cover for a guy that
I'm literally saying is disgusting
>> because it's very clear who we work for.
He fled to Israel after sex.
>> You have no information. You just
Google. Tell me what you read.
>> Okay. This has been suspect that he was
smuggling weapons. He has meant about
the
>> in the in Okay. You want to hear actual
information?
>> Speculated. You just said it's been
speculated. That's what I said. How come
what you're saying is like I'm going to
bring
>> I said the same exact thing and you said
I was running cover. You just repeated
what I said.
>> No. No. I'm giving you actual evidence
right now. Jeffrey Epstein him said that
MSAD executed Robert Maxwell after he
tried to extort them of 500 million
pounds because he had secrets. He had
secrets that MSAD had. Only a MSAD agent
has MSAD secrets to that extent. Jeffrey
Epstein said that he was a MSAD agent
and he was executed for
>> Epstein said that MSAD assassinated
allegedly assassinated Robert Maxwell
because he tried to extort MSAD of their
secrets. Only an agent is going to be
able to have secrets of MSAD at that
level.
>> Okay. What are you reading right now so
I can look into this? Listen, Sneo, you
have to understand you admitted this is
you that's off the top of the dome. Go
look at the Epcot all this reading. Oh,
I read all this hadith. You don't read
the Epstein files. You have the flag of
a country behind you
all over it. You don't research that.
You look away on this. I think you're an
expert.
>> Wow. You are crashing out.
>> I'm not crashing out. This is how this
is.
>> I'm trying to answer you the difference
between the files. I'm trying to answer
you the difference between the Epste
files and 20,000 ads. Had sometimes a
sentence long to maybe a paragraph. The
Epstein files are over that has been
released. I think it's four to five
million pages. It's so stupid to say,
"Well, you've read this many of these.
You haven't ever read the Epstein
files." Dude, have you read all the
Epste files? Of course you haven't.
That's rhetorical.
>> I've I've read I read enough to make
conclusive to have a conclusive claim
that he worked for Israel. Again,
>> I'm going to look this up. Did
>> Minister
I'm going to look it up to see if you're
even telling the truth. Say Robert
Epste
was an Israeli operation. Are you going
to rip that flag down?
>> Israeli operation?
Yes.
>> By what? By current Israel today, like
the people in government today or
before? I'm just confused.
>> Yeah, Nanya was still in charge. He said
he was going to meet with Nanya. He's
had a meeting set up. If this was an
Israeli operation to get Epstein to
blackmail American politicians to
support Israel, will you rip down that
flag?
>> I don't think you'll be able that
whatever whatsoever.
>> Okay. Do you want to hear why you Google
things like a good prime minister?
>> I'm already real quick. I already looked
up the first thing and that's not true.
So, can you provide where you're getting
that from about Epstein saying that
Robert Maxwell was assassinated by MSAD?
>> I'll get I'll give all of that to you.
The second one,
>> no, I want that one first.
>> I don't really care what you want.
You're covering up for Epstein. Prime
Minister Yakir reportedly stated that
Maxwell has done more for Israel today
that can be said.
>> Prime Minister, Israeli Prime Minister
said Robert Maxwell has done more for
Israel than could today be said.
>> Cool. I will be more than glad. Can you
prove your first point instead of
running away from it because you lied?
>> You don't like this one?
>> No, it's not about liking it or not. I
don't particularly care what people in
the past said.
>> I If you want me to say they're
disgusting, they're disgusting.
>> You don't care about But you have the
the nation of the you have the flag
right here. And the former prime
minister of that country says Robert
Maxwell done did more for Israel than
can today be stated and you said you
don't care. If you don't care what
happened in the past, he said you don't
care about the past, THEN WHY ARE YOU
HARPING ON Are you asking me?
>> Why are you harping on about 1927? Can I
answer?
>> Why do you keep talking about October?
>> I'd be more than glad to answer. You
guys notice how he doesn't let me
answer. Be more than glad to answer. Are
you telling me you're lying to logic?
>> No, you're not. Because I didn't say I
don't care about what happened in the
past.
>> I didn't say that. I didn't say that. I
said I don't care about what you said in
the past. I didn't say I don't care
about the past. Specifically with Robert
Maxwell. Are you telling me Robert
Maxwell was doing something with the
Epstein Island? Should I condemn Robert
Maxwell? I thought the only reason you
brought up Robert Maxwell was because of
Gain Maxwell. Is that correct?
>> Mhm.
>> So, what does Robert Maxwell doing?
>> Hold on. What does Robert Maxwell doing
so much for the state of Israel have to
do with Epstein?
>> Right. Gain Maxwell was his girlfriend.
Correct.
>> I agree with that. But what does Robert
Maxwell doing so much for the state of
Israel? Why is that a bad thing? I'm
confused. Is Robert Maxwell a bad
person?
>> The 100,000 pieces of evidence that
Epstein worked for Israel.
>> Hold on. You're not answering the
question. I said I answer
the question directly right now.
>> Somebody thought that Robert Maxwell did
so much for
>> Your mic cut out.
>> I said, can you hear me?
>> Your mic's off.
>> My mic's off.
>> It's not me. It's you. Your mic's off.
>> Hello.
>> Oh, he's running from Epste.
>> I'm literally not running.
>> Why are you running?
>> Hello.
>> Why are you running?
>> Everyone says that they can hear me
running. Wait, why are you lying?
Everyone's saying he can hear me.
>> He's running. He muted the mic.
>> Mad got his microphone.
>> Ms got his microphone.
>> Hello. Can you hear me?
>> Your mic is out. Okay, you just fix it.
>> It's true. Your mic is out on your
>> dude. Everyone in my chat is saying they
can hear me. What are you doing?
>> You just You just fixed it.
>> Okay, great. So, what I was saying,
>> I don't need to lie like you. I don't
need to lie and pretend for.
>> Okay, great. Anyway, so what I was
saying, Hold on. I was speaking. So what
I was saying what I was saying is is you
said that Robert Maxwell was said to be
doing so much for the state of Israel.
Why is that a problem? Is Robert Maxwell
a bad person or are you talking about
Gain Maxwell being a bad person?
>> Okay. So I am giving you one piece of a
100,000 pieces of evidence that Epstein
works for Israel. One of the major
factors is that Gain Maxwell, the top
pimp for this pedophile blackmail that
you're running cover from, her father
was MSAD. Former Israeli prime minister,
said he had done more for Israel than
could be stated today. You want the
email from the Epstein files where
people figured out why he was passed
away. In the Epstein files, Rob said the
evidence. This is from this is from
Jeffrey Epste. I'll read it to you
because
>> Jeffrey Epste also said he hated Israel.
He literally said, "I don't like Israel
at all." So what? Jeffrey Epstein was a
[ __ ] piece of [ __ ] This is what's
funny. We started off talking about no
one second.
>> Millie said this is not
>> Are you going to give the evidence
finally?
>> You Yes, I'm reading.
>> PERFECT. THEN I WILL SHUT UP. If you're
going to give the first thing you
promised about 20 minutes ago, I will
stop talking. Go ahead.
>> I'm trying to, but you keep trying to
talk.
>> No, go ahead. I guarantee you a bet
anything he doesn't give it.
>> Okay, great. Jeffrey Epste emailed
saying Robert Maxwell threatened Assad.
He told them if they unless they gave
him400 million pounds to save his
crumbling empire, he would expose all he
had done for them.
>> In that time he had access to Margaret
Thatcher's Downing Street, Ronald
Reagan's White House, to the Kremlin,
and to the corridors of power throughout
Europe. Maxwell passed on all the
secrets he learned to MSAD in Tel Aviv.
In turn, they tolerated his excesses,
vanities, and insatiable appetite for a
luxurious lifestyle.
>> How is this providing me with the
evidence?
>> Oh my god. First off,
>> one more time because I just want to
make sure. Are you saying that Epstein,
you're saying Epstein said this, so you
believe what Epstein said? Is what
you're saying?
>> This is one piece of the millions of
pieces of evidence that Epstein worked
for Israel. You asked, "Why do I bring
up Robert Maxwell?" I'm giving you a
piece of evidence.
>> No, that's not what I asked. I asked why
was it a problem that Maxwell did a lot
for Israel as a possible massage agent
or not? I don't see what the problem
with that was. Was Maxwell, not Golain,
Robert Maxwell like a pedophile? Was he
working on the Was he working uh on the
island or something? What is the
problem?
>> You wanted proof. You agreed that
Epstein was an evil pedophile and you
said he should be castrated. Right? Then
you said, "I don't know who he worked
for." So now I'm giving you one of the a
million pieces of evidence that he
worked for Israel. I said Barack visited
his estate allegedly 30 times in
Manhattan. There's a picture of him
sneaking in. I said he was financed by
Leon Black and Leslie Wexner, not
Russians and not Saudis like you're
insinuating. He was funded by Jewish
Zionists in America whose allegiance is
with Israel. That's who he got his money
from. Then I pointed out that the top
pimp of the organization, Gain Maxwell,
his girlfriend, her father was MSAD. You
said, "I don't know if he's MSAD." I'm
telling you in the Epstein files,
Epstein is saying that they were going
to assassinate him or they wanted to
assassinate him. And this is assuming
why he passed away. Because ma because
Robert Maxwell tried to extort Assad
of400 million pounds and he would expose
all Assad had done. This is an email
from Jeffrey Epstein. How many more
pieces of evidence do you need? Stop
running cover for a pedophile state.
>> Yeah. One sec.
>> Yeah, I'm looking it up right now
because there's something right here in
the files that actually debunks that
email, but I'm I'm trying to get it
because you won't tell me what to look
up. So, I'm trying my hardest to like
find it as you're speaking.
>> Go to Okay. Okay. So, here you go. I'll
type the link because you're you're a
little bit slow. Okay. So, I was reading
it for you because you asked me to read
it because you didn't want to look.
>> I never asked any of that.
>> Okay. You asked where's the evidence? I
gave you the evidence and now you want
the link. So, there go.orld.
Dude, I know how to do There's a search
uh on the DOJ website. You can also
search. I'm asking what to search, but
it's fine. I I'll I'll find it.
>> Robert Maxwell threatened MSAD.
Cuff, thank you for the rain.
Appreciate.
>> So, when I type in Robert Maxwell, when
I type in Robert Maxwell, it says no
results.
>> When I type in what you asked me to type
in.
>> Okay.
>> I'm going to go to the justice.gov
>> page. Hold on one sec.
I typed in word for word what you asked
me to type in. Did you spell the word
correctly?
>> Sure did.
Okay. So, now I'm on the justice
website.
>> And the DOJ, they have been covering up
pictures like they cover a picture to
Howard Lutnick, another tycoons. Okay.
So, this is on justice.gov. I'm actually
reading straight from the actual source.
>> Yeah. Which they which they they've
omitted
that as the most credible source. They
omitted the Howard Lutnik pictures.
>> This is not omitted. This is reading
straightforward words, not
>> I know, but they omitted Howard Lutnik.
They they got rid of the Secretary of
Commerce on
>> Cool. So, this is what it says straight
from the government website, straight
from the Epstein files. The late
tycoon's daughter fled Britain and now
resides in Manhattan where the Columbus
connection emerges. Roser reported that
a one-time partner of Epste, an
immensely powerful New York property
developer and financer. Other newspaper
reports have described Ebstein as
everything from a concert pianist,
corporate spy, math teacher, stock
broker, merchant banker, and globe
trotting businessman. He has steadfastly
denied rumors of links to the Israeli
MSAD. Maxwell denied similar connections
just prior to his accident at sea. So ju
I don't like taking Epstein's words for
it because he's again a piece of [ __ ]
I'm simply saying this is what he said
because you're also going with what
Epstein said, which I think is
ridiculous.
>> So, okay. So then let's rule that out.
Let's let's let's talk about
>> from the Department of Justice.
>> Leslie Wexter and Leon Black were the
main financeers of Jeffrey Epsteine.
That's how he funded all of his
properties where he raped little kids to
blackmailed people to support the state
that you're showing for.
>> Yeah, I think all that's disgusting,
too. But do how do you know he did this
for the state and not just people who
were also just like Well, almost done.
Just like how there were many other
officials of other governments who
worked with Epstein. How do you know
that these weren't just people in the
Israeli uh positions, not just
government, but higher positions that
also did stuff with him, just like
Clinton did stuff with him? That doesn't
mean I think Donald Trump or America is
doing this.
>> Do you know what all this has in common?
>> Yeah. Go ahead.
>> You're googling again. You You ask a
question. I'm All this has in common,
these places, there are connections to
Israel, right? You're saying, "Okay, he
was there with American politicians. He
was there. There's Trump is all over the
files. Who did Trump just bring our
country into war with? He brought our
country to war with Iran to support
Israel.
>> Trump was all over the files.
>> Explain why.
>> Okay. Adding words is okay.
>> Not in any nefarious way that we know of
as of now.
>> Well, he did say Epstein had a lot of
beautiful young women. Some of them very
young. A lot of beautiful women. So,
yeah, maybe it's just a coincidence that
he was bringing children around him.
pictures of younger, not children, but
some pictures.
>> Epste files. You say you studied the
Epstein files. The Epstein files also
showed that he turned him in before any
of this was even in the news and he
called him a horrible guy. So again,
it's just it's just ridiculous. Like if
something came out and we knew I think
you don't understand the difference
between like evidence and proof. You
keep saying you have proof and you're
giving speculation. You're right. Trump
could be a PDF file, whatever you want
to call it, right? He totally could be.
And if he is, and it's proven, not your
speculation, Sneo, not evidence that
maybe you speculate this way and some
people speculate that way. If there's
proof, I'd be more than glad to call him
a piece of [ __ ] Just as disgusting.
>> If they ever release If they ever all of
them,
>> yeah, if they if they ever release all
the files, they only release less than
half and probably far less than they
have. They've omitted a lot of them, but
I'm sure it would implicate
>> It's definitely more than half.
>> Definitely not. They
>> They said there's three million pages
left. There's been more than 3 million.
I don't know if you think math works.
>> Look up the terabytes since you don't
know what you're talking about. Look at
the amount of gigabytes of files that
released compared to the total amount
because if like legitimate files uh yes
paperwork and everything but the amount
of gigabytes it's not even close but you
didn't know
>> or so if you're if you're wondering why
that he's working with and he has
connections to Saudi Saudi works with
Israel right in a lot of ways they do
trade with them they've allied with them
directly or indirectly America's
completely
>> Saudi
>> yeah oil of course
>> you said
>> America you're saying Saudi Arabia
>> okay let me answer your original
question before you keep on deflecting
to run away from pedophile.
>> You mean trying to go back to our
original topic before you deflected to
Epste because I'm losing the debate.
>> I am making you asked why was he there
working with leaders of all over the
world?
>> First off, I never brought up Epstein.
You brought it up because you were
losing the original argument.
>> I'm answering your question. I am
answering.
>> That's fine. But if you say deflect one
more time when you literally deflected,
which we'll all see the recording when I
post all of this when you see you
deflect to
>> see one of your questions.
>> Yeah. Okay. We'll all see it. Trust me.
Actually, Epc is not. You have the flag
of a country right behind you that would
not exist right now and not have the
power over our country without EPC.
That's why I'm talking about it. It's
more relevant than ever. These files
have just been released a couple weeks
ago and now we're
>> So, Israel had no control over America
prior to Epstein. Okay, that's
interesting. I've never heard
>> they had overwhelming control
afterwards. You ask, why are so many
world leaders implicated on this? The
coincidence is all these people also
have ties with Israel and are also
supporting Israel. I just said that. You
said peace of the a lot of people are
saying Saudi has direct connections to
Israel. That's why they treat the US
dollar and that's why they're not
supporting.
>> Nobody says that by the way. Saudi Saudi
But you're just wrong. Saudi is trying
to get into Abraham accords but as of
right now they haven't. I think you're
confusing the UAE maybe with Saudi
Arabia. I'm not sure.
>> Okay. So you think Saudi Arabia and
Israel are trading back and forth?
>> Can you say yes to that, please?
>> Of course of of course. Of course they
are.
>> Perfect. Thank you.
>> Okay. Of course they are. Go Google it
because you don't know what you're
talking about. Then you asked about
America and you said, "Why are so many
American politicians working with
Epstein?" The coincidence is our country
is completely subverted because shills
like you are promoting the same slop
that people like Epstein were promoting.
Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, Bill Gates,
all these people.
>> There you go, guys. Just Googled it like
he asked.
>> It says formal diplomatic It says formal
diplomatic relations. It says formal
diplomatic relations.
>> Yep. Mhm. And it also
>> say read it. Read it.
>> I am. It also has no official trade or
business ties exist with Israel while
official B. Right. Correct. That's what
you said.
>> Official. Continue. Continue. Continue.
>> Sure. It says while official bilateral
trade figures are attempting to be
processed through the Abraham Accords.
As of right now, there is no trade. Now,
are you saying unofficially like they're
doing it in secret? Is that what you're
>> said? They traded oil, right?
>> Look, we can go back to Epstein. It's
fine. But you made a claim. You said oil
specifically.
>> Oil with America. US and Israel. US.
>> That's not what you said. You said Saudi
Arabia and Israel.
>> US is US is Israel right now. It's the
same. They are the same
>> because of the That's what you meant,
Nico. That's That's what you meant. Got
it. Perfectly.
>> Absolutely. They've made that clear with
this war that you're promoting that US
and Israel are the same.
>> You're just too proud to say, you know
what, I was wrong to say that Israel and
Saudi Arabia traded oil. So you're
trying to be like, "Oh, I meant that
America." Just Dude, you got it wrong.
It's fine.
>> Dude, are are you too slow to explain
the connections? Okay. So you want to
figure out
>> So when you said when you said Saudi
Arabia and Israel traded oil, you really
meant America and Saudi Arabia. Got it.
Sure, bud.
>> US and Israel are the same. It's traded
with the pro dollar. They use the US
dollar. Israel benefits off this dollar.
The Rothschild central bank system
controls American banks. Trading with
the US is trading with Israel. These are
the same. They've made that clear. This
is why the GCC countries are being
bombed right now. If you didn't know
that, you were ignorant.
>> So, back to Epstein. Anyways, when you
type in here, I screenshotted it for
you. When you type in MSAD and Maxwell
together, only one document shows up,
which specifically talks about
>> the DOJ.
>> Uh, this is from the full This is
searching the full Epstein library.
>> The full everything that's been
released.
>> Yep. No, no, no. They omitted a picture
that was then found of Howard Lutnik,
the the current Secretary of Commerce
under Trump right now hovering over him,
the guy who was absent
>> because they omitted that picture and
you're using that website as a source
like, "Oh, there's only one email." Even
though you also conceded that they
haven't released the majority of the
files, so you don't know what you're
talking about. Again, they are hiding so
much of this and already from what
they've released, there is so much
conclusive evidence. This is extreme.
You're saying that
>> this is not a street.
>> Can you tell me how you got your
information then?
>> It's been leaked.
>> It's been leaked. Oh, wow. By who?
>> So many so many of these images been
leaked.
>> Sounds like Candace.
>> So, this isn't So, you're saying this
isn't from the FC files. This is by some
other website that told you this is a
real thing. Is that what you're saying,
Sneo?
>> Yes. The Department of Justice made
errors and some of the names that were
originally COVERED UP.
>> HE SAID IT WAS THE SD FILE.
>> YEAH. You know whose name was originally
redacted files so much?
>> Can you do me a favor? Can you tell me
who leaked it?
>> No, no, no. I can't. I can't. Do you
want to know this was that? They
unredacted these files.
>> I wish I asked him that in the very
beginning. That's hilarious.
>> You're You're
explaining.
>> Yeah, because I realized you've been
lying this whole time. I thought you
were searching the Epstein files.
>> You told me you're searching some random
thing. That's why, by the way, he didn't
want to show me because he didn't want
to see that he was just reading from
some [ __ ] western.
>> You're willfully look you're you're
willfully looking away because you don't
want to admit that you're holding up the
flag of a country that exists.
Thank you for admitting that because you
want because you want to trust the
government releasing these
>> Can we get back to Israel Palestine
anytime soon? Yeah, because you got
[ __ ] smoked on that [ __ ] argument.
>> You don't know what you're talking
about.
>> He admitted he didn't.
>> You're going to talk over me the whole
time. a pedophile. Yeah, cuz you're a
[ __ ] liar. This whole time I thought
you were talking about I thought you
were talking about the Epstein files. I
thought you were talking about the
Epstein files the whole time and the
whole time you were just [ __ ] reading
from some [ __ ] website that you told
it was a leaked thing.
>> This has been confirmed.
>> Oh, confirmed by who?
>> You said it's been confirmed by who?
>> Yeah. No, by who? NO. NO. GO AHEAD,
SNEO. Tell me who has confirmed. Okay.
How?
>> Confirmed by who?
And the Leslie Wexler leak.
>> Yeah. No, no, I'm I'm asking confirmed
by who? You said it was confirmed by
who?
>> Okay.
>> It's been confirmed, but they won't
release it.
>> This is the best part of my life.
>> Photo of Lutnik. This is CBS News. This
is uh one of the Goyam news sites that
you probably believe in.
>> The article reads, "Potonik on island
removed removed from
Justice Department.
>> Wait a minute. So, you're saying the
Justice Department released it
and then they removed it?
>> You said they released it and then
removed it, right?
>> Right.
>> A photo release,
>> right?
>> A photo.
>> You wanted the source. I'm reading you
the source.
>> You said they released it. Why would
they release it if they're controlled by
the Who authorized that release? I
thought you said it was
>> a photo.
>> Huh?
>> Oh my god. Do you LIKE ARGUING
SEMANTICS?
>> FOR THEM TO remove something, that means
they put it out there first. You agree
with that, right? Listen to this. A
photo released last month by the Justice
Department as part of the Epstein files
showed commerce secretary Howard Lutnik
with convicted sex offender Jeffrey
Epstein on Epstein Island in the
Caribbean was removed from the Justice
Department's website before being
restored Thursday night. So, it was
removed and then it was readded.
>> You said it was leaked. You said it was
leaked and now you're saying they did
release it and then re-restored it.
>> Is all you have semantics? It was
>> It's not semantics. Your whole point was
based off of that. You said, "I
shouldn't trust a website." Remember
what you originally said that you
already forgot? You said, "I cannot
trust this website because they remove
stuff or don't release it." And I said,
"How do you know that?" You said, and I
quote, "Well, it was leaked and
confirmed is leaked." I said, "Confirmed
by who?" And then you admitted that they
reput it back out there.
within
somebody in the Justice Department
released after somebody in the Justice
Department who's not been identified
because they're covering up for people
like people like you are covering up.
They originally removed it from the
files. This was originally not supposed
to be a part of it and someone who had
access to the Justice Department's
website restored it there. That is what
a leak is.
>> So why can't I trust this website then?
Cuz you told me originally don't trust
them because they're not giving us
information.
>> Prove that people are omitting the
files. [ __ ] Someone from THE INSIDE
IS NOT RELEASING ALL THE INFORMATION AND
THEN IT WAS RELEASED. THAT'S THE WHOLE
>> So why can't I trust it now?
>> So why can't I trust it now if they're
actively doing this to release it?
>> Not all of the information is there. You
can
>> So what's not there about Maxwell and
Msad? I just looked it up.
>> And going back to the original point,
you said there's only one email about
Maxwell and I'm telling you not all the
files are released. So, how do you know?
>> We have many references not from the
Epstein files that show former Israeli
prime minister saying
>> Robert Maxwell did more for Israel that
could even be stated today. So, you want
sources from many different sources that
Robert did. I have sources from Israeli
Prime Minister. I have sources from the
Justice Department.
>> Oh my god. I've never seen somebody try
to weasle their way out of something
that is so blatantly obvious to
everybody. You are realizing now that
you're covering up for pedophile island
to support the Jewish star behind you,
the star of David.
>> Anyways, I typed in also the Howard Lutn
photo. Zero results. He said that it was
put out there after on Thursday. Zero
results. That's insane. It's like he
keeps lying
>> because did you not just say that?
>> That is wild. It was released and then
it was omitted. That's the whole point.
>> And then you said they re-released it,
right? Did you not just say that?
>> And then the article says it was
omitted. So it was released on the
website and then they omitted it. Dum
dum.
>> This photo exists now.
>> This article.
>> The photo exists now.
>> Yeah, this article.
>> There's many.
>> Right.
>> That's not the one I was reading.
There's many.
>> You said CBS News.
photo of Lutnik on Epstein's Island,
right? That one.
>> Yeah, this is the one you were reading.
I can tell on your face.
>> Yeah, definitely not in the files.
That's crazy.
>> I hope everyone can see this, right? Can
everyone type a warning if you can see
that instead of having a conversation
about how clearly work for Israel, he's
saying you said leak, not remove, you
said restore. It's restored, not leaked.
It's like the snakeiest. It's the
snakiest. I've never seen somebody talk
like this because it's the most
disingenuous conversation I've ever
seen. Instead of just saying what's Oh,
you said leaked when you really meant
restored. You said it wasn't trustworthy
because you were putting evidence. It's
just you're just trying to go to
semantics the entire conversation.
>> Dude,
>> nobody's stuttering. You're the
stuttering.
>> EVERYBODY'S SEEING WHAT YOU'RE DOING.
EVERYBODY'S seeing the snaky tactics.
>> I don't
now that I provided evidence.
Jewish next door to Jeffrey.
>> I don't see why that matters. What does
this have to do? What does this have to
do with the Israeli government? Like,
yes, I agree. There are a lot of
officials
for Israel.
>> Did Epstein work for Israel?
>> Again, you have done an awful job at
proving any of this.
>> I can't answer. I've answered all of
your questions. You can answer.
>> So, I'm I'm trying to I'd be more than
glad to answer.
>> Can you tell me how is
>> one more question? Can you tell me how
any of this means he worked for like all
of Israel? Can you tell me? I agree. He
had relationships with people in Israel.
>> Again, semantics.
>> NO, NOT LITERALLY ALL OF ISRAEL
is insane. Not literally the word of
Israel.
>> He's he's yelling over me again because
he doesn't want me to explain.
>> Israel, right? Are you saying
>> right? I got you.
>> It's so The cope is insane. He yells
over you when he doesn't want to hear
the whole sentence. I'm not literally
saying all of Israel like just answer
question.
>> I'm asking a question. I'm asking one
question. It's a yes or no question.
Okay. He doesn't want to hear it because
he knows he's losing.
>> I'm asking question for Israel
>> based off of what you gave me. No.
Definitely not.
>> No. No. No. Based off of what you said.
No.
You have done an awful job at
describing. So, can I ask a question
now? Can I ask a He doesn't want He
doesn't want to hear it. No.
>> You're asking You're asking me. He's
still
>> Did you see wearing an IDF shirt?
>> Did you see him wearing an IDF shirt in
the You see that picture
>> about the one on the plane that was
debunked?
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah, that was debunked, dude. Yeah, it
was uh it was No, it wasn't actually
even AI. People said it was AI. It was
actually just photoshopped and they
found it because the lighting on his
face actually didn't match the lighting
on the plane. Literally, that is not
official. That's embarrassing cuz that
was debunked like that was debunked like
six months ago.
>> Wexer,
>> wait, hold on. Are you I want to hear
about this photoshoppinger. Okay.
>> He literally, look at him. He's turning
red. He just brought up a photoshopped
photo that was debunked over six months
ago. That is insane.
>> Anyways, can I ask a question real
quick? Are you asking He doesn't want to
hear it because he's losing the
argument.
>> He doesn't want to hear it. Pieces of
evidence.
>> I got it. And I So I can't So I can't
ask anything about the pieces of
evidence you brought up.
>> So why does I want you to hear that? I
want you to say that real quick. Are you
saying I'm not allowed to ask any
questions about the evidence you brought
up? I'm not I'm asking about Epstein.
I'm not allowed to ask anything.
>> You made a statement. You said
absolutely no. Jeffrey Epstein did not
work for
>> based off of what you're forcing me to
say because you won't let me speak.
>> I'm not to say this.
>> You are because you're not letting me
ask anything. You're just you're
interrupting because you're losing the
debate hard. You brought up a
photoshopped photo that was debunked 6
months ago. This is after you deflected
cuz you were losing Israel Palestine. So
you're like, I WANT TO TALK ABOUT EPSIL.
I WANT TO TALK ABOUT EPSTEIN BECAUSE
BECAUSE I'M LOSING ISRAEL PALESTINE. I
am trying to every single point. I cook
you the whole time. Okay. Well, we'll
see. You know what is confirmed? What is
confirmed and not photoshop? What is
confirmed?
>> So, he's still not he's still not
letting me ask any questions about
Epstein. It's insane. He wants to push a
narrative, but he doesn't want to have a
conversation about it. This is a very
clear tactic.
>> You can't look away. This is not even
some like trying to do debate rhetoric.
>> Once again, once again, Epstein is
disgusting. He's awful. And if people
work for him, I don't care if they're an
Israeli official. And you got to you got
to remember how I am as soon as you go
on that you run cover for pedophile
island and you will look away from I
don't know if you're getting 7K
I get way more than that. I get 10k I
get 10k a post actually.
>> Tell me worships a pedophile. How does
he feel about that?
>> See there's only one person that
worships a pedophile. I get paid $10,000
a post. No, actually 20,000. Tell your
followers that. $20,000 a post by
straight from BBnet and Yahoo to my bank
account. So can I ask my question?
>> Was that your attempt to humor? You
should stick to the
>> No, it wasn't humor. Totally true. 100%
true. Um, anyways,
>> you get you get Wait, so you're being
honest right now? You're
>> $20,000 a post.
>> $20,000 a post.
>> So, you are a [ __ ] slave.
>> Yep. Yep. That's It actually says that
on the check. [ __ ] slave. $20,000.
>> Okay. So, you're not funny. You're
trying to joke around. Stick to the, you
know, semantics conversation. You are
the most unfunny, zesty, Epstein show.
>> I'm laughing. Anyways, back to what I
was saying. Are you asking me?
>> No, no, no. if it was an official Are
you asking if it was an official source
by Israel like they did some kind of
program or are you saying did he have
relationships with people in Israel
including like EU Barack etc. Is that
your question?
>> Cuz yes I believe or I know he had
relationships with these people. That's
true. Just as much as he had
relationships with other people that
doesn't mean I think that they
>> Nobody's asking again another one of
your stupid sneaky semantic tactics.
Nobody's asking about the relationships
he had. He was friends with people all
over the world. He was a socialite. The
question was who did he work for? Who
did he work for?
>> Yeah, I do not think he worked for
Israel.
>> And based off of the information you've
given me so far, it does not prove that.
>> Then who did he work for? Right. That
was he just doing this for fun.
>> What do you mean doing it for fun?
>> Why was he doing this?
>> I believe that there's a lot of people
who are rich and they're so rich that
they attempt next after being rich. They
attempt for power and a lot of them do
disgusting things for power. I think
that's what he was chasing. Now again,
based off of your information that
you've given me, you've done an awful
job at trying to convince me.
>> So this was not okay. Okay. So it's it
was just fun. It was like a theme park
for PE.
>> I didn't say that at all. You're
changing the word cuz you're strong
maning my argument this whole time.
>> Was it was this was this a black say
that again without
>> Here's the link.
>> Here's the Justice Department link from
earlier.
>> There you go. There's the MSAD link.
You're not going to click it because uh
you want to look away, but here's the
Robert Maxwell clip. This is what
Epstein's saying that Robert Maxwell was
assassinated by MSAD.
>> You want to click that
>> uh again. And the one that I read said
the opposite. Why is yours more
appropriate than Why is yours more
appropriate? Okay. Again, it's funny how
you don't like to hear any counters.
It's like it's interesting. Why is it
that what yours
>> Wait, are you not going to click this
link? You wanted this link before. I
couldn't source it and I'm sourcing it
so that you could read it.
>> Couldn't source it. So, you admit you
didn't have it originally. Fine. I will
click it. But can I ask a question? See,
look. I clicked it.
>> Yeah, I had an image. I had an image,
but I didn't have it from the source.
Good boy. You clicked it. Now you go
read it. Go learn up. Go figure out what
makes this What makes this any more or
less than the other email where he said
he didn't have this uh connections to
the MSAD? Why is this, which is by
Jeffrey Epstein, why is this something
that I should automatically believe, but
Jeffrey Epstein also saying the
opposite? I shouldn't. Also, why does
Robert Maxwell, even if this was true,
Robert Maxwell was threatened by the
assault? Let me read it real quick.
Robert Maxwell threatened MSAD. Oh, it
says he threatened MSAD.
>> Send it to me.
>> Okay. Uh, yeah. One second. So, he
>> The subject of the email is he was
passed away.
>> Hold on a sec.
>> Okay. So, it says Robert Maxwell
threatened MSAD. uh H equals sign told
them that unless they gave him 400
million to save his
Kremlin equal empire he would expose all
he had done for them in that time he had
free access to Margaret Thatcher's
Downing Street T equal Ronald Reagan's
White House to the Kremlin. Huh? To the
Kremlin. That's interesting. Wait, are
you going to ignore that part?
>> Keep reading.
>> Sure.
>> Finish it. It's interesting how it also
says Russia in here. But okay, let's
keep reading. And to the corridors of
power throughout Europe. Oh. Oh, not
just Russia, also European powers. Okay,
interesting. We're just going to ignore
that, of course. Maxwell passed on all
the secrets he learned MSAD in Tel Aviv
in turn. Oh, so he betrayed the MSAD and
started giving powers to Russia and
Europe. This is really debunking you.
Let's keep going.
>> What is the subject line? They tolerated
his excess. Hold on. Let's keep reading.
Let's keep reading. This is great. In
turn, they tolerated his excesses,
vanities, and insatuable appetite for a
luxurious lifestyle and women. He told
his controllers who they should target
and how they should do it. His
controllers being the Kremlin and
European powers. By the way, he
appointed himself as Israel's unofficial
ambassador to the Soviet block. Okay, so
Robert Maxwell, I just want to get this
right. Robert Maxwell, Gain Maxwell's
dad, who was the partner of Epstein, had
ties to the Kremlin and European powers.
Thank you for that, Sneo. I APPRECIATE
THAT. THAT was great.
>> You're proving my point.
>> Thank you. I appreciate that.
>> He has ties to American politicians and
>> Well, it doesn't say that, but perfect.
Thank you. Thank you for proving Thank
you for proving Robert Maxwell worked
for the Kremlin and European powers. I
really appreciate that, Sneo.
>> The fact that you you run away the the
whole point.
>> I literally read exactly what you asked
me to read and now you're freaking out.
>> It says Robert Maxwell threatened.
NOBODY'S FREAKING OUT.
>> YEAH. OH, HE WORKED against the massage.
Correct. That's what that means. Do you
agree? He
>> signed he tried he tried to extort them
after he had secrets of that. What
>> for the YouTube video?
>> So you agree Robert Maxwell turned his
back on Israel and the msad. Do you
agree?
>> OBVIOUSLY.
>> OH, OBVIOUSLY. PERFECT. OKAY. SO then he
started working with who?
>> Come on. Let's read it again. Sneo,
thank you so much for sending I I'm so
upset I didn't read this before and I
was doubting.
>> You were avoiding the most important
part. I'm reading what you asked me to
read and now that I want to talk about
it, now you're freaking out and you
don't want to talk about it. That's
insane. He said, "Click the link, read
it all, and now that I'm reading exactly
what it says." He no longer wants to
talk about that. This email proves that
he turned his back on the MSAD. He and
he said, "Obviously, Sneo said obviously
that's true. He turned his back on
Israel. He turned his back on the MSAD."
>> How did he get the secrets?
>> Well, first off,
>> how did he get the secrets?
>> Great. But he turned his back on them.
So by the time it would have reached
Epstein, how would he be a connection to
the MSAD if the MSAD was threatening him
because he turned his back on them? How
could he give Epste a connection to the
Msad?
>> How did he get MSAD secrets to extort
them?
>> Why does it matter? Your whole point is
that Epste
because Robert Maxwell, you just proved
Robert Maxwell turned his back on. One.
That was one piece of the a million
pieces of evidence.
>> Can you do me a favor? Do you know when
Robert Maxwell died?
>> Oh, yeah.
>> Do you know when Robert Maxwell died?
>> 1991.
>> Right. So before any of the stuff with
Epstein or any of the stuff we're
talking about, you just said that Robert
Maxwell He literally proved he literally
proved that Robert Maxwell turned his
back on the MSAD. He proved that he
turned his back on Israel. He proved he
had connections to Russia. He proved he
had connections to European powers. And
his whole point, remember the beginning,
remember the beginning of the argument,
the beginning of the argument, the
beginning of the argument was that
Robert Maxwell was a MSAD agent. And
because he was a MSAD agent, a bad faith
debilarious
because you like to fixate on
one aspect. I read THE WHOLE EMAIL. IN
FACT, I read the parts you left out last
time.
>> That's insane.
>> One piece of evidence of a million
pieces of evidence that
>> piece of evidence that debunked your
whole point,
>> right? That's true.
>> No, it doesn't. Because he had MSAD
secrets, you could only get that many
secrets by working with or for Assad.
>> And then betrayed Assad and started
working with Russia. Wow.
>> And then betrayed MSAD after obtaining
secrets because he worked for them,
[ __ ] Now, instead of doing bad faith
debating, let's talk about the bigger
point that this is
>> Oh, you want to go back to Israel
Palestine finally instead of this
deflection? Are we still on the
deflection?
>> I want you to answer about
>> He still wants to go on the deflection.
Okay, go ahead. What's your deflection?
>> My husband's going to get a reward for
this.
>> Wesley Wex and Leon Black. Okay. They
financed him. So, you are saying that
Epstein was just a pedophile having fun
in a theme park. You said this before.
You keep trying to go on tangent
tangents.
>> Yes. How dare I read the email you asked
me to read?
>> Terrible.
>> Was Epstein Island.
>> Was Epstein Island a blackmail
operation?
>> A what? I'm sorry.
>> Are you [ __ ] Can you not hear words
or are you just
>> His hands are shaking when he puts them
up?
>> Let Let me Let me let me say it slow for
you. Was Epstein a blackmail operation
>> against the United States or just
everyone?
>> In general,
>> for Israel specifically or just in
general?
>> No, no, no, no, no. I'm going to sleep
so well. I have I have to ask because
what happens is that I answer yes or no
and then you end up saying, "Oh, look.
He said yes to this."
>> A blackmail
operation
>> by
>> answer the question.
>> I have no idea. I'm not going to answer
your extremely vague question. I know
you want to get a vague question so you
can later say Nick said yes to this. You
saw it. Not doing it, dude. Not doing
it.
So Epste's not a blackmail operation. He
was just connecting billionaires,
politicians, world leaders all over the
world.
>> Getting them to sleep with underage
girls,
>> getting them to break.
>> Totally. He got them too. Of course,
it's because these guys are pedophiles.
Leave it to the Muslim to say they got
tricked into it. Of course. Okay.
>> More more semantics. More semantics.
>> He was So he was just doing this for
fun. Is that what you believe?
>> Literally never said that. Never once
said that. So, what do you So, what was
this about?
>> I already told you. Power. I already
said this. You answer You asked the same
question like 10 minutes ago. Answer
this already.
>> Power.
>> Power. Power for who?
>> For himself. I just I already answered
this. Do you not remember when you asked
this question 10 minutes ago?
>> Power for himself. Okay. So, he wanted
to get power, but he was financed
completely by billionaire Zionists,
right?
Why would billionaire Zionists fund him
if he was just doing this for power?
I think a lot of billionaires
absolutely are horrible people, right?
Because a lot of people when they gain
so much wealth that they don't they
can't spend it fast enough, they end up
going towards power and they see
themselves a lot of the times they deify
themselves. Okay? And when you deify
yourself, you end up doing a lot of
horrible things. Same thing with Diddy.
I don't think he was a Msad apparition
either. When you deify yourself, you do
these kind of things. A lot of
billionaires fall into that boat. I
don't automatically think billionaire
>> wasn't finance, right?
>> Diddy finance himself. Epste was
finance. He was propped up by rich
Jewish.
>> You're not really getting the point. The
point is that people deify themselves.
They do a lot of these disgusting
things. And a lot of people, by the way,
don't do that kind of things.
>> I again, you're really focusing on like
the you're focusing on the wrong.
>> Just pretend I didn't say Diddy so you
could stop deflecting. Just let's just
pretend I didn't say the word.
>> It's a bigger comparison. It's a big
analogy about doing this because
>> he really loves to def.
>> Yeah, I do. You said Diddy is comparable
to Epstein because they like to do
these. didn't say he was comparable to
Epstein, by the way. He's not
comparable.
>> The difference
>> diddy was not funded by Jewish
scientist. Epste was
>> Epste was funded by
>> Diddy is irrelevant to this at all. It
had nothing to do with Right. Not to say
he was comparable to Epste. I said that
when people deify themselves, they do
awful things. Did you not hear that part
or you just like ignoring it? You're
diddy and you got like all excited.
>> That's why it's not different.
>> Little Muhammad. Muhammad got excited.
He's like, "Oo, you
>> you worship a pedophile country and you
know you're shilling for people that
want to
>> I guess we're the same. I guess we're
the same then. We both worship
pedophiles. That's crazy.
>> I I only serve God. You worship shekels
and you're covering for pedophiles. It's
embarrassing."
>> Great. So, can I get back to you as if I
didn't say?
>> No, you can't. No, you can't. No, you
can't.
>> Literally never said Diddy was
comparable. I I never said I never said
Diddy was comparable to Epstein. You are
making this up because you don't want to
get debunked. So, you're going off of
this titty thing now.
>> Bad faith. Should I skip this guy? Tap
one in the chat if I should skip.
>> He wants to skip.
>> If you can't If you can't answer the
question,
>> he's running.
>> He was funded by Black. Yes. You want to
question? Look at him. Look at him run.
>> I want to finish what I was saying when
you started interrupting me. That's what
I want to I want to just finish what I
was saying.
>> Was he financed by Leon Black and Lesie
Wexler? This is insane. What's your new
deflection?
>> Was he financed by Leon Black and Lesie
Wexler? That's not Can you answer the
question? Was he assume based off of
what you said that's true? Yes.
>> You assume or you could look it up and
find
>> I'm just going to assume you're telling
the truth. So yes.
>> So you're not going to look this up for
yourself. Also, you can click right
here. The photo you said?
>> Yes.
>> The photo that you said was Photoshop of
him wearing an IDF shirt has been
confirmed by Telegraph UK. So here he is
on a plane.
>> Did you just say Telegraph? Oh my
[ __ ] god. First off, it wasn't
confirmed by Telegraph Genius. Telegraph
was the first one to release it based
off of the butler sources. One of the
new sources.
>> Oh my god. No, it's not. You love
semantics.
>> No, it's not. You're so dumb. Telegraph
was the first one to release it.
>> Telegraph was the first one to release
it. Genius. Holy [ __ ] Whoever Whoever's
texting you this information, you need
to tell them you they're fired.
>> Tell them they're fired.
>> Telegram's the one that released it for
the first time. Oh my god, that's
embarrassing. Holy [ __ ] Anyways,
>> this is how these people win. This is
HOW THEY
>> I JUST WANT TO FINISH WHAT I was saying.
You're the one that deflected to Epste
in the first place.
>> Answering very clear things. Oh my god.
Epstein was funded by Jewish
billionaires. Look it up for yourself.
It's all over the DOJ. It was funded by
Leslie Wex.
>> Guys, just so you know, this is the
Telegraph group. He's talking about the
UK site. This was the first one to just
FYI.
>> Just straight deceiving and lying.
>> Bro, I'm the one that allowed you to
deflect to Epste. And now that I'm
trying to This is conversation.
>> Israel would not have the power it is
today without Epstein. Really? Again,
this video will be released and it'll
show the time.
All right.
>> Yeah. Yeah. I edit it up, too, huh?
Yeah. Release it just like this, too.
Don't do
>> No [ __ ] problem.
>> Less Wexner.
>> No problem whatsoever. I promise you the
whole thing will be on the whole thing.
Whole thing will be up there.
>> YouTube comments. YouTube comments
>> right now. Right. If you're seeing this
part of the debate, you see how he's
running away from the fact that Leslie
Wexer, a Jewish scientist, funded him.
He said here in this conversation,
>> he said two things that you need to
remember from this conversation. He does
not think that Epstein worked for Israel
and he does not think that Epstein
Island was a blackmail operation. This
is who you're listening to. This is
somebody covering up for the most evil
island that anybody that the world has
ever seen. Left, right, he's going to
try to shake. Look at his hand.
>> No. Nobody could defend this. Nobody
could defend this. This is who is
pushing these lies. These types of
people running cover for take it back to
have not been vindicated yet. They've
been lying about them. They've been
covering it up. They haven't released
the files and now we're at war with
Iran. The people who are covering up
these files, they brought us into war
with Iran for Israel, which would not
exist without the pedophile black.
>> As for those among your women who have
ABHED