SnapSummary logo SnapSummary Try it free →
End Of 25/26 Season - Talking Wolves Podcast
Talking Wolves · Watch on YouTube · Generated with SnapSummary · 2026-06-02

00:01 526 campaign. Apologies that it's a

00:03 little bit later than usual as well. Of

00:05 course, we try and get those out. And

00:07 then last week was a little bit uh

00:08 mental, but we've got some news that we

00:10 can talk about. Of course, we'll touch

00:11 on Burnley a little bit. We'll talk

00:13 about our pre-season predictions as

00:15 well, which were is always good fun to

00:17 have a laugh about. Um, and then of

00:20 course answering some of your questions.

00:21 We are live on YouTube, so touchwood.

00:23 there's no sort of technical

00:24 difficulties uh throughout the evening,

00:27 but h it will be available as on an

00:29 audio podcast as always as well. But

00:32 alongside me today, I got three co-hosts

00:35 and Wolves fans to discuss uh the

00:37 action. We'll kick off with you, Finn.

00:39 Thanks for jumping on. How you keeping

00:40 mate?

00:41 >> All good, thank you, mate. Yeah, nervous

00:43 for these preseason predictions now you

00:45 mentioned them, but

00:46 >> I think you actually did okay when we

00:47 come on to them.

00:48 >> I feel like I was going Did I was going

00:50 down or if not 17? So, I think I'm I'm

00:52 safe with one, but yeah, I'm all good.

00:54 Thank you.

00:55 >> No, good. Uh George, good to have you

00:57 back on, mate. How you keeping?

00:58 >> Yeah, mate. All good, thank you. How are

01:00 you?

01:00 >> Yeah, all good. Weather has been not so

01:03 good over the last couple of days, has

01:05 it? Um, but yeah, I mean, last week was

01:07 glorious. That was I know I always bring

01:08 up the golf for you, Joel. That was

01:10 prime golf weather last week, mate.

01:12 >> I did play Wednesday last week um and

01:15 actually played in a match and uh

01:17 actually won for a change. So the form

01:20 after beating Don Goodman's gone

01:21 downhill, but I actually managed to get

01:22 a win again last Wednesday. Um, which

01:25 was nice. Um, and I spent the weekend in

01:27 Warsaw in Poland, so it was uh change

01:30 scenes got market or something then.

01:33 Okay.

01:33 >> No, no, no. Um, probably the same

01:36 quality as best market. No, I'm joking.

01:39 No, it was good.

01:40 >> Oh, it's the week. Was it this weekend?

01:41 The week my mate was on a stag do in

01:43 Warsaw. Uh, really?

01:44 >> I think it was I think it was it might

01:46 have been the weekend before, I think.

01:47 Uh yeah, because I saw him yesterday, so

01:49 wouldn't it wouldn't have been I'd have

01:52 had a different weekend to him. I went

01:53 to watch Olivia Dean.

01:57 >> Yeah, yeah, she was good live as well.

01:59 It was my wife's uh Christmas present,

02:01 but to be fair, it was sound solid. No

02:03 complaints

02:04 >> as in you couldn't get tickets.

02:06 >> Couldn't get couldn't get tickets in the

02:07 UK. No, basically it was that old that

02:10 typical thing like typical female thing

02:12 of two weeks before Christmas going,

02:13 "Oh, I know what I want now. I want

02:14 Livia Dean tickets." I'm like, "Okay, go

02:16 on ticket master and you got no chance."

02:18 So, I could either see her in Warsaw or

02:20 Oslo and I've already been to Oslo. I've

02:23 never been to Poland, so I was like,

02:24 going to Poland.

02:26 >> Happy days. There you go. Um, Harry as

02:29 well. Good to good to have you back on,

02:31 mate. How you keeping?

02:32 >> Very well, mate. Thank you. Very good.

02:33 Uh, it's been nice to not have any

02:35 football for the past couple of weeks.

02:36 So, yeah. Uh, all good, mate. Buzzing.

02:39 >> Setup sorted as well. I can see behind

02:41 you now.

02:42 >> Yeah, it's nice, mate. It's nice little

02:43 light going on there. That's my only

02:45 feature at the moment, but I'm uh got

02:47 plenty more to come.

02:49 >> Is that just because the you didn't fix

02:51 the paneling right and there's a massive

02:52 gap?

02:53 >> Let's not let's not talk about that

02:54 paneling. Let's not talk about the

02:55 paneling. I've had to angle in the

02:57 actual camera so you don't see the light

02:59 switch. It's absolutely dreadful. So

03:01 >> Oh, keep that covered, mate.

03:03 >> Yeah, I mean we learn. We live in I'm

03:05 sure we'll see more DIY SOS with Harry

03:08 Gil throughout the summer as well, but

03:09 we'll wait and see. Uh lads, thanks for

03:11 jumping on anyway and thanks for

03:12 everyone that's watching live on uh on

03:14 YouTube. You'll be able to watch it back

03:15 if you miss any part of the podcast and

03:17 of course you'll be able to listen to it

03:19 back on Spotify and Apple later on uh

03:21 from this evening. Uh we will touch on

03:23 Burnley. It seems like a lifetime ago

03:24 now, but Walls finished off the campaign

03:26 with a 1-1 draw at Turfmore. Thankfully,

03:30 it was an absolutely glorious day in

03:32 Burnley, which is a rarity up there, but

03:34 it was nice. Um Finn, we'll touch on the

03:37 match itself and what you remember of

03:38 it. I mean it was far from memorable but

03:41 a point on the road but a little bit

03:43 frustrating as I felt probably Burnley

03:45 edged it in the end.

03:47 >> Yeah being fully transparent I was doing

03:49 a lot of house moving stuff for the

03:50 first half so I only saw the second half

03:52 so I thought we were horrendous but I

03:53 have heard that there was well it

03:55 wouldn't be improvements because it

03:56 happened beforehand but I've heard we

03:57 were slightly better first half. You

03:59 were there Dave weren't you in the

04:02 >> Yeah. Um second half was just a

04:04 non-event even though I was watching it.

04:06 I spent half the time looking at my

04:07 phone. Um, but yeah, I even from what I

04:11 do remember, most of it's been a raise

04:12 now. Was it 29% possession or something

04:15 like that?

04:16 >> Wasn't really a way to go out and as you

04:18 say, it's it's at championship level. If

04:20 we' have finished 19th, it's the value

04:21 of an extra signing, isn't it really?

04:23 So, it's not like nothing was on the

04:24 line. Um, even though the neutral would

04:26 have seen it as our two teams on the

04:27 beach, they know their fate. There was

04:29 there was something on it. So, yeah,

04:30 disappointing. Um, especially from what

04:32 I saw, but it be forgotten very quickly.

04:36 >> Yeah, I forgot to ask you. Are you in

04:37 your new house now? That looks like your

04:38 standard setup or you

04:40 >> Yeah, imagine that's just a green

04:41 screen. No, I was we're in um we're in

04:43 the in the transition at the moment.

04:45 Although I've had to literally nip up

04:47 just before this because the new

04:49 neighbor text saying, "Oh, our tortoise

04:51 has escaped." Um apparently next door I

04:53 have a tortoise. So I figured that just

04:55 had to run around the garden look for a

04:56 tortoise. Couldn't find one and now I'm

04:57 back here. Um but yeah, we're in the

04:59 we've just ordered a sofa. This there's

05:01 nowhere to sit at the moment. We've

05:03 ordered a sofa. Um, so I'm still here

05:05 for now and then, yeah, we'll be moving

05:06 pretty soon. Don't know where I'm going

05:08 to be.

05:09 >> Sitting down in a deck chair in the

05:10 living room, the pizza,

05:11 >> camping chairs. Yeah, bean bags. We've

05:13 got a bean bag. We've got two dining

05:15 chairs now, so me and Jam can sit. But

05:17 yeah, we're getting there.

05:18 >> Yeah, Jordan, in terms of season finale,

05:20 it was far from eventful. I mean, for

05:22 Wolves anyway, our form at the end of

05:24 the campaigns tends to be pretty

05:26 underwhelming and pretty poor as well.

05:28 But, I mean, it didn't really do Rob

05:30 Edwards many favors, did it? I suppose

05:32 you always want to end the season on a

05:34 high and you always think we could try

05:35 and win that game and finish 19th, but I

05:37 think there would have just been that

05:38 little boost in morale and atmosphere

05:41 around the fan base going into the

05:42 summer, but you know, we're far from

05:44 good enough once again, really, were we?

05:47 >> No, but it's just one of those things,

05:48 isn't it? I think it would have been

05:51 nice not to come 20th. And actually,

05:53 when we hired Rob Edwards back in sort

05:56 of what, November time, October time, I

05:58 said if if we come if we if we don't

05:59 finish bottom, he's done a good job. and

06:01 that would have go against everything

06:02 I've said over the last few weeks. So,

06:04 I'm not saying kind of glad we didn't

06:06 win because that sounds bad, but I was I

06:08 was almost eating my own words there a

06:09 little bit. Um,

06:11 >> look like I think it's been a horrible

06:13 season. If we'd have won on against

06:15 Burnley, would it have made any

06:16 difference? Maybe 1% right, but um it's

06:21 just been a poor season as we all know.

06:23 And I think now it's just being trying

06:25 to be optimistic and looking forward to

06:26 next season really. I think if we'd have

06:28 gone to Burnley and stuck four or five

06:30 past them, does it carry any weight into

06:33 the first game of the Championship

06:34 season in August? Probably not to be

06:36 honest with you. Um it just been nice

06:38 for the fans that have traveled up

06:39 there, put a smile on the face. And

06:41 again, I I didn't watch the game live.

06:43 Um I actually went to the Furs and

06:44 sacked it off and had a Desi instead.

06:46 But

06:47 >> um you know, for the fans that did go,

06:49 you know, it' have been it' have been a

06:50 nice thing for th for those fans and and

06:52 and give them a good send off. But um

06:55 yeah, to be honest with you, I'm just

06:56 glad it's over.

06:58 >> Yeah, I think most of us in the same

07:00 camp. Weirdly, I was at the first

07:01 probably the night before cuz I did the

07:03 old Gold Pack shirt launch and then I

07:04 went to uh the Furs for a Mixie after

07:06 that. It's one of those I think a Desi

07:08 Pub is one of the only places like if

07:10 you want food at like 10 p.m. they'll

07:12 they'll still be serving because I think

07:14 it was about 10:00 after I left the uh

07:16 the launch and my mate was desperate for

07:18 some food. I said, "Well, get a Dixie."

07:19 He's like, "Nah." And yeah, so we went

07:22 to the first. It was all right. But

07:23 yeah, that is the old goal pack shirt. I

07:24 think there are still limited numbers

07:26 available if anyone wants to uh check

07:28 them out. Just uh just find just go on

07:30 the website. Um Harry Adam Armstrong on

07:32 the score sheet. It was nice to actually

07:33 get a V decision go away uh as well. And

07:36 you know he's going to be a part of the

07:38 squad next season. So I suppose it's

07:39 nice moment for him to to get his name

07:41 on the score sheet once again.

07:43 >> Yes, of course. Always good to get

07:44 yourself especially as a striker a bit

07:46 of confidence. I know it's the last game

07:48 of the season so I'll probably forget

07:50 about that by the time preseason comes

07:51 around. Uh but even so, it's nice to see

07:54 your actual striker scoring goals for

07:55 you and he took his penalty really well

07:58 and that's what you want to see. I I

08:00 haven't been too impressed with our

08:02 penalty takers this season.

08:04 >> They've all been pretty poor. Uh so it

08:07 was good to see him dispatch that that

08:08 one um a couple of weeks back and and

08:11 yeah, I look forward to seeing what he

08:13 can do next season in a Championship.

08:15 >> Yeah, it's frustrating because obviously

08:16 the Palace game which was Too was I

08:18 don't know if I can't remember if

08:19 Armstrong was on the pitch at that

08:20 point. um in that game but you know that

08:23 Palace game if we score that penalty you

08:25 go won the look probably into Halime

08:27 completely different game that that

08:29 would have been that was in in the midst

08:31 of sort of the Arsenal and Villa and

08:32 Liverpool games you know you had another

08:34 three points there I know look we were

08:37 relegated quite comfortably in the end

08:38 but it certainly would have made that

08:40 post international break running a

08:41 little bit more interesting we missed we

08:43 oh Strand Lson wasn't it as well earlier

08:45 on I think that was Brenford pre

08:47 Christmas

08:48 >> um so yeah it's just frustrating that we

08:50 you know have those golden

08:52 opportunities. But um be nice, you know,

08:55 nice to to get on the score sheet. Just

08:56 frustrating that we can go and get all

08:58 three points in the end. We saw um J

09:02 Abby as well uh Finn breaks record,

09:05 youngest Premier League player, second

09:06 youngest player in the club's history as

09:08 well. I don't I'm not expecting to see

09:10 him in the match day squad every week uh

09:12 next year, but do you think that's just

09:14 Rob Edwards, you know, um rewarding a

09:17 player? Is it a message to the board, do

09:20 you think? or is it walls trying to sort

09:22 of pin down one of them more promising

09:24 youngsters to new a new contract again

09:26 or all of the

09:27 >> when he maybe when he came on I was

09:30 convinced Sky got his name wrong as well

09:32 because wasn't is it has he got an older

09:34 brother that was in the academy

09:35 >> yeah Jerome no so I I I tweeted that out

09:37 first wrong actually

09:40 I deleted it because yeah Jerome Abby is

09:42 a little bit older used to be in the

09:43 academy as well

09:44 >> yeah wrong about it must have been a

09:46 football manager name or something and I

09:47 was convinced I got it wrong but yeah um

09:49 who Who was the Who did he break the

09:51 record of for us? Who was was it Morgan?

09:53 Was he 16

09:54 >> in the Premier League? I think

09:55 >> Oh, Premier, of course, because he came

09:57 on in the FA Cup, didn't he at 16

09:59 something against

10:00 >> Stoke? Uh, I was trying to think.

10:02 >> Um, either way,

10:03 >> I was going to say Mano, but obviously

10:04 he isn't Mane or was it when he came on

10:06 against um came on against what under

10:09 Vtor Pereira? I

10:10 >> for someone in the comments. That's the

10:12 beauty of being

10:12 >> scoring.

10:15 I think maybe score three outside the

10:17 box and be Portuguese or whatever it

10:19 was.

10:20 Yeah, that was the that was a good

10:22 start. Yeah. Or unless anybody in the

10:23 comments because I know Anthony Ford was

10:25 up there with the youngest player back

10:26 in but I'm talking like 18. So he

10:28 probably smashed that record actually. I

10:30 think

10:31 >> I can't think.

10:32 >> Um but aside from that he loo looked

10:34 okay, didn't he? Um didn't stand out in

10:36 positively or negatively massively but

10:38 yeah was um look sharp. Didn't quite

10:40 have a Tomdozi debut but not everyone

10:42 can. And um yeah, it might be a name

10:44 that I don't know with um with 14y olds

10:47 getting snapped up from our academy. Is

10:48 it one way? Yeah, they're just trying to

10:49 um to maybe tempt him to stay, but it it

10:52 does seem tough out there in the the

10:53 academy scene. So, yeah, I don't know if

10:55 maybe we'll see on the bench as you say

10:57 a few times next year. Not expecting

10:58 massive things, but we said that of

11:00 Manet, what was he 17 last year? 17 18

11:03 and then look what he's done. So, yeah,

11:05 promising.

11:06 >> Yeah, I think I was just trying to uh

11:08 see there. Sharky thinks it was uh Matt.

11:12 Can I flag up? Oh, there you go. Can I

11:13 flag up a comment on the screen there?

11:14 Um he reckons it was Brighton um for

11:17 Matteas Mana. I think that was under um

11:19 Bour Pereira, wasn't it? So I was just

11:22 going to try and see if uh I can quickly

11:24 go on to FB Ref, but as you can imagine

11:25 with all these ads and stuff, it's not

11:27 so easy. Um but yeah, I I do agree. I

11:30 think in terms of, you know, the club

11:32 trying to keep all the players, you

11:34 know, it's come out over the last couple

11:35 of days, it's the 14y old goalkeeper,

11:37 which Zack Trinda, which I think Matt

11:39 Jackson was talking about in the fans

11:40 forum, wasn't he? So um yeah, it's

11:42 pretty obvious. Yeah, it was it was

11:44 Matteas Mané and then that he beat

11:46 Anthony Ford was the one before him as

11:48 well. So Jerome Abby's smashed it by

11:50 almost a whole year to be fair. So um

11:53 interesting to see where the future

11:55 takes uh takes him. Anyway, we'll move

11:57 on. That's from the the Burnley game

12:00 itself because again I don't think

12:01 there's much to uh to write home about.

12:03 Let's let's jump into probably one of

12:05 the the fun parts of the podcast. Let's

12:08 react to some of those preseason

12:10 predictions as well before we look

12:11 towards the summer and uh beyond. Uh

12:15 let's start off with the top goal

12:17 scorer, George. Can you remember who you

12:18 predicted for this?

12:21 >> I'm probably just going to say it was

12:23 Strand Larson.

12:24 >> Yeah. Um we all did actually. It was so

12:27 the preseason podcast was me, George,

12:29 and Finn, and we all said Jorgen Strand

12:31 Larson. Now, if we're talking all

12:33 competition,

12:33 >> he wasn't far off. Well, if you're

12:35 talking all competitions, he he was top

12:37 scorer with six

12:39 >> uh alongside

12:41 >> I was talking about all competitions,

12:42 Dave.

12:43 >> Yeah, definitely. Yeah. If you're

12:45 talking Premier League, um yeah, he was

12:49 >> Yeah. No, I think Well, in the Prem he

12:51 scored once for us, didn't he? So, um

12:53 yeah, but in the Premier League, it was

12:54 level top goal scorers with three goals

12:56 each. Santiago Bueno, Matteas Mane, Tu,

12:59 and Rodrigo Gomez. So, um, yeah, we

13:03 could say we got that right, but I I'd

13:06 feel dirty saying that to be honest,

13:07 considering how bad that was. And how

13:09 many Scott goals did he score? Was it

13:10 three against four against Shrewsbury?

13:12 Was it?

13:13 >> So, um, did we do

13:15 >> you know these predictions? Was it

13:16 before or after the Newcastle stuff? Was

13:18 it like did we do it after the transfer

13:20 window?

13:20 >> Uh, it was before it was uh before it

13:22 was start of the season. So, and then so

13:24 the Newcastle stuff was a couple of week

13:25 like a week or so after.

13:27 >> Yeah.

13:28 >> Yeah. because it was towards the end of

13:29 the uh end of the season, wasn't it? Um

13:32 most assists.

13:34 Um George, you went with

13:37 >> Je

13:40 was going to go Jean Aras, but you said

13:41 to be different, you go Xiao Gomez. And

13:44 I went with Aras as well, but did give a

13:46 shout out to Hugo Bueno. Um so in all

13:50 competitions, our most assist was

13:51 actually Hang, believe it or not. Four

13:53 assists. Yeah, he got he got four

13:55 assists. If we're talking Premier

13:57 League, um it was a level with four

14:00 players. You got Müller Woler, Hugo

14:02 Bueno, Adam Armstrong, and Hang with two

14:04 each.

14:05 >> We're g man. We are. We are dreadful.

14:08 >> But yeah, we I mean I shouted Hugo on

14:11 the pod. George, you also mentioned

14:12 Müller Woler, but you were disappointed

14:14 with his display against Celt. So know

14:17 from that you

14:18 >> he was running through mud against

14:19 Seliggo on thinking.

14:22 >> Yeah. Yeah. And then finally,

14:24 >> did either of them get Sorry, Dave. Did

14:26 either of them get one at all? Did Aras

14:27 or Good actually. Aras didn't according

14:31 to FB

14:32 >> and Xiao Gomez did get one.

14:35 >> He did get one. Yeah, I I would I would

14:37 have put money on John Aras getting at

14:39 least one, but

14:40 >> he definitely got at least one against

14:42 Rusebury. He might have got he might

14:44 have got two or three.

14:45 >> Oh, yeah. So, I'm on the Premier League

14:46 there. So, let's have a look.

14:48 >> Aras

14:50 scored, didn't he? I'm sure he

14:51 >> Yeah, he did. Yeah, he got one assist in

14:53 all comps to be fair. So, but yeah,

14:55 Huang leading the way on the on the

14:56 assists. So, that Yeah, I was going to

14:58 say no, I was going to say has J Huang

15:00 got the most goals and assist combined,

15:02 but he hasn't it was to strand last with

15:04 eight each. Um, and then our hot takes

15:06 for the season. Oh, no, no, sorry. Final

15:08 league position first. Obviously, Wolves

15:10 finishing rock bottom. Uh, George, you

15:13 predicted 14th, but saying that, you did

15:16 say, you know, it was depending on the

15:18 rest of the transfer business, which was

15:20 a little bit roby obviously. Um, I went

15:22 with 15th and then Finn, you said with

15:26 the trend at the moment, it is probably

15:27 going to be bottom three, but you were

15:29 slightly more positive and said 17th.

15:31 Uh, so again, you weren't far away from

15:33 that. So,

15:35 >> and then the hot takes, uh, which I'll

15:37 have to fact check some of these. So, I

15:39 said, I mean, I was awful with this. I

15:41 said the three promoted teams to go

15:42 straight back down. So, I was very wrong

15:44 on that. Um, thing you said Salah to get

15:47 less than 10 goals. Now, without

15:49 searching it, I'd assume that's right,

15:51 but I don't

15:52 >> I think he got seven because I I think I

15:53 saw it in an FPL context the other day.

15:55 But did he did he get 30 last year or 20

15:57 something?

15:59 >> Uh over 30 last year.

16:01 >> So, I mean, if you're talking league, he

16:02 got seven goals in the league, all

16:04 competitions, because he got three in

16:05 the Champions League. He got he did

16:07 score bang on 10, but still it wasn't a

16:09 bad Well, I think it's a very good shot

16:11 actually.

16:12 >> Um considering George, you went with

16:14 Everton. less than five home wins in the

16:18 new stadium. Um I assume considering

16:21 their form they got more than that.

16:24 Uh but I'd have to again I'd have to

16:26 check but you did also say Nuno the

16:28 first manager to be sacked.

16:30 >> Did that was that was that true that

16:33 September was

16:34 >> Yeah. Yeah. Um I see Sharky as well

16:38 mentioning that about Mane again that

16:40 I'm talking Premier League Sharky um is

16:43 in like the modern Premier League. Uh

16:44 Jimmy Mullen yet is the youngest player

16:47 uh to have played for Wolves I believe

16:48 still. That is still the fact anyway. Um

16:51 yeah, Everton in terms of home wins. I

16:54 mean again I don't know if anyone could

16:56 fact check this for us but I would I

16:58 would assume it's right Jord

17:00 >> as in like they well they definitely

17:03 they definitely beat Chelsea because I

17:04 was there for that one.

17:06 >> So they beat Chelsea beat Bryant at

17:08 home, beat Palace at home, beat Fulham

17:10 at home, beat Forest at home.

17:14 Oh. Oh. Oh, no. I'm uh

17:19 Why is there a break there?

17:20 >> Oh, no. They draw with City.

17:22 >> I think they got I think they only got

17:23 six. I think they only got six to be

17:25 fair. Six or seven. So, it wasn't far.

17:26 It wasn't bad.

17:27 >> Yeah. I've just got I've got a breakdown

17:28 of it at home. They won six, drew five,

17:30 lost eight.

17:32 >> Yeah.

17:32 >> So, it wasn't horrendous, but I thought

17:34 they were going to have a Spurs style

17:36 home form.

17:37 >> But,

17:38 >> yeah.

17:39 >> I don't think I don't think it's

17:40 horrendous.

17:41 >> No, it's not an awful shot. It'll be

17:43 well, we'll get work get working and

17:44 thinking of your hot takes um for next

17:47 season throughout the summer because

17:48 it's always an interesting one. Anyway,

17:51 um I can't I can't remember some of the

17:52 best ones that we've had. Matt always

17:54 used to love Everton, didn't they? So,

17:56 Matt used to go with the the positive

17:58 Everton shouts, but um yeah, not bad,

18:00 lads. Not bad considering how bad the

18:02 season's been. I mean, some of the ones

18:04 factually correct, some not so good, but

18:07 yeah, not not too far away. Um, let's

18:10 talk about some of the news that we've

18:11 been having over the last week or so,

18:12 lads. So, considering how poor the

18:13 season's been, how negative uh, it

18:16 finished. There has been some positive

18:17 news off the field for Wolves. Um, we

18:21 talked about Rahim as we already spoke

18:23 about him, I guess, in the last podcast,

18:25 but Kieran Trippia apparently set to

18:27 sign for Wolves. Um, not completely done

18:30 yet, but said to be in agreement in

18:32 principle, needs to complete his

18:33 medicals and so on. Finn, this is

18:36 positive news. I think I think when this

18:38 came out, I don't think anyone's

18:39 expecting it to actually come to

18:40 fruition, but um

18:42 >> yeah, Trips looks like he's going to be

18:44 a new Walls player.

18:46 >> Yeah, well they say good news comes in

18:48 threes and it was Andre, him links and

18:50 uh and Trippia.

18:51 >> Um slightly convenient that they all

18:53 come out before the season ticket

18:54 deadline and that seemed to work quite

18:56 well because it's good numbers. Um

18:58 >> good numbers. But yeah, once it's been

19:00 here we go. I mean that here we go seems

19:01 to be getting less and less um

19:04 >> like locked in these days. We've had a

19:06 couple, haven't we? I think was Pedro

19:07 Leman not here we go to Chelsea.

19:09 >> Yeah, he we had a I think we had a Huey

19:12 go for Mark Pubil as well.

19:14 >> Do we? Yeah, of course we did. Yeah. And

19:16 he's playing at center

19:18 as well for him.

19:19 >> Yeah.

19:20 >> Well, so maybe don't count your chickens

19:22 yet. But if it does go through,

19:24 >> um yeah, really solid. I think it's it's

19:28 more the leadership thing than anything,

19:29 isn't it? And then when you you see the

19:31 Newcastle fans reaction, it's if he can

19:33 stay fit, then he's going to be one hell

19:34 of an asset. And it could be one of

19:36 those where he gets injured in the

19:38 second game and is out for the season

19:39 and then we go, what was the point in

19:41 that? I'm sure he's on a decent whack to

19:42 to choose wolves over options in Saudi

19:44 or even lower Prem um or promoted teams

19:47 or whoever was in for him. It seemed

19:48 like there was quite a few. So um it

19:50 could go really well. It could go really

19:52 poorly. Um, but overall I think it's all

19:54 things considered I think it's a um a

19:56 really smart move because leadership's

19:58 been one of the things this season

19:59 that's been it's just there's nothing

20:01 there is that the armband's been passed

20:03 around more than we're live aren't we?

20:05 I'll stop there. Um and uh uh and it's

20:10 wingers leadership um and I'm sure both

20:12 of those will be addressed um in the

20:14 next few weeks as well. Well in the next

20:15 few months now as well. So yeah positive

20:17 start. um the Himosz links. We can talk

20:19 about them. I'm fine to the whole

20:21 podcast if we need to. Still got him up

20:23 on the wall. Um so yeah, I I've been

20:26 trying to dig with with certain people.

20:27 I've only had positive whispers, but

20:29 nothing concrete yet. So

20:31 >> I thought you wearing a Fulham shirt

20:32 then, but see you haven't got the the

20:35 Fulham logo on there. I thought it was

20:36 going to be

20:37 >> So he's gone as well. Any Marco Silva's

20:38 gone today?

20:38 >> Yeah. Well, my concern is that I saw him

20:40 and linked with Benfica the other day

20:42 and Marco Silva has now gone to Benfica.

20:44 So, it does concern me a little bit if

20:46 they can knock him back on the door for

20:47 for Ral. But, uh, we can we can talk

20:50 about him a little bit more in a second.

20:52 George, I think, uh, Finn's right. I

20:54 think the right back area has been so

20:56 poor for Wolves in terms of the lack of

20:58 consistency. We have lacked leaders. Um,

21:02 this is a positive move. Look, I he's

21:04 not going to play 46 games across the

21:06 season for Wolves, but it's uh, in terms

21:08 of the caliber of player that we're

21:10 getting, um, it's good news. My only

21:12 concern possibly is that why has he said

21:15 yes so quickly? He has so much control

21:17 as a free agent and it's like it's not

21:19 officially not even open. So Wolves must

21:21 be offering him a a serious project or a

21:25 serious pay packet. Of course,

21:27 >> I think it's probably both. I think in

21:29 terms of Kieran Triier, I I genuinely

21:32 think like this is this is probably the

21:35 best sort best sort of signing we could

21:37 we could make. I I genuinely think that

21:39 I think these are the sort of players

21:41 that and again I know I know he wasn't a

21:43 free agent last summer but these are the

21:45 type of signs we should have been doing

21:47 12 months ago when you talk about

21:48 leaders when you talk about

21:50 >> um types of players with Premier League

21:52 experience that we needed desperately

21:54 last summer

21:55 >> Kieran Trippia would have been high on

21:57 that list last season um the fact that

21:59 we've gone down into the Championship

22:00 and he wants to come again it might be

22:03 money it could be multiple factors I

22:05 think really like the only club I

22:07 thought that we'd you know struggle to

22:09 compete with him on would have been

22:11 Burnley because he's got obviously come

22:12 through the academy there but obviously

22:15 Carl Walker's blocked him there. Carl

22:16 Walker's got um another year left on his

22:18 deal.

22:19 >> Um and I think we've acted early. I I

22:21 think I think we've spoken to him in a

22:23 way of I think we've told him he's going

22:24 to have the armband. I think it's a

22:26 project. I think the fact that he's

22:28 moving from Newcastle a little bit

22:31 further down south albeit, you know, it

22:34 it's close to his Lancasher links and

22:36 all that sort of stuff for family and

22:38 and all that sort of those sort of

22:40 things that'll come into it when he's,

22:41 you know, 34. Um, I genuinely believe

22:44 that this is a statement signing and I

22:47 genuinely believe even if he comes in

22:49 and starts 30 games for us, it's typical

22:50 to what I said about the rail links on

22:52 the last pod. Do I think he's going to

22:54 come in and play 46 games of a

22:56 Championship season? No. But if he comes

22:57 in and plays 30 35, it's an unbelievable

23:00 sign. And, you know, even if we're

23:02 giving him, you know, 40, 50 grand a

23:04 week, the fact he's a free agent,

23:06 there's nothing stopping us giving him 5

23:07 million quid as a signing on fee of

23:09 four. And I'm I'm speculating here,

23:11 right? I don't know what the figures

23:12 are, nor would nor would I, but um that

23:15 would be that would be favorable as

23:17 well. And I just think Trippy might look

23:19 at it as a little bit like the Newcastle

23:20 thing. when he went into Newcastle, they

23:22 were 19th. They were struggling and he

23:24 turned that club around. Not not on

23:26 himself, but he was sort of the main

23:28 pillar that started um the trajectory of

23:31 that football club into what it is now.

23:33 I know they didn't have a good season

23:34 last year, but he was a big catalyst of

23:36 getting them up the league, winning them

23:37 trophies, getting him into Europe. And I

23:39 think if he's here for two years,

23:42 we'll be back in the Premier League at

23:44 the first time of asking. And I think

23:45 he'll be he'll be playing for Premier

23:47 League football for us next year. in a

23:50 game probably deputizing between 20 and

23:51 25 games a season.

23:53 >> Yeah, Harry, we had a chat, we got a

23:55 video coming out later this week. Um, in

23:57 regards to Trippier and like George

23:59 said, you squeeze 30, 35 games at least

24:02 out of him, but then you probably have

24:04 the understudy of Pedro Lemur. It's

24:05 almost the perfect tutor for somebody

24:07 like that. Lemur needs game time in some

24:10 capacity. So maybe there is a universe

24:12 where he does go out on loan, but I

24:14 think he'll certainly get minutes. he

24:16 plays second fiddle to Trippia who could

24:18 be a good mentor for him that could be a

24:20 really positive move for for him as a

24:21 player as well.

24:22 >> Yeah, I think if I was Pedro Leman

24:24 looking at it as well and I was looking

24:26 up to the the players in the Wolves team

24:28 next season and I'm seeing Kieran

24:30 Trippier come in. Yeah, it might be a

24:32 bit of a a damper in the fact that he

24:34 might not get as many games as he may or

24:37 may not like but he's learning off a

24:39 real a real pro. I mean, Trip's played

24:43 how many games in Champions League this

24:44 season? You know, he's played Premier

24:47 League for most most of this season as

24:49 well when he when he can fit. So, if

24:51 Trippia can stay fit, and I'm sure that

24:54 he will be able to do that, um, we

24:57 could, like George said, get 30 games

24:59 out of him, 35 games out of him, and

25:01 he's a real asset to Wolves, not only on

25:03 the pitch, but off the pitch as well. We

25:05 all know he'll probably be the skipper.

25:07 He should be the skipper if he comes in.

25:10 Um, that's the type of player that we've

25:13 we've been needing for a while now. And

25:15 I feel we lost it when we got rid of

25:18 Dawson. You know, we have we have those

25:21 kind of focal points in the team who

25:24 lads can get around when times are tough

25:27 or they've got a good head on them that

25:29 are able to just kind of bring you up

25:32 and take you forward. And I think Dors

25:34 is one of those players and trips falls

25:36 into that category for me. So yeah, I'm

25:39 uh I'm looking forward to it if it

25:41 happens. Um but at the same time

25:45 in terms of an injury type type of

25:46 thing, if he gets injured and and the

25:49 next person is Pedro Lemur, he's got a

25:51 lot to step up to.

25:53 >> Yeah, definitely. Finn, uh Mold's asked,

25:55 do we have any concerns about Trippier

25:57 off the pitch?

25:58 >> See, I was just thinking to to play

26:00 devil's advocate on going, "All right,

26:02 finally some leadership." I mean, yeah,

26:05 there's been a few things in the in the

26:06 press, hasn't there? Um, I mean, the

26:09 gambling one was just that seemed pretty

26:10 innocent. Was that just he'd sent to his

26:12 mates that he was signing for Atletico?

26:14 >> Maybe that's why he's had to do it

26:15 early. He couldn't keep his mouth shut

26:17 by Wolves.

26:18 >> Um, and then yeah, there's been other

26:20 things off the pitch, but overall, I

26:22 mean, yeah, on the pitch at the very

26:24 least, which is I suppose off the pitch

26:26 counts as well, but a large percentage

26:27 of it on the pitch, he's going to be a

26:30 mouth, which we don't have. um some

26:32 talking players through it. I think

26:33 probably since Kilmano needed they were

26:36 more lead by example than than lead with

26:38 their voice. And I don't know whether

26:40 Trippy's going to come more into the you

26:41 know the system that's sort of been

26:43 played in those last few games. Would he

26:44 drop in almost as like a third center

26:46 back with Rodrigo further ahead?

26:48 >> He probably could do that. Um it might

26:50 suit him more at his age as well. I

26:52 don't know. But I'm excited either way.

26:54 Um yeah, we'll we'll ignore that for now

26:56 and then unless something comes up and

26:58 then um we can say well that was always

27:00 going to happen. But he's he's getting

27:01 old now. He might not have time for all

27:03 that stuff.

27:05 >> U Jordan, we mentioned earlier about Ral

27:07 him and there's obviously there's been

27:08 whispers about him as well. That one

27:10 might be um a more sort of drawn out

27:13 process in regards to the potential sign

27:16 of Ral because I think there will be

27:17 more suitors. There'll probably be more

27:19 money on the table. Of course, there uh

27:23 there's going to be more money um more

27:25 money involved, I think, to sign him and

27:27 he's going to the World Cup as well. Do

27:29 you think there is a world where Ral

27:31 Gimenez comes back to Molyneu next

27:32 season?

27:34 >> I think so. I I think again I think if

27:37 we if we signing the right profile of

27:40 player to attract Ra to a project 100%.

27:43 It seems like from a family perspective

27:47 um and again I'm only going from um

27:49 things you see on social media from from

27:51 his wife on Instagram. They still got

27:53 fond connections to the area. They're

27:55 still very much fondly of Wolverampton.

27:57 So, I think he's at a part of his career

27:59 now as well where again he could get one

28:02 last final big payday if he wanted to go

28:04 to Saudi or he wanted to to go and do

28:06 this sort of stuff, even go back and

28:07 play in Mexico maybe. But I think from

28:10 like an affinity perspective, I think

28:12 there'll be I think there'll be clubs

28:14 that can offer more money than Wolves in

28:15 the Championship. But I think from a

28:18 purely emotional play, I think we said

28:20 it on the last podcast, right? think he

28:24 he feel I think Ral thinks he's got

28:26 unfinished business at Wolves.

28:30 I really do. So, it's that thing of um

28:34 if he can come back and uh

28:37 if he can if he can come back and finish

28:39 that business, i.e. get us back into the

28:41 Premier League, I think he'll feel

28:42 satisfied.

28:43 >> Yeah. This is why we don't go live on

28:44 YouTube as well because we all end up

28:45 reading the comments in the chat. It

28:47 throws us off guard a little bit. Um

28:49 >> I've just closed in my

28:52 >> um Harry George right obviously you've

28:55 got Armstrong still there which you

28:57 spoke about you still got Tyu who you

28:59 probably would have to move on if you

29:01 bring in bring in Rin as well but that's

29:04 the sort of signing where it will give

29:07 everybody at the football club a lift

29:08 anyway because he does have that sort of

29:10 cult hero status um at the football club

29:14 but again similar to Trippier there'll

29:15 be other players younger players looking

29:17 at the football club and when walls are

29:19 talking to them. They're saying, "Yeah,

29:20 get me involved." You know, you're

29:22 playing with some players that have

29:24 played at the top stage, you know, made

29:26 international caps. The P R if he joins

29:29 would have just played at the World Cup.

29:31 You know, that that's that's a huge

29:33 signal of intent and a huge sort of

29:35 drawing factor, I think, for other

29:37 players as well.

29:38 >> Yeah, definitely. I mean, the players

29:40 looking at Wolverampton wonders this

29:41 season, a lot of them would have been

29:43 saying, "Don't get me anywhere near that

29:45 football club." And then for us to then

29:47 go down and still be able to attract

29:50 this caliber of player

29:53 regardless of how old they are is a

29:55 massive thing for us and a massive boost

29:57 for the club as a whole. Um and if they

30:01 do manage to pull those those two off,

30:03 the ones that we've been speaking about

30:04 the most at the moment, um then it's a

30:07 massive plus point before we've even

30:09 kicked the ball for next season. So

30:11 yeah, I'm I'm looking forward to see if

30:13 if it happens. Um it's down to R at the

30:17 end of the day. I mean he's out of

30:19 contract. So he can choose wherever he

30:21 wants to go and choose him to come back

30:23 to Wolves in the championship or or be a

30:25 part of a a country abroad then good

30:29 luck to him. But hopefully he's in a

30:30 Wolf shirt next season and then that

30:33 will come with its own attraction for

30:35 other players as well. So yeah, I'm I'm

30:38 quietly excited about Wolves next

30:40 season. I'm not getting too ahead of

30:42 myself because it all could come

30:43 crashing down in the space of three

30:46 hours. So, who knows? Yeah, it's very

30:49 very very early days still. I mean, um a

30:52 couple of people there mentioning Ellie

30:53 Sims in the comments section as well. Um

30:57 like uh Kevin says here, Ral will be

31:00 fantastic, but we need someone with pace

31:02 up front. Adam Armstrong has got that

31:04 turn of pace, but I don't think we've

31:05 seen it enough. I think he can get away

31:07 with that sort of pace thing as well

31:10 when you've got quicker and you know

31:13 quality players out wide as well around

31:15 him and use them to to get yourself up

31:17 the pitch rather than your sort of your

31:19 focal point through the middle. Um but

31:21 yeah, Ellie Sims, Jordan James has been

31:23 linked as well probably both seem a

31:26 little bit of a stretch at present, but

31:28 again they're the sort of players where

31:29 you may have to wait until the back end

31:31 of August to sign. But the fact that

31:34 Wolsa all being well have already got

31:36 Trippier in. Hopefully we can sign two

31:38 or three players within the next four

31:40 weeks to, you know, for when the players

31:42 return to preseason training. That would

31:44 be uh that would be excellent if they

31:46 can do do so. Uh Finn, it's pretty

31:49 obvious now that Rob Edwards is going to

31:50 be sticking around. Um I know there have

31:53 been a few question marks over his

31:55 future sort of a few weeks ago. I think

31:57 the fact that he sat at the fans forum

31:59 and he was, you know, talked to fans and

32:01 answering questions showed to me that he

32:03 probably would be the man. Um the fact

32:05 that there's been no news already, I

32:07 think that that says something as well.

32:09 But as a whole, are you looking forward

32:12 to next season in the Championship? What

32:14 are you hoping and what you expecting

32:16 from Wolverampton wonders? I'm probably

32:17 going to ask you the same question

32:19 obviously on the preseason podcast um

32:21 within the next sort of two months as

32:23 well.

32:24 >> Yeah, it's it's one of those with Rob

32:26 Edwards where it could change very very

32:29 quickly. I think you don't pick up

32:31 points in the first few games and it

32:33 could be one of those where oh my god we

32:34 saw it wasn't going right. Why didn't we

32:36 give a new bloke a preseason? We've

32:37 wasted it. It's Rob's play did it. It

32:39 could be one of those or the middles

32:41 preseason started well. Well, obviously

32:42 the Luton one, he says there are other

32:45 circumstances going on there with the

32:46 stadium, but on the face of it, it was a

32:49 team with that sort of downwards

32:50 momentum and he couldn't stop that rot

32:52 and it and it carried on. Um, Watford, I

32:55 think you probably can't really go off

32:57 many managers records at Watford. A bit

32:58 of a basket case. So, there's there are

33:00 samples there. There's there's ways you

33:02 can make excuses and uh for some of

33:05 them. So, I think playoffs have got to

33:09 be an absolute minimum. I think those

33:11 those top two places, you're going to

33:12 have West Ham and Burnley thinking

33:14 they're entitled to them. You're going

33:15 to have us thinking we're entitled to

33:16 them. You're going to have teams like

33:18 Southampton. Now, I've seen Echart

33:19 staying. Yeah. Uh I was watching, it's

33:21 weird. I'm getting into like

33:22 championship content now. I'm like

33:24 watching stuff and there was they were

33:25 saying like the teams to watch that with

33:27 good momentum. It was Norwich,

33:28 >> Derby. Norwich,

33:30 >> Sheffield United was it? I saw we had a

33:32 comment from a from a Norwich fan as

33:33 well. So, there's a lot of teams.

33:34 Luckily, there are two more spaces to

33:36 accommodate two more teams in the

33:37 playoffs to to not be too annoyed. um

33:40 all season, although that's going to be

33:42 it's kind of a disadvantage to Wolves

33:43 because I'd back us to finish top six

33:45 and it's made the playoffs a bit more

33:46 convoluted. Um so yeah, I if we're not

33:50 in and around sixth in what October that

33:52 there could be trouble. Um that's

33:55 correct. Yes, I'll dust off the camera

33:57 if if that happens. Um but yeah, I I

34:01 don't know. It could go I always think

34:02 about Nuno's first game. It was against

34:04 Middlesbrough, wasn't it? And

34:05 >> yeah,

34:05 >> everyone wasn't sure. I remember the

34:07 preseason games. We got battered by

34:08 Shrewsbury and there was some strange

34:10 games and then that one Bonitini goal.

34:12 Um it seemed to then I think we'd have

34:15 done all right regardless but just that

34:16 positive momentum to get us going. Um

34:19 and one of us is going to be Lincoln

34:21 away first game of the season, isn't it?

34:22 It's going to West Ham, Burnley or

34:24 Wolves. Um it's just so happen to be

34:26 drawn like that for the Friday night. So

34:28 that would be a lovely start. Um but I

34:31 don't know. I I don't know. I I always

34:34 go back to Leicester's team this season

34:36 that got relegated and you go, "Oh,

34:37 Trippia, Andre did a well, there's no

34:39 chance we'll be anywhere near any

34:40 danger." And then I looked at

34:41 Leicester's team the back end of last

34:42 season. There's like Ricardo Pereira and

34:45 Deedi. Um basically like their Prem team

34:48 and they were awful and you just think

34:49 maybe it isn't it's not just the names,

34:51 it's the mood within the club and

34:53 thankfully who that does seem to be

34:54 changing. Um but part of my mind is

34:57 going it's all going to go wrong. But

34:59 there's early signs are that we are

35:01 turning the ship around and as you say

35:02 if there's players that can see a

35:03 positive momentum whereas with Leicester

35:04 it was down down with Wolves the last

35:06 few seasons it's been if you put our

35:08 league position on a graph and you're a

35:09 player looking to sign for us you go oh

35:11 no thanks that's going nowhere. So maybe

35:13 we can show people that we're we've sort

35:15 of hit the bottom and now we're going to

35:16 bounce back up. So yeah overall I'm

35:18 looking forward to it. Yeah, there's a

35:20 few people in the in the live chat here

35:22 still doubting Rob Edwards. And I think

35:24 it it's fair, George. I think I think

35:26 the concern for me was going into next

35:28 season with a manager where there's a

35:31 portion of the fan base that don't have

35:33 any faith in him. And I think really

35:34 he's got so much pressure on him to hit

35:36 the ground running, hasn't he? Like he

35:37 really really has to

35:40 win win games because if he goes a

35:42 couple of games into the season wall

35:44 still haven't got a win, he's in big

35:45 trouble, I think, isn't he?

35:47 Yeah, I genuinely don't think he'll be

35:49 here by November and that's because of

35:54 and again depending on how the window

35:56 goes that should be caveated with that

35:57 response but I feel like even if we're

36:00 sort of fourth, fifth, sixth, that ain't

36:02 good enough for Frozen. I think they're

36:03 going to put all the eggs in the basket

36:04 that we need to go up this season.

36:07 >> I feel like if we're even like five, six

36:09 points a drift of the top two, maybe

36:11 come that sort of October international

36:13 break, November international break, I

36:14 think they'll pull the trigger. I think

36:16 the reason why they haven't pulled the

36:17 trigger yet is very much around you know

36:20 what actually

36:22 well Jeff and the and the football team

36:24 at the time brought Rob in for next

36:26 season and maybe Nathan feels like he

36:29 owes it to Rob who you know who came in

36:31 at a very difficult time to give him a

36:32 chance and that's the reason why he took

36:34 the job in the first place to let him

36:35 let him do it. Now I hope I'm wrong. I

36:38 feel like if Rob Edwards is manager this

36:40 time next season when we're doing this

36:42 podcast, it's probably because we're

36:43 champions or we finish in the top two if

36:45 I'm want being honest with you. I just

36:46 feel like if we're not in and around

36:48 those automatics plots come like

36:50 November, I think I'll pull the trigger

36:52 early. I genuinely do.

36:54 >> Yeah, I I think so as well. Somebody

36:56 mentioned as well Harry in the chat like

36:59 and it probably isn't a healthy position

37:00 for the football club to be in that he

37:02 could win the first five and then lose a

37:04 sixth and then the pressure would be

37:05 straight back on. I think in the

37:07 Championship it's going to be like that

37:08 anyway. Um it's it's it's a horrible

37:11 league to be playing in. Um but I sort

37:15 of understand what George says as well.

37:16 That's why I was cautious when we got

37:18 relegated. It almost felt like we needed

37:20 that clean slate, but they're obviously

37:22 confident in in what's been happening

37:24 off the pitch. They're obviously

37:25 confident in their recruitment. And I

37:27 suppose they're showing that with the

37:28 likes of Kieran Trippier. But you know,

37:30 he's his main excuse at the moment is

37:32 that the playing squad is nowhere near

37:34 good enough. If you're bringing in

37:35 players of that quality, he hasn't got

37:36 that excuse anymore.

37:37 >> Yeah. And I think that's kind of his

37:39 last straw that he's got really because

37:42 like he's come out after most of the

37:44 games this season and said the playing

37:46 squad isn't good enough. And I've kind

37:48 of gone like, "Oh yeah, to be fair, he's

37:50 right."

37:51 >> Yeah,

37:51 >> they aren't good enough. But next

37:53 season, he's going to have the whole

37:55 preseason to himself. He's going to

37:56 bring in his players that he's wanted.

37:58 He's got to hit the ground running. And

38:00 not just hit the ground running, he's

38:02 got to continue that throughout the

38:03 season. it's all right winning your

38:05 first five or six games and then you

38:07 start to drop off a bit then what you

38:10 know you we're already talking about him

38:12 getting rid in one of the you know

38:14 international breaks and getting

38:17 somebody else in but I just don't I

38:20 don't think he's set up to to kind of

38:23 have a good season in terms of for Walls

38:25 fans next season already. Yeah,

38:28 >> we all, not all of us, there there are a

38:31 majority of people that are happy with

38:33 Rob Edwards and and you've been brought

38:35 in for the championship, so we'll see

38:36 how he does in the championship. Um,

38:39 I've not been in that in that crowd of

38:41 people, I've been kind of I want him out

38:44 now type of thing. Um,

38:47 but I over the past weeks and and we've

38:50 chatted about this a lot, like I have

38:52 kind of come to terms with the fact that

38:54 he will be here. So you kind of you've

38:56 got to give him the chance. Um but it

38:59 will be very very telling five or six

39:01 games into the season and if he's lost

39:03 them mind you is not going to be a very

39:05 nice place again. Um especially with in

39:08 terms of if Fosan are bringing in

39:10 players like Kieran Trippia and if we

39:12 get R in you know some of these players

39:14 that we've been touted with Jordan James

39:16 and other one you know and we're not

39:18 winning games of football there's a

39:20 serious issue there and that would kind

39:22 of run through the manager at that point

39:24 because he is had his team he's had his

39:28 way of setting up he's had his way of

39:30 playing and if it's still not working

39:32 then we've got a big issue. Yeah,

39:34 definitely. One of the areas on the

39:36 pitch that will probably be addressed,

39:38 well, we think it will be addressed

39:39 anyway, is going to be the goalkeepers.

39:41 We already knew, I mean, that has been

39:42 an article out today by Talk Sport and

39:44 Liam Keane as well about Jose uh more

39:48 than likely moving on. Um, and then

39:52 goalkeeper situation. I think there's a

39:54 going to be a new 13 goalkeeper, I would

39:56 assume. Um George there was obviously

39:59 we've seen John Rudy uh released today

40:02 confirmed by Newcastle United as well.

40:05 Um the chance you reckon he could come

40:07 back although I think Bentley may or may

40:09 not stick around with John Rudy and

40:11 aging John Rudy.

40:12 >> Well yeah and like I say we spoke about

40:15 it off air. I text you about 02:00 saying

40:17 I've been told that we're in talks with

40:20 John Rudy for a season. Whether that's

40:22 third choice, second choice. I

40:23 definitely don't think it's first

40:24 choice. Um well hope it's not first

40:27 choice. Um but yeah and then that

40:30 article comes out there's no smoke

40:31 without fire. So whether whether those

40:33 talks are happening or not at the moment

40:35 who knows right like I say led to

40:37 believe that is what's going on. But

40:39 again another one though I think from a

40:41 if you're bringing him in from a from a

40:44 perspective of leaders being here done

40:46 it in terms of at Wolves winning at

40:48 Wolves as well he probably isn't a bad

40:52 signing when you're talking about as a

40:53 third choice keeper right. um as someone

40:56 who can who's a leader and I think he's

40:58 from down south originally and his

41:00 family are down south so it's one of

41:01 those things where um again that move

41:03 from Newcastle coming back to the

41:05 Midlands might be better from a family

41:06 perspective and I I might be wrong in

41:08 thinking I think he's was his is his son

41:10 in one is his son in one of themies

41:13 locally as well or was

41:15 >> uh he was in an academy I can't think

41:18 >> his son come out once to train with them

41:21 before the before the game Yeah.

41:25 Not sure if he's in the Wolves Academy

41:26 or another academy, but I'm not sure.

41:28 >> He's at He's at Norwich now. He's at

41:30 Norwich Academy now. No, I think he's

41:32 always been at Norwich to be fair. I say

41:34 just he's being released at the end of

41:36 this season.

41:37 >> Oh, there you go.

41:38 >> There was another RD, wasn't there? But

41:40 it wasn't a Wolves, but

41:41 >> Oh, yeah. Not not that Ry definitely was

41:43 like his young Yeah, it wasn't Jack.

41:45 Jack Ruddy, wasn't it? The Scottish

41:46 keeper.

41:47 >> Yeah.

41:47 >> Yeah. Well, weirdly John Ruddy's son is

41:49 also called Jack Ruddy. I think that's

41:50 why a little bit confusing. Yeah.

41:53 >> Yeah. That was Jack Rudy. He's 28 now

41:54 playing for B well last time he was

41:56 playing was Bones United. Uh which is a

42:00 club in Scotland. So his career is just

42:02 completely gone. Unfortunately, one of

42:03 those players that ended up out on loan

42:04 at FC Jir back in the day. If you know,

42:07 you know.

42:07 >> Oh my god, what a throwback.

42:09 >> I know. Um Harry Anthony Patterson, one

42:12 of the goalkeepers mentioned over the

42:14 last 24 hours or so. Somebody that you

42:16 would take maybe or you want would you

42:18 prefer somebody else? Um,

42:20 you know, in terms of championship

42:22 goalies, I think he's a good option. Uh,

42:25 he had a bit of a resurgence at Mu

42:27 second half of the season. Um, and he's

42:30 been touted as a brilliant shots

42:32 stopper. Um, I can see that in him. Uh,

42:34 I I haven't watched a major amount of

42:37 him as a whole. Uh, he wouldn't be my

42:40 first choice goal goalkeeper in terms of

42:43 who I would want in. Um it would be

42:47 Donnaruma if possible but

42:51 uh but like uh the Stoke goalie is it

42:54 Hansen

42:56 >> goalie like

42:57 >> he's on a new deal there so I always

42:58 >> I know I've seen that but he would be he

43:02 would be my first choice he's been my

43:03 first choice for a while even in the the

43:06 Prem I thought he he'd be a good shout

43:08 for us but yeah but I watched I've

43:10 watched a little bit of him and yeah I'd

43:13 be happy with that going into that

43:14 season I'd be happy with him him being

43:17 brought in. Uh but it doesn't really

43:20 matter who he get in goal. It's who's in

43:22 front of him to help him really at the

43:24 same time. So it's it would be a good

43:26 start though. I think bedding in some

43:28 serious championship quality players. I

43:31 think that's what we also need to do.

43:32 It's good having the likes of Trippier

43:34 come in and you know R if you came in

43:36 and all those types of players but we

43:39 need some championship ready players as

43:40 well I think.

43:42 >> Yeah. Let's talk about quickly um before

43:44 we finish off with the questions. The

43:46 shirt, it's set to be released we

43:48 believe on Friday at some point and of

43:51 course it's going to be the 150th

43:54 anniversary shirt um from the football

43:57 club. As far as well, we saw the sleeve

43:59 sponsor released in Wolf competitions

44:02 last week. As far as I'm aware,

44:04 Midnight, the online gambling company

44:06 are set to be the front of shirt sponsor

44:08 for Wolves. um as well. Um the one

44:12 benefit of this fin is that they're

44:14 pumping absolutely loads of money into

44:15 social media, so we may get paid in some

44:17 capacity, but it is another betting

44:19 company on the on the front of the

44:21 shirt. Any thoughts uh ahead of the

44:24 shirt release on Friday?

44:26 >> Yeah, it's hard to make a traditional

44:29 like anniversary shirt look sort of

44:32 classy. I think with

44:34 >> it doesn't matter if it's a gambling

44:35 sponsor, any sponsor on a

44:37 >> No. Yeah. Unless unless it's Doritos or

44:39 something.

44:40 >> Yeah, true. Yeah.

44:41 >> Yeah.

44:42 >> Yeah. It's tricky. Um but obviously if

44:45 if they are looking to to sponsor social

44:47 media channels, I think they're a great

44:48 choice for the front of the shirt. And

44:50 so

44:52 um but no, yeah, with the sleeve one, I

44:53 think I said in our chat, didn't I when

44:55 I did the stadium alike this year that

44:56 Wolf competitions was plastered

44:58 everywhere and I pointed out to my dad

45:00 going, "Oh, that'd be a good one for

45:01 wolves to get involved with." Are they

45:03 literally just like is it what it does

45:05 on the tin? like comp just competition

45:07 >> raffle like you pay Yeah. You just pay

45:09 like a raffle thing. You pay for

45:10 tickets.

45:11 >> They've got an iPhone.

45:12 >> I suppose it's only sleeve is

45:16 >> um but yeah, it's a bit like the W8,

45:18 isn't it? Everyone goes, "Oh, look. It

45:19 looks like a W and you've got the Wolf

45:21 on there." Um and then the Midnight One,

45:23 I had heard of them. Do they sponsor

45:25 someone else?

45:26 >> Chef United,

45:28 >> is it? It definitely rang a bell. Um,

45:30 and yeah, I'll reserve judgment, but

45:32 very positive just in case they do get

45:34 in contact with you, Dave.

45:37 >> The the logo is fairly clean. I think

45:39 George I think everybody loves a shirt

45:42 without a sponsor anyway. And I think

45:44 part a lot of us are probably half

45:46 expecting like a traditional looking kit

45:48 uh come on Friday. Um, but yeah, I mean

45:52 in an ideal world, if Wolves can offer a

45:54 sponsorless version, I think it's a

45:55 win-win for them. Yeah, I think the club

45:58 will well, if the club have got anything

46:00 about him, I think they will probably

46:02 release a sponsorless version or even

46:05 play the first game of the season

46:07 without sponsor on it and almost make

46:08 that like a limited edition version of

46:10 of the kit. I would like to think that

46:12 that's something they're thinking about,

46:13 but again, this is Frozen. This is sudo.

46:17 anything for a pound note and it could

46:18 even be stipulations within sort of the

46:21 the agreement with Midnight if that's

46:22 who it's going to be to say no you've

46:24 got to have it on all the training kit

46:25 all the home kit all the way kits as

46:26 well so it depends commercially what's

46:28 been agreed there but I would like to

46:30 think there would be an option where you

46:31 can buy um the anniversary shirt without

46:35 a sponsor um because I think that would

46:37 be quite authentic in a way and again

46:40 not saying it's going to ruin a shirt

46:42 with a sponsor but you know the meaning

46:45 behind the You know, you'd like to think

46:48 that, you know, if you if basically if

46:50 you offer me a version with Midnight or

46:52 without it for that one shirt, I'm going

46:54 to take the no sponsor 100%.

46:57 >> But if Midnight want to sponsor us, then

47:00 I'll wear wear whatever they want.

47:03 >> I'll get a Midnight tattoo across your

47:05 chest here.

47:08 >> Yeah. Um, we'll move on to the questions

47:10 now. If anyone in the um in the chat on

47:14 live chat on YouTube wants to get

47:15 involved, feel free to do so. We'll go

47:17 over to the questions that we had on

47:19 Twitter. Uh do a quick fire one on this

47:22 one. We mentioned it earlier, but super

47:23 grand Christine, she says, "Is it cenor

47:26 or no senor?" Arie, what you thinking?

47:29 >> Seenor

47:31 like it.

47:32 >> That's all I want.

47:35 >> Bring him back.

47:36 >> There we go. He's a seat. Go on, Finn.

47:38 Full House

47:40 >> second. No, I um

47:45 >> do you know you know that um I've seen

47:46 Trippy's being added to the like the Rio

47:48 Ferdinand at QPR and all that.

47:52 >> Yeah. And then I'm like got Sack Puntas

47:54 in 2026 and people start flinging that

47:56 at me. Um but no, yeah, obviously a C

47:59 see till I die.

48:01 >> So the content coming back if he rejoins

48:03 for the

48:04 >> I think it'd be silly not to. At least

48:05 the very start. To be fair, when he

48:06 left, I had a video um of every single

48:09 sacrifice ever and just never released

48:11 it. So, I think if he did come back,

48:13 that'd be a good excuse to put that back

48:15 out. We live the old days. I think I'll

48:17 cringe a little bit, but we'll get it

48:19 out there.

48:20 >> Uh Amar's music show. Do you think

48:22 there's a realistic chance that we will

48:23 start next season with a stronger squad

48:25 than the than the start of this season?

48:27 If so, shows how ambitious we are for

48:30 next season or how crap the squad was

48:32 this year. Um it's a good question,

48:35 Harry. I think he's he's pro could

48:36 possibly be right. I think in terms of

48:38 caliber and the talent that we have in

48:40 the squad, Wolves may have a stronger

48:42 squad at the start of the Championship

48:43 season.

48:44 >> You could put us four in the

48:45 championship team in the Premier League.

48:49 Yeah, definitely. I definitely think if

48:52 you put the two teams up against each

48:53 other, the Championship squad, if Fos

48:57 are walking the walk, then um it would

49:00 definitely be better than the Premier

49:01 League team that we had at the start of

49:02 this season. Uh, no, no doubt about

49:05 that. I can already think of two

49:06 positions from the rumored ones are

49:08 happening that ultimately getting over

49:11 them anyway. So, so yeah, I definitely

49:14 think if they continue the way that

49:16 they're talking about continuing, then

49:18 yes, mate, we definitely will have a

49:20 better team.

49:21 >> Yeah, no problem. George, I assume

49:23 you're in agreement with that as well.

49:26 >> 100%. I think if if it was weaker than

49:28 the Premier League squad, we might be

49:30 doing a double dip. um which wouldn't be

49:33 nice to talk about. Um but even like you

49:35 say even on the Trippia one like you

49:37 know Trippier to Chicha is like going

49:39 from my jammer to Susan Boil in it.

49:41 >> So it's you know it's quite

49:43 >> respect he's in a new trim mate.

49:45 >> Yeah.

49:47 >> You might respect you.

49:49 >> Yeah.

49:51 It's been a tough summer. Um Sharky,

49:54 sorry I saw I saw you mention this. Has

49:56 uh it's Christian Prusser I assume

49:58 you're talking about. has he made any

50:00 changes to the academy yet? Um I mean it

50:03 was a to I said before I can't remember

50:05 what video I mentioned it on but it's

50:07 been a toxic place the academy over the

50:10 last 12 months or so of course losing

50:12 another player there but I think Wolves

50:14 are trying to get the the the right

50:16 things in place potentially some changes

50:18 with some of the staff there as well but

50:20 so are notable changes not yet but

50:23 obviously he's been in the job about two

50:25 months um so it'll be interesting to see

50:28 if anything you know you remember

50:30 recruitment over the last few is, you

50:32 know, Wolves heavily were recruiting for

50:34 the 21s and so on, especially under

50:36 Scott Cellers. I know he got a lot of

50:37 stick, but you know, we did bring in

50:39 some players. I'm not going to say

50:41 especially world beaters, but you know,

50:43 we did look to strengthen in that

50:45 department, so we may see that again.

50:47 Um, but, you know, we'll uh we'll wait

50:50 and see. Um, we we'll flick over to some

50:53 questions that are in the chat at the

50:54 moment. Thomas, is Tommy Doyle good

50:56 enough to start if we sign Jordan James?

50:59 Finn, I mean, I like Tommy Doyle. I I' I

51:01 want him to be part of the team this

51:03 season, but I think I think Jordan James

51:06 probably does start ahead of him. But I

51:08 there's possibly a place for both of

51:10 them. I'm just a bit concerned about a

51:11 Tommy Doyle

51:13 uh Andre too because I think you look at

51:16 you have the same issues as what we had

51:17 this season with Xiao Gomez and Andre.

51:20 >> Yeah, I I always think of the mix of the

51:22 the Nuno Championship side and you've

51:25 had Neves who was unbelievable on the

51:27 ball, but Seace could kick people

51:29 everywhere. Alfred and Dar, you could

51:30 chuck him in if you needed to turn that

51:31 up to 11 as well. And and we've always

51:34 had like a a Dendona when you've got

51:36 Neves and Matino, you've got to have

51:37 someone like that. And yeah, Andre Doyle

51:40 on the face of it like the quality there

51:42 should be great for the championship,

51:44 but in some games I think that would

51:46 really get exposed. So it's not to say

51:48 like we can have four or five

51:50 midfielders in the squad as well, so

51:51 it's horses for courses. And there'll be

51:53 some games where you could do Doyle and

51:54 Andre and they'll pass the team to death

51:55 and and will look unbelievable. But I I

51:58 haven't watched too much of Jordan James

51:59 to know how different he is to them two.

52:01 Was he a Blues? Because I was he a

52:03 Blues?

52:04 >> He was a Blues. Yeah, we were linked to

52:05 >> my mate raved about him who's a Blues

52:07 fan. Um I think you still want an

52:10 enforcer. He doesn't strike me as that

52:12 type from from what I've seen as him.

52:13 But then if you've got that as a four,

52:15 that's quite a complete midfield. Four

52:17 options. But equally, all of them are

52:18 going to want to be starting in the

52:19 championship, I'd imagine. So especially

52:21 Andre with with the the contract would

52:23 be silly with probably what we're paying

52:25 him not to. So yeah, it's a tricky one.

52:27 Um I don't know how it'll fall out.

52:29 There is a world in which Doyle leaves

52:31 on loan permanently. Um so we'll yeah I

52:34 don't know how that's going to go to be

52:35 honest and I don't know what would make

52:37 me happiest as in with the mix of that

52:39 midfield three four. I don't know what I

52:41 want to see almost. It's weird. You just

52:43 want a bit of everything, don't you? But

52:44 it's hard to do that.

52:45 >> Yeah. Yeah. Uh Neil, why are podcasts

52:48 for debate or one-sided opinions? I

52:50 would say they're for debate. Um, we

52:52 probably side of each other a bit too

52:53 much on here to be fair, but um, yeah,

52:56 they definitely are. Um,

52:57 >> we we can start that if you want. We can

52:59 kick off if it

53:01 >> just do a charity talking walls raw

53:03 rumble.

53:04 >> Um, Andy Gregory, any idea on the away

53:06 colors, the anniversary kits. Um,

53:08 obviously the home's going to be gold. I

53:10 don't know how true it is, but the

53:12 second and third kit, one's meant to be

53:14 white and one's meant to be black, but

53:16 again, I don't know how true.

53:17 >> That's nice. may may not want.

53:19 >> Why did we do last year blue and blue?

53:23 >> That

53:24 >> that way was that must have been

53:26 leftover material from the goalkeeper

53:27 kit to the year before. It must it must

53:30 have been I'm adamant.

53:31 >> Um so there were there was another

53:34 question in there some good questions on

53:36 the live chat as well. Um,

53:40 sorry. Um, Moldy, he says, "Do you think

53:44 Gary O'Neal would have got more points,

53:45 George, than um Rob Edwards did this

53:48 season?"

53:49 >> No,

53:51 that was nice. Uh, Maximus, right? Do

53:54 you think Tommy Doyle makes at least 15

53:57 starts or more and we finally start

53:59 scoring from set pieces, Harry?

54:01 >> Yeah, I I think so. It also depends on

54:04 who we sign I guess m really and whether

54:06 he actually does start games I suppose

54:09 but yeah if we sign nobody now then

54:12 100%.

54:14 >> Yeah. Yeah. Very true. Uh old golden

54:17 chat evening gent thank you their

54:18 question. Thanks for all the great

54:20 content this year. Uh no problem at all

54:23 mate no worries. Um

54:26 do you think Yan C is back? Uh, do you

54:29 think there's any genuine risk of

54:30 back-to-back relegations this season,

54:32 Finn?

54:35 >> Um, yeah. I suppose I'm the only one

54:37 that's slightly voiced it in the

54:38 podcast, I've probably been a little bit

54:40 too um wary about that. I don't know. Do

54:43 you guys feel any genuine sense of it?

54:45 Because I I do I think before the Andre

54:47 and Trippia news, I when I'm speaking

54:49 about, you know, you get the people you

54:51 haven't seen for a while, oh, what about

54:52 Wolves? And you're going, "Oh, yeah,

54:53 well, could be a double, get your money

54:55 on it, whatever." And I genuinely was

54:56 saying stuff like that. But now it feels

54:59 slightly less. But should should Andre

55:02 and Trippy tip that balance that much?

55:04 Maybe. It has made me feel a lot more

55:05 confident. But there's still that little

55:07 thing. I mean, I've seen it. We've all

55:08 seen it in our lifetime, haven't we?

55:09 We've seen Wolves double dip. It's not

55:11 too uncommon. I like on the football

55:13 anvil they call it the Pompy Highway.

55:14 It's good whenever there's a team like

55:16 in danger because of the their uh famous

55:19 fall and it's not Yeah. Luton,

55:20 Leicester, there are there are ones in

55:22 recent history. It's crazy that it can

55:24 happen. Do you think that the gulf

55:26 between Premier League and Championship

55:27 how that they can let that go again? I

55:29 think that's only getting it should

55:31 become more and more unlikely if you

55:32 know what I mean. And yet we're seeing

55:33 it happen quite a lot. But

55:35 >> I was going to say I just don't I just

55:36 don't see it with us.

55:38 >> I just I just don't I think the

55:40 comparisons to Leicester from fans. I

55:43 understand because we've done it before.

55:44 I understand why there's almost that

55:48 uh like scar tissue as it were about the

55:50 double dip and going down again. I just

55:52 feel like financially we're in a much

55:54 stronger position than Leicester were or

55:56 have been for many many years.

55:58 >> Luton were almost on that on that mad

56:01 trajectory of like riding the crest of a

56:03 wave and they were over they were

56:05 probably over succeeded in the

56:06 Championship, let alone in the Premier

56:07 League.

56:08 >> And I just think with us, you know,

56:11 Frozen have dropped the ball last few

56:12 years. I think they're the first to

56:14 admit it. And again, proof will be in

56:15 the pudding like you know what come out

56:18 of that fans forum. But I do genuinely

56:20 think they they realize the [ __ ] up

56:22 and ultimately they need to get this

56:24 asset back in the Premier League if they

56:25 ever want to sell it. So I think I

56:27 genuinely feel and again I'm not one to

56:30 be overly positive. It's usually Dave is

56:31 a positive one on on this podcast for

56:33 you. I just I genu I just genuinely

56:36 don't see a realm where we're not in and

56:38 around the playoffs as a bare bare

56:40 minimum.

56:41 >> Yeah. Um 123 North Street to be fair if

56:44 you listen to the podcast we all raised

56:46 our concerns about him as well and I

56:48 know you have just joined so I'll give

56:49 you the benefit of the doubt um we saw a

56:52 shiv who's asking about the rivalries

56:54 Harry it's not just west prom obviously

56:56 massive game at the black country derby

56:57 blue's going to be in there as well um

57:00 huge isn't it for for next season some

57:02 tasty games

57:03 >> massive and exciting as well I think

57:05 we've missed that massively in recent

57:08 years you saw it at the uh the FA Cup

57:10 game That day was absolutely

57:12 unbelievable. Um, and thankfully we won

57:16 that day. So, yeah, I'm looking forward

57:18 to kind of falling back in love with

57:20 football a little bit and kind of joy

57:23 that it brings me even like going to

57:25 these away days with, you know, the

57:28 anticipation of going to Blues knowing

57:30 that you could have a brick for your

57:32 coach window on the way there and, you

57:34 know, that that sort of thing. It is

57:36 just gets me a bit a bit excited for the

57:38 rest of the season. So yeah, it's great

57:40 to have football rivalries as well. We

57:42 don't have enough of them or enough good

57:45 ones in terms of Premier League

57:47 football. They're all very, you know,

57:50 let's all cuddle each other outside the

57:52 ground type of thing rather than uh

57:55 proper snot. So yeah, I'm looking

57:56 forward to that next season, mate.

57:59 >> I was going to say to add to that as

58:00 well, it's not just our It's not just

58:01 our derby. It's like West Ham Milwall.

58:03 Yeah. Norwich. You've got Sorry, I was

58:05 going to say Norwich. There you haven't.

58:06 You got Southampton Portsmouth. You've

58:08 got Cardiff Swansea.

58:10 >> Yeah.

58:10 >> You got Rexom in that mix as well with

58:12 all the Welsh teams as well. US Blues,

58:13 it's been played for a few years as

58:15 well.

58:16 >> Burnley as well.

58:17 >> Burnley. Honestly, I think

58:21 >> yeah, you know, talk about that being a

58:23 first game of the season candidate thing

58:25 about early that's going to be played

58:27 early. That is

58:29 >> Yeah% Bora Walls or Rob Edwards derby

58:31 and he'll be sacked by then anyway

58:33 probably.

58:34 Um, quickly go over to again quickfire

58:37 because we're running out of time. Drew

58:39 over on Twitter, how many matches in the

58:41 Championship before Wolves exceed the 20

58:43 points I had in the past Premier League

58:45 season. Finn, I think I'd be

58:46 disappointed if Wolves didn't get 20

58:48 points within the first what 12,

58:51 13 games, I'd say.

58:53 >> Yeah. So, what seven games 21? So,

58:58 yeah, you'd you'd like to think so. Um,

59:02 >> what gets you up now? was we did 99,

59:04 didn't we, to win and then did anyone

59:06 did commentary hit 100 this year?

59:09 >> I think they got 91

59:12 miles off it.

59:13 >> Who was it? Was it Burnley got 100 then

59:15 last year? I swear Burnley got 100.

59:17 >> Yeah, Burnley and Leads did, didn't

59:18 they? They came very close.

59:19 >> Yeah, I was just looking at the odds

59:20 saying about the odds go down. I can't

59:22 find them yet, but to be promoted were

59:23 second favorite. Um, so yeah,

59:26 >> got 95. I switch got 84.

59:29 >> Both up automatically. But is it who was

59:32 it that said you win your home games,

59:34 draw your away games, and you'll you'll

59:35 win the league. We can maybe go with

59:36 that to get promoted. I mean, that would

59:38 be an unbeaten season. Um, well, that's

59:40 four points every two games. So, yeah,

59:42 you you'd have your 20 Was it what was

59:44 the first thing? 20 points. So, you'd

59:46 get that.

59:46 >> Yeah. 20 points. Yeah.

59:48 >> Yeah.

59:48 >> Yeah. We'll go with Well, I mean, that

59:50 would be amazing because then you you

59:51 would be unbeaten, but um let's go for

59:54 Yeah. Your 12 probably a bit more

59:55 conservative. Let's go 12. That's the

59:57 That's the target, Rob.

59:58 >> Yeah. Uh Bobby Smith, the season we've

1:00:00 tried Rodrigo, Kiana Hoover, Matt Doati,

1:00:03 Chichua, Mosca, and Lemur in some

1:00:05 capacity at right back to varying

1:00:07 degrees of failure. Given that George,

1:00:09 did we underestimate how consistent

1:00:11 Nelson was?

1:00:13 >> Yeah, I think he was severely underrated

1:00:15 when he was here. I think people

1:00:17 compared to Tomo to Matt Dogy on

1:00:21 attacking output alone whereas I think

1:00:23 if you flipped it and looked at

1:00:24 defensive output tomato is a far

1:00:26 superior defender than Docky ever was

1:00:29 and that's not me bad dogy great servant

1:00:32 love you know loved everything he's done

1:00:34 for the club but um got stick first of

1:00:38 all for his attacking output and

1:00:39 secondly because he cost 37 million quid

1:00:41 and I've said it time and time again on

1:00:43 this podcast we we were in no position

1:00:45 at that time of our development as a

1:00:47 football club to be spending 37 million

1:00:49 quid on a right wing back in my opinion.

1:00:51 It could have been money that could have

1:00:52 been spent elsewhere, but

1:00:55 the the names on at least you've just

1:00:57 mentioned.

1:00:58 >> Yeah.

1:00:58 >> Could never lace Nelson to boots.

1:01:03 >> Yeah, I would I would agree with that as

1:01:05 well. I would agree. Um,

1:01:06 >> sure. Sorry Dave, that keeps going

1:01:08 through my brain with Trippia and we

1:01:10 probably won't play him as wing backs,

1:01:11 but Trippia is giving me Barry Douglas

1:01:14 vibes and Wol is kind of like as in the

1:01:17 Championship season. Wol strikes me as

1:01:19 like a dock. It's like we've flipped him

1:01:21 over in that he doesn't strike you as

1:01:22 the best player, but he seems to know

1:01:23 where the goal is in in the limited

1:01:24 time. Think did he get two against

1:01:26 Chelsea Wolf in that one game? You might

1:01:28 almost find himself. We did go with wing

1:01:29 back.

1:01:30 >> Yeah, I don't think we will. I don't

1:01:31 think we'll see Trippier at wing back,

1:01:32 but it's given me those those Nuno vibes

1:01:34 of you might swap them over, but the

1:01:36 roles that they play um would kind of be

1:01:38 the same. So, and Wolf might even stay.

1:01:40 You never know. But yeah, there's

1:01:43 interesting one to look out.

1:01:44 >> Well, guys, I believe that is all for

1:01:46 and and yeah, North Street just

1:01:48 mentioning the shirt once again, the old

1:01:49 gold pack shirt, uh which the the Walls

1:01:52 official kit drops on Friday. You don't

1:01:54 like uh you don't like it, obviously

1:01:56 you've got that as an option, um as well

1:01:58 instead. But um we'd like to um thank

1:02:02 you all for your support across this

1:02:04 season. Been a dreadful season

1:02:06 ultimately, but obviously we stuck with

1:02:07 us throughout the podcast. Anyone that's

1:02:09 been involved with Talking Walls, whe

1:02:11 it's the fans react, whe it's the the

1:02:13 writers on the website as well, first

1:02:15 proper year with content going out on

1:02:18 the website. So there some great people

1:02:20 that I speak to pretty much daily about

1:02:22 things all things Wolves and going on

1:02:24 the website as well. So big shout out to

1:02:26 them. Um, and obviously shout out to you

1:02:28 three boys, uh, chilling with me right

1:02:30 now. Uh, Finn, thanks for jumping on,

1:02:32 mate. Where can people find you if they

1:02:34 wish?

1:02:35 >> Just Finn is everywhere. Um, I wouldn't

1:02:37 bother unless Ralph signs, but if he

1:02:38 does, we may be back.

1:02:40 >> Perfect, mate. Thank you, George. Apart

1:02:42 from Susan Bo's DMs, where can people

1:02:44 find you?

1:02:46 >> Uh, well and truly in Susan B's DMs. Um,

1:02:49 Jord 7 on Twitter and Instagram.

1:02:52 >> Perfect, mate. Harry

1:02:55 >> uh talking walls Harry now on uh there

1:02:59 and Twitter now. So yeah, follow us over

1:03:01 there, man.

1:03:02 >> Yeah, perfect. If you're watching on

1:03:03 YouTube, there's still plenty of you in

1:03:05 the live chat, be sure to hit that like

1:03:06 button and subscribe. You will be able

1:03:08 to watch it back. If you only caught

1:03:09 half of it, you'll be able to watch it

1:03:11 back shortly. And uh if you're listening

1:03:13 on Apple or Spotify, please feel free to

1:03:15 leave us a fivestar rating. But guys,

1:03:17 please do enjoy your summer. Of course,

1:03:18 there'll be loads of content going out

1:03:20 on YouTube and all the social platforms.

1:03:22 So, make sure you're following us on all

1:03:23 of those. And until next time, we'll see

1:03:25 you all very, very soon.

Summarize any YouTube video instantly

Get AI-powered summaries, timestamps, and Q&A for free.

Generate your own summary →
More summaries →